Types of Law Archives - Page 27 of 150

June 17, 2022June 17, 2022

U.N. Death Cult: 73 Million Abortions Annually Worldwide

The World Health Organization openly posts and discusses some pretty disturbing and messed up data on abortion worldwide. (See archive).

This expands on a recent Canuck Law article, which estimates that there have been over 4.2 million abortions just in Canada since 1970. This averages out to approximately 20% of pregnancies being willfully terminated. Few are aware of just how big this problem is.

Here are some claims W.H.O. promotes:

Abortion is a common health intervention. It is safe when carried out using a method recommended by WHO, appropriate to the pregnancy duration and by someone with the necessary skills.
Six out of 10 of all unintended pregnancies end in an induced abortion.
Around 45% of all abortions are unsafe, of which 97% take place in developing countries.
Unsafe abortion is a leading – but preventable – cause of maternal deaths and morbidities. It can lead to physical and mental health complications and social and financial burdens for women, communities and health systems.
Lack of access to safe, timely, affordable and respectful abortion care is a critical public health and human rights issue.

And this one is a doozy:

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

This claim is based on work from Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C et al, which covered estimates from the years 1990 through 2019. They used a “Bayesian framework”, meaning dta on pregnancy intentions and abortion were compiled from country-based surveys, official statistics, and published studies found through a literature search. So, it’s not just a straight compilation, but estimates as well.

Of course, if this figure of 73 million, per year, is even remotely accurate, it would be somewhere between 2 and 5 billion children have been aborted since the 1970s, when the movement really took off.

Restrictive abortion regulation can cause distress and stigma, and risk constituting a violation of human rights of women and girls, including the right to privacy and the right to non-discrimination and equality, while also imposing financial burdens on women and girls. Regulations that force women to travel to attain legal care, or require mandatory counselling or waiting periods, lead to loss of income and other financial costs, and can make abortion inaccessible to women with low resources.

Estimates from 2006 show that complications of unsafe abortions cost health systems in developing countries US$ 553 million per year for post-abortion treatments. In addition, households experienced US$ 922 million in loss of income due to long-term disability related to unsafe abortion. Countries and health systems could make substantial monetary savings by providing greater access to modern contraception and quality induced abortion.

A set of scoping reviews from 2021 indicate that abortion regulations – by being linked to fertility – affect women’s education, participation on the labour market and positive contribution to GDP growth. The legal status of abortion can also affect children’s educational outcomes, and their earnings on the labour market later in life. For example, legalization of abortion – by reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and thus increasing the likelihood that children are born wanted – can be linked to greater parental investments in children, including in girls’ schooling.

Does W.H.O. condemn the hundreds of millions — if not billions — of lives that are lost through this? Not exactly. The rights of the unborn never seem to factor into the equation.

W.H.O. attempts to make several economic arguments as to why abortion should be legal and as accessible as possible. Of course, they don’t seem to bother with addressing the long term physical and psychological impacts of women who do abort their children.

The World Health Organization also has its own division on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH). (See archive). It’s funded both by various governments and private companies, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (See archive). They always seem to be around whenever there are population reduction programs involved.

5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences

Enshrining abortion is also written right into Agenda 2030, which was signed by “Conservative” Stephen Harper in 2015. (See archive). It’s item #5.6 on the Treaty.

One might think it strange that population control groups are interested in keeping abortion legal and readily available. Then again, once one realizes the scale of this mass infanticide, things start to make a whole lot more sense.

Furthermore, the W.H.O. and U.N. link to the U.N. Population Fund, their 2014 Programme of Action, and to the Beijing Declaration And Platform For Action. (See archive). In a sick twist, abortion is promoted as women’s rights, and pregnancy an often unwanted evil.

Of course, 50% or so of the babies who are killed would have grown up to become women. This is something that many women’s rights groups don’t get, or at least pretend they don’t.

It’s interesting that groups like the United Nations claim to be against child exploitation and human trafficking. That said, they support encourage practices that ensure the deaths of countless unborn, while their remains can be sold off for a variety of purposes.

It’s even more disturbing that the U.N. keeps detailed and up-to-date records of abortion regulations across countries. Guess it’s one way of tracking where the most victims are likely to come from.

