Population Replacement Archives - Page 3 of 10

May 23, 2022May 13, 2023

Replacement Migration In Canada: The Years 1989 To 1998

The Kalergi Plan was laid out for Europe a century ago. The goal was to ultimately get rid of all the whites, with a combination of open doors immigration, depressed local birth rates, and miscegenation. That said, the plot is not limited to Europe, but to all white countries.

Forced diversity is code for genocide.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

Let’s have a look at some of those recent years. While 2003 to 2020 has already been covered pretty extensively on this site, the problem extends much further than that.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1989
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	19,908	10.4	1
Poland	15,985	8.3	2
Philippines	11,383	5.9	3
Vietnam	9,425	4.9	4
India	8,819	4.6	5
United Kingdom	8,420	4.4	6
Portugal	8,189	4.3	7
United States	6,931	3.6	8
Lebanon	6,179	3.2	9
China	4,430	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	99,679	51.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	92,322	48.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	193,001	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1989
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	12,199	6.3
Asia and Pacific	93,261	48.6
South America	8,685	4.5
United States	6,931	3.6
Europe and the United Kingdom	52,107	27.1
North/Central America	5,870	3.1
Caribbean/Antilles	10,909	5.7
Others	2,041	1.1
Total	193,001	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1990
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,261	13.7	1
Poland	16,579	7.7	2
Lebanon	12,462	5.8	3
Philippines	12,042	5.6	4
India	10,624	5.1	5
Vietnam	9,081	4.2	6
United Kingdom	8,217	3.8	7
China	7,987	3.7	8
Portugal	7,917	3.7	9
United	6,084	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	120,256	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,974	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	214,230	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1990
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,440	6.3
Asia and Pacific	111,739	52.2
South America	8,898	4.2
United States	6,084	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	51,945	24.3
North/Central America	7,781	3.6
Caribbean/Antilles	11,689	5.5
Others	2,654	1.2
Total	214,230	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1991
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,340	9.7	1
Poland	15,731	6.8	2
China	13,915	6.0	3
India	12,848	5.6	4
Philippines	12,335	5.3	5
Lebanon	11,987	5.2	6
Vietnam	8,963	3.9	7
United Kingdom	7,543	3.3	8
El Salvador	6,977	3.0	9
Sri Lanka	6,826	3.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	119,465	51.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	111,316	48.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	230,781	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1991
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,087	7.0
Asia and Pacific	119,955	52.0
South America	10,582	4.6
United States	6,597	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	48,055	20.8
North/Central America	13,404	5.8
Caribbean/Antilles	12,922	5.6
Others	3,179	1.4
Total	230,781	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1992
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	38,910	15.4	1
Philippines	13,273	5.2	2
India	12,675	5.0	3
Sri Lanka	12,635	5.0	4
Poland	11,878	4.7	5
China	10,429	4.1	6
Vietnam	7,681	3.2	7
United States	7,537	3.0	8
Taiwan	7,456	2.9	9
United Kingdom	7,138	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	129,612	51.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	123,230	48.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	252,842	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1992
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	19,633	7.7
Asia and Pacific	139,216	54.4
South America	10,389	4.1
United States	7,537	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	44,871	17.5
North/Central America	12,526	4.9
Caribbean/Antilles	14,952	5.8
Others	3,718	1.5
Total	252,842	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1993
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	36,574	14.3	1
India	20,472	8.0	2
Philippines	19,772	7.7	3
Taiwan	9,867	3.9	4
China	9,466	3.7	5
Sri Lanka	9,103	3.6	6
Vietnam	8,301	3.2	7
United States	8,014	3.1	8
United Kingdom	7,159	2.8	9
Poland	6,877	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	135,605	53.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	120,214	47.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	255,819	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1993
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,918	6.6
Asia and Pacific	147,323	57.6
South America	9,580	3.7
United States	8,014	3.1
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,602	18.2
North/Central America	7,737	3.0
Caribbean/Antilles	16,563	6.5
Others	3,082	1.2
Total	255,819	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1994
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	44,169	19.7	1
Philippines	19,097	8.5	2
India	17,225	7.7	3
China	12,486	5.6	4
Taiwan	7,411	3.3	5
Sri Lanka	6,671	3.0	6
United States	6,234	2.8	7
Vietnam	6,230	2.8	8
United Kingdom	5,971	2.8	9
Bosnia-Hercegovina	4,905	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	130,399	58.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,476	41.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	223,875	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1994
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,706	6.1
Asia and Pacific	141,587	63.2
South America	7,919	3.5
United States	6,234	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,641	17.3
North/Central America	3,503	1.6
Caribbean/Antilles	9,980	4.5
Others	2,215	1.0
Total	223,875	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1995
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	31,746	14.9	1
India	16,215	7.6	2
Philippines	15,149	7.1	3
China	13,291	6.3	4
Sri Lanka	8,926	4.2	5
Taiwan	7,691	3.6	6
Bosnia-Hercegovina	6,270	3.0	7
United Kingdom	6,161	2.9	8
United States	5,185	2.4	9
Pakistan	3,996	1.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	114,630	53.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,874	46.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	212,504	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1995
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	14,631	6.9
Asia and Pacific	129,106	60.8
South America	7,538	3.5
United States	5,185	2.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,266	19.4
North/Central America	2,842	1.3
Caribbean/Antilles	10,056	4.5
Others	1,880	0.8
Total	212,504	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1996
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,966	13.3	1
India	21,276	9.4	2
China	17,516	7.8	3
Taiwan	13,207	5.8	4
Philippines	13,132	5.8	5
Pakistan	7,753	3.4	6
Sri Lanka	6,151	2.7	7
United States	5,837	2.6	8
Iran	5,828	2.6	9
United Kingdom	5,585	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	126,251	55.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	99,522	44.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,773	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1996
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	36,503	16.15
Asia and Pacific	124,771	55.20
South and Central America	18,878	8.35
United States	5,869	2.60
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,009	17.70
Not Stated	20	0.01
Total	225,773	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1997
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,242	10.30	1
India	19,614	9.08	2
China	18,530	8.58	3
Taiwan	13,321	6.17	4
Pakistan	11,233	5.20	5
Philippines	10,873	5.03	6
Iran	7,477	3.46	7
Sri Lanka	5,069	2.35	8
United States	5,043	2.33	9
United Kingdom	4,659	2.16	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	118,061	54.65	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,983	45.35	—
GRAND TOTAL	216,044	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1997
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	37,794	17.49
Asia and Pacific	117,076	54.19
South and Central America	17,425	8.07
United States	5,043	2.33
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,673	17.90
Not Stated	33	0.02
Total	216,044	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1998
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	19,749	11.34	1
India	11.34	8.80	2
Philippines	8,172	4.69	3
Hong Kong	8,083	4.64	4
Pakistan	8,081	4.64	5
Taiwan	7,164	4.11	6
Iran	6,772	3.89	7
South Korea	4,910	2.82	8
United States	4,764	2.74	9
Russia	4,299	2.47	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,321	50.16	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	86,779	49.84	—
GRAND TOTAL	174,100	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1998
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	32,534	18.69
Asia and Pacific	84,036	48.27
South and Central America	14,003	8.04
United States	4,764	2.74
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,477	22.10
Not Stated	286	0.16
Total	174,100	100

Source for 1995/1996:
Source for 1996-1998

Are things starting to make sense? Immigration policies for the last 50+ years have focused on Asians and Africans, replacing (to a large degree) the overwhelmingly European makeup that was Canada for many years.

Of course, speaking up about what’s apparent will lead to cries of racism.

One thing people really need to get clear: so-called “conservatives” have no interest whatsoever in preserving demographics or the makeup of a country. They fully support the genocide agenda, but try to pitch it from a more economic perspective.

White replacement is a very real thing. Only the most obtuse or unobservant cannot see what’s going on, especially given how blatant it is..

While Liberals are generally quite open for their disdain of Europeans, “Conservatives” behave in a stealthier and more subversive manner. They camouflage their true intentions, making them more dangerous.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

(B.0) https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/statistics-open-data.html
(B.1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/cic/MP43-333-1999-eng.pdf
Canada Immigration Facts And Figures 1998
(B.2) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/MP43-333-2000E.pdf

May 21, 2022May 31, 2022

Canada Before 1970: Growing A Population Without Replacing It

In Western societies, there seems to be the mentality that populations must always grow. Furthermore, large numbers of people from very different backgrounds should be brought in to make this happen. At least, this is what public figures and media heads say, regardless of what the citizens want.

That being said, this “diversity” push is something that has only existed for the last 50 years or so. Before that, there was a focus on maintaining the demographic makeup. Let’s take a look.

A good starting place would be to see how many people are coming to Canada every year. Although this doesn’t tell the entire story, the numbers of Permanent Residents is a good place to start.

YEAR	PERMANENT RESIDENTS	% OF POPULATION
1852	29,307	—
1853	29,464	—
1854	37,263	—
1855	25,296	—
1856	22,544	—
1857	33,854	—
1858	12,339	—
1859	6,300	—
1860	6,276	0.2
1861	13,589	0.4
1862	18,294	0.6
1863	21,000	0.6
1864	24,779	0.7
1865	18,958	0.6
1866	11,427	0.3
1867	10,666	0.3
1868	12,765	0.4
1869	18,630	0.5
1870	24,706	0.7
1871	27,773	0.8
1872	36,578	1.0
1873	50,050	1.3
1874	39,373	1.0
1875	27,382	0.7
1876	25,633	0.6
1877	27,082	0.7
1878	29,807	0.7
1879	40,492	1.0
1880	38,505	0.9
1881	47,991	1.1
1882	112,458	2.6
1883	133,624	3.0
1884	103,824	2.3
1885	76,169	1.7
1886	69,152	1.5
1887	84,526	1.8
1888	88,766	1.9
1889	91,600	1.9
1890	75,067	1.6
1891	82,165	1.7
1892	30,996	0.6
1893	29,633	0.6
1894	20,829	0.4
1895	18,790	0.4
1896	16,835	0.3
1897	21,716	0.4
1898	31,900	0.6
1899	44,543	0.9
1900	41,681	0.8
1901	55,747	1.0
1902	89,102	1.6
1903	138,660	2.5
1904	131,252	2.3
1905	141,465	2.4
1906	211,653	5.3
1907	272,409	4.2
1908	143,326	2.2
1909	173,694	2.6
1910	286,839	4.1
1911	331,288	4.6
1912	375,756	5.1
1913	400,870	5.3
1914	150,484	1.9
1915	33,665	0.4
1916	55,914	0.7
1917	72,910	0.9
1918	41,845	0.5
1919	107,698	1.3
1920	138,824	1.6
1921	91,728	1.0
1922	64,224	0.7
1923	133,729	1.5
1924	124,164	1.4
1925	84,907	0.9
1926	135,982	1.4
1927	158,886	1.6
1928	166,783	1.7
1929	164,993	1.6
1930	104,806	1.0
1931	27,530	0.3
1932	20,591	0.2
1933	14,382	0.1
1934	12,476	0.1
1935	11,277	0.1
1936	11,643	0.1
1937	15,101	0.1
1938	17,244	0.2
1939	16,994	0.2
1940	11,324	0.1
1941	9,329	0.1
1942	7,576	0.1
1943	8,504	0.1
1944	12,801	0.1
1945	22,722	0.2
1946	71,719	0.6
1947	64,127	0.5
1948	125,414	1.0
1949	95,217	0.7
1950	73,912	0.5
1951	194,391	1.4
1952	164,498	1.1
1953	168,868	1.1
1954	154,227	1.0
1955	109,946	0.7
1956	164,857	1.0
1957	282,164	1.7
1958	124,851	0.7
1959	106,928	0.6
1960	104,111	0.6
1961	71,698	0.4
1962	74,856	0.4
1963	93,151	0.5
1964	112,606	0.6
1965	146,758	0.7
1966	194,743	1.0
1967	222,876	1.1
1968	183,974	0.9
1969	164,531	0.8
1970	147,713	0.7
1971	121,900	0.6
1972	122,006	0.6
1973	184,200	0.8
1974	218,465	1.0
1975	187,881	0.8
1976	149,429	0.6
1977	114,914	0.5
1978	86,313	0.4
1979	112,093	0.5
1980	43,137	0.6
1981	128,641	0.5
1982	121,175	0.5
1983	89,186	0.4
1984	88,272	0.3
1985	84,347	0.3
1986	99,355	0.4
1987	152,079	0.6
1988	161,588	0.6
1989	191,555	0.7
1990	86,452	0.6
1991	232,806	0.8
1992	254,790	0.9
1993	256,641	0.9
1994	224,385	0.8
1995	212,865	0.7
1996	226,071	0.8
1997	216,035	0.7
1998	174,195	0.6
1999	189,951	0.6
2000	227,456	0.7
2001	250,637	0.8
2002	229,048	0.7
2003	221,349	0.7
2004	235,823	0.7
2005	262,242	0.8
2006	251,640	0.8
2007	236,753	0.7
2008	247,247	0.7
2009	252,172	0.7
2010	280,689	0.8
2011	248,748	0.7
2012	257,887	0.7

Source for this chart is that data provided on page 3. Also, data for some earlier years is provided by Statistics Canada.

Even though large numbers of people have been coming to Canada for a long time, there was still a lot of social cohesion. This is because migrants were primarily selected from countries with a very similar makeup and composition.

Historically, the numeric predominance of those of British and French origin was unquestionable. Before the great wave of European migration to Canada between 1896 and the beginning of the First World War, Canada’s population was indeed mainly made up of those of British and French origin. For example, the 1871 Census of Canada shows that 60 percent of Canada’s 3.5 million people were of British origin, and 30 percent French origin; Europeans not of British nor French origin accounted for only 7 percent of Canada’s population in 1871 as well as in 1881 (Kalbach, 1990: 24). This demographic composition basically persisted until the turn of the century.

The wave of immigration to Canada prior to the First World War began to increase the stock of Europeans not from British or French origin. Between 1896 and 1914, over three million immigrants came to Canada. When the supply of emigrants from England and Western Europe was dwindling, Canada began accepting people from Eastern and Southern Europe, including Poles, Ukrainians, Hutterites and Doukhobors. In the period between the two world wars from 1915 to 1945, another two million immigrants came to Canada (Statistics Canada, 1983: A125-163).

The census data of Canada indicate that Canadians of European origin other than British and French increased from 8.5 percent of the total population in 1901 to 14.2 percent in 1921, and to 17.8 percent in 1941 (Kalbach, 1990: 24). In contrast, Canadians of British origin declined in relative terms from 57 percent of the total population in 1901 to 50 percent in 1941, but those of French origin remained at around 30 percent of the total population in 1901 and in 1941. In short, if the composition of Canadians of European origin other than British and French is used as an indicator of ethnic plurality, then there was an increase in diversity between 1901 and 1941. However, Canada’s population in 1941, as in 1871, was made up of people mainly of European origin, which accounted for 98 percent of the total population in 1941 and in 1871, despite the fact that the population had increased from 3.5 million people in 1871 to 11.5 million people in 1941.

The Government of Canada openly admits that traditionally, the bulk of immigration came from Europe. More specifically, it came from the West, from places like Britain and France. (See archive).

And what was the result of this? Very little in terms of enclaves or balkanization. The population grew, but without the genocidal “multicultural” push that goes around now. This type of system focused on cultural compatibility, something that would be unthinkable today.

TIME PERIOD	REGION	# OF MIGRANTS	% OF TOTAL
1968-1972	Europe	387,670	52.6
	United States	114,615	15.5
	Central/South America	24,863	3.4
	Carribean	53,100	7.2
	Asia	112,584	15.3
	Africa	22,014	3
	Australia	18,656	2.5
	Oceania	0	0
	Not Stated	3,622	0.5
	Total	737,124	100
1973-1977	Europe	324,131	37.9
	United States	102,141	11.9
	Central/South America	63,598	7.4
	Asia	216,837	25.4
	Africa	42,748	5
	Australia	10,870	1.3
	Oceania	7,937	0.9
	Not Stated	0	0
	Total	854,889	100
1978-1982	Europe	196,546	33.2
	United States	49,407	8.4
	Central/South America	36,262	6.1
	Carribean	39,362	6.7
	Asia	236,596	40
	Africa	21,946	3.7
	Australia	6,438	1.1
	Oceania	4,502	0.8
	Not Stated	232	0
	Total	591,291	100
1983-1987	Europe	124.344	24.42
	United States	36,214	7.1
	Central/South America	56,442	11
	Carribean	39,079	7.6
	Asia	226,326	44.1
	Africa	24,027	4.7
	Australia	2,774	0.5
	Oceania	3,771	0.7
	Not Stated	38	0
	Total	513,015	100
1988-1992	Europe	237,666	22.6
	United States	33,686	3.2
	Central/South America	91,061	8.7
	Carribean	59,911	5.7
	Asia	545,410	51.9
	Africa	70,744	6.7
	Australia	4,771	0.5
	Oceania	8,534	0.8
	Not Stated	0	0
	Total	1,051,783	100
1993-1995	Europe	126,509	18.3
	United States	19,433	2.8
	Central/South America	39,199	5.7
	Carribean	36,599	5.3
	Asia	418,016	60.4
	Africa	45,255	6.5
	Australia	3,476	0.5
	Oceania	3,791	0.5
	Not Stated	0	0
	Total	692,198	100

The Government’s own data tables show just how rapidly the source countries have been shifting. While immigration to Canada used to mainly be from Europe, it’s now overwhelmingly Asian. Looking at the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament in recent years, this trend has only gotten worse.

Now, were the voters ever asked if they wanted to become minorities?

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

A Government doesn’t have to round up and execute its citizens in order to commit genocide. Another way is to flood the country with large numbers of very different people, with the purpose and intent of diluting and erasing the host population. Instead of having a national identity, society becomes “multicultural”.

One caveat of course: the people coming in are encouraged to maintain their own identities, customs, traditions, and language. The populations being replaced are expected to endlessly accommodate that.

If a larger population is needed, it’s entirely possible to grow it organically. However, modern efforts across the West can best be explained as attempting to erase groups entirely.

(1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/cic/Ci1-8-2012-eng.pdf
(2) https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-310-x/2011003/fig/fig3_1-2-eng.cfm
(3) https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rp02_8-dr02_8/t2.html
(4) https://archive.ph/QkUeu
(5) https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rp02_8-dr02_8/p2.html
(6) https://archive.ph/PzcO3
(7) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml
(8) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
(9) UN Convention On Punishing And Preventing Genocide

May 17, 2022May 31, 2022

M-44: Parliament Votes To Accelerate TFW/Student-To-PR Pipeline

Motion M-44 has recently passed. The House of Commons voted to demand that the Trudeau Government come up with new ways to accelerate the transition of “temporary” foreign workers and international students into Permanent Residents.

The legislation was advanced by Liberal Randeep Sarai. This isn’t at all surprising, considering the largest group coming to Canada in recent years has been Indians.

The final vote was 324-0. This means each Member of Parliament who voted did so in favour of this Motion, regardless of partisan affiliation. Every single “Conservative” voted in favour of speeding up demographic replacement by supporting this.

Even worse: they condemn the truthful description of what’s happening as racist conspiracy theories.

It’s interesting that there’s no hurry by Federal politicians to get rid of masks or vaccine passports. However, all of Parliament agreed that there should be a plan within the next 4 months to expand and speed up pathways to creating more Permanent Residents.

