Bit Of History: University Of Toronto, Public Health, Funded With Rockefeller Money

[Reprinted without permission]

The Rockefeller Foundation’s contributions to the University of Toronto have been an important part of its global philanthropic agenda in support of health, food, employment, cities, energy and innovation over the past century.

Established in 1913, the Rockefeller Foundation has disbursed more than US$17 billion in today’s dollars. Among its achievements, the foundation played a role in the founding of the field of public health, developed vaccines for diseases such as yellow fever and malaria, and led a global transformation of agriculture that has saved millions of lives.

Created by American industrialist John D. Rockefeller, the foundation is also a major supporter of educational institutions. It established the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and schools of public health at both Harvard and Johns Hopkins Universities. It became a major benefactor of the University of Toronto following the discovery of insulin in 1921 by Frederick Banting and Charles Best.

The following year, the foundation donated several million dollars to U of T for a chair of surgery and to fund construction of anatomy and pathology labs. The foundation also helped establish the School of Hygiene, which housed the Departments of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Public Health Nursing, Epidemiology and Biometrics, and Physical Hygiene, as well as a Division of Industrial Hygiene. It incorporated the existing Connaught Laboratories, then a global leader in the development and manufacture of vaccines.

In 1933, further contributions helped create the School of Nursing, transforming the program at U of T from a diploma course for existing nurses into a fully-fledged bachelor’s degree program in a new departmental building at Queen’s Park Crescent. Other Rockefeller gifts helped found programs in Chinese Studies in 1934, and the Department of Slavic Studies in 1949.

The foundation’s leadership in global philanthropy for more than a century has had a tremendous impact. Its support for education and research at U of T has played a major role in building our impressive global legacy.

Certainly not the only major donor. However, no one else has given anywhere close to $17 billion places like the University of Toronto (adjusted for inflation). Check out other major names. Correction: an earlier interpretation of the announcement thought it was $17B exclusively to this school.

Kind of makes one wonder who financed the various outlets at the school, such as the Centre for Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, the WHO Collaboration Centre.

One notable set of donors are William (Bill) Graham and Catherin Graham. Bill is a former Defense Minister of Canada, former Foreign Affairs Minister, and former Interim Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. In total, they have contributed from $10.4 million.

This is quite the rabbit hole, but a few points to consider:

While this may be coincidental, the U.S. Federal Reserve came into existence in 1913. This led to the latest iteration of debt based currency, and debt slavery in that country.

The Rockefeller Foundation recently announced a $13.5 million grant, mostly for the U.S., to be spent on combatting misinformation.

The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine is listed as being founded by Rockefeller. From their own website: “The Rockefeller Foundation invented an international health system virtually overnight in 1914, simultaneously launching a pilot project throughout Central America and the British Caribbean to treat hookworm disease and lay the foundations of permanent departments of health under the auspices of its International Health Board.”

The LSHTM, much like Imperial College London, and the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium, receive heavy financing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

  • European Commission
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Merck
  • University College London
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • UNICEF

The Vaccine Confidence Project, headed by Heidi Larson, is run by the LSHTM. Unsurprisingly, pharma companies are the biggest donors. After all, VCP is generating newer and larger markets for their products.

Johns Hopkins University has been running pandemic “scenarios” for many years. Makes one wonder how much of any of this is actually real.

In 2016, the ID2020 group was started. Among its initial partners are the Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, and GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance.

Rockefeller founded (along with others), the Climate Bonds Initiative. And this is hardly the only organization. Those carbon taxes people hate paying are going to make a limited number of people very rich.

And as mentioned before, UofT is structured as a charity.

Some interesting bits of information that most people probably never think about.

(1) https://www.chancellorscircle.utoronto.ca/members/the-rockefeller-foundation/
(2) https://archive.is/8r2eH
(3) Wayback Machine
(4) https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-opens-groundbreaking-centre-strengthen-vaccine-confidence-through-collaboration
(5) https://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/who-collaborating-centre-on-health-promotion/
(6) https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events-archive/2001_dark-winter/index.html
(7) https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events-archive/2005_atlantic_storm/index.html
(8) https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events/2018_clade_x_exercise/index.html
(9) https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
(10) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rockefeller.Foundation.lockstep.2010.pdf
(11) https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/the-rockefeller-foundation-commits-13-5-million-in-funding-to-strengthen-public-health-response-efforts/
(12) https://id2020.org/alliance
(13) https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/events/rockefeller-foundation-parasitism-and-peripheral-origins-global-health
(14) https://www.vaccineconfidence.org/
(15) https://www.vaccineconfidence.org/partners-funders
(16) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24-gates-financing-of-imperial-college-london-and-their-modelling/
(17) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24b-london-school-of-hygiene-tropical-medicine-more-modelling-financed-by-gates/
(18) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24c-vaccine-impact-modelling-consortium-more-bogus-science/
(19) https://www.climatebonds.net/about/funders

Rockefeller Spends $13.5 Million To Combat “Misinformation” In U.S., Elsewhere

Think that it’s only taxpayers who are funding efforts to stop so-called “misinformation”? Turns out, the Rockefeller Foundation is financing it as well, and this is quite the contribution.

July 15, 2021—The Rockefeller Foundation is announcing $13.5 million in new funding to strengthen Covid-19 response efforts in the U.S., Africa, India, and Latin America to counter health mis- and disinformation – confusing, inaccurate, and harmful information that spreads at an unprecedented speed and scale and threatens the health and wellbeing of communities around the world. The announcement responds immediately to Confronting Health Misinformation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Building a Healthy Information Environment, which calls for a “whole-of-society” effort so that people around the world know what to do—and trust the sources they hear from—during a public health emergency.

“By identifying mis- and disinformation as a challenge to our collective health, the Surgeon General’s guidance reinforces The Rockefeller Foundation’s role in investing in data-driven public health interventions to meet the unique challenges of today’s media environment,” said Bruce Gellin, Chief of Global Public Health Strategy at The Rockefeller Foundation.

The funding will support the design and evaluation of interventions, tools, and methods to build trust in Covid-19 vaccination efforts and counter inaccurate information, and research to understand how inaccurate health information impacts online and offline behaviors, the true cost of mis- and disinformation on health and economic outcomes, and what strategies might be most effective to counter and manage inaccurate and harmful information from malicious sources. Funded projects will provide a foundation for modern information and communication networks that better serve people and are better prepared to encourage actions and behaviors essential to public health response efforts. Detailed information is slated to be released by the end of 2021.

“Science alone is not sufficient to drive action: the best data analysis in the world will not stop an outbreak if people at risk are not aware of the problem, do not think it is a real threat, do not trust the messenger, or do not know what actions to take to protect themselves and their loves ones,” said Estelle Willie, Director of Health Policy and Communications at The Rockefeller Foundation. “The Rockefeller Foundation’s $13.5 million commitment is a direct acknowledgment that effective public health begins with effective communication that cuts through the noise and confusion stemming from mis- and disinformation.

Today’s announcement marks another step in The Rockefeller Foundation’s commitment to reinvigorate public health for the 21st century so that the world can effectively prevent, detect, and respond to health threats to avert future pandemics. This investment builds on the Foundation’s U.S. Equity-First Vaccination Initiative, which supports community-based organizations serving people of color with the expertise and resources to own and drive evidence-based, misinformation-resilient conversations about vaccines in their communities. Launched in April 2021, the year-long initiative will identify effective strategies to increase vaccine confidence in diverse communities, and assess, to the extent possible, the role misinformation plays in shaping knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Covid-19 vaccines.

“Vaccine equity” is a term that’s based on the assumption that racism and structural inequalities are the reasons that certain minorities are unable to get vaccines in high enough numbers.

Of course, Rockefeller is also the same organization who brought the “Lockstep Narrative” back in 2010. It was also a partner in the 2016 project, ID2020.

Don’t worry, nothing to see here.

(1) https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/the-rockefeller-foundation-commits-13-5-million-in-funding-to-strengthen-public-health-response-efforts/
(2) https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/covid-19-response/achieving-vaccine-equity/
(3) Rockefeller.Foundation.lockstep.2010
(4) https://id2020.org/alliance

Karlyn Borysenko Wants CRT Banned As Anti-White Agenda Is Too Obvious

On June 17, 2021, Karlyn Borysenko released a video, demanding that people stop calling critical race theory (CRT) an anti-white ideology. The entire video is well worth a watch. According to her biography, she is a “organizational psychologist and executive/performance coach.” Clearly, this is a smart person, which makes this claim so striking.

CRITICAL RACE THEORY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE

This doesn’t appear to be trolling. Borysenko it making the straight faced claim that this is the reality. Her major points are as follows:

  1. Borysenko claims that critical race theory isn’t about race, but about power. She says this is done to ultimate promote a communist utopia
  2. Borysenko claims that CRT makes people racist, despite previously statin that CRT isn’t about race. Some nice mental gymnastics
  3. Borysenko claims that CRT will create an actual white power movement in the United States.

Borysenko says that CRT came from the universities in the 1970s, and the idea is that racism exists everywhere. Consequently, it must be “sussed out”. While there is truth to this, she intentionally leaves out that the West has been continuously framed as a “white power” ideology, built on oppression. It doesn’t target any other group.