Has abortion been stopped, or slowed over the last 2 1/2 years during this so-called pandemic? Not at all. In fact, it’s one of the few things that were still available in Canada the entire time. Sure, weddings, churches, and funerals were “non-essential”. However, abortion, weed and liquor were still accessible.

SOURCE MATERIAL
(1) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
(2) https://canucklaw.ca/eugenics-in-canada-20-of-babies-aborted-in-pro-choice-movement/
(3) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32710833/
(4) https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-(srh)/human-reproduction-programme
(5) https://archive.ph/uyd8J
(6) https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-(srh)/human-reproduction-programme/donors
(7) https://archive.ph/7tb5Q
(8) https://www.un.org/ohrlls/sites/www.un.org.ohrlls/files/2030_agenda_for_sustainable_development_web.pdf
(9) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development web
(10) https://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-and-development-programme-action
(11) https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/CSW/PFA_E_Final_WEB.pdf
(12) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/UN-Beijing-Declaration-And-Platform-For-Action.pdf
(13) https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/related-health-issues
(14) https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331561/WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
(15) WHO-2019-nCoV Essential Health Services 2020 March 2020
(16) WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services June 2020
(17) https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/AbortionPoliciesReproductiveHealth.pdf

June 14, 2022February 11, 2023

Sports Groups That Took CEWS Money To Enforce Masks, Vaxx Pass

Ever wonder why so many sports groups, including youth sports, were all too willing to enforce masks and vaccine orders? Maybe, just maybe, it’s because of the CEWS handouts they’ve been getting. CEWS is of course the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy. Of course, it’s not practical to add each agency, so searching the registry for individual names is probably the best.

Even at the NHL level, it seems that subsidies were too tempting rather than just treat people normally.

Wild idea, but with so many playing along, perhaps society isn’t worth saving.

(1) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/habs/cews/srch/pub/bscSrch
(2) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/habs/cews/srch/pub/dsplyBscSrch?request_locale=en

OTHER SHILLS FOR MASKS AND VACCINE PASSPORTS
Hotel, Restaurant Groups Getting Wage/Rental Subsidies
Liberals, Conservatives, NDP All Getting Bailout Money
Lawyers, Bar Associations Receiving CEWS Money
Conflicting Out? Lawyers Getting More Than Just CEWS
Churches Are Charities, Getting CEWS, Subsidies & Promoting Vaccines
Trucking Alliance Grants Raising many Eyebrows
Chambers Of Commerce Subsidized By Canadians, Want Open Borders
Banks, Credit Unions, Media Outlets All Getting CEWS
Publishing Industry Subsidized By Taxpayer Money
Gyms And Fitness Centers Getting Subsidies To Push Vaxx Pass
Chapters-Indigo Getting Millions In Subsidies To Discriminate
Jordan Peterson Shills For Vaxx, Suspension Of Civil Rights
Toronto Region Board Of Trade Pushing Vaxx Passports

June 13, 2022July 22, 2024

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

Below is some significant data on temporary foreign workers (TFW) from 1994 to 2013. (See archive). In fairness, the totals differ somewhat from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. Perhaps, the methods of calculation weren’t the same.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

There’s also the issue that “temporary” workers and students often don’t leave when their visas expire. Canada offers many pathways to extend their stays, and there is little in the way of enforcement.

Aside from all the official totals, there are 3 “temporary” programs that are worth mentioning. These lead to hundreds of thousands of foreigners entering Canada each year, and most with some option to extend. There are also pathways to permanent residence. These are:

Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
International Mobility Programme (IMP)
International Students

Let’s look at a decade worth of data, and see where the bulk of these people are coming from. Of course, this should be pretty obvious. This is from page 27 and 36, and focuses on the International Mobility Programme. In fairness, it’s likely that a lot of these people leave afterwards. That said, having the rates would be nice.

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

For reference: the International Mobility Visas (also known as “Working Holiday Visas”) are typically valid for 1-2 years. The charts below refer to the total at any given year.

YEAR	NEW IMP PERMITS ISSUED
1994	64,020
1995	60,358
1996	59,293
1997	61,339
1998	64,405
1999	67,584
2000	71,186
2001	72,525
2002	66,984
2003	58,619
2004	66,757
2005	72,689
2006	81,312
2007	88,217
2008	102,659
2009	106,737
2010	121,642
2011	138,533
2012	148,070
2013	161,541

This is from page 27 of this report. Overall data is from 1994 to 2013. Also, the number of permits has nearly tripled from 1994 (64,000) through to 2013 (161,000).

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	18,567	27.8	1
Australia	7,271	10.9	2
France	7,028	10.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,476	9.7	4
Japan	5,916	8.9	5
Germany	2,467	3.7	6
China	1,801	2.8	7
Ireland	1,615	2.4	8
South Korea	1,558	1.8	9
New Zealand	1,484	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	53,517	80.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	13,240	19.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	66,757	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	19,453	26.8	1
France	8,636	11.9	2
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,701	9.2	3
Japan	6,244	9.2	4
Germany	2,751	3.8	5
South Korea	1,998	2.7	6
China	1,959	2.7	7
New Zealand	1,702	2.3	8
India	1,688	2.3	9
Ireland	1,572	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	52,704	72.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	19,985	27.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	72,689	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	21,469	26.4	1
France	9,767	12.0	2
Australia	7,975	9.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,894	8.5	4
Japan	5,953	7.3	5
Germany	4,211	5.2	6
India	2,295	2.8	7
China	2,242	2.8	8
South Korea	2,009	2.5	9
Ireland	1,998	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	64,813	79.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	16,499	20.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	81,312	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	22,168	25.1	1
France	10,358	11.7	2
Australia	8,220	9.3	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,397	8.4	4
Japan	5,683	6.4	5
Germany	4,809	5.5	6
China	2,822	3.2	7
South Korea	2,363	2.7	8
Ireland	2,259	2.6	9
New Zealand	2,058	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	68,137	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	20,080	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	88,217	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	24,169	23.5	1
Australia	11,879	11.6	2
France	11,505	11.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,813	7.6	4
Japan	6,715	6.5	5
Germany	5,336	5.2	6
India	3,776	3.7	7
South Korea	3,318	3.2	8
China	3,098	3.0	9
New Zealand	2,436	2.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	80,045	78.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	22,614	22.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	102,659	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	23,446	22.0	1
France	14,233	13.3	2
Australia	10,053	9.4	3
United Kingdom	7,983	7.5	4
Germany	6,092	5.7	5
Japan	5,954	5.6	6
India	4,166	3.9	7
South Korea	4,041	3.8	8
China	2,920	2.7	9
Ireland	2,812	2.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,700	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	25,037	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	106,737	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,398	22.5	1
France	16,107	13.2	2
Australia	10,375	8.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	8,161	6.7	4
Germany	6,812	5.6	5
India	6,603	5.4	6
South Korea	5,508	4.5	7
Japan	5,059	4.2	8
Ireland	3,649	3.0	9
Philippines	3,440	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	93,112	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	28,530	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,642	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,979	20.2	1
France	17,509	12.6	2
India	9,961	7.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,386	6.8	4
Australia	9,160	6.6	5
Germany	6,854	4.9	6
Japan	6,284	4.5	7
South Korea	6,014	4.3	8
Philippines	5,514	4.0	9
Ireland	5,247	3.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	103,908	75.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	34,625	25.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	138,533	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	29,833	20.1	1
France	17,951	12.1	2
India	11,368	7.7	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,771	6.6	4
Australia	9,135	6.2	5
Germany	6,932	4.7	6
Japan	6,436	4.3	7
Ireland	6,231	4.2	8
South Korea	6,144	4.1	9
Philippines	5,387	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	109,188	73.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,882	26.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	148,070	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	30,399	18.8	1
France	19,971	12.4	2
India	14,251	8.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	10,189	6.3	4
Australia	9,840	6.1	5
Ireland	7,076	4.4	6
Japan	6,723	4.1	7
Philippines	6,703	4.1	8
Germany	6,386	4.0	9
South Korea	5,885	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	117,423	72.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	44,118	27.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,541	100	—

It should also be mentioned: it’s likely that a lot more of people from this program will actually leave afterwards, as opposed to international students, and the TFWP.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

(B.0) https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/statistics-open-data.html
(B.1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/cic/MP43-333-1999-eng.pdf
Canada Immigration Facts And Figures 1998
(B.2) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/MP43-333-2000E.pdf
(B.3) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/cic/Ci1-8-10-2013-eng.pdf
Temporary Migration In Canada 2004-2013

June 12, 2022July 21, 2024

Source Countries For “Temporary” Workers: 2004-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
International Mobility Programme (IMP)
International Students

Let’s look at a decade worth of data, and see where the bulk of these people are coming from. Of course, this should be pretty obvious. This is on page 17.

Starting with the TFWP: it should be apparent from the data provided that the Philippines is consistently at the top of the TFWP.

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

Note: these figures are considerably less than the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. It’s unclear why, but perhaps this doesn’t encompass all portions. In any event, we can at least see where people are coming from.

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	13,812	37.1	1
United States	4,423	11.9	2
India	2,714	7.3	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	2,636	7.1	4
Japan	1,125	3.0	5
France	1,095	2.9	6
South Africa	918	2.5	7
Australia	847	2.3	8
China	537	1.4	9
South Korea	513	1.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	28,620	76.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	8,602	24.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	37,222	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	16,561	38.1	1
United States	4,721	10.9	2
India	3,560	8.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,179	7.3	4
France	1,233	2.8	5
Japan	1,042	2.4	6
South Africa	972	2.2	7
Australia	867	2.0	8
Germany	827	1.9	9
China	642	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	33,004	76.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	10,415	24.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	43,419	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	21,362	39.5	1
United States	4,924	9.1	2
India	4,249	7.9	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,568	6.6	4
France	1,509	2.8	5
Germany	1,225	2.3	6
Japan	1,055	2.0	7
South Korea	1,020	1.9	8
Australia	984	1.8	9
Thailand	847	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	40,743	75.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	13,275	24.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	54,018	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	32,451	41.4	1
India	6,250	8.0	2
United States	5,456	6.9	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,402	5.6	4
China	2,447	3.1	5
Mexico	2,337	3.0	6
France	1,928	2.5	7
Germany	1,905	2.4	8
South Korea	1,531	2.0	9
Australia	1,234	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	59,941	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	18,420	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	78,361	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	46,816	42.3	1
India	8,333	7.5	2
United States	6,305	5.7	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,812	5.3	4
Mexico	4,819	4.4	5
South Korea	2,922	2.6	6
Germany	2,743	2.5	7
China	2,727	2.7	8
France	2,309	2.1	9
Japan	1,684	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	78,165	70.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	32,464	29.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	110,629	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	51,019	45.3	1
India	8,287	7.4	2
United States	6,242	5.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,657	5.0	4
Mexico	4,467	4.0	5
South Korea	3,101	2.8	6
France	2,435	2.2	7
Germany	2,349	2.1	8
China	2,239	2.0	9
Japan	1,523	1.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,319	77.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	25,266	22.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	112,585	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	44,401	50.8	1
India	7,338	8.0	2
United States	5,044	5.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,165	4.5	4
Mexico	2,747	3.0	5
France	2,409	2.6	6
South Korea	2,305	2.5	7
China	1,717	1.9	8
Guatemala	1,468	1.6	9
Germany	1,378	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	72,972	79.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	19,182	20.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	92,154	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	36,984	45.3	1
India	5,728	7.0	2
United States	4,937	6.1	3
Mexico	4,019	4.9	4
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,749	4.6	5
France	2,664	3.3	6
South Korea	2,210	2.8	7
China	1,568	1.9	8
Guatemala	1,523	1.9	9
Jamaica	1,188	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	64,570	79.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	17,016	20.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	81,586	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	36,501	42.1	1
India	6,520	7.5	2
United States	5,741	6.6	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,052	4.7	4
Mexico	2,983	3.4	5
France	2,924	3.4	6
South Korea	2,517	2.9	7
Guatemala	2,036	2.3	8
China	1,632	1.9	9
Thailand	1,403	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	66,039	76.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	20,671	23.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	86,710	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	40,655	39.0	1
India	7,930	7.6	2
United States	5,861	5.6	3
United Kingdom	4,941	4.7	4
Mexico	4,226	4.1	5
South Korea	3,369	3.5	6
France	3,230	3.1	7
Guatemala	2,504	2.4	8
Jamaica	2,234	2.1	9
Ireland	2,078	2.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	77,028	74.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	27,132	26.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	104,160	100	—

Of course, this is just a snapshot from a decade, but it shows the patterns. It’s also worth noting that the TFWP has many pathways to extend visas, or to transition in permanent residents.

A quick look will show that Canada went from 37,000 or so visas in 2004, to issuing 104,000 in 2013. That has not gone on unnoticed.

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

This point had been made before, but is important to go over again. (See archive). In 2013/2014, the “Conservative” Government of Stephen Harper faced backlash for how many TFWs were coming into the Canada, and the effect of reducing wages.

Instead of making serious cuts — as was implied — the Government split up the program, and bumped up the number of people who could come under the International Mobility Programme. This had the effect of appearing (on paper) that significant reductions had occurred, but was really a sleight-of-hand.

The International Mobility Programme will be covered in greater detail later, but here is some background information on it.

And sure, there’s always the claim that immigration and temporary workers will grow the economy. Yes, but which economies? Perhaps many aren’t up to date on some of the statistics surrounding remittances sent abroad from Canada. Or sent globally.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

June 5, 2022August 6, 2022

Taking That Last Step To See Through The Lies….

Credit for the artwork goes to Bill Huston, and please visit his website. Also, this confrontation with Andrew Kaufman and Judy Mikovits is very much worth the watch. The full livestream is available online and mirrored for anyone wanting it.

Plenty of decent people across the world are fully aware that their freedoms have been crushed in a planned and deliberate manner since 2020. They see that these “conspiracy theories” of using a so-called pandemic to implement societal control turned out to be accurate. Kudos to them for that.

But, there’s one step many won’t take: admit there’s no virus.

Why does this last step matter? Because it’s the pipeline to realizing how deep the pharma rabbit hole goes. If there’s no “Covid-19”, then it means all of the testing equipment is completely faulty and invalid. Moreover, all of the other “viruses” discovered over the years would be immediately suspect. If no viruses have ever been proven to exist, then virology — and germ theory itself — come crashing down. In order to preserve the medical industry, then this lie needs to be protected at all costs.

Why are theories of lab leak and/or bioweapon promoted? Because they attempt to explain the origins of this “virus”, rather than look into whether it’s even real.

How is a “case” defined, according to the World Health Organization? (See archive).

Notwithstanding how vague “suspected” and “probable” cases are, the definitions for so-called confirmed cases are equally dubious.

A person with a positive Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT)
A person with a positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-RDT AND meeting either the probable case definition or suspect criteria A OR B
An asymptomatic person with a positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-RDT who is a contact of a probable or confirmed case.

NAAT testing doesn’t prove anything, which will be addressed later. Also, everyone, including the WHO, admits these tests aren’t reliable.

Not only is there the issue of no isolation, WHO recommends in its March 2020 (see page 3), and September 2020 (see page 8), guidance NOT to isolate for routine testing.

Perhaps WHO just doesn’t want proper testing done normally to save money?! Well, not really, their own paperwork (see archive) indicates that they view testing for just a gene to be sufficient.

If no virus has even been isolated or shown to exist, then what have doctors been prescribing over the years? Are they morons, or just being paid off?

Admittedly, it wasn’t really a topic addressed here for quite a while. However, the time has long come for hitting this home. And what is the definition of a “Covid death”? According to the World Health Organization, it is:

2. DEFINITION FOR DEATHS DUE TO COVID-19
A death due to COVID-19 is defined for surveillance purposes as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death.
.
A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer) and should be counted independently of preexisting conditions that are suspected of triggering a severe course of COVID-19.

Unfortunately, this isn’t satire. The WHO actually provides this incredibly vague and meaningless definition. Only a complicit and deliberately obtuse media wouldn’t expose this. (See archive), as the original has either been deleted or moved.

The BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC), admitted in April 2020 that these tests can’t actually determine active infection. (See original). Also, the 30% error rate is apparently just a commonly quoted statistic, not the result of real research.

There was an article in June 2020 (now deleted), where BCPHO Bonnie Henry warned against mass testing, as false positives could overburden hospitals. See archives here and here.

To repeat: considering that there is no virus isolation, and these tests aren’t designed for infection anyway, what exactly is being tested for?

Why is this virus pushed, despite lack of proof it exists?
Why have other viruses been pushed, despite lack of proof they exist?
Why does WHO recommend against isolation in regular testing?
Why does WHO see testing for a gene as sufficient?
Why is the definition of “Covid death” so convoluted?
Why does Bonnie Henry admit false positives could flood hospitals?
Why does the BCCDC admit these tests can’t determine infection?

These are just a few of the core problems.

There’s also all kinds of proof that this was planned in advance. And people should wonder about connections like the Rockefeller Foundation to the University of Toronto.

Of course, this isn’t to say that everyone who still believes in germ theory or viruses is a grifter or shill. Plenty of well meaning people are still caught up in that. They RIGHTLY recognize martial law being imposed, but can’t bring themselves to admit that it’s all been a lie.

Many accept that 90-95% of this is a lie, but can’t come to that last part.

That being said, there are still some basic questions that need answering.

Simply saying: “I oppose masks, vaccine passports and lockdowns” is a safe position to take. It doesn’t address the depth of the hoax.

And if you haven’t checked out the work from Fluoride Free Peel, go do that. This deadly “virus” hasn’t been isolated or proven to exist, anywhere in the world. Additionally, it doesn’t appear that any others have been either. There’s also a pretty interesting set of Google docs available from A Warrior Calls, worth checking out.

(1) https://www.bitchute.com/video/qm1z7PhGXnGe/
(2) https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Surveillance_Case_Definition-2020.2
(3) WHO-2019-nCoV-Surv_Case_Definition-2020.
(4) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf
(5) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf
(6) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-Guidelines-Classification-Of-Death.pdf
(7) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-COVID-19-laboratory-Testing-March-17-2020.pdf
(8) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-2019-nCoV-laboratory-September-11-2020-Guidelines.pdf
(9) https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf
(10) Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR
(11) https://www.bitchute.com/video/iKXqxr8RgNQz/
(12) https://odysee.com/@CanuckLaw:8/Definitions-Matter:d
(13) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BC-COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf
(14) http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Professionals-Site/Documents/COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf
(15) https://www.glaciermedia.ca/bc-news/bonnie-henry-warns-businesses-against-covid-testing-4682197
(16) https://archive.ph/U2k6g
(17) Wayback Machine
(18) https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
(19) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BZ7kHlWeg5pcvLMFvC-Hao8pIc4hiM-o
(20) https://www.youtube.com/c/BillHustonPodcast
(21) https://www.chancellorscircle.utoronto.ca/members/the-rockefeller-foundation/

June 2, 2022February 14, 2023

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

This piece focuses on the problem that is the United States border, particularly the side with Mexico. There have been many interests vested in not securing it. Consequently, people flood in illegally, since there’s little reason not to.

Why should Canadians care about this?

The answer is simple: it’s not just an American problem. Open borders threatens the sovereignty of nations in general. Not only that, many of those illegal aliens will surely be working their way to Canada, given the generous welfare benefits available.

Unfortunately, far too few Canadians, including many “conservatives”, fail to realize that open borders changes everything. The makeup of the country impacts everything: voting patterns; finance; culture; crime; and future immigration policies. And the mantra “just come legally” misses the bigger picture.

For an earlier piece on the estimated real scale of illegals in the U.S., north of 22 million. There was also this gem in 2018, suing for the right to illegally enter the U.S.

Now, let’s get into some of the data from the USCBP, or the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. The numbers are quite shocking indeed.

A note about “fiscal year”: Fiscal Year 2022 runs October 01, 2021 – September 30, 2022. All of the years seem to be done in this format.

“Recidivism” in the context of CBP refers to the percentage of people who are detained multiple times within the same fiscal year. It’s been approximately 25% the last few years, meaning 1/4 of people caught and forced to leave are caught again. There doesn’t seem to be much of a deterrent. As for drugs being brought in:

Month	Marijuana	Cocaine	Heroin	Meth	Fentanyl	Other
October 2021	376	220	0	290	73	3
November 2021	191	73	0	581	84	3
December 2021	127	102	66	559	26	4
January 2022	360	39	0	457	65	56
February 2022	785	90	2	268	12	27
March 2022	58	50	2	224	13	4
April 2022	259	186	14	479	174	19

Data from the 2022 fiscal year (thus far). The C.B.P. also provides recent statistics on the drug busts that have occurred from people trying to bring narcotics into the country. While it’s nice to have these seizures, it’s likely just a drop in the bucket as to what really goes on.

AGENCY INVOLVED	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office of Field Operations Encounters	216,370	281,881	288,523	241,786	294,352	259,057
U.S. Border Patrol Total Encounters	310,531	404,142	859,501	405,036	1,662,167	1,219,920
Total Enforcement Actions	526,901	683,178	1,148,024	646,822	1,956,519	1,478,977

For “enforcement actions”, this refers to: individuals encountered at ports of entry who are seeking lawful admission into the United States but are determined to be inadmissible, individuals presenting themselves to seek humanitarian protection under our laws, and individuals who withdraw an application for admission and return to their countries of origin within a short timeframe. This is according to the CBP’s own definition.

In other words, it’s the number of people who show up LEGALLY to border ports of entry and then are turned away. It doesn’t cover the vast numbers who enter illegally between border ports.

CATEGORY	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office Of Field Operations
Criminal Non-Citizens	10,596	11,623	12,705	7,009	6,567	9,101
NCIC Arrests	7,656	5,929	8,546	7,108	8,979	5,580
U.S. Border Patrol
Criminal Noncitizens Encountered	8,531	6,698	4,269	2,438	10,763	5,985
Criminal Noncitizens With Warrants	2,675	1,550	4,153	2,054	1,904	525

There have also been considerable amounts of arrests for people who either had criminal records, and/or outstanding warrants. This doesn’t include people who entered without being detected.

GANG ARRESTS	FY15	FY16	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
18th Street	84	47	61	145	168	36	28	66
MS-13	335	253	228	413	464	72	113	149
Paisas	73	119	53	62	90	93	79	80
Other	352	283	194	188	254	162	128	98
Total	844	702	536	808	976	363	348	393

There have also been gang-related arrests of people attempting to enter the United States. Of course, not all are included, just a few which represent the larger numbers of arrests.

Concerning arrests of suspected terrorists (all nationalities), CBP provides some data of people detained at both the Southern and Northern borders.

TERRORISTS AT BORDER	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Southern Border	116	155	280	72	103	42
Northern Border	217	196	258	124	54	115
Total	333	351	538	196	157	157

How many encounters does the U.S. Government have overall? Thankfully, they do provide more data, and a lot of it is mind blowing.

Nationwide Encounters
.
Encounter data includes U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Title 8 Apprehensions, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 Inadmissibles, and Title 42 Expulsions for fiscal years (FY) 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data is available for the Northern Land Border, Southwest Land Border, and Nationwide (i.e., air, land, and sea modes of transportation) encounters.

FISCAL YEAR	2019	2020	2021	2022
October	60,781	45,139	71,929	164,849
November	62,469	42,643	72,113	174,849
December	70,694	40,565	73,994	179,254
January	58,317	36,585	78,414	154,816
February	76,545	36,687	101,099	165,900
March	103,731	34,460	173,277	221,144
April	109,415	17,106	178,795	234,088
May	114,116	23,237	180,597	–
June	104,311	33,049	189,034	–
July	81,777	40,929	213,593	–
August	62,707	50,014	209,840	–
September	57,674	192,001	227,547	–
TOTAL	962,533	458,088	1,734,686	1,141,054 (so far)

Once more, how many people are simply sneaking in undetected?

The data can further be broken down by the type of person/people coming:

Accompanied Minors (AM)
Individuals in a Family Unit (FMUA)
Single Adults
Unaccompanied Children (UC)

While there are clearly a lot of people who get stopped by the various departments, an awful lot don’t. They are let in through some pathway, or just sneak in.

It also doesn’t help that there are countless Sanctuary Cities and States, which do an end run around border security. If people know they can get social services without the risk of being deported, many more will come.

Again, this is not just an American issue. Many of the hordes flooding into the U.S. will eventually make their way North. Canadians should absolutely be worried about this.

Don’t worry, there will be much more included on this subject in the near future. This can’t be done justice by a single piece.

(1) https://www.cbp.gov/
(2) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
(3) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters
(4) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
(5) https://canucklaw.ca/true-scale-of-illegals-in-us-22-million-more-amnesty-coming/
(6) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-2-migrant-caravan-lawyers-sue-for-right-to-legally-invade-u-s/
(7) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-10b-sanctuary-cities-an-end-run-around-having-borders/

Category: Types of Law

U.N. Death Cult: 73 Million Abortions Annually Worldwide

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

Like this:

Sports Groups That Took CEWS Money To Enforce Masks, Vaxx Pass

Like this:

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Source Countries For “Temporary” Workers: 2004-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Taking That Last Step To See Through The Lies….

Like this:

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

Like this:

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: