This is Brian Lilley, who works for the Toronto Sun. Rather than do any in depth reporting on the fraud and hoax that this “pandemic” is, Lilley prefers to run interference for Doug Ford. Instead of holding the Ontario Government to account, his response is: “well, the other guys would have been worse”.
Lilley wants people to look at a symptom (how this is managed), and not the disease (creeping Communist takeover). He’s far from alone.
1. Strategic Uselessness Of Con Inc. Media
Liberal position: More lockdowns, more restrictions, more freedoms taken away. Don’t be selfish and act in individual interest.
Conservative position: Maybe these measures are a bit harsh, but people shouldn’t go around flaunting the rules. They should follow the directions of Public Health.
The effect this has is one of limiting of Overton Window so that public discourse is extremely narrow. An honest discussion of what’s going on is not encouraged by either side. And Conservative Inc. media plays their part in freezing and neutralizing any real opposition.
Very few argue that these measures — which are effectively martial law — are completely wrong, or that the “pandemic” is a manufactured crisis. What they do is criticize details of how it’s implemented.
This is intentional, of course. The goal is not holding Governments accountable for the things they do, but the “illusion” of holding them accountable. This is something completely different.
2. Con Inc. 2-Faced On Media Subsidies
Lorrie Goldstein, in that one tweet, sums up what is wrong with “conservative” outlets in Canada. He feigns outrage at Trudeau for using taxpayer money to prop up unprofitable media. In the next breath, he shrugs it off as necessary to save jobs.
Perhaps their tepid opposition is one of pragmatism: in order to keep the subsidies rolling in, it’s best not to rock the boat too much. The odd shot at Trudeau is allowed, but no serious threats to the status quo are premitted.
Of course, an honourable mention goes to the “charity” of True North Centre for Public Policy. This is what Candice Malcolm, (Jason Kenney’s ex-Staffer), took over and claims to have founded. It was originally the Independent Immigration Aid Association. Even while Malcolm rails against media subsidies, she profits from repurposing an actual charity for tax benefits.
3. More Examples Of Controlled Media
People should follow the rules and obey Public Health guidelines. But at least Hillier is open about his position. Really?
What second wave?
Or take this piece by Spencer Fernando. He calls for Rod Phillips to be fired for taking a trip abroad in December, but Ford apparently gets a pass, despite covering it up. Such hypocrisy. Then again, what can one expect from the National Citizen’s Coalition?
There’s also this juvenile clip from Andrew Lawton. He proposes removing any restriction that a politician gets caught breaking. While amusing, he avoids any real coverage on the deception at the heart of the scam.
These examples are just a tiny bit of what is available online.
In recent days, 2 noticeable themes have emerged:
 Criticizing politicians for leaving the country
 Borders remain open during “pandemic”
A focus lately is how countless politicians have been caught breaking the rules they insist on for other people.
Interestingly, many in the media don’t take this as an opportunity to reevaluate how dangerous the whole situation is (or isn’t). Instead, the anger is directed at the people not being subjected to the same erosions of their freedoms. Nice trick.
Similarly with the flights coming in. Media in Canada are finally talking about the absurdity of keeping the borders open in a “pandemic”, and not asking why borders should be open at all. The focus becomes on asking if it is safe to allow travellers in.
These tactics are great are directing anger towards people breaking the rules, rather than getting the public to question why those rules exist in the first place. Conservative outlets don’t seem to have much of an issue with stripping our rights away in general. They just argue over the minor details of how to do it. It’s a way to narrow the focus on debate, and limit real discussion.
4. Goal Is To Limit Public Discussion
There isn’t any real opposition in the MSM to Governments imposing martial law, no matter where on the political spectrum they are. Instead,
Putting the spotlight on people like Rod Phillips, breaking his own rules, is a deliberate move. It is done to focus anger on those who are not following along. This is an appeal to emotion, deflecting from having a logical discussion.
A very common tactic is played out here: get people focused on a symptom (hypocritical politicians), and not on the disease (erosion of basic rights). Too many in Canada will spend their time covering the symptoms exclusively.
Keep in mind that Con Inc. media has very low regard for the growing resistance to these power grabs. These people are not allies, and cannot be trusted. Legitimate voices are ignored, or dismissed as conspiracy theorists.
5. Questions That Need To Be Asked
Here some difficult questions that must always be in the public eye. Before accepting the official narrative at face value, they have to be answered. Unfortunately, we aren’t getting this from the media giants.
- Has this virus ever been isolated?
- What’s the real fatality rate?
- How many people have it, and have recovered?
- Why use PCR tests, when its creator says this isn’t their purpose?
- What’s the error rate of PCR tests?
- What’s the error rate of antibody tests?
- Why bother with rapid-tests if the test itself is flawed?
- Do masks actually work?
- How are group sizes (or bubbles) determined?
- Where did the 2m distancing requirement come from?
- Why are hospitals really being emptied out?
- Why are other causes of death being downplayed?
- Why are deaths mis-labelled to drive up the CV count?
- How do you determine “non-essential” businesses?
- Why are Governments so eager to shut businesses down?
- Is this all just an excuse to implement social changes?
- Was the “Great Reset” laid out in advance?
- Why are laws written to give health officers dictator powers?
- Are we legally obligated to follow WHO’s IHR?
- Did the WHO actually write the 2005 Quarantine Act?
- How many politicians actually oppose what is going on?
- Have politicians been bribed or threatened into compliance?
- Was all of this planned out?
6. Other Articles On CV “Planned-emic”
The rest of the series is here. Many lies, lobbying, conflicts of interest, and various globalist agendas operating behind the scenes, obscuring the vile agenda called the “Great Reset“. The Gates Foundation finances: the WHO, the US CDC, GAVI, ID2020, John Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the Pirbright Institute, the BBC, and individual pharmaceutical companies. Also: there is little to no science behind what our officials are doing; they promote degenerate behaviour; and the International Health Regulations are legally binding. See here, here, and here. The media is paid off, and our democracy compromised, shown: here, here, here, and here.
This is what a small site can come up with, given enough time and hard work. Yet the mainstream media Canada in can’t provide proof that this “pandemic” is entirely manufactured?