Also, the bulk of the people promoting the anti-white narrative aren’t white now, are they?

She repeats her contradictory claims that CRT is both: (a) not about race; and (b) can be used to target people of any race. How can an ideology that has nothing to do with race also be incredibly racist?

She claims that CRT can be directed against any group, including black and hispanic. Strange how there aren’t any claims of Mexican power in academia.

She also claims that an “actual white power movement” will result from pushing of CRT. Of course, she conflates violence with whites realizing that they are deliberately under attack. This attempt to steer the narrative has been done before, and she comes across as a less eloquent version of Jordan Peterson.

This dishonest take on CRT has an obvious interpretation: Borysenko doesn’t object to the anti-white agenda overall, but CRT is too overtly so. Can’t have the whites realizing that they are the targets. It’s a question of tactics here, not beliefs.

She makes the assertion that CRT is used to divide people while keeping a certain group in power. Okay, who’s in power? It probably isn’t whites, considering this is the only group it’s legal to discriminate against.

If Borysenko had simply condemned CRT, or claimed that things were being blown out of proportion, there would have been a lot less to question. However, she denies what is obvious, and claims that people organizing to resist it is an “actual white power movement”.

One has to wonder why she is being promoted as a “thought leader”, when many of the things she says are so obviously false.

Borysenko repeatedly makes strawman arguments. People calling CRT what it is are not trying to start any violent movement, they just want the truth told about this. However, she’s being intellectually dishonest when gaslighting such concerns.

Of course, if you start pointing out (with details) that CRT is anti-white, Borysenko has no problems blocking you. In fact, she seems to enjoy the idea of shutting out dissenting views. Her attitude and actions show that she has no interest in openly discussing what is obvious:

Critical race theory is anti-white, and used to condemn whites.

This isn’t just a one off. Borysenko’s YouTube channel is full of such content. On June 11, she did a stream on Robyn DiAngelo, author of “White Fragility”. DiAngelo isn’t white, but likes to condemn them anyway. Go through Borysenko’s work for more examples.

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh0EMfjhqzM
(2) http://www.twitter.com/drkarlynb
(3) https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1406618460428378120
(4) http://facebook.com/drkarlynb
(5) https://www.linkedin.com/in/karlynborysenko/
(6) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcZgVjM9K34
(7) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av2HN7e8n8Q
(8) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYTy6x7-5V8

Guest Post: Blaise Vanne And Vaccines Everywhere (Part 4)

VACCINES, VACCINES EVERYWHERE, AND NARY A DROP (OF TRUTH) TO DRINK
Part 4 in an on-going series on the greatest scam this side of the Crab Nebula
““A woman has an absolute right to her own body” and “My body, my choice”
– Planned Parenthood… except that this absolute only applies for abortions, not for the
Covid shot

Before we delve into the Covid shot, let me set the stage with some observations and comments on other trojan horse “gifts” from your technocratic elites, and what is outside the scope of this paper:
It is strange, is it not, mes amies, that people who would never think of buying the very first edition of a new car or unnecessarily volunteer for a first time-ever brain surgery, are lining up for the faux vax that has not successfully passed animal trials, and is unapproved for the prevention of Covid except as an emergency authorization – in sum, you legally an un-named participant in a Stage 4 FDA Vaccine Trial. Were you aware of that when you signed up? Or did they just look for gullible people who were manipulated by fear? For now, let’s leave aside that, fast coming down the road, there is now a push to create straight DNA vaccines, to literally change your DNA (courtesy of the same technocrats that brought you Microsoft’s “Blue Screen of Death.”). To wit, here is a sentence from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches: “NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…” Technocracy News summarizes: “Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.” Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Not just a ‘visit.’ Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, he will live with that change—and all the ripple effects in his genetic makeup—for the rest of his life.” And these vaccines are not designed to prevent infection, or its spread – only to stop the majority from getting a more serious case. Which, of course, sufficient Vit D over 40 ng/mL (and under 100), zinc and quercetin will do… only a LOT cheaper

Paired with tis is self-appointed Einstein heir apparent Tom Knight, professor at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab, said in 2007 that “The genetic code is 3.6 billion years old. It’s time for a rewrite.” Might this recall that “Best and the Brightest” cadre that got us into Vietnam? Looks like we have a new replacement crew for them! Knight’s synthetic biology company Ginkgo Bioworks is using its synthetic biology tech to develop COVID vaccines. Apparently Tom knows more than God, you can be assured. And of course the vile Bill Gates funded synthetic biologists believe that they can “do better” than nature with “self-assembling nanoparticles” that will be injected into your body: “With all due respect to nature, synthetic biologists believe they can do better. Using computers, they are designing new, self-assembling protein nanoparticles studded with viral proteins, called antigens: these porcupine-like particles would be the guts of a vaccine.”
To which I have one word. Or make that picture:

Yep, even God Himself (herself? zirself?) couldn’t sink her!

Technocracy News has a lengthy write up on this topic in depth here.

Of course, the current mRNA “vaccine” is NOT a vaccine – which comes from the Latin vaccinus, the word for cows, illustrating the first vaccine from Edward Jenner ~1800 used a small amount of cowpox virus to inoculate others. But wait! In line with the Orwellian rule of co-opting of language first and foremost, Merriam-Webster came out and changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ so Covid ‘vaccines’ can be defined as such. As someone with a graduate degree in linguistics, I am outraged at this…. Depending, of course, on how Webster defines “outrage” (or for that matter, male or female, truth, 2+2+4, or perhaps more germane – the word propaganda).

First of all, it is not the virus itself that causes the symptoms, but rather the reaction to the virus – here a hyper-inflammatory response by the body. Note that the Salk Institute reported in research published April 30, 2021 in Circulation Research that “shows conclusively” the virus is a vascular disease). The hyper-inflammatory aspect is significant, as this is what is behind the hospitalizations and deaths – and also provides a vector by which we can treat the virus… on our own, if the medical authorities won’t let us have medications that actually work, like Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc. And of course, these vaccines do not actually prevent one from getting infected or transmitting the virus, only that the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization permitted their use with the understanding that this would make infections less severe. LifeSite News adds to this, quoting the Pfizer site itself: “Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are not FDA approved but have been released under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). These are novel vaccines that use messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), which is a molecular portion of the virus’ total genetic information. The clinical trials had followed recipients for 2 months after 2 doses. Long-term side effects are unknown. Neither mRNA nor the lipid nanoparticles have been tested in humans. Vaccines commonly use a weakened or killed virus or part of the virus toxin to inject. This triggers the person’s immune system to make antibodies that would recognize and neutralize an infecting virus. A mRNA vaccine works differently because laboratory-made genetic material coding for a part of the virus (spike protein) is injected. It first relies on the recipient’s cells to read this genetic code and make more of the foreign protein molecule for the spike protein. Then it relies on the immune system to make antibodies to this part of the virus. These antibodies are presumed to inactivate the foreign virus and not attack the person’s own cells.” (Note: DNA is that double helix you have seen pictures of in high school, whereas RNA is only one strand. Genetic info in RNA is read by ribosomes, which results in the creation of proteins needed by the cell – the LifeSiteNews.com link has a detailed explanation). But key point is that, per biochemist Dianne Irving, Ph.D., “…while it may be correct to say that the foreign mRNA does not change the DNA structure inside the nucleus, or the DNA structure of the mitochondrial DNA, it does change the functioning of the mitochondrial-bound ribosomes and thus the functioning of the mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA is part of the human genome. Therefore, foreign messenger-RNA causes a change in function of mitochondrial-bound ribosomes, and thus in mitochondrial DNA function. This change in function of the mitochondrial DNA is to produce a foreign protein that it would never make naturally. This change in function of the mitochondrial ribosomes can affect all cells…” And while Dr Fauci tells us the mRNA shot will not impact our DNA, the NIH openly says it does in the article A novel mRNA modification may impact gene expression.

While you may think the vaccine will prevent the spread of the virus, experts have repeatedly told us that is unknown, and we will still need all the lockdown activities as before. Y’know… as if they think we are stupid enough to forget the whole gambit was just to “bend the curve” – which we all dutifully did. Pfizer did tests on monkeys and found that vaccinated animals still got Covid although the duration of infection was shorter. The Pfizer site tells us: “The clinical vaccine trials did not test for Sars-CoV-2 in all participants so it cannot answer the question of whether the vaccine actually reduces infection or transmission of the virus. The trials only tested for presence of the virus if the test subject became symptomatic. 170 of the total 41,135 (0.41%) subjects given two doses of the vaccine or placebo became symptomatic. Of these 170 subjects, 162 were in the unvaccinated group and 8 were in the vaccinated group. From these small numbers of symptomatic test subjects the 90-95% efficacy claims were calculated. The truth is, first the fake news told us Pfizer and Moderna COVID injections did not prevent infections; then they unsure if it prevented transmission. Then in April 2021 we were told that variants can still infect vaccinated people…. except that a few weeks later the story changed again: “A new study shows the Pfizer vaccine does prevent transmission. And of course, as of late April 2021, with 86 million vaccinated, Covid cases are the same as in February two months earlier! Dr. Harvey Risch professor of epidemiology at Yale University, explicitly said in April 2021 that the vaccine companies “provided no information” on their shot stopping the spread of the infection; so if we look at where the vax has been extensively used, Israel, it stops the spread by 50 -60%. This helps herd immunity, but “is not an overnight shutting off of the spread.” This also doesn’t address an individual’s risk – where around 60% of the new Covid cases, per Risch himself, being treated are those who have already had the shot! Epoch Times – which is the new “newspaper of record” in my books, similarly told us end of April 2021 that “At Least 9,245 Americans Tested Positive for COVID-19 After Vaccination; 132 Dead.” So, that Stasi-like “vaccine passport” means what again, exactly??

The need for the vaccine should be predicated on the risk of death one would think. If so, America’s Frontline Doctors White Paper on Experimental Vaccines for Covid-19, using CDC’s own data, reported The Infection Fatality Ratio is 0.003% for Americans under age 19 (in which case, hopefully they can create a vaccine to protect against kids getting hit by meteorites too) to as high as 5.4% for those 70 years of age and above, an 1800x risk difference based upon age! Here are the fatality rates per CDC stats: 0-19 years: 0.00003; 20-49 years: 0.0002; 50-69 years: 0.005; 70+ years: 0.054.

Risks of the Covid jab? Guillain-Barre, which has up to 7% fatality rate, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, a “rare inflammatory condition that affects the brain and spinal cord,” transverse myelitis, a neurological disorder that inflames the spinal cord, Kawasaki disease, mostly in kids under 5, and other listed outcomes are anaphylaxis, stroke, seizures, heart attacks and death. See here for full list.

The issues are so severe that as of March 19, 2021, 19 countries plus Thailand had halted the used of AstrZeneca’s vaccine, either in full or part, due to blood clots, while doctors in Oslo University confirmed three blood clots caused by the vaccine (in April Children’s Defense Fund reported that the Pfizer and Moderna shots could also cause blood clots as well. Just dandy). Professor Pål Andre Holme, chief physician at Oslo University Hospital, said “Nothing but the vaccine can explain why these individuals had this immune response.” See March 18, 2012 article in Science Norway for details, but in sum, they think a lot of this is predicated on “a powerful immune response” to the vaccine. In Germany, March 19, 2021, German Spektrum researchers reported they think clots may be due to an immune response where platelets are activated, stating the vaccine “…activates platelets and thus triggers thrombosis. This preliminary conclusion is being made by a working group made up of Andreas Greinacher from the University Hospital Greifswald.” Perhaps this is why, for example, n CA. and OH. around half of front line medical staff are refusing the vaccine. Incredibly, Mashupmd.com reports that fully 15% of trained, professional US healthcare workers refuse to take the vaccine. Another report tells us 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the vaccine…maybe they aren’t wowed by the rushed science either. I am not a doctor, not did I play one in our high school theatre, but apparently a lot of trained medical staff share the same concerns. As a brief sample of a few related stories, see here via CBS, here at Forbes, or here per fake news LA Times. Just the U.S? Mais non. For example, after taking the vaccine, one report I read (and since lost the source) reported: “The university hospital of Brest in Brittany, Western France saw up to 25 percent of its vaccine recipients call out of work due to severe symptoms like headaches, muscle aches, and high fever. Another report notes that the Hygiene and Safety Committee at the hospital in Périgueux, France reported serious adverse effects occurring in up to 70 percent of their recently-vaccinated healthcare worker.”

There is also the issue of low platelets as elucidated by freelance medical writer and neurobiology postgrad Shin Jie Yong in a March 19, 2021, Medium article, Dr. Goh Kiang Hua, a consultant general surgeon and Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, hypothesized the lipid-coated nanoparticles, which transport the mRNA, may be carrying that mRNA into the megakaryocytes in your bone marrow. Megakaryocytes are cells that produce platelets. According to this hypothesis, once the mRNA enters your bone marrow, the megakaryocytes would then begin to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which would tag them for destruction by cytotoxic T-cells. Platelets then become deficient, causing thrombocytopenia,” Yong writes, adding, “Of course, he emphasized that these are just speculations.” Great. Question is do you want to “speculate” with your life or health?

Another question: Famed reporter Jon Rappoport, who, like other well-known reporters such as
Sharyl Attkisson has “left the reservation,” also questions here whether the COVID vaccination actually “forces cells of the body to produce not one, but hundreds of DIFFERENT proteins. Some of these proteins launch severe and fatal allergic reactions. Other foreign proteins stimulate the body to produce a powerful and continuing immune response that goes on too long; the person becomes severely ill or dies. Still other proteins, which are inherently needed by the body, are now viewed as evil intruders which must be neutralized.” Just “kinda” important to think about before getting the shot, n’est pas?

The anecdotal list of deaths can never be conclusive of course, and the numbers and stories will change daily, but as of as of April 21, 2021, here is a simple point in time snapshot of deaths in a few news articles from the shot:

VAERS: Two-year-old baby in Virginia dead six days after second experimental Pfizer mRNA shot

Darlene Blackwell: 61-year-old South Carolina woman has brain aneurysm, dead 10 days after Johnson & Johnson shot

Rachel McKinney: 35-year-old British healthcare worker develops multiple sclerosis, dead three months after experimental Pfizer mRNA shots

India: actor and comedian Vivek dead 48 hours after Covaxin “inactivated virus” shot

European and U.S. databases show nearly 10,000 total deaths from experimental COVID-19 shots

18-Year-Old Undergoes 3 Brain Surgeries From Blood Clots After J&J Vaccine

https://covidvaccinereactions.com/ also has a great list that is updated regularly. Well, sorta. As of May, 2021, the US government has scrubbed the statistics on vaccine related deaths. Could this be the reason that as of May, 2021 almost HALF of CDC’s employees at CDC’s Infectious Disease branch had NOT taken the jab? Don’t worry, THAT won’t be in your fake news outlet any time soon…or ever, for that matter.
Natural Blaze tells us here that “Based on injury compensation data, the flu vaccine is dubbed as the most dangerous vaccine. In a world where science is king, those who claim to be in charge seem to ignore their own data:
• Published data in the 2011 Journal of Autoimmunity and the 2012 J Trace Elem Med Biol. shows aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, including the flu vaccine, can induce autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome, (ASIA), which include encephalitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis, subcutaneous pseudolymphoma, and siliconosis.
• Adjuvants in the flu vaccine have been associated with an increase in antibodies leading to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes Syndrome. The alum-antigen in many vaccines is identical to phospholipids, which form the cell membrane in every cell, it can attack any part of the body – the eye, cardiovascular system, brain, nerves, skin, reproductive system – but is becoming known for causing heart attacks and fetal death (Journal Lupus. June 2012).
• Children who get flu vaccine are at three times the risk for hospitalization for flu! (American Thoracic Society).
• The 2010 Cochrane Database Systems Review – a systems review of primary research in human health care and health policy – found “no evidence that flu vaccines affect complications, such as pneumonia, hospitalization transmission of flu between people or death.” Further, claims that the flu vaccine cuts elderly deaths in half were negated: “Due to poor quality data of the available evidence any conclusions regarding the effects of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older cannot be drawn.”
• In the aftermath of the 2009/2010 swine flu scare, a 2010 study in the British Medical Journal showed that children in England and throughout the world given the Pandemrix flu vaccine had a 1,400 percent increased risk of developing narcolepsy compared to those not vaccinated.
• A 2011 study in the Journal Vaccine, showed inflammatory adverse events, such as preeclampsia and preterm birth, among pregnant women taking the trivalent influenza vaccine.
• A 2011 study in the Journal of Internal Medicine revealed flu shots result in inflammatory cardiovascular changes indicative of increased risk for serious heart-related events such as heart attack.
• According to a 2012 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in Clin Infect Dis. March 15, 2012, (the first of its kind) conducted in healthy children 6 to 15 years of age, getting a flu shot was found to increase the risk of other respiratory viral infections over four-fold.
• According to a 2005 study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, “There are not enough influenza-related deaths to support the conclusion that vaccination can reduce total winter mortality among the U.S. elderly population by as much as half.”
• In response to mandatory flu vaccines for medical staff, a group of medical professionals published an open 2013 letter in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, questioning whether such mandates are medically warranted and ethically correct. They cited that the flu vaccine: 1) is a “statistical gamble” in targeting actual circulating viruses; 2) shows seventy percent of people are already immune at the time of vaccination, according to FDA studies; and 3) shows no evidence that it affects complications of pneumonia or transmission from person to person, as advertised. No answer ever followed.

Of course, does the vaccine even work? (And if not, the vaccine “passports” are bogus, let alone the fact that the CDC has told us we will still shed the virus after getting the vaccine, and thus require masks – that don’t really work anyway). Here is one report from April, 2021: “In a public statement released on March 30, 2021, the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) acknowledged that 102 “breakthrough” cases of COVID-19 had occurred so far in the Pacific Northwest state — since February 2021 alone. It’s certainly a small amount compared to the 1 million Washingtonians who have already received their two doses. However, of these 100+ people — who all tested positive for COVID-19 at least two weeks after their final dose of the COVID injection — eight required hospitalization, and two died.” Similarly in MI., 246 fully vaccinated resident in one setting were diagnosed, with three dying; and at the same time, MI, which has one of the highest vaccination rate in April 2021 led the nation in new per capita Covid cases. Truth is, other shots, including the flu shot, are less effective in people older than 65, as noted by a 2014 review from Nature Immunology; NaturalHealth365 reports “Of course, neither Pfizer nor Moderna are willing to claim that their injections are 100% effective. Pfizer executives claim their shots are 91.3% effective against symptomatic COVID-19 and 95.3% effective against severe COVID-19. Pfizer does not claim that their injections prevent transmission, reduce the spread of the disease, or even prevent someone from getting infected. They are only claiming that getting a shot will reduce the risk that a person will get symptoms if they end up contracting the virus — a virus that causes only mild or even no symptoms in 8 out of 10 people who come across it…Many other organizations and news outlets will claim that the COVID-19 injection will help reduce the transmission of the virus, even though government officials and Pharma execs readily acknowledge that there’s not enough evidence yet to fully support this contention.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits to this lack of data on their website using the euphemistic phrase “we are still learning” (aka: they don’t know). Interestingly, the CDC claims on the same webpage that the jab is effective at “keeping you from getting COVID-19” and later revises this as “keeping you from getting sick.” To critics and medic freedom proponents, this isn’t just a matter of semantics. Yes, COVID-19 is the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, but the two are often used interchangeably, contributing to the confusion. And not getting COVID-19 vs. not getting symptoms of COVID-19 are two completely different outcomes, at least in terms of “slowing the spread.” So tell me again, exactly, what vaccine passports are good for? But to add fuel to the fire above, Dr. Harvey Risch, professor of epidemiology at Yale, reported end of April, 2021 that 60% of New Covid Patients Have Been Vaccinated. And as exhibit A, the fully vaccinated NY Yankees baseball team in mid-May 2021 saw “their starting lineup crippled (shortstop Gleyber Torres was kept out of Wednesday’s starting lineup during a game against Tampa Bay) and a number of coaches and staff sidelined due to a sudden flareup of COVID-19”; while on the other side of the planet, in just a single occurrence, India reported 37 previously fully vaccinated doctors at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital came down with Covid, which even the co-opted lie-rag NYTimes had to report. (don’t worry though… I think it is part of a broader scam to push the “variant” scare to get the game going). Per research at Texas Tech Univ., looking again at the virus at this time, they “ found that cultured human airway cells exposed to both low and high concentrations of purified spike protein showed differences in gene expression that remained even after the cells recovered from the exposure. The top genes included ones related to inflammatory response.” As you deal with this issue for your family and yourself, always keep in mind that you need to address hyperinflammatory issues.

And if the other concern is that the “vaccine” – which is not, per dictionary definition, a vaccine, but rather gene therapy – impacts one’s immune system at a genetic level. Re. the mRNA Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTechA jabs, if they were vaccines, they would, by definition, inject a weakened form of pathogen to prompt an immune response; instead, in a mRNA shot, one permanently (i.e., once administered, there is no “off” button) self-manufactures antibody proteins. Or as the UK’s Daily Mail says, “The Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines use mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles to introduce mRNA coding for a the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into a person’s own cells to make that protein and thereby stimulate the immune system to react against it .”

Jim Rickards, who has advised the CIA in financial war gaming among other exploits, explains it thusly: “These treatments use experimental genetic modification to inject you with mRNA, which is a partial strand of genetic code. That mRNA then enters your cells and orders the cells to construct a spike protein similar to SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID). This spike protein then precipitates antibodies that can reduce your reaction to SARS-CoV-2 if you get it. But the “vaccine” does not prevent you from getting COVID, and it does not prevent you from spreading it to others. The spike protein remains with you indefinitely. In effect, you have modified your own genetic make-up to fight COVID without actually gaining immunity and without reducing transmissibility. But these vaccines do not prevent you from being infected or spreading it to others. Studies have not gone on long enough to evaluate long-term side effects. These drugs are not FDA approved; they are being distributed under an emergency waiver to avoid the normal approval process. It’s almost like we’re being used as guinea pigs… It is likely that most people receiving the drugs are unaware of these important differences between the new drugs and traditional vaccines, which raises questions about whether their “consent” is fully informed… As far as vaccines go, mRNA genetic therapy is a brave new world — one that is not well understood.”

Even Moderna’s own website states “Typical vaccines for viruses are made from a weakened or inactive virus, but mRNA-1273 is not made from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is made from messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), a genetic code that tells cells how to make protein, which help the body’s immune system make antibodies to fight the virus.” Wired Magazine agreed, stating in a Nov. 18, 2020 article “The active ingredient inside their shot is mRNA — mobile strings of genetic code that contain the blueprints for proteins. Cells use mRNA to get those specs out of hard DNA storage and into their protein-making factories. The mRNA inside Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine directs any cells it reaches to run a coronavirus spike-building program.” You can review what Pfizer itself says on its own website here.

We are just getting started on the Covid gene therapy/non-vaccine scam. Stay tuned for more.

1 Year Later, Media Silent On Christine Elliott’s Admission Deaths “With Covid” And Deaths “From Covid” Conflated

One year ago, Ontario Health Minister, Christine Elliott, was asked in a press conference about the death of a woman who died “from Covid”, as it was officially listed. The interesting thing was that she tested positive for the coronavirus, but that wasn’t acually the cause of her death. Nonetheless, it was formally written up as if it were.

The obvious conclusion one could draw from that was that Ontario (and other jurisdictions) were deliberately conflating the 2 in order to artificially drive up the death toll. In other words, this “pandemic” was being manufactured, at least in part. See this for more examples.

This video was pulled off a Facebook page in early June, which is now unavailable.

To my knowledge, there has never been any follow-up on this, by anyone in any “mainstream” outlet in Canada.

Elliott’s main qualification for being in Cabinet seems to be her being the widow of the late Jim Flaherty, former Ontario Finance Minister.

1 Year Ago, Maria Van Kerkhove Of WHO Suggested 16% Of Global Population Already Infected

June 8, 2020, Maria Van Kerkhove, who claims to be a doctor and an expert, told the world “asymptomatic transmission” was extremely rare.

The day after, a very terrified looking Kerkhove backpedaled, claiming that “very rare” didn’t really mean very rare. She claimed that so-called modelling estimated that between 6% and 41% of the total population had already been infected. She stated that there was a point estimate (whatever that is), or around 16%.

Let’s crunch some numbers:
-The world population was around 7.8 billion people last year.
-6% of that would be 468 million people.
-16% of that would be 1.25 BILLION people.
-41% of that would be 3.2 BILLION people.

This time last year, assuming these models are even in the ballpark, 1 to 3 billion people had already been infected. About 500,000 people had died, notwithstanding how fraudulent the reporting system is.

In her still pinned tweet, Kerkhove tries to explain how scientific collaboration is done, and how different partners work together.

Kerkhove claimed in April 2020 that research papers are being sent to the WHO prior to publication. One has to wonder if the conclusions are “tweaked” in order to suit a particular narrative. She says that all evidence everywhere is looked at, which is reasonable take on its own.

Problem is that you have people like BC Provincial Health Officer, “Babbling Bonnie” Henry, who repeatedly admit that there is no real science behind the things that they do. Is this supposed to be a joke?

Neither Canadian public health officials nor bureaucrats at the WHO will address topics such as the heavy lobbying and financing from the pharmaceutical industry. They won’t delve into the new enterprises that stand to be lucrative from a prolonged pandemic. They go out of their way to avoid these subjects.

They also try to downplay how these gene therapy “vaccines” are not approved anywhere, but instead have some form of emergency use authorization. The manufacturers are indemnified from lawsuits, which removes the incentive to create safe products.

Things aren’t quite what they appear to be.

Any wonder why the idea of “airborne transmission” is now being pushed? They have to keep moving the goalposts in order to keep others from locking in on their lies. It’s also why they are now pushing the “variants” nonsense. Don’t be deceived.

How’s this for a conflict of interest? Kerkhove also works for Imperial College London, which featured Neil Ferguson (Professor Lockdown) and his doomsday modelling. ICL is heavily funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. She also got her PhD at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. This also gets funding from Gates, and partners with the Vaccine Confidence Project — funded by drug companies.

Ever get the feeling that this woman isn’t been transparent?

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQTBlbx1Xjs
(2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Im0G7jb78jc
(3) https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/doctors-call-for-canada-to-adopt-airborne-transmission-protocols-for-covid-19-1.5464013?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3A%7B%7Bcampaignname%7D%7D%3Atwitterpost%E2%80%8B&taid=60c1adecd23e040001810e69&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
(4) https://twitter.com/mvankerkhove
(5) https://twitter.com/mvankerkhove/status/1402705209772675079
(6) https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/the-rockefeller-foundation-announces-key-grants-and-collaborations-toward-the-creation-of-a-pandemic-prevention-institute/
(7) https://twitter.com/mvankerkhove/status/1255917989356019713
(8) https://www.linkedin.com/in/maria-van-kerkhove-4a562b4/
(9) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24-gates-financing-of-imperial-college-london-and-their-modelling/
(10) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24b-london-school-of-hygiene-tropical-medicine-more-modelling-financed-by-gates/
(11) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24c-vaccine-impact-modelling-consortium-more-bogus-science/
(12) https://canucklaw.ca/cv-24d-heidi-larson-lshtm-vcp-vaxxing-pregnant-women-financed-by-big-pharma/