MOTION TEXT
That, in the opinion of the House, the government should develop and publicly release within 120 days following the adoption of this motion a comprehensive plan to expand the economic immigration stream to allow workers of all skill levels to meet the full range of labour needs and pathways to permanent residency for temporary foreign workers, including international students, with significant Canadian work experience in sectors with persistent labour shortages, and such plan should incorporate the following elements:
.
(a) amending eligibility criteria under economic immigration programs to give more weight to significant in-Canada work experience and expand the eligible occupational categories and work experience at various skills levels;
.
(b) examining evidence and data gathered from recent programs such as Temporary Resident to Permanent Resident Pathway, Atlantic Immigration Program (AIP), Rural and Northern Immigration Program (RNIP), and Agri-Food Pilot, and Provincial Nominee Process (PNP);
.
(c) incorporating data on labour market and skills shortages to align policy on immigrant-selection with persistent labour gaps;
.
(d) assessing ways to increase geographic distribution of immigration and encourage immigrant retention in smaller communities, as well as increase Francophone immigration outside Quebec;
.
(e) identifying mechanisms for ensuring flexibility in immigration-selection tools to react quicker to changes in labour market needs and regional economic priorities; and
.
(f) specifically considering occupations and essential sectors that are underrepresented in current economic immigration programs, such as health services, caregivers, agriculture, manufacturing, service industry, trades, and transportation.

What specific sectors will be targeted? Included are: health services, caregivers, agriculture, manufacturing, service industry, trades, and transportation. Of course, it’s much easier to support a family if they are living in a country with a much lower cost of living.

Sure, one could argue that it’s just to demand a plan. However, Trudeau is extremely accommodating when it comes to finding new ways to bring people into Canada.

Another development saw the Government extend the work visas for graduates get extended by 18 months. Now, students who complete a diploma or degree are typically eligible for a 3 year open work visa (via the Post Graduate Work Program). For those involved, it effectively makes those permits 4 1/2 years. It’s unclear if this is just a one-off.

In 2020, the Government quietly made changes to allow people on student visas to work an unlimited amount of hours — while still in school. This policy existed to ensure that students were in fact focused on studying, and not just using it as a backdoor work permit. See page 12 of 2021 Report. Guess we’ll see if it ever goes back.

It seems unlikely that the average Canadian has any idea just how many students and “temporary” workers come to Canada. This should demonstrate the trend, at least for recent years.

Year	Stu	TFWP	IMP	Total
2003	61,293	82,151	–	143,444
2004	56,536	90,668	–	147,204
2005	57,476	99,146	–	156,622
2006	61,703	112,658	–	174,361
2007	64,636	165,198	–	229,834
2008	79,509	192,519	–	272,028
2009	85,140	178,478	–	263,618
2010	96,157	182,276	–	278,433
2011	98,383	190,842	–	289,225
2012	104,810	213,573	–	318,383
2013	111,865	221,310	–	333,175
2014	127,698	95,086	197,924	420,078
2015	219,143	73,016	175,967	468,126
2016	265,111	78,402	207,829	551,342
2017	317,328	78,788	224,033	620,149
2018	356,876	84,229	255,034	696,139
2019	402,427	98,310	306,797	807,534
2020	256,740	84,609	242,130	583,452

Stu = Student Visa
TFWP = Temporary Foreign Worker Program
IMP = International Mobility Program

Data for this table was compiled from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament, from 2004 through 2021. These cover the years 2003 to 2020. Keep in mind, this is just what’s on the books.

How many of them actually stay? It’s hard to say. Either the Government doesn’t keep data on this this, or they do, but just don’t make it easily available.

About the change from 2013 to 2014: the Harper Government got a lot of flack for flooding Canada with TFWs. The solution they came up with was not to reduce the number of them. Instead, they broke up the program into different areas to better conceal what was happening. This has been addressed elsewhere on this site.

Simply beyond pumping up the people who are getting PR status, the Canadian Parliament has also been holding hearings since February on the topic of boosting the number of international students coming in the first place.

More people coming + more staying = faster rate of change

The lie has been heavily promoted that it’s only 300,000 or 400,000 people coming to Canada per year. It’s not. Whether it’s ignorance or malice, very few report the truth, including those in alternative media. Here’s a recent review of the numbers in Canada. It’s shocking, or at least it should be.

While politicians here facilitate open borders, it’s worth mentioning that over 4.2 million babies have been aborted since 1970. Then of course, they’re feminism and the globohomo agenda doing a number on birth rates. The solution then becomes to bring more people over, to compensate for a declining population.

Are things starting to make sense now?

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist to discuss hard truths.

(1) https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/89339/motions/11528727
(2) https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/randeep-sarai(89339)
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/votes/44/1/85
(4) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/CIMM/StudyActivity?studyActivityId=11473703
(5) https://kitchener.citynews.ca/national-news/federal-government-will-let-international-graduates-stay-in-canada-another-18-months-5291183
(6) https://www.cp24.com/news/tory-leadership-candidate-pierre-poilievre-denounces-white-replacement-theory-1.5906421

May 5, 2022May 6, 2022

Eugenics In Canada: 20% Of Babies Aborted In “Pro-Choice Movement”

Ever wonder just how much of the Canadian public has been lost due to “abortion” in recent decades? Considering the size and scale of this, it must be good business.

According to a compilation of data from the Federal Government, approximately 20% of pregnancies have ended in abortion. Of course, this relies on transparent reporting, so the number could be much higher. These totals exclude miscarriages and stillbirths.

For a good source on this data, visit Love4Life. There is a considerable amount of statistical data compiled, and it connects back to official Government sources.

Now, there are going to be some discrepancies in the data. This is partly because of incomplete reporting, and also because some sources have different numbers. Nonetheless, it should paint the picture quite gruesomely.

Let’s drop the spoiler here: there were over 4,222,858 abortions between 1970 and 2020. This isn’t a joke. Our “pro-choice” supporters and policies have literally killed millions of Canadians.

It’s also quite interesting that many of the same people are behind two (seemingly) opposing ideologies within Western countries. Then again, population replacement is just some racist conspiracy theory.

[1] Promote widespread abortion locally
[2] Promote mass immigration to counter falling birth rates

Anyhow, let’s look at some of these numbers:

*** The U.N. has some data prior to 1974, so that’s added in:

YEAR	ABORTIONS
1970	11,200
1971	30,923
1973	43,201
1974	52,435
1975	53,705
1976	58,712
1977	59,864
1978	66,710
1979	69,745
1980	72,099
1981	71,911
1982	75,071
1983	69,368
1984	69,449
1985	69,216
1986	69,572
1987	70,023
1988	72,693
1989	79,315
1990	92,901
1991	95,059
1992	102,085
1993	104,403
1994	106,255
1995	108,248
1996	111,659
1997	111,709
1998	110,331
1999	105,666
2000	105,427
2001	106,418
2002	105,154
2003	103,768
2004	100,039
2005	96,815
2006	91,310
2007	98,762
2008	95,876
2009	93,755
2010	*64,641
2011	108,844
2012	100,958
2013	102,446
2014	100,194
2015	100,104
2016	97,764
2017	94,030
2018	85,294
2019	83,576
2020	74,155

**Note: data is combined from CIHI and Statistics Canada. The Canadian Institute for Health Information does have considerable recent data on abortion in this country.

*2010 is considered incomplete, since there wasn’t reporting from Quebec.

The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada also compiles recent statistics on abortion numbers here. (see archive). It’s actually pretty morbid to think about.

According to Statistics Canada, there were 1,375,774 abortions between the years of 1987 to 2000. This is a span of 14 years, and showed an average of about 98,000 abortions per year. This amounted to some 263 performed per day.

If we factor in the data from 1970 to 2020 (data from a few different tables), there were 4,222,858 abortions. This covers 51 years, and would be approximately 86,000 per year. Converted into daily totals, that means roughly 227 babies would have died, every single day.

Don’t worry, it’s about to get a lot more disgusting when the ages of the girls and women are taken into account. There are an awful lot of children getting abortions.

YEAR	ABORTIONS	UNKNOWN	UNDER 15	15 TO 17	18 TO 19
1974	52,435	0	623	7,937	7,868
1975	53,705	0	650	8,135	8,038
1976	58,712	0	717	8,551	8,764
1977	59,864	0	697	8,684	9,051
1978	66,710	0	642	9,228	10,453
1979	69,745	0	694	9,661	10,827
1980	72,099	0	613	9,650	11,115
1981	71,911	0	607	8,954	10,785
1982	75,071	0	586	8,463	11,073
1983	69,368	0	561	7,150	9,568
1984	69,449	0	504	6,887	8,996
1985	69,216	0	554	6,658	8,525
1986	69,572	0	430	6,636	8,497
1987	70,023	0	433	6,411	8,587
1988	72,693	0	424	6,361	8,916
1989	79,315	0	452	6,446	9,755
1990	92,901	0	597	7,635	10,639
1991	95,059	0	495	7,722	10,492
1992	102,085	0	580	8,153	11,037
1993	104,403	1	659	8,249	11,740
1994	106,255	338	526	8,386	12,371
1995	108,248	2,242	545	7,887	12,388
1996	111,659	2,439	532	8,117	13,021
1997	111,709	3,547	511	8,175	12,458
1998	110,331	3,832	464	7,741	13,118
1999	105,666	232	464	7,253	13,357
2000	105,427	219	389	7,369	10,611
2001	106,418	33	412	7,222	12,746
2002	105,154	17	337	6,381	12,626
2003	103,768	14	302	5,785	11,871
2004	100,039	5	304	5,974	10,964
2005	96,815	2	284	5,588	10,477
2006	91,310	156	267	5,608	9,609

Data available from Statistics Canada: 1987 to 2000. Another version, which goes from 1974 to 2006, is also available. There are a few discrepancies, but the total is still shocking.

It’s also worth pointing out that starting in 1994, there were large numbers of women getting abortions for which there was no age listed. Just a hunch, but most of them were probably either in the country illegally, or didn’t want to disclose that they were minors.

Also, these are just “official” statistics. It’s very likely that there are a lot more abortions that have gone on, and are unreported. And recently:

induced-abortion-can-2015-en-web
induced-abortion-can-2016-en-web
induced-abortion-2017-en-web (1)
induced-abortions-reported-in-canada-in-2018-updated-data-tables-en-web
induced-abortions-reported-in-canada-in-2019-en (1)
induced-abortions-reported-in-canada-2020-en

There were 100,104 abortions reported in 2015.
There were 97,764 reported in 2016.
There were 94,030 reported in 2017.
There were 85,294 reported in 2018.
There were 83,576 reported in 2019.
There were 74,155 reported in 2020.

But don’t worry. There are no doubt countless politicians and public figures working diligently to reverse this trend, right?

And what do “conservatives” in Canada have to say about this? They don’t seem to care about the millions who’ve died as a result of abortion. There’s no ideological issue with infanticide in general. However, they insist that babies not be killed simply because of their sex. This was Bill C-233, a Private Member’s Bill in the last session.

There are also major demographic implications for abortion on this scale, which needs to be addressed as well.

The topic of births and deaths is certainly important to consider. That said, including abortion — especially being so widespread — changes the dynamics considerably.

Note: Difference = Live Births – Total Deaths
Note: Per Day = (Difference)/365 or 366

Year	Birth	Deaths	Diff	Day
1991	402,533	195,569	206,964	567
1992	398,643	196,535	202,108	552
1993	388,394	204,912	183,482	503
1994	385,114	207,077	178,037	488
1995	378,016	210,733	167,283	458
1996	366,200	212,880	153,320	419
1997	348,598	215,669	132,929	364
1998	342,418	218,091	124,327	341
1999	337,249	219,530	117,719	323
2000	327,882	218,062	109,820	300
2001	333,744	219,538	114,206	313
2002	328,802	223,603	105,199	288
2003	335,202	226,169	109,033	299
2004	337,072	226,584	110,488	302
2005	342,176	230,132	112,044	307
2006	354,617	228,079	126,538	347
2007	367,864	235,217	132,647	363
2008	377,886	238,617	139,269	381
2009	380,863	238,418	142,445	390
2010	377,213	240,075	137,138	376
2011	377,636	243,511	134,125	367
2012	381,869	246,596	135,273	370
2013	380,323	252,338	127,985	350
2014	384,100	258,821	125,279	343
2015	382,392	264,333	118,059	323
2016	383,102	267,213	115,889	318
2017	379,450	276,689	102,761	281
2018	375,390	283,706	91,684	251

A few years back, it was covered how Canada had a growing population even without immigration. In fairness, it’s not clear how much of this was due to birth tourism. However, the rates weren’t plummeting as people were led to believe.

A quick and dirty estimation (based on births and abortions) would be that approximately 20% of the pregnancies — excluding miscarriages — ended up being aborted. This translated to 1 in 5.

YEAR	BIRTHS	ABORTIONS	B + A	% ABORTED
1991	402,533	95,059	497,592	19.1%
1992	398,643	102,085	500,728	20.3%
1993	388,394	104,403	492,797	21.2%
1994	385,114	106,255	491,369	21.6%
1995	378,016	108,248	486,264	22.3%
1996	366,200	111,659	477,859	23.3%
1997	348,598	111,709	460,307	24.3%
1998	342,418	110,331	452,749	24.4%
1999	337,249	105,666	442,915	23.8%
2000	327,882	105,427	433,309	24.3%
2001	333,744	106,418	440,162	24.2%
2002	328,802	105,154	433,956	24.2%
2003	335,202	103,768	438,970	23.6%
2004	337,072	100,039	447,111	22.4%
2005	342,176	96,815	438,991	22.0%
2006	354,617	91,310	445,927	20.5%
2007	367,864	98,762	466,626	21.2%
2008	377,886	95,876	473,762	20.2%
2009	380,863	93,755	474,618	19.8%
2010	377,213	*64,641	441,854	*14.6%
2011	377,636	108,844	486,480	22.3%
2012	381,869	100,958	482,827	20.9%
2013	380,323	102,446	482,769	21.2%
2014	384,100	100,194	484,294	20.7%
2015	382,392	100,104	482,496	20.7%
2016	383,102	97,764	480,866	20.3%
2017	379,450	94,030	473,480	19.9%
2018	375,390	85,294	460,684	18.5%
2019	375,229	83,576	458,805	18.2%
2020	361,667	74,155	435,822	17.0%

*2010 is skewed, since Quebec didn’t fully report their totals.

This isn’t hyperbole to claim that 20% of pregnancies in recent years end with an abortion. Slaughtering large segments of future generations has been happening for decades.

Again, 4,222,858 abortions between 1970 and 2020, and that’s just Canada. Also, these are just the official figures. Factoring in the unreported, the number is likely much higher.

Don’t worry about the falling birth rates and the slaughter of Canadian children. After all, we can just import a replacement population in order to keep up.

(1) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310016901
(2) https://archive.ph/OhV01
(3) https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/aca40ae3-d026-45b8-8e37-9185b4347c43
(4) https://archive.ph/Y7DYZ
(5) http://run-with-life.blogspot.com/2021/03/cihi-is-still-underreporting-abortions.html
(6) https://love4life.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Annual_20_203.pdf
(7) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-223-x/82-223-x2008000-eng.pdf
(8) https://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a05?lang=eng&id=1069005
(9) https://www.cihi.ca/en/access-data-and-reports/data-tables?keyword=abortion&published_date=All&type_of_care=All&place_of_care=All&population_group=All&health_care_quality=All&health_conditions_outcomes=All&health_system_overview=All&sort_by=field_published_date_value&items_per_page=10
(10) https://www.arcc-cdac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/statistics-abortion-in-canada.pdf
(11) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=1310042801#timeframe
(12) https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310071001
(13) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/43-2/c-233
(14) http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=abortion+statistics&d=POP&f=tableCode%3a17
(15) https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/
(16) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion

March 10, 2022

(Now Available) Borderless Canada: Replacement Migration & Fifth Columnists Operating Within

With all the content given out, occasionally, an ad needs to be run. And this is another book. The 4th one, Borderless Canada, is now available both in paperback and as an e-book. This helps support the costs of running the website, and ensures the information reaches a wider audience.

Borderless Canada: The many hidden costs of the mass migration policies, including economic, social, and cultural. This couldn’t have happened without many subversive interests pushing it. Many know that politicians act as puppets, but not how deep it goes.

Most people aren’t remotely aware of what’s happening on the subjects of borders and immigration. Nor do they grasp the full extent of subversion agents and NGOs working towards these goals. Partly, this is intentional, as politicians and media figures aren’t interested in a fully informed public. You think those subsidies are just a form of charity?

This cannot be explained as simple incompetence or cluelessness. The replacement of the West has long been a deliberate aim.

Also, this isn’t a partisan issue. The bulk of the “right wing” in Canadian politics supports this destruction, as do many of their voters. They just insist it be done legally, and with economic benefits.

Of course, earlier publications are still available.

Twenty Twenty-One: A condensed form of this research into the fake pandemic in Canada. Hard details and stats provided throughout, refuting virtually all major Government claims. Spoiler, there isn’t a “pandemic” at all.

Inside The Ontario Science Table: The sequel focuses on the “independent experts” calling for Ford to keep the Province locked down, and pushing and pandemic narrative. The ties to the University of Toronto and big pharma run very deep.

The Green Bankers Cartel: There’s a lot more than meets the eye to the climate change movement. Far from the image of being grassroots, the financial sector sees it as opportunity. Useful idiots support it anyway, without realizing that they advocate for policies that ensure their own enslavement. We are told “The debate is over” as a means of stifling legitimate concerns and inquiries.

All of these are available online either as ebooks, or paperback.

February 8, 2022February 10, 2023

Chambers Of Commerce: Collecting Subsidies While Calling For Open Borders

According to the CEWS Registry, the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy has been handed out to some 235 institutions that have “Chamber of Commerce” as part of their name. That should alarm people, that hundreds of organizations that claim to promote business are getting handouts from Ottawa — or rather, taxpayers.

The Chambers of Commerce are just part of a long list of institutions that are getting funded to shill the “pandemic” narrative. These include: restaurants and hotels, political parties, law firms, more law firms, churches, and trucking associations, to name a few.

While it would be unrealistic to do a profile on all 235 organizations, let’s take a look at one: The Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

Description of the organization’s activities
Founded in 1925, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce is the nation’s largest business association, representing small and large firms from every sector and region in Canada. The Canadian Chamber is a network of 420 community chambers and boards of trade across Canada, in addition to individual corporate members and over 80 trade and professional organizations. The total membership exceeds 192,000. It is dedicated to the promotion and development of a strong economy. The chamber monitors federal and international issues, solicits the views of the Canadian business community and communicates them to policymakers in Ottawa and internationally. Headquartered in Ottawa, it also has staff in Toronto, Montreal and Calgary.

This is how the group describes its activities.

Instead of calling for people to be able to run their businesses freely, and with minimal interference, the Chamber of Commerce parrots the line that vaccines and rapid tests are the quickest way back to normal. On the surface, it looks like they are playing along because of the financial incentives provided. More on that coming up.

The “wins” they brag about include getting CEWS and CERS extended. CERS is the Canada Emergency Rental Subsidy which is available for businesses. This “business” group also brags about getting the hiring subsidy created, so that taxpayers help fund new employees.

While this organization does receive private donations, it undeniably is getting Government handouts as well. In fact, this has been happening for many years.

GOVERNMENT BRANCH SOURCE	YEAR	AMOUNT
Bank of Canada	2019	$1,375.00
Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC)	2015	$5,000.00
Canada Foundation for Innovation	2020	$2,300.00
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC)	2021	$5,000.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2014	$10,000.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2015	$6,000.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2017	$6,000.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2018	$1,900.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2020	$10,000.00
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2021	$30,000.00
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)	2020	$850,623.60
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)	2021	$118,464.75
Competition Bureau Canada (COBU)	2016	$1,800.00
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)	2018	$3,400.00
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)	2019	$74,496.00
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)	2020	$22,451.00
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)	2021	$12,180
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)	2017	$56,548.68
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)	2018	$29,600.00
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)	2019	$2,500.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2014	$37,500.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2015	$29,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2016	$42,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2017	$63,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2018	$65,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2019	$65,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2020	$51,000.00
Export Development Canada (EDC)	2021	$79,100.00
Farm Credit Canada (FCC)	2018	$2,500.00
FedDev Agency for Southern Ontario	2018	$2,300.00
FedDev Agency for Southern Ontario	2020	$2,300.00
Global Affairs Canada (GAC)	2017	$1,900.00
Global Affairs Canada (GAC)	2018	$1,900.00
Global Affairs Canada (GAC)	2019	$2,300.00
Health Canada (HC)	2021	$4,947,978.19
Industry Canada	2014	$1,500.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2015	$1,800.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2016	$2,300.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2018	$2,300.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2019	$2,300.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2020	$530,300.00
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada	2021	$2,300.00
Montreal Port Authority	2020	$5,000.00
Montreal Port Authority	2021	$5,000.00
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)	2015	$132,300.00
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)	2017	$22,122.12
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)	2014	$1,500.00
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)	2015	$1,800.00
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)	2016	$1,800.00
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)	2017	$1,900.00
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)	2019	$2,000.00
Office of the Procurement Ombudsman (OPO)	2020	$2,300.00
Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman	2018	$2,300.00
Ontario Federation of Agriculture	2020	$5,000.00
Port Alberni Port Authority	2016	$10,000.00
Prince Rupert Port Authority	2016	$4,500.00
Public Works and Government Services Canada	2014	$1,500.00
Royal Canadian Mint	2014	$2,500.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2014	$32,500.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2015	$10,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2016	$43,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2017	$65,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2018	$50,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2019	$40,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2020	$40,000.00
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (Port Metro Vancouver)	2021	$57,500.00
VIA Rail Canada	2016	$7,500.00
VIA Rail Canada	2017	$18,500.00
VIA Rail Canada	2019	$10,000.00
VIA Rail Canada	2020	$10,000.00
VIA Rail Canada	2021	$15,000.00

You’d be forgiven for thinking that these were really Communists. Now, what is the Chamber of Commerce getting for itself? The listings should scare you. Keep in mind, that other Chambers of Commerce are likely also receiving money at the local level.

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has been getting handouts going back many years. The CEWS is really just the least of it. It would also be interesting to know what the conditions were for that nearly $5 million they received from Health Canada.

The Chamber doesn’t appear to call for the end to martial law restrictions. Instead, they lobby for more handouts in order to cope with lockdowns. For a business orientated group, they seem completely okay with Government interference and restrictions.

There also appears to be no issue with policies like vaccine passports. After all, if Canadians don’t want to play along, they can just be replaced by TFWs who took the shots as a condition of employment.

This group also calls for drastically increased immigration, and more ways to remain in Canada. They also support free trade which will see industries outsourced based on cost. Think about how this plays out in the long term.

[1] Flood Canada with more people, driving up demand for work
[2] Support trade deals which reduce the supply of available work

Never mind the social impacts of importing large numbers from very different backgrounds, or the culture clash that will result. It appears these business groups don’t care about such things.

If you think it’s bad now, the agenda from a few years back is even worse. Or perhaps it’s just more open about what they really wanted then.

BORDER CROSSINGS – Beyond the Borders Initiative, with respect to implementation of the action plan items.
BORDER CROSSINGS – with respect to the development of a new International Crossing between Windsor and Detroit.
FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS – Promote balanced free trade agreements for Canada with Europe, India Japan and Korea. Promote Canada’s participation in the Trans-Pacific partnership and in the Trade in Services Agreement
IMMIGRATION – Expedited application process with regard to giving priority to applicants who possess skills in short supply in Canada and processing their applications within 6-12 months.
IMMIGRATION – Foreign Credentials Recognition Program with regard to working with the provinces/territories and business community to develop national accreditation standards to evaluate foreign credentials, professional and trade qualifications, and certification in regulated and non-regulated occupations that reflect employers’ needs
IMMIGRATION: Changes intended to attract and retain international students with respect to work permits, applications for permanent residency, and processing times for applications.
IMMIGRATION: Changes to increase the number of economic immigrants to this country to double the current rate. Renegotiation and signing of new memoranda of understanding with each of the provinces and territories to increase provincial caps for Provincial Nominee Programs. Adequate staffing of local Citizenship and Immigration Canada offices to meet demand and alleviate the labour market shortages.
IMMIGRATION: Regional strategy for settlement needs and at levels of service to ensure access to skilled workers in all regions of the country.
International Trade: Expanding trade and investment links with developing countries.
Labour: Ensuring that any changes to the Canada Labour Code are implemented only if they address a real problem or result in improvement for these employers, their employee and/or the Canadians they serve.
Labour: Asking the federal government, specifically the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development, to work with the Canadian private sector to identify ways to increase long-term formal employment opportunities for the poor in developing countries, and facilitate the availability of financial institutional products and services, including microfinance, to stimulate job creation for the poor

The above section includes items from 2014 (#36 on their profile with the Lobbying Registry). The Canadian Chamber of Commerce (and presumably all chapters) support virtually open borders as it ensures ready access to an endless supply of cheaper labour.

Put bluntly, Canadian taxpayers are helping to finance groups calling for outsourcing of industries, and the importing of a new work force for what’s left. It not only causes havoc with jobs, but drives down wages for the ones that remain.

Now, about those 235 groups receiving the CEWS:

1000 ISLANDS GANANOQUE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ABBOTSFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Aboriginal Chamber Of Commerce – Grand Rapids
AIRDRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ALBERNI VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ALBERTA CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
ANNAPOLIS VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
AURORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BAFFIN REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BANCROFT & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BATHURST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BATTLEFORDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BEAUMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ASSOCIATION
BONNYVILLE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOCIETY
BOW VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ASSOCIATION
BRACEBRIDGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BRANDON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BRAZIL-CANADA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BRIGHTON AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BROCKVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BURLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BURNS LAKE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CAMBRIDGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CAMERA DI COMMERCIO ITALIANA DELL’ ONTARIO/ITALIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ONTARIO
CAMPBELL RIVER AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CAMROSE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CANADIAN GERMAN CHAMBER OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE INC
Canadian Women’s Chamber of Commerce
CASTLEGAR & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CENTRE WELLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BRANTFORD-BRANT
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SERVING COQUITLAM, PORT COQUITLAM PORT MOODY
Chamber of Marine Commerce CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE MARITIME
Chambre de commerce Canada-Floride/ Chamber of commerce Canada-florida
Chambre de commerce de l’Est de Montréal Eastern Montreal Chamber of Commerce
CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE ET D’INDUSTRIE DE BÉCANCOUR NICOLET-YAMASKA / BECANCOUR NICOLET-YAMASKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHARLOTTETOWN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHATHAM-KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHETWYND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHILLIWACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CLOVERDALE DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Coboconk, Norland & Area Chamber of Commerce
COLD LAKE REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ASSOCIATION
COLUMBIA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CORNWALL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
COWICHAN LAKE DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CRANBROOK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
DAWSON CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ASSOCIATION
DAWSON CREEK & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
DELTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
DRUMHELLER AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
DRYDEN DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
DUNCAN-COWICHAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
EAST GWILLIMBURY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
EAST HANTS AND DISTRICTS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Eastern Prince Edward Island Chamber of Commerce Inc.
EDMONTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
EDMUNDSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/LA CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE DE LA REGION D’EDMUNDSTON INC
ESTEVAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FENELON FALLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FERNIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT FRANCES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT MACLEOD AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT MCMURRAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT NELSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT SASKATCHEWAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FORT ST JOHN AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FREDERICTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GANDER & AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
GEORGINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GIBSONS AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GRANDE PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GRAVENHURST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER BARRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER KINGSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER LANGLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER NANAIMO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER NIAGARA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER OSHAWA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER PETERBOROUGH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Greater Saskatoon Chamber of Commerce
GREATER SUDBURY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER VERNON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GREATER VICTORIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GRIMSBY & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GUANGDONG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (CANADA)
GUELPH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
HALIBURTON HIGHLANDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
HALIFAX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
HALTON HILLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
HUMBOLDT AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CORP.
HUNTSVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
INDO-CANADA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
INNISFAIL AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOCIETY
ITALIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN CANADA – WEST/CAMERA DI COMMERCIO ITALIANA IN CANADA – OVEST
JASPER PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KAMLOOPS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KAWARTHA LAKES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-EASTERN REGION
KELOWNA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KENORA AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KENSINGTON AND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KIMBERLEY BAVARIAN SOCIETY
KINDERSLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
KITIMAT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LA CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE DE GASPE – /GASPÉ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LA CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE DE MANIWAKI-THE MANIWAKI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LA CHAMBRE DE COMMERCE ITALIENNE AU CANADA. ITALIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN CANADA CAMERA DI COMMERCIO ITALIANA IN CANADA
LA CRETE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LAB WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LABRADOR NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC.
LAC LA BICHE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Lacombe and District Chamber of Commerce
LADYSMITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LAKE COUNTRY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LEAMINGTON DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LEDUC REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LETHBRIDGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LINCOLN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LINDSAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LLOYDMINSTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LONDON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MEDICINE HAT AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MILTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MOOSE JAW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MORDEN AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MOUNT PEARL PARADISE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MUSKOKA LAKES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
NELSON AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
NEW WESTMINSTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
NEWMARKET CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC.
NIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
NORTH BAY AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Northumberland Central Chamber of Commerce
NWT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
OAKVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ORILLIA AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ORO-MEDONTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
OWEN SOUND & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PARKSVILLE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PEACE RIVER BOARD OF TRADE AND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PEACHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PEMBERTON AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PENTICTON AND WINE COUNTRY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PLACENTIA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PONOKA & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOCIETY
PORT HARDY & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PORT HOPE AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
POWELL RIVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
PRAIRIE SKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC.
PRINCE GEORGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
QUESNEL AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
QUINTE WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RADIUM HOT SPRINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RED DEER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
REGINA & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RENFREW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
REVELSTOKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RICHMOND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RUSSELL AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SALT SPRING ISLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SARNIA LAMBTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SASKATCHEWAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SAUGEEN SHORES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SAULT STE MARIE AND DISTRICT OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SELKIRK & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
SHERWOOD PARK & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SICAMOUS AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SIMCOE AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SMITHERS DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SMITHS FALLS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SOCIETY OF THE MORINVILLE AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SOUTH SURREY AND WHITE ROCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SOUTHERN GEORGIAN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Springfield Chamber of Commerce Inc.
SQUAMISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
ST. ALBERT AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOCIETY
ST PAUL & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ASSOCIATION
ST THOMAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
STONY PLAIN & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
STRATHROY AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SUMMERLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SUSSEX AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC.
SWIFT CURRENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
SYLVAN LAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE ARMSTRONG-SPALLUMCHEEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE CALGARY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE CANADIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NIAGARA FALLS, CANADA
THE EDSON AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The Greater Kitchener Waterloo Chamber of Commerce
THE GREATER MONCTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE GREATER SUMMERSIDE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE HAMILTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE MACKENZIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE MANITOBA CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
THE MOUNT FOREST DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE PARRY SOUND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE PAS AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE PERTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE SAANICH PENINSULA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THE TABER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The Winkler and District Chamber of Commerce
THE WINNIPEG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THUNDER BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TILLSONBURG DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TIMMINS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TOBERMORY & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TOFINO-LONG BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Trail Chamber of Commerce
TRENT HILLS AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
TRURO AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
UCLUELET CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
VAUGHAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
VEGREVILLE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
VERMILION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WASKESIU CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WELLAND/PELHAM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WEST PRINCE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WEST SHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WEST VANCOUVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WEYBURN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHITBY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHITCHURCH STOUFFVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHITECOURT AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHITEHORSE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WIARTON AND DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WILLIAMS LAKE & DISTRICT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Windsor-Essex Regional Chamber of Commerce
WOODSTOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
YARMOUTH AND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
YELLOWKNIFE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
YORKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Do you get it now? Your tax dollars are being used to support these “Chambers of Commerce”. These groups lobby Federal and Provincial Governments to spend even more money propping up businesses which impose mask and vaccine rules. They also support the open border agenda to mass import people who will work for less, and who are more receptive to taking experimental shots.

In many ways, this comes across as a protection racket. These groups push for certain “safety” grants and measures for their members, but always ones that profit them as well.

(1) https://chamber.ca/
(2) https://chamber.ca/campaign/business-led-recovery/
(3) https://chamber.ca/advocacy/wins-for-canadian-business/
(4) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/cews/srch/pub/bscSrch
(5) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/habs/cews/srch/pub/dsplyBscSrch?request_locale=en
(6) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?regId=812012&cno=15787#regStart

Category: Population Replacement

Replacement Migration In Canada: The Years 1989 To 1998

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Canada Before 1970: Growing A Population Without Replacing It

Like this:

M-44: Parliament Votes To Accelerate TFW/Student-To-PR Pipeline

Like this:

Eugenics In Canada: 20% Of Babies Aborted In “Pro-Choice Movement”

Like this:

(Now Available) Borderless Canada: Replacement Migration & Fifth Columnists Operating Within

Like this:

Chambers Of Commerce: Collecting Subsidies While Calling For Open Borders

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: