For the very extensive effort to expose the coronavirus hoax, see the previous two dozen articles on the subject. Much of it includes the lobbying efforts, and the money changing hands. Once you understand the money and influence peddling behind the scenes, things start to make sense.
In a June 30 tweet, Toronto Public Health claimed that there were 1,093 (nearly 1,100) deaths due to coronavirus. Interestingly, they neglect to mention that they consider all deaths where a person HAS this virus to be CAUSED by the virus.
These are not the same thing. If a person was run over by a drunk driver and die, the cause of death would be some sort of blood loss or blunt force trauma. Even if he or she had the virus or some other disease, that is not the cause of death. Saying otherwise is fraudulent.
Toronto Mayor John Tory made it mandatory for residents to begin wearing masks, and Toronto Public Health obviously promoted the decision. However, the whole mask demands are about getting the citizens to submit, rather than any real health benefits. No one demonstrates the dishonesty more than Anthony Fauci, the “top doctor” in the U.S.
Anthony Fauci later claimed he only recommended against masks in order to prevent a buying spree which would have left no masks available for health care workers. Motives aside, he blatantly lied to the public. In the third video, he appears to take the mask off as soon as the cameras are off. But remember, trust the experts and official sources.
4. More Lies From Toronto Public Health
The Toronto Public Health feed is full of tweets like this, tracking total deaths. However, it is all based on deception, since Toronto (as many other surely do) treats people who HAVE the coronavirus — or any of these viruses — as if it CAUSED their deaths.
5. City Of Toronto Lies About Virus Deaths
The City of Toronto continues to respond to COVID-19. Torontonians are reminded to continue adhering to Toronto Public Health’s advice to wash their hands often, stay within their social circle of no more than 10 people, and practise physical distancing, or wear a face covering or non-medical mask to protect others when in settings where physical distancing cannot be maintained.
There are 14,134 cases of COVID-19 in the city, an increase of 40 cases since yesterday. There are 233 people hospitalized, with 60 in ICU. In total, 12,215 people have recovered from COVID-19, an increase of 88 cases since yesterday. To date, there have been 1,072 COVID-19 deaths in Toronto. Case status data can be found on the City’s reporting platform.
Provincial Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act orders, the City bylaw on physical distancing, and laws prohibiting consumption of alcohol on City property and in unlicensed public areas remain in effect. Yesterday, the City received 103 complaints related to parks use and physical distancing. Officers have spoken to or cautioned more than 6,600 people this month. Bylaw officers issued nine tickets yesterday in City parks or squares.
The City’s website is updated daily with the latest health advice and information about City services, social supports and economic recovery measures. Check toronto.ca/covid-19/ for answers to common questions before contacting the Toronto Public Health COVID-19 Hotline or 311.
Toronto is home to more than 2.9 million people whose diversity and experiences make this great city Canada’s leading economic engine and one of the world’s most diverse and livable cities. As the fourth largest city in North America, Toronto is a global leader in technology, finance, film, music, culture and innovation, and consistently places at the top of international rankings due to investments championed by its government, residents and businesses. For more information visit toronto.ca or follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/CityofToronto , on Instagram at instagram.com/cityofto or on Facebook at facebook.com/cityofto .
Toronto has 2.9 million residents, and has had 1,100 deaths due to this so-called virus. And there has clearly been some inflation to get it that high. Even if it were true, it would mean that 1 our of every 3,000 or so people have died from CV. It’s obviously completely overblown.
Yet nowhere in this press release is it stated that people who simply have the virus and die are presumed to have died because of it. A little transparency would be nice.
6. Ontario Government Supports Falsification
In a very roundabout way, the Ontario Government admits that on at least one occasion, a person who did not die of CV-19 was classified as that being the cause of death. This woman died in a car crash, but it was still attributed to this virus.
The CDC, the Center for Disease Control (U.S.), has been making it easy to lie and FALSELY CLAIM that a person had died of Covid-19 when it is unknown. Take a look.
It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Other terminology, e.g., SARS-CoV-2, can be used as long as it is clear that it indicates the 2019 coronavirus strain, but we would prefer use of WHO’s standard terminology, e.g., COVID-19. Specification of the causal pathway leading to death in Part I of the certificate is also important. For example, in cases when COVID-19 causes pneumonia and fatal respiratory distress, both pneumonia and respiratory distress should be included along with COVID-19 in Part I. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II. Here is an example:
Look at how it is worded. “disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death”. It doesn’t say that the virus caused the death, but rather assumed to have caused or contributed to death. That is a much, much lower standard.
Why would doctors misdiagnose someone on purpose? A cynic might wonder if it has to do with the extra federal funds that are available for coronavirus patients. Supposedly $39,000 dollars (USD) if it is a covid patient.
Yes, this information has been out for quite a while. Still, it’s worth a reminder about just how deceitful the system is when it’s rewarded financially.
8. Death Tolls Artificially Inflated
If the only way to get the numbers up is to falsify the cause of death (or just not properly determine it), then it’s clear that governments are lying to their citizens. Toronto Public Health has admitted that people who test positive for this virus after death are attributed to the virus, even if that wasn’t the actual cause of death. The Ontario Government has admitted to doing it, and only because they got caught. This goes on elsewhere as well.
CLICK HERE, for #0: Theresa Tam; archives; articles; lobbying. CLICK HERE, for #1: piece on Bill Gates, Pirbright, depopulation. CLICK HERE, for #2: Coronavirus research at U of Saskatchewan. CLICK HERE, for #3: Gates; WHO, ID2020; GAVI; Vaccines. CLICK HERE, for #4: Gates using proxies to push vaxx agenda. CLICK HERE, for #5: Crestview Strategy, GAVI’s lobbying firm. CLICK HERE, for #6: people GAVI/Crestview lobbied follow Gates. CLICK HERE, for #7: M-132, Canada financing pharma research. CLICK HERE, for #8: Canada/WHO & “vaccine hesitancy” research. CLICK HERE, for #9: Raj Saini, lobbied by big pharma (M-132). CLICK HERE, for #10: pharma lobbying in Alberta legislature. CLICK HERE, for #11: ON Pharma; Bill 160 Not Implemented. CLICK HERE, for #12: 2006 report recommends surveillance/vaxx. CLICK HERE, for #13: more on who Theresa Tam really is. CLICK HERE, for #14: AbCellera gets $175.6M from Ottawa. CLICK HERE, for #15: refusing forced medications and vaccinations. CLICK HERE, for #16: Koch/Atlas, both sides in AB court challenge. CLICK HERE, for #17: the CV industry emerging in Canada. CLICK HERE, for #18: buying “vaccine bonds”; GAVI/GPEI grants. CLICK HERE, for #19: the Vaccine Confidence Project. CLICK HERE, for #20: aborted babies used for vaccine development. CLICK HERE, for #21: Gates’ many allies in pharma lobbying. CLICK HERE, for #22: shifting the culture to make masks normal. CLICK HERE, for #23: claim that masks violate religious beliefs.
2. Alternate Theory On Models
Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson has (justifiably) taken a lot of criticism for his doomsday computer modelling of how the coronavirus “planned-emic” was supposed to play out.
Considering Ferguson’s laughable failures in other predictions before, people are wondering why anyone still takes this man seriously. That is a fair question to ask.
But consider an alternate theory. Let’s suppose these doomsday scenarios were cooked up on purpose. Perhaps this modelling INTENTIONALLY led to overhyped conclusions and estimates. It wasn’t incompetence, but deliberate.
Why would someone do this? To answer this, think about where Imperial College London gets a good amount of its financing from. There are many vested interests who would stand to make a fortune if countries around the world were desperate for a vaccine. In this scenario, Ferguson’s modelling should not be taken as research, but as a calculated effort at propaganda.
Disclaimer: I don’t have any hard evidence to support such a theory. However, it is interesting that Ferguson’s work is financed by people who would greatly benefit from him reaching a doomsday conclusion. It’s reasonable to assume he would become more cautious after his repeated failure, but he hasn’t.
3. Gates Grants To Imperial College London
This chart was compiled from information posted on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation website. The following grants are just those provided to Imperial College London. Note: it seems that computer modelling is just one small part of what they do.
AIDS, Malaria, Other Diseases
Test CD4+, T-lymphnodes
Novel Recombinant Adenovirus
Health Package in Dev. World
Neglected Tropical Diseases
Neglected Tropical Dis.
Prevent TB Replication
Collab W/Euro Partners
Feeding Prog in Africa
“Homing Factors” As Vax Adjuvants
Enzymes, Malaria Parasites
Euro Agri Development
HIV Computer Modelling***
Neglected Tropical Disease
Disease From Livestock
Polio Vaccine, India
Malaria Blocker Research
Oral Polio Vaccine
Malaria Computer Models***
HIV, Hormone Contraceptives
HIV, Intervention, Planning
Merger, Computer Modelling***
Advocacy, EU Donors
Product Development, Misc.
Polio Computer Modelling***
DNA Vaccine, HIV
TB Computer Modelling***
Health Care Consulting
Vaxx Research Meetings
Cell Phones, Meals
Cost Estimates, Vaccines
Meals Or Shoes For Vaxx
Optical Imaging, Gut Lesions
Child Health, Africa
Global Health Care
Vaxx for HIV, mucosal
Stop Malaria Transmission
Malaria Tracing Modelling***
Vaxx Computer Modelling***
TB Computer Modelling***
Attend Mosquito Summit
Malaria Control, Africa
Testing Gene Drives
Degradable Contraceptive Implant
Population Replacement In Genes
As for just the funds directly provided to Imperial College London for computer modelling, these are the donations listed on the site.
HIV Computer Modelling***
Malaria Computer Models***
Merger, Computer Modelling***
Polio Computer Modelling***
TB Computer Modelling***
Malaria Tracing Modelling***
Vaxx Computer Modelling***
TB Computer Modelling***
Yes, the Gates Foundation directly finances a lot of the computer modelling that Imperial College London is involved with. Some $16 million or so directly granted for these computer models.
But do these doomsday models actually work? Are they supposed to? Perhaps not. After all, if they predicted that there weren’t deadly pandemic, then there would be no need to develop a vaccine.
4. GAVI Funded By Gates Foundation
This is probably the most well known link in the chain. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped found GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance in 1999, and has made regular contributions to it. The foundation essentially runs the show.
The Global Vaccine Alliance, as the name suggests, is an organization devoted to pushing vaccinations on the public all across the world. Bill Gates has long been a proponent of mass vaccinations.
One of (but certainly not the only) lobbyist for the vaccine agenda is a firm called Crestview Strategy. They lobbied the Federal Government on behalf of GAVI, on 20 separate occasions. See Part 4 in the series.
5. Gates/GAVI Issuing Vaccine Bonds
(Information on what the International Finance Facility for Immunization, or IFFIm, really is and does)
This was covered in Part 18 of the series. Vaccine bonds are now a real thing, and GAVI is involved in running the operation. Of course, the bonds market would completely dry up if there weren’t a pandemic to deal with. Pretty convenient.
While this is by no means an exhaustive list, the point is clear. See Part 21 in the series. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust (which is separate from the Foundation), owns stocks and bonds in many pharmaceutical companies that are pushing the Federal Government for money to develop a vaccine.
7. Gates Funding WHO & CDC
It’s pretty well known at this point that the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control in the U.S. both are heavily funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Consequently, they toe the line that coronavirus is a deadly pandemic, and that vaccines are necessary.
8. Immunization 2030, ID2020
This was addressed in Part 3. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is heavily involved in both ID2020 and Immunization Agenda 2030. The Foundation also supports some version of a “vaccine certification” which would be needed to go about life in the new normal.
Of course, advancing these agendas depends on there being a pandemic (or perceived pandemic). Good thing Ferguson was so completely off in his computer modelling. Make no mistake, it’s not only helpful that the death rates be inflated, but essential that they are.
9. Models Supposed To Be Wrong?
Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Charlotte Reid, a farmer’s neighbor, recalls: “I remember that appalling time. Sheep were left starving in fields near us. Then came the open air slaughter. The poor animals were panic stricken. It was one of the worst things I’ve witnessed. And all based on a model — if’s but’s and maybe’s.”
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that, by 2080, up to 150,000 people could die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay.
Could it be that Ferguson is truly incompetent, and has no clue what he is doing? Or, are his predictions exaggerated on purpose? There’s no reason to take him or his models seriously, yet governments still do.
While this all sounds like an absurd conspiracy theory, consider what else is going on. Would there be a growing vaccine bonds industry without this so-called pandemic? Would it be easy to get the public on board with implanting a vaccine certificate, or pushing Immunization 2030? How else could one get the public on board with making mask wearing seem normal?
It is possible that there is nothing malevolent here, and that Ferguson is just a serial screwup. But it’s undeniable that these screwups help advance other parts of the agenda.
CLICK HERE, for #1: series intro and other listings. CLICK HERE, for #2: suing for the right to illegally enter U.S. CLICK HERE, for #3: the U.N.’s hypocrisy on sexual abuse. CLICK HERE, for #4: fake refugees gaming the system. CLICK HERE, for #5: various topics on subject. CLICK HERE, for #6: Islamic sexual violence, women/children. CLICK HERE, for #7: UNHCR party to S3CA, consultations req’d. CLICK HERE, for #8: UN Blurs Line Smuggling/Irregular. CLICK HERE, for #9: More UN Research Into Smuggling. CLICK HERE, for #10: allowing illegals violates int’l treaties. CLICK HERE, for #11: orgs in court to open CDA’s borders. CLICK HERE, for #12: the Zionist roots of Amnesty Int’l. CLICK HERE, for #13: Canadian Council of Refugees NGO. CLICK HERE, for #14: Roxham Rd. crossings coordinated. CLICK HERE, for #15: Ex-Israeli Ambassador David Berger. CLICK HERE, for #16: NGOs repeatedly undermine borders. CLICK HERE, for #17: reduced penalties for child sex crimes. CLICK HERE, for #18: does CDN Gov’t support trafficking? CLICK HERE, for #19: politicians deliberately keep border open. CLICK HERE, for #20: Soros, lawfare, funding, population replacement. CLICK HERE, for #21: DNA testing to spot smuggled/trafficked children. CLICK HERE, for #22: pushing gay/trans agenda on young children.
2. Media Bias, Lies, Omissions And Corruption
CLICK HERE, for #1: Unifor in bed with Federal Gov’t CLICK HERE, for #2: Global News’ selective truth on TRP granted. CLICK HERE, for #3: Post Media owning most Canadian media. CLICK HERE, for #4: conservative content dominated by Koch/Atlas. CLICK HERE, for #5: origins of Malcolm’s “charity” True North Canada. CLICK HERE, for #6: the people running the Post Millennial. CLICK HERE, for #7: how to do research, investigative journalism. CLICK HERE, for #8: Koch/Atlas both sides, AB court challenge. CLICK HERE, for #9: picking up on predictive programming. CLICK HERE, for #10: Trudeau Foundation & media embeds. CLICK HERE, for #11: Trudeau swapped out for body double? CLICK HERE, for #12: Shanifa Nasser, racism narrative, FHA. CLICK HERE, for #13: George Floyd “murder” was staged psy-op. CLICK HERE, for #14: culture shift to make face masks normal. CLICK HERE, for #15: response times, crisis actors, dummy swap. CLICK HERE, for #16: Trudeau Foundation wields power in Canada.
3. Context For This Article
True, this story broke last year. However, it is worth recounting the media coverup and reluctance to address it, despite all the evidence available.
The coronavirus pandemic and the recent race riots have provided quite the distraction from what should have been an ongoing and consistent investigation. Almost as these events were planned to cover up this story.
This isn’t about rehashing the entire story on Jeffrey Epstein, and his child sex trafficking ring. Instead, the focus is on the efforts to keep the story out of the public eye, and to divert attention.
4. ABC Sits On Story, Whistleblower Fired
In November 2019, Project Veritas released a recording of Amy Robach of ABC talking about how the network had refused to air an interview with Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) implicating Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton, and others.
However, when this “hot mic” moment was released publicly, there was pressure to get the whistle-blower fired. The pressure wasn’t to ask why the story wasn’t aired, but why the news of it not being aired was leaked. But as it turns out, the person who got the ax was the wrong one.
Also chilling is the attitude Robach seems to have. No concern for the victims, but rather that someone else pushed the story that ABC had. She was scooped. It’s telling how being able to continue to interview Will and Kate (for tabloid material) was more important than bringing this story to light. Very messed up priorities.
5. Media Silence Helps 2016 Clinton Campaign
Keep in mind, the “hot mic” moment with Amy Robach happened in the fall of 2016. She mentions how she had the goods on everyone, including Bill Clinton, 3 years ago. (see 4:20 in the video)
What was happening 3 years ago? It was 2016, and Hillary Clinton was running to become U.S. President. Had ABC broken the news about Virginia Guiffre (which implicated her husband, Jeffrey Epstein, and many others), what would have happened to the Clinton campaign? Would it have sunk it? Or, had Clinton won, would ABC have been in the awkward place of having made allegations against the husband of a sitting President?
Now let’s take a look at some examples of the media being far too close to politicians. This doesn’t serve the public interest in any way.
6. Claire Shipman & Jay Carney
Claire Shipman is a former White House Correspondent (with NBC), and now an ABC senior national correspondent for 19 years. Jay Carney was a communications advisor for 2 years (for then Vice-President Biden), and then spent the next 2 years as White House Press Secretary. Carney has frequently appeared on ABC. Shipman and Carney are married.
7. Ben Sherwood & Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall
Ben Sherwood was named President of ABC news in 2010. His sister, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, was a fomer adviser to President Barack Obama, and in 2013 was moved to National Security Staff.
8. David Rhodes & Ben Rhodes
David Rhodes is a former President of CBS News, and a former Vice-President of Fox News. Ben Rhodes is a former advisor to Barack Obama and co-chaired an NGO called “National Security Action”. The men are brothers.
9. Virginia Moseley & Tom Nides
Virginia Moseley was named Vice President of CNN in 2012. Her husband, Thomas Nides, was at a time Deputy Secretary of State under Barack Obama.
10. Chris Cuomo & Andrew Cuomo
This one is pretty well known, but CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, and New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo are brothers. Their father, Mario Cuomo, is a former NY Governor. The Cuomo family was openly supportive of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.
The above examples are just a few instances of the media not being independent of the politics they cover, despite claims to the contrary. There are more of course.
11. Alexander Acosta: Labour Sec, Pedo Lawyer
Alexander Acosta was at one time the Secretary of Labour for Donald Trump. As a prosecutor, he helped hide the plea agreement that sent Jeffrey Epstein to prison for a very short term.
12. Alan Dershowitz, Trump Defense Team
Alan Dershowitz, a well known lawyer, has also taken trips to Epstein’s Island. His name is among those on the Lolita Express. Currently, he is involved in the defense of Donald Trump against impeachment. A cynic might wonder if he is just trying to make himself useful to lessen potential damages that will come later on.
13. Ghislaine Maxwell At Clinton’s Wedding
Though not reported by major networks, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s (alleged) accomplice, attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton. Yes, the daughter of Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Curious to know what sort of relationship with a former President would warrant an invitation to his daughter’s wedding.
Doesn’t Bill look stunning in blue? This mural was found on Epstein’s Island. However, it seems that this look might attract all the wrong attention if done in public.
This is (allegedly) Bill Clinton with a 15 year old Rachel Chandler. There are plenty of compromising photos of Clinton available with a quick search, but won’t be shown here.
Mitt Romney ran for President twice, in 2008 and again in 2012. In 2012, he was embarrassed when the true story of his rise to wealth was widely published. He had had $2 million invested in his private equity fund from Robert Maxwell and Jack Lyons. It wasn’t hard work that made Romney wealthy, it was the right investors. Romney’s story is long and beyond the scope of this article.
But it is worth pointing out that the man who helped make Mitt Romney extremely wealthy had a daughter. Her name: Ghislaine Maxwell. Had Romney become President (either in 2008 or 2012), what favours might he be expected to perform?
15. Bill Gates Visiting Epstein
Bill Gates apologized on Wednesday for his association with financier Jeffrey Epstein, making his first public statements since news surfaced that he had met with Epstein, a convicted sex offender, more often than previously believed.
“I made a mistake in judgment in thinking those discussions would go to global health … that money never appeared,” Gates said during a panel discussion hosted by The New York Times Dealbook series.
“And I gave him benefit of my association,” Gates said.
The Microsoft cofounder has maintained that he believed meeting with Epstein would lead to investments in charities supported by Gates, who along with his wife, runs one of the world’s largest philanthropic organizations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Admittedly, this quite the interesting alibi of Gates to offer. They didn’t meet to discuss underae sex trafficking. They met to discuss the financing of Gates’ efforts to depopulate the world using vaccines.
16. Prince Andrew’s Denial Of Events
This has been ridiculed and mocked by nearly everyone watching the interview. Worth a watch, as the Prince is not convincing in the slightest. He struggles to give any straight answers to questions. Whatever one may think about Virginia Giuffre’s claims, few, if any believe the Prince.
17. ABC, Other Outlets, Owned By Disney
In August 1996, prior to Disney’s acquisition of ABC, Inc., Braverman was named senior vice president and general counsel, ABC, Inc. In October 1994, he was promoted to vice president and general counsel. He joined ABC, Inc. in November 1993, as vice president and deputy general counsel.
Braverman joined Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. from the Washington, D.C. law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, where he started in 1976. He became a partner in 1983, specializing in complex commercial and administrative litigation. Before joining Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Braverman was a law clerk to the Honorable Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., Justice, Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Going through the management list of Disney, there are several executives who were with ABC prior to it being taken over by Disney in the 1990s. Holdouts from the old days.
It’s been out for a while, but plenty of Disney employees have been arrested in recent years for child sex offences.
This is believed to be legitimate copies of flight logs from Epstein’s Lolita Express. Although many passengers are just listed by initials, there are full names in there as well. Note: this isn’t all the names.
19. Why Write This Now?
Yes, the Epstein story was big in 2019. However, just because he “committed suicide”, doesn’t mean the case is over. There are many accomplices who have not been brought to justice. Plenty of questions that still need to be answered.
Whether intentional or by accident, the coronavirus “planned-emic” and the recent race riots have had the effect of making the story disappear from most people’s memories.
CLICK HERE, for #1: Unifor in bed with Federal Gov’t CLICK HERE, for #2: Global News’ selective truth on TRP granted. CLICK HERE, for #3: Post Media owning most Canadian media. CLICK HERE, for #4: conservative content dominated by Koch/Atlas. CLICK HERE, for #5: origins of Malcolm’s “charity” True North Canada. CLICK HERE, for #6: the people running the Post Millennial. CLICK HERE, for #7: how to do research, investigative journalism. CLICK HERE, for #8: Koch/Atlas both sides, AB court challenge. CLICK HERE, for #9: picking up on predictive programming. CLICK HERE, for #10: Trudeau Foundation & media embeds. CLICK HERE, for #11: Trudeau swapped out for body double? CLICK HERE, for #12: Shanifa Nasser, racism narrative, FHA. CLICK HERE, for #13: George Floyd “murder” was staged psy-op. CLICK HERE, for #14: culture shift to make face masks normal. CLICK HERE, for #15: response times, crisis actors, dummy swap.
2. Context For This Article
In order to fairly and accurately report on political and social events, the media has to have a certain level of detachment from the situation. Understandably, one cannot be a part of an organization, yet do any real investigative work on it. There is an obvious conflict of interest.
But that is exactly the case with the Trudeau Foundation. Many prominent members of the media (and former members) are part of the Foundation. This becomes a problem since they do little to hold the Foundation, or the Trudeau Family, to account for anything.
It must be mentioned, however, that Koch/Atlas cronies are prominent in so-called conservative media. Also, Post Media is the parent company of not only mainstream publications, but many alternative ones as well.
What is the result of the media being in bed with the Trudeau Foundation? For starters, they don’t seem to care about how many politicians or judges are also part of the group. Again, the conflict of interest is clear for everyone to see.
4(a). Ed Broadbent – NDP Leader
4(b).Philippe Couillard – QC Premier
4(c). Raymond Chretien – Ambassador
4(d). Michael Fortier – Senator
4(e). Michael Harcourt – BC Premier
4(f). Megan Leslie — NDP Deputy Leader
4(g). Wade MacLauchlan – PEI Premier
4(h). Elizabeth May – Green Party Leader
4(i). Anne McLellan – Deputy PM
4(j). Ed Roberts – NFLD Lt. Governor
4(k). Roy Romanow – Saskatchewan Premier
4(l). John Sims – Deputy AG
4(m). Chuck Strahl – Privy Council
Yes, politicians across the spectrum are also involved with the Trudeau Foundation. Makes one wonder how ideologically divided they are if membership in this group (named after a former Prime Minister), is no big deal for any of them. And things are about to get even worse still.
of course, many of these people have left their positions, but still.
5(a). Thomas Cromwell – SCC Justice
5(b). Marie DesChamps – SCC Justice
5(c). Louis LeBel – SCC Justice
5(d). Beverley McLachlin – SCC Justice
5(e). Lynn Smith – BCSC Justice
Three former Supreme Court of Canada Justices, and 1 BC Supreme Court Justice are also members of the Trudeau Foundation. This won’t help with the impression that the judiciary is independent of the executive branch of government.
6. Jacques Bougie – SNC Lavalin
This person being with both Trudeau Foundation and on the SNC Lavalin Board of Directors wouldn’t have anything to do with how Lavalin got its deferred prosecution agreement, would it? No, didn’t think so.
Of course let’s not forget John McCall MacBain, head of the European Climate Foundation, or Roy Heenan, co-founder of the law firm Heenan Blaikie.
7. Are They All Involved?
Why is the mainstream media in Canada so hesitant to report on topics like the Trudeau Foundation, and why won’t they go into depth when they do? Consider the makeup of past and present members of the Trudeau Foundation:
Prominent members of the media
Politicians of all parties
Supreme Court Justices
Members of academia
What you see is an organization that has members of: (a) the media; (b) politicians; (c) the courts; and (d) universities, all under the same umbrella. There is no independence here, no checks and balances.
Is this the same man? Are they both Justin Trudeau?
The man on the right appears to have a bruise on the left cheek. The bridge of this nose is flatter, and the nostrils are more pronounced. The brow ridge also looks more defined.
1. Media Bias, Lies, Omissions And Corruption
CLICK HERE, for #1: Unifor in bed with Federal Gov’t CLICK HERE, for #2: Global News’ selective truth on TRP granted. CLICK HERE, for #3: Post Media owning most Canadian media. CLICK HERE, for #4: conservative content dominated by Koch/Atlas. CLICK HERE, for #5: origins of Malcolm’s “charity” True North Canada. CLICK HERE, for #6: the people running the Post Millennial. CLICK HERE, for #7: how to do research, investigative journalism. CLICK HERE, for #8: Koch/Atlas both sides, AB court challenge. CLICK HERE, for #9: picking up on predictive programming. CLICK HERE, for #10: Trudeau Foundation & media embeds.
2. “Dave” Movie Released In 1993
Dave Kovic runs a temporary employment agency in Georgetown, Washington, D.C., and has a side job impersonating President Bill Mitchell. He is requested by Secret Service agent Duane Stevensen to make an appearance as the president at a hotel. Dave assumes it is a matter of security, but it is really to cover up Mitchell’s extramarital affair with a White House staffer.
Mitchell suffers a severe stroke during the rendezvous, leaving him in a coma. White House Chief of Staff Bob Alexander and Communications Director Alan Reed convince Dave to continue impersonating the president, telling him that Vice President Gary Nance is mentally unbalanced. Only Bob, Alan, the Secret Service, and the medical staff know of the switch. First Lady Ellen Mitchell leads a separate life, rarely seeing the president, in contrast to their public image of a closely knit couple.
The public is notified that Mitchell has had a “minor circulatory problem of the head”. With Dave established as president, Bob and Alan send Nance on a 12-nation goodwill tour of Africa and implicate him in savings and loan fraud. Once Nance is forced to resign, Bob plans for Dave to nominate him as vice president, whereupon Mitchell will have a more serious stroke and Bob will ascend to the Presidency.
After apologizing to Nance and the country, Dave fakes a stroke and makes a switch with the real Mitchell in an ambulance en route to the hospital. Nance becomes acting president under the terms of the 25th Amendment and is sworn in as president five months later when Mitchell dies. Bob and eight other members of the Mitchell administration are indicted two days after Dave’s jobs initiative passes.
The above is quotes of a plot synopsis that Wikipedia provides. In short, an imposter ascends to the Presidency, and the intent is to have someone take over.
Interestingly, in the movie, there are “conspiracy nuts” who try to raise attention that the President has been swapped out with someone else.
Why is this important? Because it could be an instance of predictive programming. There are rumours circulating that the man occupying 24 Sussex is not Justin Trudeau, but a double. There have also been claims that Chrystia Freeland (now Deputy Prime Minister), is being groomed to take over.
Absurd conspiracy theory? Or is there something more substantive behind it?
As an aside, Kevin Kline looks at lot like the new Melinda Gates, except with a haircut. This is not meant as an insult, but stating an observation. And Melinda doesn’t look anything what we were used to seeing.
3. Recent Changes In Justin Trudeau
The screenshot on the left was taken from the October 2019 election victory speech. The one on the right is from a March 2020 press conference. This Justin Trudeau has a gap between his front teeth, something that hadn’t been noticed before. One interesting trait is that the newer Justin rarely (if ever smiles), which may be a deliberate attempt to make the gap less obvious.
There are virtually no photos available of Trudeau smiling since he returned from his trip to Costa Rica. While he once would flash a smile at any time, the “new” Trudeau has become much more reserved.
The gray on the right was the choice of the publisher, so please ignore. Trudeau looks to have aged a decade between the pictures, but it was really 2 1/2 months. And most of that time, Trudeau was on vacation. The dates are: October 21, 2019, and January 6, 2020.
A lot of media hoopla came out when Trudeau finally returned to Canada, sporting his new beard. Thing is, is isn’t much of a beard, just thick stubble. In his early days in Parliament, Trudeau adopted the Captain Morgan look. Yet all of this is glossed over.
True, wearing the masks is part of the psy-op. That said, there is another benefit: it helps obscure differences in THIS Trudeau’s face. If this is a different person, then it’s wise to avoid drawing attention to it.
It could be argued that these physical differences are circumstantial. Fair enough, except Trudeau seems to have undergone a personality change as well. He is far more measured and controlled, and has lost a lot of his joking side. This may be seen as a sign of maturity, if he didn’t hide from the public 23 1/2 hours per day.
Same man, just aging very badly? Or is it a duplicate, who just wants us to “think” that it’s the real person, but just aging badly?
Look at the tip of his nose, real Justin has a bump, double doesn’t Eye brows and eyes not the same. Ear lobes are different. No teeth in this one, we already know they don’t match.
The double looks like his eye brows are waxed to get that shape.
Comment from YouTuber, Blue Apple
Does it look like the features match? Ears, nose, chin?
4. Staged Affection With Sophie
From the 2020 Canada Day announcement. Considering Justin’s well known boundary issues, this seems incredibly forced and staged. Almost like they weren’t a real couple. Also, are they in front of a green screen?
5. Did “Dave” Become A Reality?
Yes, this comes across as an absurd conspiracy theory. However, this doesn’t at all look like the same man who has been the Prime Minister for the last session.
At a quick glance, this man looks similar enough as to not generate much thought. However, when you look more closely, the differences start showing through.
While the physical differences may not seem like a cause for concern, it’s worth pointing out that Trudeau (at least this version of him), seems to have had his personality removed. His antics and snarkiness have all but vanished. If this isn’t a placeholder, then what is it?
And why hasn’t the media reported on it, or asked questions? It could be that since so many of them belong to the Trudeau Foundation, they have no interest in this issue.
(Political parties registered with Elections Canada)
Rocco Galati is explaining here, here, and here about the corruption of the banking system. He lays out the control of the Canadian debt by foreign private banks.
1. More On International Banking Cartel
CLICK HERE, for #1: restoring 1934 Bank of Canada Act. CLICK HERE, for #2: Rocco Galati, COMER court case, appeals. CLICK HERE, for #3: U.S. Federal Reserve, End The Fed. CLICK HERE, for #4: questions to CDN Finance Department. CLICK HERE, for #5: globalist approved talking points. CLICK HERE, for #6: response from the Bank of Canada. CLICK HERE, for #7: Carney, UN Climate Finance, CCX.
The public is lied to constantly about the national debt in Canada. While media figures and politicians whine about “borrowing and overspending”, they intentionally leave a key piece out of the puzzle: the corruption of the monetary system.
In 1974, then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau (without a mandate), stopped using the Bank of Canada to issue money and started using private banking loans. Money is still artificially created, but at least using the Bank of Canada meant that ownership of the debt remained in Canadian hands. There was no legitimate reason for doing so, yet it is rarely questioned in the media.
Instead of continually drawing attention to this change, politicians and media puppets focus on borrowing itself, not the usurious private loans. They focus on a much lesser issue.
This particularly true among “conservatives” and their parties. While many how about excessive borrowing and debt, few (if any), will discuss the changes to the banking system since 1974. By diverting attention away from the main issue, politicians distract the public, and act as a form of controlled opposition.
This is the current list of registered political parties, according to the Elections Canada website:
Animal Protection Party of Canada
Canada’s Fourth Front
Canadian Nationalist Party
Christian Heritage Party of Canada
Communist Party of Canada
Conservative Party of Canada
Green Party of Canada
Liberal Party of Canada
Libertarian Party of Canada
Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada
National Citizens Alliance of Canada
New Democratic Party
Parti pour l’Indépendance du Québec
Parti Rhinocéros Party
People’s Party of Canada
Stop Climate Change
The United Party of Canada
Veterans Coalition Party of Canada
Note: this is not to endorse any one particular candidate or party. This research is just to see who is willing to address the topic of the Banking Cartel in an open and sincere manner.
4. Some Parties “Do” Address Banking Cartel
Before writing off all politicians and political parties as corrupt, it’s worth noting that some of them do address the corruption of the money system in their platforms. Let’s give credit where credit is due.
National Economic Plan
–Restore the Bank of Canada to its purpose as outlined in the Bank Act of 1938.
-Review and potentially repudiate debt incurred by our public institutions.
-Revise the Investment Canada Act so that foreign investment is prohibited in Class A Banks.
–Withdraw ourselves from organizations such as the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) and International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-Increase the reserve ratio of our banking sector from 0%.
-Establish state-owned trusts or funds (GLCs) in major sectors of the economy under a policy of corporatization.
BANK OF CANADA
(a) Canada currently borrows operating and investment capital from other nations and from international bankers and pays interest on the debt incurred—around $70 million every single day!
(b) The CHP would restore the Bank of Canada to its proper function. It would create and provide Canada’s money supply and provide low-interest or interest-free loans to Provinces, crown corporations and municipalities for urgently needed infrastructure.
(c) Current governments, through incorrect use of the Bank of Canada, have created a blight over the futures of our children as they will be forced to repay the debt plus interest.
Central Banking Central banking is essentially legal counterfeiting that enriches a few at the expense of the many, increases wealth inequality, erodes buying power, constitutes a tax on the unborn, incentivizes consumption over production, leads to a harmful business cycle of booms and busts, creates market distortions and creates inefficient resource allocation. The Libertarian Party seeks to end the central banks monopoly on money supply and monetary policy and move back to a system of free banking.
Restore the 1934 Bank of Canada Act along with the 1938 Amendment and our own amendments, and thereby re-institute the true Bank of Canada, people’s bank, which fully belongs to the Canadian people, and thereby end the usury, inflation, and control of Canadians’ wealth by central banks.
There may be other parties that have adopted similar policies. However, there are other parties who are clearly aware of the banking system, even if isn’t reflected in their current platforms.
5. Green Party BoC Motion in 2012
If adopted, this motion will dramatically change the party’s fiscal policies by introducing the requirement that the federal government borrow from the Bank of Canada.
-WHEREAS government debt is reaching such critical proportions that many countries are currently facing financial collapse because of the interest on the debts they owe to banks;
-WHEREAS Section 91 of Canada’s Constitution (classes 1A, 4, 14, 15, 18, 19 & 20) on the Legislative Authority of the Parliament of Canada stipulates that Parliament has full control of the public debt and interest, as well as the right to issue money;
-WHEREAS the interest on money borrowed by the government through the issue of treasury bills and bonds purchased by banks and foreign governments now accounts for about 90% of the total market debt of $596.8 billion (31 March 2011) owed by the people of Canada, and repaying that interest is advantageous to banks but deleterious to the welfare of the country;
-WHEREAS the Bank of Canada issues interest-free currency into circulation for the benefit of the nation, though this is currently only about 5% of the country’s money supply, under the authority of the Bank of Canada Act it is authorized to make interest-free loans to the Government of Canada to make up budget deficits and is currently doing so, by holding approximately $60 billion in Government of Canada bonds and treasury bills;
-WHEREAS the Bank of Canada currently lends the Government of Canada money interest-free through the purchase of government bonds and treasury bills;
The Canadian government has been running deficits since the Trudeau years, except for a few years under Paul Martin when it was finally, painfully, able to move back into a surplus. But even when running a surplus, the government is still paying down the debt accumulated over those decades – debt which is composed of principal, interest, and interest on interest. And interest on interest is by far the largest portion of that debt. A 1993 Auditor General report said that of the accumulated net debt of $423 billion, only $37 billion was principal – the rest was due to the ‘magic’ of compound interest. Thus, a very large portion of all of the painful cutbacks, program cuts, etc. needed to ‘pay down the debt’ are to pay interest on debts owed to bankers. In 2009 (the last year for which data is available on Statcan), Canada paid $28.882 billion in interest charges. Since then, with a return to deficit budgets under the Conservatives, that figure has been rising.
It doesn’t have to be this way. This system of government borrowing is rarely questioned because the people running our banks and central banks have a vested interest to keep the system as it is because it works very well for them – they receive billions in interest payments for the ‘risk’ of lending governments money.
The GPC Shadow Cabinet believes that this is not a fiscally responsible policy. The Bank of Canada already lends at no interest to the government but when it determines that such lending would be inflationary, it requires the government to borrow on private markets. This resolution would undermine the ability of the Bank of Canada to carry out its mandate to control inflation. This approach to government borrowing is essentially the same as was used in Argentina, leading to chronic hyper inflation at great social cost.
It doesn’t appear that this motion was ever adopted into Green Party policy. Nonetheless, it does show that high ranking people in the Green Party (even in 2012), were aware of the scam that is the International Banking Cartel.
Elizabeth May and Jack Layton (then NDP leader), both knew full well about how the banking system worked in Canada. Yet neither would make it a major issue to be decided by Canadians. One really has to wonder how sincere they were, to intentionally leave this out.
6. NDP Socialist Caucus In 2018
28. Reforming the Bank of Canada Act
Whereas Canada’s national debt, owed primarily to wealthy bond holders, is the primary motivator behind austerity and the resistance to public spending to grow the Canadian economy,
And whereas well over 90% of Canada’s public/government debt is attributable to accumulated interest payments on Government issued bonds, interest on which no goods or services were ever consumed by the Canadian public;
And whereas it is both possible and preferable for the Government to use, as it has in the past, the Bank of Canada, to hold its public debt;
Therefore Be It Resolved that a Federal NDP Government, in its very first year, amend the Bank of Canada Act and proceed as follows, nullifying any international agreements that stand in the way:
Use the Bank of Canada as the buyer of all future Government of Canada Bonds and hold them interest free,
Expand the Bank of Canada as a full service Commercial and Industrial Bank that would serve Canadians on the same terms as the existing private banks. And host in its public service buildings Bank of Canada operations, including in, but not limited to Canada Post Offices, federally regulated airports, and any hospitals under provincial jurisdiction that accept federal monies through the Canada Health Act and corollary agreements.
The Socialist Caucus of the NDP, in 2018, passed a resolution to have the party revert back to using the Bank of Canada as a source of money creation, instead of the private banks.
In the 2019 election platform, the topic of the Bank of Canada was not mentioned anywhere. Pretty bizarre when the Socialist Caucus is the voice of reason on this issue. NDP.2019.federal.campaign.platform
7. Canada’s Major LibCon Parties
This was addressed in Part 2 of the series, the COMER case. In 2011, COMER (and its lawyer Rocco Galati) filed a lawsuit against the Bank of Canada. Beyond the private loans themselves, COMER challenged the idea that meetings with the Bank for International Settlements could be kept secret — despite the BIS effectively setting monetary policy in Canada.
In 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal, effectively ending the case. In short, they gave political deference to the government in allowing it to do such a thing.
The Liberal Government of Pierre Trudeau started in process in 1974. Successive administrations (both Liberal and Conservative), have kept the system intact.
Also worth a mention, the People’s party of Canada (while not a real party), is headed by Maxime Bernier. Bernier was in cabinet during the early part of the lawsuit. It’s therefore extremely unlikely that he isn’t aware of the lawsuit. With his nearly 20 years in finance and banking, it’s not credible that he isn’t aware of how the monetary system works. While Bernier goes on and on about the DAIRY cartel, he never mentions the BANKING cartel. A nice way to deflect.
8. Parties Are Aware Of Banking Cartel
From the information compiled above, let’s ask who is fully aware of the scam that is private bank loans? At a minimum, it includes these parties listed below.
Canadian Nationalist Party
Christian Heritage Party of Canada
Conservative Party of Canada
Green Party of Canada
Liberal Party of Canada
Libertarian Party of Canada
National Citizens Alliance of Canada
New Democratic Party
People’s Party of Canada
Of course, it’s likely that most — if not all — of the other parties know about this as well. However, these are the ones where admissions can be directly proven.
While some on this list do openly campaign against the international Banking Cartel, others choose to ignore it. However, the topic isn’t addressed by the media. Politicians talk about a symptom (the debt), while ignoring the disease (the banking cartel).
It’s a sleight-of-hand that goes on all the time. Focus on the debt, without looking at WHO the money is being borrowed from.
Note: a few of the online debt reports have broken links and are not accessible.
The reality is that the Federal Government borrows over $200 billion per year, and the bulk of it is to pay off old debts. If we still used the Bank of Canada as a source of money creation this would not be a problem. However, the money is coming from private sources.
Rather than going through this cycle every year, one has to ask why not just pay off the existing debt (with a Bank of Canada loan), and then cancel the debt. Instead, successive governments seem content to just let the interest grow.
Taxation is only one source of revenue raising. The other big one is a form of “Ponzi borrowing”. It’s where the government issues more and more bonds in order to cover the costs from other bonds which are now due. Obviously this is an unsustainable system.
Instead of constantly shifting the focus with “overspending” or with “excessive borrowing”, politicians and the media should focus on the privatization of money creation (starting in 1974). Almost everything else becomes irrelevant when you realize this change was done in order to create unending debt. However, they won’t focus on the head of the snake.