Population Replacement Archives - Page 2 of 11

July 3, 2022July 21, 2024

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1966 To 1979 Data

Here’s some data going back to the 1960s. These years feature quite differently than more recent reports. The United States and United Kingdom were consistently at the top of the source countries list. That has since been replaced by China, India and the Philippines. White genocide (a.k.a “replacement”) is a very real thing.

According to the United Nations, enacting policies designed to bring about the destruction of an ethnic, racial, or religious group (in all or in part), is considered genocide. Consequently, forced multiculturalism and population replacement should be viewed through that lens.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Source Countries From 1966 To 1979

Let’s look at the “official” numbers from 1966 to 1979. The U.S. and U.K. are still featured prominently, something that will change in the coming years.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1966
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	63,291	32.5	1
Italy	31,625	16.2	2
United States	17,514	9.0	3
Germany	9,263	4.8	4
Portugal	7,930	4.0	5
France	7,872	4.0	6
Greece	7,174	3.7	7
China	4,094	2.1	8
West Indies	3,935	2.0	9
Netherlands	3,794	1.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	156,492	80.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,251	19.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	194,743	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1967
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	62,420	28.0	1
Italy	30,055	13.4	2
United States	19,038	8.6	3
Germany	11,779	5.3	4
Greece	10,650	4.6	5
France	10,122	4.5	6
Portugal	9,500	4.2	7
West Indies	8,403	3.8	8
China	6,409	2.9	9
Australia	4,967	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	173,343	77.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	49,533	22.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	222,876	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1968
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	37,889	20.6	1
United States	20,422	11.1	2
Italy	19,774	10.8	3
Germany	8,966	4.8	4
China	8,382	4.6	5
France	8,184	4.4	6
Austria	8,125	4.4	7
Greece	7,739	4.2	8
Portugal	7,738	4.2	9
West Indies	7,563	4.1	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	104,782	57.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	79,192	43.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	183,974	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1969
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	31,977	19.8	1
United States	22,785	14.1	2
West Indies	13,093	8.1	3
Italy	10,383	6.4	4
China	8,272	5.1	5
Portugal	7,182	4.4	6
Greece	6,937	4.3	7
Germany	5,880	3.6	8
France	5,549	3.4	9
India	5,395	3.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	117,453	72.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	44,078	27.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,531	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1970
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	26,497	18.7	1
United States	24,424	16.5	2
West Indies	12,456	8.4	3
Italy	8,533	5.8	4
Portugal	7,902	5.4	5
Greece	6,327	4.3	6
Yugoslavia	5,672	3.8	7
India	5,670	3.8	8
China	5,377	3.6	9
France	4,410	2.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	101,596	68.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,118	31.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	147,714	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1971
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	24,366	20.0	1
United Kingdom	15,451	12.8	2
Portugal	9,157	7.5	3
Italy	5,790	4.8	4
India	5,313	4.4	5
China	5,009	4.1	6
Greece	4,769	3.9	7
Philippines	4,180	3.4	8
Yugoslavia	2,997	2.4	9
France	2,966	2.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	79,998	66.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	41,902	34.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,900	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1972
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	22,618	18.5	1
United Kingdom	18,197	14.9	2
Portugal	8,737	7.2	3
Hong Kong	6,297	5.2	4
India	5,049	4.1	5
Uganda	5,021	4.1	6
Italy	4,608	3.8	7
Greece	4,016	3.3	8
Philippines	3,946	3.2	9
France	2,742	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,231	66.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	40,775	33.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	122,006	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1973
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	26,973	14.6	1
United States	25,242	13.7	2
Hong Kong	14,662	8.0	3
Portugal	13,483	7.3	4
Jamaica	9,363	5.1	5
India	9,203	5.0	6
Philippines	6,757	3.7	7
Greece	5,833	3.2	8
Italy	5,468	3.0	9
Trinidad-Tobago	5,138	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	122,122	66.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	62,078	33.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	184,200	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1974
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	38,456	17.6	1
United States	26,541	12.1	2
Portugal	16,333	7.5	3
India	12,868	5.9	4
Hong Kong	12,704	5.8	5
Jamaica	11,286	5.2	6
Philippines	9,564	4.4	7
Greece	5,632	2.6	8
Italy	5,226	2.4	9
Haiti	4,857	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	143,467	65.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	74,998	34.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	218,465	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1975
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	34,978	18.6	1
United States	20,155	10.7	2
Hong Kong	11,132	5.9	3
India	10,144	5.4	4
Portugal	8,390	4.5	5
Jamaica	8,211	4.4	6
Philippines	7,364	3.9	7
Italy	5,078	2.7	8
Guyana	4,394	2.3	9
South Korea	4,314	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	114,163	60.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	73,718	39.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	187,881	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1976
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	21,548	14.4	1
United States	17,315	11.6	2
Hong Kong	10,725	7.2	3
Jamaica	7,282	4.9	4
Lebanon	7,161	4.8	5
India	6,733	4.5	6
Philippines	5,939	4.0	7
Portugal	5,344	3.6	8
Italy	4,530	3.0	9
Guyana	3,430	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	90,007	60.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	59,422	39.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	149,429	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1977
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	17,977	15.6	1
United States	12,888	11.2	3
Hong Kong	6,371	5.5	3
Philippines	6,232	5.4	4
India	5,555	4.8	5
Lebanon	3,847	3.3	6
Portugal	3,579	3.1	7
Italy	3,411	3.0	8
France	2,757	2.4	9
Guyana	2,472	2.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	65,089	56.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	49,825	43.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	114,914	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1978
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	11,801	13.7	1
United States	9,945	11.5	2
India	5,110	5.9	3
Hong Kong	4,740	5.5	4
Philippines	4,370	5.1	5
Portugal	3,086	3.6	6
Italy	2,976	.43	7
France	1,754	2.9	8
South Africa	1,653	1.9	9
Lebanon	1,454	1.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	46,880	54.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,424	45.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	86,313	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1979
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	19,859	17.7	1
United Kingdom	12,853	11.5	2
United States	9,617	8.6	3
Hong Kong	5,966	5.3	4
India	4,517	4.0	5
Laos	3,903	3.5	6
Philippines	3,873	3.5	7
Jamaica	3,213	2.9	8
Guyana	2,473	2.2	9
China	2,058	2.1	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	68,332	61.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	43,764	39.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	112,096	100	—

Permanent Residents: U.S., Europe and Australia as a percentage of overall migration globally. The vast majority of people getting PR in recent years aren’t from those areas.

YEAR	# U.S.	% U.S.	# Eur.	% Eur.	# Aust	% Austr	# Other	% Other
1973	25,242	13.7	71,883	39.0	2,096	1.1	84,979	46.1
1974	26,541	12.1	88,694	40.6	2,022	0.1	102,208	46.3
1975	20,155	10.7	72,898	38.8	1,654	0.1	87,174	46.4
1976	17,315	11.5	49,908	33.3	1,387	0.1	80,819	54.1
1977	12,888	11.2	40,747	35.5	1,063	0.1	60,216	52.4
1978	9,945	11.5	30,075	34.8	1,233	1.4	45,060	52.2
1979	9,617	8.6	32,858	29.3	808	0.1	68,813	61.4

3. More Recent Statistics On Immigration Source Countries

The above may not seem too bad, but keep in mind that the trends are about to get a whole lot worse. Here are numbers from within the last decade. Of course, this doesn’t include the hordes of students and “temporary” workers who come and don’t leave.

(Page 16 of the 2015 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 10 of the 2016 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 14 of the 2017 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 28 of the 2018 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2019 Annual Report to Parliament)

Notice any major changes? The U.K. and U.S. are nowhere near as prominent as they once were, and the demographic replacement is accelerating.

Of course, this doesn’t address the levels of student visas and “temporary” workers, which would increase drastically in the coming years.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

June 30, 2022

Gov’t Recommends More Pathways For Hong Kong Residents To Come

The Canadian Government has posted its take on the report by the Immigration Committee in Parliament. This concerns the topic: “Safe Haven in Canada: Special Immigration and Refugee Measures are Urgently Needed for the People of Hong Kong”.

The responses are not encouraging. Overall, Ottawa seems to favour more people coming to Canada, and less accountability overall. While most of the recommendations are specific to Hong Kong, there’s little interest in legitimate security concerns related to China.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

Recommendation 1
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issue study permits to Hong Kong applicants who have been accepted in a study program at an institution with a COVID-19 readiness plan, regardless of their age.

Recommendation 2
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada undertake to extend the young professionals Working Holiday work permit for Hong Kong residents to two years and to include persons up to 35 years of age.

Recommendation 3
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada extend the criteria for eligibility for the three-year open work permit to include all persons with a minimum of 60 credits or its equivalent of post-secondary education regardless of when this education was completed.

Disagreed with, if only because there are already of pathways available. This is a response that will come up over and over again.

Recommendations 4 and 5
#4 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada adopt an inclusive approach and develop a pathway to permanent residence for former Hong Kong residents based on a broad range of work experience, and requiring minimal language and education levels.
#5 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada quickly develop and implement a pathway to permanent residence for Hong Kong residents who complete their post-secondary studies in Canada, ensuring that this pathway remains available to all Hong Kong residents studying at designated learning institutions.

Recommendations 6 and 7
#6 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada create a temporary public policy to grant refugee status to pro-democracy activists within Hong Kong and within third countries, which will enable their resettlement to Canada.
#7 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada implement a temporary public policy to bring Hong Kong residents at risk to Canada on temporary resident visas regardless of their age.

Recommendation 8
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada partner with designated non-governmental organizations to identify Hong Kong pro-democracy activists in need of safe haven in Canada on a temporary resident visa, to certify Hong Kong refugees, and to facilitate both classes of Hong Kong residents at risk to travel from Hong Kong to third countries and to Canada, and redevelop a refugee stream similar to the former source country program.

Recommendation 9
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada acknowledge the urgency of the situation and that, given the exit ban will take effect on 1 August 2021, the Minister immediately respond with an expansion of humanitarian measures to the current immigration and refugee measures to support the people of Hong Kong.

Recommendation 10
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issue travel documents to residents of Hong Kong at risk of persecution and exempt them from non-essential pandemic travel restrictions, following all public health guidelines.

Recommendation 11
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada implement a temporary public policy to create an expedited pathway to permanent residence for Hong Kong residents in Canada or abroad before the exit ban comes into effect on 1 August 2021.

Recommendation 12
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada promote its family reunification stream to family members of Hong Kong residents looking to come to Canada and create a temporary public policy to also include extended family members of Canadian citizens and of pro-democracy activists living in Canada.

Recommendation 13
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada develop a temporary public policy to allow former Canadian citizens to return to Canada as permanent residents.

Recommendation 14
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, in partnership with Public Services and Procurement Canada, and, as needed, other departments and agencies, investigate Canada’s Visa Application Centres in China, especially in regard to personal data leaks due to employee coercion, and that it tables its findings with the Committee.

Recommendation 15
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada terminate its contract with VFS Global in China and bring the services back in-house at Canadian diplomatic missions in China.

The Government disagrees with recommendations #14 and #15, which is interesting. There seems to be little urgency to investigate, or replace a private agency (despite concerns) that is processing the visas for Chinese nationals.

Doesn’t seem like there is much interest in protecting Canadian borders or sovereignty.

3. Important Links

(1) https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/CIMM/report-1/
(2) https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/CIMM/report-1/response-8512-441-10
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/content/Committee/441/CIMM/GovResponse/RP11842881/441_CIMM_Rpt01_GR/DepartmentOfCitizenshipAndImmigration-e.pdf
(4) Department Of Citizenship And Immigration Hong Kong

June 17, 2022June 17, 2022

U.N. Death Cult: 73 Million Abortions Annually Worldwide

The World Health Organization openly posts and discusses some pretty disturbing and messed up data on abortion worldwide. (See archive).

This expands on a recent Canuck Law article, which estimates that there have been over 4.2 million abortions just in Canada since 1970. This averages out to approximately 20% of pregnancies being willfully terminated. Few are aware of just how big this problem is.

Here are some claims W.H.O. promotes:

Abortion is a common health intervention. It is safe when carried out using a method recommended by WHO, appropriate to the pregnancy duration and by someone with the necessary skills.
Six out of 10 of all unintended pregnancies end in an induced abortion.
Around 45% of all abortions are unsafe, of which 97% take place in developing countries.
Unsafe abortion is a leading – but preventable – cause of maternal deaths and morbidities. It can lead to physical and mental health complications and social and financial burdens for women, communities and health systems.
Lack of access to safe, timely, affordable and respectful abortion care is a critical public health and human rights issue.

And this one is a doozy:

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

This claim is based on work from Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C et al, which covered estimates from the years 1990 through 2019. They used a “Bayesian framework”, meaning dta on pregnancy intentions and abortion were compiled from country-based surveys, official statistics, and published studies found through a literature search. So, it’s not just a straight compilation, but estimates as well.

Of course, if this figure of 73 million, per year, is even remotely accurate, it would be somewhere between 2 and 5 billion children have been aborted since the 1970s, when the movement really took off.

Restrictive abortion regulation can cause distress and stigma, and risk constituting a violation of human rights of women and girls, including the right to privacy and the right to non-discrimination and equality, while also imposing financial burdens on women and girls. Regulations that force women to travel to attain legal care, or require mandatory counselling or waiting periods, lead to loss of income and other financial costs, and can make abortion inaccessible to women with low resources.

Estimates from 2006 show that complications of unsafe abortions cost health systems in developing countries US$ 553 million per year for post-abortion treatments. In addition, households experienced US$ 922 million in loss of income due to long-term disability related to unsafe abortion. Countries and health systems could make substantial monetary savings by providing greater access to modern contraception and quality induced abortion.

A set of scoping reviews from 2021 indicate that abortion regulations – by being linked to fertility – affect women’s education, participation on the labour market and positive contribution to GDP growth. The legal status of abortion can also affect children’s educational outcomes, and their earnings on the labour market later in life. For example, legalization of abortion – by reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and thus increasing the likelihood that children are born wanted – can be linked to greater parental investments in children, including in girls’ schooling.

Does W.H.O. condemn the hundreds of millions — if not billions — of lives that are lost through this? Not exactly. The rights of the unborn never seem to factor into the equation.

W.H.O. attempts to make several economic arguments as to why abortion should be legal and as accessible as possible. Of course, they don’t seem to bother with addressing the long term physical and psychological impacts of women who do abort their children.

The World Health Organization also has its own division on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH). (See archive). It’s funded both by various governments and private companies, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (See archive). They always seem to be around whenever there are population reduction programs involved.

5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences

Enshrining abortion is also written right into Agenda 2030, which was signed by “Conservative” Stephen Harper in 2015. (See archive). It’s item #5.6 on the Treaty.

One might think it strange that population control groups are interested in keeping abortion legal and readily available. Then again, once one realizes the scale of this mass infanticide, things start to make a whole lot more sense.

Furthermore, the W.H.O. and U.N. link to the U.N. Population Fund, their 2014 Programme of Action, and to the Beijing Declaration And Platform For Action. (See archive). In a sick twist, abortion is promoted as women’s rights, and pregnancy an often unwanted evil.

Of course, 50% or so of the babies who are killed would have grown up to become women. This is something that many women’s rights groups don’t get, or at least pretend they don’t.

It’s interesting that groups like the United Nations claim to be against child exploitation and human trafficking. That said, they support encourage practices that ensure the deaths of countless unborn, while their remains can be sold off for a variety of purposes.

It’s even more disturbing that the U.N. keeps detailed and up-to-date records of abortion regulations across countries. Guess it’s one way of tracking where the most victims are likely to come from.

Has abortion been stopped, or slowed over the last 2 1/2 years during this so-called pandemic? Not at all. In fact, it’s one of the few things that were still available in Canada the entire time. Sure, weddings, churches, and funerals were “non-essential”. However, abortion, weed and liquor were still accessible.

SOURCE MATERIAL
(1) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
(2) https://canucklaw.ca/eugenics-in-canada-20-of-babies-aborted-in-pro-choice-movement/
(3) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32710833/
(4) https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-(srh)/human-reproduction-programme
(5) https://archive.ph/uyd8J
(6) https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research-(srh)/human-reproduction-programme/donors
(7) https://archive.ph/7tb5Q
(8) https://www.un.org/ohrlls/sites/www.un.org.ohrlls/files/2030_agenda_for_sustainable_development_web.pdf
(9) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development web
(10) https://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-and-development-programme-action
(11) https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/CSW/PFA_E_Final_WEB.pdf
(12) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/UN-Beijing-Declaration-And-Platform-For-Action.pdf
(13) https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/related-health-issues
(14) https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331561/WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
(15) WHO-2019-nCoV Essential Health Services 2020 March 2020
(16) WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services June 2020
(17) https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/AbortionPoliciesReproductiveHealth.pdf

June 13, 2022July 22, 2024

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

Below is some significant data on temporary foreign workers (TFW) from 1994 to 2013. (See archive). In fairness, the totals differ somewhat from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. Perhaps, the methods of calculation weren’t the same.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

There’s also the issue that “temporary” workers and students often don’t leave when their visas expire. Canada offers many pathways to extend their stays, and there is little in the way of enforcement.

Aside from all the official totals, there are 3 “temporary” programs that are worth mentioning. These lead to hundreds of thousands of foreigners entering Canada each year, and most with some option to extend. There are also pathways to permanent residence. These are:

Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
International Mobility Programme (IMP)
International Students

Let’s look at a decade worth of data, and see where the bulk of these people are coming from. Of course, this should be pretty obvious. This is from page 27 and 36, and focuses on the International Mobility Programme. In fairness, it’s likely that a lot of these people leave afterwards. That said, having the rates would be nice.

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

For reference: the International Mobility Visas (also known as “Working Holiday Visas”) are typically valid for 1-2 years. The charts below refer to the total at any given year.

YEAR	NEW IMP PERMITS ISSUED
1994	64,020
1995	60,358
1996	59,293
1997	61,339
1998	64,405
1999	67,584
2000	71,186
2001	72,525
2002	66,984
2003	58,619
2004	66,757
2005	72,689
2006	81,312
2007	88,217
2008	102,659
2009	106,737
2010	121,642
2011	138,533
2012	148,070
2013	161,541

This is from page 27 of this report. Overall data is from 1994 to 2013. Also, the number of permits has nearly tripled from 1994 (64,000) through to 2013 (161,000).

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	18,567	27.8	1
Australia	7,271	10.9	2
France	7,028	10.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,476	9.7	4
Japan	5,916	8.9	5
Germany	2,467	3.7	6
China	1,801	2.8	7
Ireland	1,615	2.4	8
South Korea	1,558	1.8	9
New Zealand	1,484	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	53,517	80.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	13,240	19.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	66,757	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	19,453	26.8	1
France	8,636	11.9	2
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,701	9.2	3
Japan	6,244	9.2	4
Germany	2,751	3.8	5
South Korea	1,998	2.7	6
China	1,959	2.7	7
New Zealand	1,702	2.3	8
India	1,688	2.3	9
Ireland	1,572	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	52,704	72.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	19,985	27.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	72,689	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	21,469	26.4	1
France	9,767	12.0	2
Australia	7,975	9.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,894	8.5	4
Japan	5,953	7.3	5
Germany	4,211	5.2	6
India	2,295	2.8	7
China	2,242	2.8	8
South Korea	2,009	2.5	9
Ireland	1,998	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	64,813	79.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	16,499	20.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	81,312	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	22,168	25.1	1
France	10,358	11.7	2
Australia	8,220	9.3	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,397	8.4	4
Japan	5,683	6.4	5
Germany	4,809	5.5	6
China	2,822	3.2	7
South Korea	2,363	2.7	8
Ireland	2,259	2.6	9
New Zealand	2,058	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	68,137	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	20,080	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	88,217	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	24,169	23.5	1
Australia	11,879	11.6	2
France	11,505	11.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,813	7.6	4
Japan	6,715	6.5	5
Germany	5,336	5.2	6
India	3,776	3.7	7
South Korea	3,318	3.2	8
China	3,098	3.0	9
New Zealand	2,436	2.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	80,045	78.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	22,614	22.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	102,659	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	23,446	22.0	1
France	14,233	13.3	2
Australia	10,053	9.4	3
United Kingdom	7,983	7.5	4
Germany	6,092	5.7	5
Japan	5,954	5.6	6
India	4,166	3.9	7
South Korea	4,041	3.8	8
China	2,920	2.7	9
Ireland	2,812	2.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,700	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	25,037	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	106,737	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,398	22.5	1
France	16,107	13.2	2
Australia	10,375	8.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	8,161	6.7	4
Germany	6,812	5.6	5
India	6,603	5.4	6
South Korea	5,508	4.5	7
Japan	5,059	4.2	8
Ireland	3,649	3.0	9
Philippines	3,440	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	93,112	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	28,530	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,642	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,979	20.2	1
France	17,509	12.6	2
India	9,961	7.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,386	6.8	4
Australia	9,160	6.6	5
Germany	6,854	4.9	6
Japan	6,284	4.5	7
South Korea	6,014	4.3	8
Philippines	5,514	4.0	9
Ireland	5,247	3.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	103,908	75.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	34,625	25.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	138,533	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	29,833	20.1	1
France	17,951	12.1	2
India	11,368	7.7	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,771	6.6	4
Australia	9,135	6.2	5
Germany	6,932	4.7	6
Japan	6,436	4.3	7
Ireland	6,231	4.2	8
South Korea	6,144	4.1	9
Philippines	5,387	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	109,188	73.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,882	26.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	148,070	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	30,399	18.8	1
France	19,971	12.4	2
India	14,251	8.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	10,189	6.3	4
Australia	9,840	6.1	5
Ireland	7,076	4.4	6
Japan	6,723	4.1	7
Philippines	6,703	4.1	8
Germany	6,386	4.0	9
South Korea	5,885	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	117,423	72.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	44,118	27.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,541	100	—

It should also be mentioned: it’s likely that a lot more of people from this program will actually leave afterwards, as opposed to international students, and the TFWP.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

(B.0) https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/statistics-open-data.html
(B.1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/cic/MP43-333-1999-eng.pdf
Canada Immigration Facts And Figures 1998
(B.2) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/MP43-333-2000E.pdf
(B.3) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/cic/Ci1-8-10-2013-eng.pdf
Temporary Migration In Canada 2004-2013

June 2, 2022February 14, 2023

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

This piece focuses on the problem that is the United States border, particularly the side with Mexico. There have been many interests vested in not securing it. Consequently, people flood in illegally, since there’s little reason not to.

Why should Canadians care about this?

The answer is simple: it’s not just an American problem. Open borders threatens the sovereignty of nations in general. Not only that, many of those illegal aliens will surely be working their way to Canada, given the generous welfare benefits available.

Unfortunately, far too few Canadians, including many “conservatives”, fail to realize that open borders changes everything. The makeup of the country impacts everything: voting patterns; finance; culture; crime; and future immigration policies. And the mantra “just come legally” misses the bigger picture.

For an earlier piece on the estimated real scale of illegals in the U.S., north of 22 million. There was also this gem in 2018, suing for the right to illegally enter the U.S.

Now, let’s get into some of the data from the USCBP, or the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. The numbers are quite shocking indeed.

A note about “fiscal year”: Fiscal Year 2022 runs October 01, 2021 – September 30, 2022. All of the years seem to be done in this format.

“Recidivism” in the context of CBP refers to the percentage of people who are detained multiple times within the same fiscal year. It’s been approximately 25% the last few years, meaning 1/4 of people caught and forced to leave are caught again. There doesn’t seem to be much of a deterrent. As for drugs being brought in:

Month	Marijuana	Cocaine	Heroin	Meth	Fentanyl	Other
October 2021	376	220	0	290	73	3
November 2021	191	73	0	581	84	3
December 2021	127	102	66	559	26	4
January 2022	360	39	0	457	65	56
February 2022	785	90	2	268	12	27
March 2022	58	50	2	224	13	4
April 2022	259	186	14	479	174	19

Data from the 2022 fiscal year (thus far). The C.B.P. also provides recent statistics on the drug busts that have occurred from people trying to bring narcotics into the country. While it’s nice to have these seizures, it’s likely just a drop in the bucket as to what really goes on.

AGENCY INVOLVED	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office of Field Operations Encounters	216,370	281,881	288,523	241,786	294,352	259,057
U.S. Border Patrol Total Encounters	310,531	404,142	859,501	405,036	1,662,167	1,219,920
Total Enforcement Actions	526,901	683,178	1,148,024	646,822	1,956,519	1,478,977

For “enforcement actions”, this refers to: individuals encountered at ports of entry who are seeking lawful admission into the United States but are determined to be inadmissible, individuals presenting themselves to seek humanitarian protection under our laws, and individuals who withdraw an application for admission and return to their countries of origin within a short timeframe. This is according to the CBP’s own definition.

In other words, it’s the number of people who show up LEGALLY to border ports of entry and then are turned away. It doesn’t cover the vast numbers who enter illegally between border ports.

CATEGORY	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office Of Field Operations
Criminal Non-Citizens	10,596	11,623	12,705	7,009	6,567	9,101
NCIC Arrests	7,656	5,929	8,546	7,108	8,979	5,580
U.S. Border Patrol
Criminal Noncitizens Encountered	8,531	6,698	4,269	2,438	10,763	5,985
Criminal Noncitizens With Warrants	2,675	1,550	4,153	2,054	1,904	525

There have also been considerable amounts of arrests for people who either had criminal records, and/or outstanding warrants. This doesn’t include people who entered without being detected.

GANG ARRESTS	FY15	FY16	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
18th Street	84	47	61	145	168	36	28	66
MS-13	335	253	228	413	464	72	113	149
Paisas	73	119	53	62	90	93	79	80
Other	352	283	194	188	254	162	128	98
Total	844	702	536	808	976	363	348	393

There have also been gang-related arrests of people attempting to enter the United States. Of course, not all are included, just a few which represent the larger numbers of arrests.

Concerning arrests of suspected terrorists (all nationalities), CBP provides some data of people detained at both the Southern and Northern borders.

TERRORISTS AT BORDER	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Southern Border	116	155	280	72	103	42
Northern Border	217	196	258	124	54	115
Total	333	351	538	196	157	157

How many encounters does the U.S. Government have overall? Thankfully, they do provide more data, and a lot of it is mind blowing.

Nationwide Encounters
.
Encounter data includes U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Title 8 Apprehensions, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 Inadmissibles, and Title 42 Expulsions for fiscal years (FY) 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data is available for the Northern Land Border, Southwest Land Border, and Nationwide (i.e., air, land, and sea modes of transportation) encounters.

FISCAL YEAR	2019	2020	2021	2022
October	60,781	45,139	71,929	164,849
November	62,469	42,643	72,113	174,849
December	70,694	40,565	73,994	179,254
January	58,317	36,585	78,414	154,816
February	76,545	36,687	101,099	165,900
March	103,731	34,460	173,277	221,144
April	109,415	17,106	178,795	234,088
May	114,116	23,237	180,597	–
June	104,311	33,049	189,034	–
July	81,777	40,929	213,593	–
August	62,707	50,014	209,840	–
September	57,674	192,001	227,547	–
TOTAL	962,533	458,088	1,734,686	1,141,054 (so far)

Once more, how many people are simply sneaking in undetected?

The data can further be broken down by the type of person/people coming:

Accompanied Minors (AM)
Individuals in a Family Unit (FMUA)
Single Adults
Unaccompanied Children (UC)

While there are clearly a lot of people who get stopped by the various departments, an awful lot don’t. They are let in through some pathway, or just sneak in.

It also doesn’t help that there are countless Sanctuary Cities and States, which do an end run around border security. If people know they can get social services without the risk of being deported, many more will come.

Again, this is not just an American issue. Many of the hordes flooding into the U.S. will eventually make their way North. Canadians should absolutely be worried about this.

Don’t worry, there will be much more included on this subject in the near future. This can’t be done justice by a single piece.

(1) https://www.cbp.gov/
(2) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
(3) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters
(4) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
(5) https://canucklaw.ca/true-scale-of-illegals-in-us-22-million-more-amnesty-coming/
(6) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-2-migrant-caravan-lawyers-sue-for-right-to-legally-invade-u-s/
(7) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-10b-sanctuary-cities-an-end-run-around-having-borders/

June 1, 2022June 2, 2022

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

Ever wonder how many international students are in Canada, and where they come from? Well, we have some data available, courtesy of the Federal Government. Let’s take a look at this troubling pattern.

The replacement agenda (a.k.a. the Kalergi Plan) is alive and well. And flooding the country with students from abroad is just one way to help implement it. Colleges and universities get much needed cash, and students get access to life in the West.

One thing to note: it appears that the data from these tables, page 44, refers to the TOTAL number of international students within Canada. This is not the same as the number of visas issued annually.

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,954	23.7	1
South Korea	26,700	15.8	2
United States	12,807	7.6	3
Japan	8,983	5.3	4
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,685	4.0	5
India	6,680	4.0	6
France	6,677	4.0	7
Taiwan	5,247	3.1	8
Mexico	3,384	2.0	9
Germany	2,294	1.4	10
Iran	2,110	1.4	11
Hong Kong	1,993	1.2	12
Pakistan	1,836	1.1	13
Vietnam	1,751	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,731	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	122,147	72.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,492	27.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	168,639	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	40,021	23.5	1
South Korea	27,596	16.2	2
United States	13,130	7.7	3
Japan	9,057	5.3	4
India	7,153	4.2	5
France	6,952	4.1	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,944	3.5	7
Taiwan	4,928	2.9	8
Mexico	3,601	2.1	9
Iran	2,558	1.5	10
Germany	2,462	1.4	11
Hong Kong	2,397	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,795	1.1	13
Bangladesh	1,718	1.0	14
Vietnam	1,695	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	131,007	76.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,461	23.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	170,468	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,993	23.2	1
South Korea	29,551	17.1	2
United States	12,920	7.5	3
Japan	8,310	4.8	4
France	8,125	4.7	5
India	7,464	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,404	3.1	7
Taiwan	4,853	2.8	8
Mexico	3,839	2.2	9
Hong Kong	2,663	1.5	10
Germany	2,588	1.5	11
Iran	2,342	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,839	1.1	13
Morocco	1,723	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,651	0.9	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	133,265	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,110	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	172,375	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	41,113	22.9	1
South Korea	30,676	17.1	2
United States	12,835	7.2	3
France	9,005	5.0	4
India	7,929	4.4	5
Japan	7,662	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,021	2.8	7
Taiwan	4,683	2.6	8
Mexico	3,861	2.2	9
Germany	2,947	1.6	10
Hong Kong	2,812	1.5	11
Iran	2,390	1.3	12
Brazil	1,959	1.1	13
Morocco	1,930	1.1	14
Nigeria	1,919	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	136,742	76.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	42,413	23.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	179,155	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	43,101	23.4	1
South Korea	28,976	15.7	2
United States	12,226	6.6	3
France	9,377	5.1	4
India	8,286	4.5	5
Japan	6,592	3.6	6
United Kingdom	4,627	2.5	7
Saudi Arabia	4,463	2.4	8
Taiwan	4,122	2.2	9
Mexico	3,879	2.1	10
Germany	3,141	1.7	11
Hong Kong	2,912	1.6	12
Iran	2,649	1.4	13
Brazil	2,396	1.3	14
Nigeria	2,178	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	138,925	75.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	45,254	24.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	184,179	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	50,446	24.7	1
South Korea	27,166	13.3	2
United States	12,128	5.9	3
India	11,682	5.7	4
France	10,358	5.1	5
Saudi Arabia	8,413	4.1	6
Japan	6,113	3.0	7
Mexico	4,184	2.1	8
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,151	2.0	9
Taiwan	3,816	1.9	10
Iran	3,507	1.7	11
Germany	3,102	1.5	12
Hong Kong	2,956	1.4	13
Nigeria	2,820	1.4	14
Brazil	2,415	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	153,257	75.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	50,795	24.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	204,052	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	57,339	25.4	1
South Korea	25,301	11.2	2
India	20,281	9.0	3
Saudi Arabia	12,267	5.4	4
United States	12,156	5.4	5
France	11,365	5.0	6
Japan	5,874	2.6	7
Mexico	4,384	1.9	8
Iran	3,930	1.7	9
Nigeria	3,648	1.6	10
Taiwan	3,639	1.6	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,563	1.5	12
Germany	3,142	1.4	13
Hong Kong	2,864	1.3	14
Brazil	2,722	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	172,475	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	52,920	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,395	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	68,469	27.5	1
India	27,339	11.0	2
South Korea	22,631	9.1	3
Saudi Arabia	14,180	5.7	4
France	12,715	5.1	5
United States	12,191	4.9	6
Japan	6,018	2.4	7
Mexico	4,801	1.9	8
Iran	4,755	1.9	9
Nigeria	4,432	1.8	10
Taiwan	3,370	1.4	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,360	1.4	12
Brazil	3,270	1.3	13
Pakistan	3,161	1.3	14
Vietnam	3,110	1.3	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	190,432	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	58,395	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	248,827	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	81,444	29.5	1
India	32,243	11.7	2
South Korea	20,285	7.4	3
France	14,748	5.3	4
Saudi Arabia	13,930	5.0	5
United States	12,302	4.5	6
Japan	6,486	2.4	7
Nigeria	5,481	2.0	8
Iran	5,229	1.9	9
Brazil	5,126	1.8	10
Mexio	4,977	1.8	11
Pakistan	3,588	1.3	12
Vietnam	3,523	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,358	1.2	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,352	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	208,961	75.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	66,922	24.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	275,883	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	95,731	31.4	1
India	34,887	11.4	2
South Korea	19,123	6.3	3
France	16,486	5.4	4
Saudi Arabia	13,955	4.6	5
United States	12,263	4.0	6
Brazil	7,757	2.5	7
Nigeria	6,903	2.3	8
Japan	6,604	2.2	9
Mexico	5,306	1.7	10
Iran	5,177	1.7	11
Vietnam	4,173	1.4	12
Pakistan	4,045	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,500	1.1	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,462	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	239,372	78.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	65,504	21.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	304,876	100	—

Again, this refers to the total number of students in the country, not the amount of visas issued in any given year. Needless to say, those numbers continue to climb as well. Note: page 48 of the same document gives even higher totals for the same years.

For a reference point, consider page 15 of the 2020 Canada Annual Immigration Report to Parliament. It was reported that:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

This means that the number of foreign students has nearly tripled from 2013 to 2019/2020. This is a major source of people entering the country.

Keep in mind, there are many, MANY pathways for international students to stay longer, or transition into permanent residents. The probable reason for not being open about this is to minimize the backlash from the already high immigration rates.

Category: Population Replacement

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1966 To 1979 Data

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Source Countries From 1966 To 1979

3. More Recent Statistics On Immigration Source Countries

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Gov’t Recommends More Pathways For Hong Kong Residents To Come

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

3. Important Links

Like this:

U.N. Death Cult: 73 Million Abortions Annually Worldwide

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

Like this:

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

Like this:

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Source Countries From 1966 To 1979

3. More Recent Statistics On Immigration Source Countries

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

3. Important Links

Share this:

Like this:

Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Share this:

Like this: