Category: Globalism

Posted on

(Charity) University Of Toronto “Institute For Pandemics” Funded By Millers, Merck, Run By Ontario Science Table

Remember those conspiracy nuts saying this was never going to end? The University of Toronto Institute for Pandemics was launched in 2020. It hosts many of the same players from the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, and the Ontario Science Table, such as Adalsteinn Brown, David Fisman and Colin Furness.

Fun fact: University of Toronto has several registered charities tied to its name. Much more on that later.

COVID-19, SARS and other urgent health threats began in animals. It’s time to drop misleading distinctions between human and animal health. Our underpinning “one health” approach considers human, animal and environmental health together.

Read between the lines on this. Not only is this meant to be about human health, but “fighting climate change” could easily be worked into the narrative.

The cause of pandemics is complex; beyond any single government or world body to address. But the opportunities are equally strong, if we can couple technological advances with an intimate knowledge of health systems, economics, the intersectional social determinants of health — and the credibility to influence change amid a historic crisis of trust in governments and the media. Universities must play a central role if we are to mitigate the human suffering and economic devastation caused by pandemics.

This group also promotes the globalist narrative that no country can do this on their own. There is also the implicit declaration that they will try to influence how the media perceives Government. This comes across as pushing propaganda.

The same self-declared “Ontario Science Table” experts who advocate for stripping the rights of Ontarians away will now be doing it directly from the U of T. As shown earlier, there is no real independence, either from Government, or the World Health Organization. It’s quite the rabbit hole.

This “institute” was started up thanks to a $1 million donation from the Vohra-Miller Foundation. About the couple that heads it:

Sabina Vohra-Miller graduated from the University of Toronto, with both a Bachelors and Masters in the pharmaceutical studies. She then spent several years in that field before starting up the Vohra-Miller Foundation with her husband. She co-founded the South Asian Health Network, which pushes vaccines and anti-racism, and founded Unambiguous Science, a website that pushes vaccines. She’s now on the Advisory Table of the Institute for Pandemics.

It’s a bit disturbing that Sabina either misrepresents (or simply is unaware) that these “vaccines” are not approved. They were given interim authorization for emergency use. But her website does little except shill and promote them.

Craig Miller spent years with Kijiji, which is an eBay company. He then moved on to Shopify, leaving in 2020. A few side notes: (a) eBay was founded by Pierre Omidyar, who was been involved in social change, and a “more informed media”; and (b) Shopify was contracted to make a contact tracing app with the Federal Government.

Craig also publicly pushes the climate change narrative. It will be interesting to see if (or how) the Institute for Pandemics will incorporate that into their agenda.

Both of them seem to have ties to organizations that will benefit from prolonging this “pandemic”.

Merck Canada’s $3-million investment will help the centre’s diverse mix of public health researchers to better understand the decision-making of individuals and communities around whether and when to receive immunizations. With expertise in vaccine science, social and behavioural health, equity and health systems, the centre’s faculty members will produce scientific research to aid the Ontario government, policy-makers and public health advocates around the world in increasing public knowledge of and access to immunizations.

Also consider that Merck Canada (the drug company) donated $3 million to the Institute for Pandemics. From their perspective, it makes sense. More pandemics mean a larger market for more drugs. Of course, with tax rebates from the Canada Revenue Agency, this $3 million gift will cost considerably less. This school has quite a few pharma donors.

It was covered previously how several current Medical Officers of Health are either Professors at U of T, or have other ties to the school. This sets up an obvious conflict of interest.

  • Barbara Yaffe – Ontario Deputy Medical Officer
  • Eileen De Villa – Toronto Chief Medical Officer
  • Vinita Dubey – Toronto Associate Medical Officer of Health
  • Lisa Berger – Toronto Associate Medical Officer of Health
  • Christine Navarro – Toronto Associate Medical Officer of Health
  • Avis Lynn Noseworthy – Medical Officer of Health for the Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge
  • Vera Etches – Ottawa Deputy Medical Officer of Health
  • Brent Moloughney – Ottawa Associate Medical Officer
  • Lawrence C. Loh – Peel Medical Officer of Health
  • Hamidah Meghani – Halton Region Medical Health Officer
  • Nicola Mercer – Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Medical Officer (U of T Medical School)
  • Mustafa Hirji – Niagara Acting Medical Officer of Health (U of T graduate)
  • Elizabeth Richardson – Hamilton Medical Officer of Health (U of T graduate)

Adalsteinn Brown is the head of the Ontario Science Table, and the Institute for Pandemics. He also runs the Dalla Lana School for Public Health. This effectively means he is the boss of other Professors in that Department. How will the power dynamics work here, as these MOH are supposed to be independent?

Moreover, there are other U of T Professors on the Science Table and the Institute for Pandemics. Will these create conflicts with the MOH, and their dual roles? Why isn’t all of this publicly discussed?

  • Students’ Alzheimer’s Alliance at the University of Toronto (SAAUT)
  • Scholarship Bursary & Education Committee Medical Alumni Association of University of Toronto
  • Student Christian Movement in the University of Toronto
  • The Encumeical Chaplaincy at the University of Toronto
  • The Governing Council of the University of Toronto
  • Trust Under Will of Reuben W Leonard for University of Toronto
  • University of Toronto International Health Program (UTIHP)
  • University of Toronto Community Radio Inc.
  • University of Toronto Schools

Interesting bit of information: there isn’t just 1 charity tied to U of T. There are 9 of them. However, only a few of them are of concern for this article. The Governing Council of the University is by far the biggest one. In their recent tax filings, this NGO claimed to be financing work and research globally. These include:

-UNITED STATES
-(Other countries in Europe)
-(Other countries in Asia and Oceania)
-UNITED KINGDOM
-FRANCE
-(Other countries in Africa)
-SPAIN
-UGANDA
-KENYA
-THAILAND
-GERMANY
-ZAMBIA
-ITALY
-INDIA
-REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA
-BANGLADESH
-KOREA, REPUBLIC OF
-ARGENTINA
-ISRAEL
-JAMAICA
-MEXICO
-BRAZIL
-JAPAN
-UKRAINE
-COLOMBIA
-GUYANA
-CAMBODIA
-GHANA
-EGYPT
-MADAGASCAR

So much for being a Canadian school. Now, how much money are they actually taking in and spending each year?

April 2016 Financial Details
Receipted donations $98,554,359.00 (3.44%)
Non-receipted donations $6,357,259.00 (0.22%)
Gifts from other registered charities $37,404,382.00 (1.31%)
Government funding $992,767,454.00 (34.65%)
All other revenue $1,730,060,546.00 (60.38%)
Total revenue: $2,865,144,000.00

Charitable programs $2,786,557,000.00 (96.35%)
Management and administration $75,834,000.00 (2.62%)
Fundraising $29,755,000.00 (1.03%)
Political activities $0.00 (0.00%)
Gifts to other registered charities and qualified donees $0.00 (0.00%)
Other $0.00 (0.00%)
Total expenses: $2,892,146,000.00

Professional and consulting fees: $50,151,000.00
Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

April 2017 Financial Details
Receipted donations $76,270,736.00 (2.21%)
Non-receipted donations $21,064,207.00 (0.61%)
Gifts from other registered charities $39,602,057.00 (1.15%)
Government funding $1,026,938,285.00 (29.72%)
All other revenue $2,291,696,715.00 (66.32%)
Total revenue: $3,455,572,000.00

Charitable programs $2,232,398,000.00 (95.10%)
Management and administration $82,954,000.00 (3.53%)
Fundraising $32,057,000.00 (1.37%)
Political activities $0.00 (0.00%)
Gifts to other registered charities and qualified donees $0.00 (0.00%)
Other $0.00 (0.00%)
Total expenses: $2,347,409,000.00

Professional and consulting fees: $21,059,000.00
Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

April 2018 Financial Details
Receipted donations $87,273,828.00 (2.51%)
Non-receipted donations $10,522,417.00 (0.30%)
Gifts from other registered charities $69,132,755.00 (1.99%)
Government funding $1,015,747,096.00 (29.20%)
All other revenue $2,295,824,904.00 (66.00%)
Total revenue: $3,478,501,000.00

Charitable programs $2,860,114,000.00 (95.57%)
Management and administration $99,245,000.00 (3.32%)
Fundraising $33,278,000.00 (1.11%)
Political activities $0.00 (0.00%)
Gifts to other registered charities and qualified donees $0.00 (0.00%)
Other $0.00 (0.00%)
Total expenses: $2,992,637,000.00

Professional and consulting fees: $36,903,000.00
Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

April 2019 Financial Details
Receipted donations $92,734,000.00 (2.53%)
Non-receipted donations $11,603,000.00 (0.32%)
Gifts from other registered charities $37,350,000.00 (1.02%)
Government funding $1,076,131,000.00 (29.34%)
All other revenue $2,449,795,000.00 (66.80%)
Total revenue: $3,667,613,000.00

Charitable programs $3,014,525,000.00 (95.39%)
Management and administration $110,505,000.00 (3.50%)
Fundraising $35,294,000.00 (1.12%)
Political activities $0.00 (0.00%)
Gifts to other registered charities and qualified donees $0.00 (0.00%)
Other $0.00 (0.00%)
Total expenses: $3,160,324,000.00

Professional and consulting fees: $41,934,000.00
Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

April 2020 Financial Details
Receipted donations $63,712,000.00 (1.80%)
Non-receipted donations $11,664,000.00 (0.33%)
Gifts from other registered charities $44,316,000.00 (1.25%)
Government funding $1,044,854,000.00 (29.51%)
All other revenue $2,375,684,000.00 (67.11%)
Total revenue: $3,540,230,000.00

Charitable programs $3,414,276,000.00 (95.92%)
Management and administration $110,186,000.00 (3.10%)
Fundraising $35,025,000.00 (0.98%)
Gifts to other registered charities and qualified donees $0.00 (0.00%)
Other $0.00 (0.00%)
Total expenses: $3,559,487,000.00

Professional and consulting fees: $47,072,000.00
Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

The Governing Council of the University takes in some $3 billion annually. They also pay their Executives very, very well. But it’s easier to do when the donations received are subsidized by the public.

It’s worth pointing out that this “charity” operates plenty of programs abroad. This is likely since many of their donors have interests abroad. A more detailed look at their financials would be appreciated, but here are some of the more generous ones listed by the school.

Is all of this going towards education and research? Or is it to be used to justify draconian measures UNDER THE PRETENSE of education and research?

(1) https://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/pandemics/
(2) https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-s-dalla-lana-school-public-health-launches-institute-pandemics
(3) https://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/pandemics/#about
(4) https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-and-merck-canada-partner-advance-and-share-vaccine-knowledge-and-research
(5) https://www.vohramillerfoundation.ca/
(6) https://www.linkedin.com/in/sabinavohramiller/
(7) https://archive.is/0wO5k
(8) https://twitter.com/sabivm
(9) https://www.linkedin.com/in/craigmillertoronto/
(10) https://archive.is/wip/IV3Ha
(11) https://twitter.com/craigmillr
(12) https://www.unambiguous-science.com/
(13) https://www.unambiguous-science.com/jj-approved-by-health-canada/
(14) https://nationalpost.com/pmn/health-pmn/canadas-shopify-blackberry-develop-covid-19-contact-tracing-app-with-local-governments
(15) https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/giving-charity-information-donors/claiming-charitable-tax-credits/charitable-donation-tax-credit-rates.html
(16) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/srch/pub/bscSrch
(17) University Of Toronto Governing Council
(18) https://canucklaw.ca/uoft-dlsph-centre-for-vaccine-preventable-diseases-was-prelude-to-ontario-science-table/

Posted on

CV #37(I): Tri-City News Pulls Article Where Bonnie Henry Admits False Positives Could Overwhelm System

A year ago, BCPHO “Babbling Bonnie” Henry publicly advised AGAINST the mass testing of employees at jobs. Her reasoning is that the possibility of mass false positives could overwhelm the health care system.

To repeat: she recommended against mass testing, since a high level of false positives would overwhelm the healthcare system.

Then again, the BC Centre for Disease Control also admitted a year ago that the PCR tests don’t actually work as advertised, and they don’t know the true error rate.

The article has since been deleted, but thankfully, there are committed people who will not let the truth disappear quite so easily.

B.C.’s provincial health officer has warned businesses against independent testing of asymptomatic employees for the COVID-19 virus.
.
“At this time, it is recommendation that only people with symptoms or people otherwise identified by a health professional should be tested for COVID-19,” Dr. Bonnie Henry said in a June 17 letter to the province’s business community.
.
Henry said B.C.’s approach to testing is evolving based on epidemiology, testing capacity and methodology and a growing understanding of the virus.
.
She said routine testing of people -including those in schools, prior to surgery or other procedures, or as a condition of employment or for travel – is not recommended.
.
“It is important to understand that testing can result in false positive and false negatives, particularly in asymptomatic people and in people who are very early on in the illness or who may be incubating the disease,” Henry said in the letter.
.
She said serological tests for the virus causing COVID19 is recommended only to focus on informing the public health response and for clinical research investigations.
.
“If large numbers of false positive tests were to occur through routine testing of asymptomatic people, this could create a significant burden for the public health system and would provide little value in protecting your business and could impede our ability to protect the health of all British Columbians,” Henry said.
.
The doctor acknowledged some business may wish to conduct precautionary testing of asymptomatic employees as part of their business operations.
.
But, she said, it’s “critically important to remember that asymptomatic testing does not replace other measures to prevent transmission, including ensuring handwashing stations are stocked and available, monitoring of employees for symptoms and ensuring employees stay home when feeling ill, and providing space for safe physical distancing, putting up physical barriers when appropriate.”
.
However, she added, businesses need to know private testing of asymptomatic individuals is against the public health guidances.
.
Those wishing to do it must establish processes and fund related infrastructure to meet legislative requirements related to testing and public health follow up for a reportable health condition, Henry said.
.
Such work by businesses could involve hiring people to conduct contact tracing under public health direction for employees who test positive and ensuring employee contact details are available to public health.
.
“For private laboratory testing, businesses must, at their own expense, use an existing or establish a new private laboratory to conduct testing. Private laboratories must be accredited under the Diagnostic Accreditation Program, operate per the stipulations set out under the Laboratory Services Act, align with provincial privacy and security requirements, and conform to related policies and regulations,” Henry said.

That article has since been removed, and mass testing is more of a priority. Anyone wonder why that may be the case? Here is one possibility.

Just putting it out there, but perhaps almost a quarter million worth of “pandemic bucks” would explain why such an article is no longer available. This is why Government subsidizing journalism is a problem: the conflict of interest is always there.

(1) https://www.tricitynews.com/bonnie-henry-warns-businesses-against-covid-testing-1.24156860 (REMOVED)
(2) Archive.is
(3) Wayback Machine
(4) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/
(5) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/id/pch,016-2020-2021-Q2-1334155,current

Posted on

Executives Of Public Health “Charities” Drawing Huge Salaries To Lock You Down

It seems that most, if not all, of these “public health” organizations are actually registered charities. This is likely structured that way to encourage private donations. After all, a person isn’t really making the entire payment if they are submitting receipts to the Canada Revenue Agency.

While this article starts off with the Nova Scotia Health Authority, the pattern here can be applied to its counterparts elsewhere.

Looking at the most recent tax information available, the NSHA took in some $2.5 billion in revenues, and approximately 90% of it was Government (or rather taxpayer) funded. Approximately 10% came from some other sources. Also makes one wonder what “other sources” could be, if it isn’t gifts, donations (with or without a receipt), or Government money.

As for the expenses, administrative costs is a pretty self explanatory title. However, 92%, presumably what was spent on health care, is actually listed as “charitable programs”. $1.7 billion was spent on salaries, and $24.5 million on consulting fees.

By the way, whatever happened to that $83 million classified as “other” spending? Did it end up in someone’s pocket, or some offshore bank account?

[March 2016] Compensated full-time positions:
$250,000 to $299,999: 7
$300,000 to $349,999: 1
$350,000 and over: 2
.
[March 2017] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 6
$250,000 to $299,999: 3
$300,000 to $349,999: 1
.
[March 2018] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 5
$250,000 to $299,999: 3
$300,000 to $349,999: 1
$350,000 and over: 1
.
[March 2019] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 3
$250,000 to $299,999: 6
$350,000 and over: 1
.
[March 2020] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 3
$250,000 to $299,999: 4
$300,000 to $349,999: 2
$350,000 and over: 1

It certainly seems that the executives were paid very well for what they do. And nothing screams competent quite like locking down an entire Province for a year (and counting). No one has been fired, or forced onto CERB or EI.

Never forget that tyrants like Rankin and Strang are willing to use secret court hearings in order to shut down the ability of people to peacefully voice their unhappiness.

Just a thought: perhaps the groups who are so interested in lobbying the Nova Scotia Government to buy large quantities of their products are also making donations to the NS Health Authority. It may be worth considering.

This is hardly limited to Nova Scotia. Taking a look at the tax records of the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, BCPHSA, we get this:

[March 2016] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 2
$250,000 to $299,999: 6
$300,000 to $349,999: 1
$350,000 and over: 1
.
[March 2017] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 1
$250,000 to $299,999: 7
$300,000 to $349,999: 1
$350,000 and over: 1
.
[March 2018] Compensated full-time positions:
$200,000 to $249,999: 3
$250,000 to $299,999: 6
$350,000 and over: 1
.
[March 2019] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2020] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

Next we turn to Alberta Health Services. Remember, Jason Kenney is a “conservative” and claims to support freedom. As for the people running the AHS, it’s interesting that there are always 10 people listed. Or perhaps it just refers to the top 10 earners.

[March 2016] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2017] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2018] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2019] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2020] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

The Saskatchewan Health Authority is no better, paying its top executives more than $350,000 each. They also support lockdowns, and pushing experimental poison on their citizens. Way to promote public health.

[March 2016] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2017] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2018] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2019] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2020] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

Next up is the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, which is separate from the Manitoba Government, although subjected to the rules imposed Provincially.

[March 2016] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2017] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2018] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2019] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10
.
[March 2020] Compensated full-time positions:
$350,000 and over: 10

Anyone notice a pattern here? The top executives are making large amounts of money, often in excess of $300,000 per year. While others are told that their jobs and businesses are “non-essential”, the decision makers are still drawing their salaries. There hasn’t been a single notice of such a person getting laid off. The damage they cause seems to be irrelevant.

See what else is listed as a charity.
It’s quite surprising.

Depending on the Province, and amount given, tax rebates are possible in the area of around 50%. This means that the public will be subsidizing these “donations”.

Remember that $5 million donation from the Como Foundation to Trillium Health Partners? Como is a company whose business skyrocketed after mask mandates were imposed. The Canadian public, and in particular, Ontarians, will be picking up the tab.

As a final thought, it’s not just health care institutions that are structured as charities. Countless colleges and universities are either structured the same way, or have a foundation that is. Every time they get donations, the public is forced to subsidize it.

And it’s worth pointing out, many schools receive grants from pharmaceutical companies. Sometimes it’s in the form of scholarships, sometimes as research funding.

(1) Nova Scotia Health Authority Charity Page
(2) https://novascotia.ca/sns/Lobbyist/default.asp
(3) BC Provincial Health Services Authority
(4) BCCDC Foundation For Population & Public Health
(5) Alberta Health Services
(6) Saskatchewan Health Authority
(7) Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
(8) https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/giving-charity-information-donors/claiming-charitable-tax-credits/charitable-donation-tax-credit-rates.html

Posted on

AstraZeneca Maker, Emergent BioSolutions, Lobbying All Federal Parties

In theory, politics is supposed to offer choice. Different views and ideals compete to see who is able to gain the support of the public. But reality is quite different. “Opposition” parties are often on the receiving end of the same influence peddling as government. In a sense, this is why nothing really changes,

And it’s at least part of the reason they keep pushing experimental vaccines on Canadians.

Not limited to Ontario or Ottawa, this lobbying is happening out in the West as well. Learn who Jean-Marc Prevost really is.

From this earlier piece, it’s shown that Amber Ruddy, the Secretary of the National Council of the Conservative Party of Canada is an ACTIVE lobbyist. It doesn’t prevent her from running the fundraising arm of the so-called “Official Opposition”.

This is not limited to the so-called “Conservatives”. This sort of conflict of interest exists in other parties as well. Left, Right, Center… it’s all the same.

Bridget Howe worked for the Liberal Party of Canada for years. She even helped Trudeau get re-elected. Then in January 2020, she moved over to Counsel Public Affairs and started working as a lobbyist. She is not alone either.

Sheamus Murphy worked for the Ontario (Liberal) Government, and for the Federal Liberals while in opposition. It seems that his work for Emergent BioSolutions actually dates back to 2017, so he’s been shilling for a while.

In August 2017, Ben Parsons went from being a Senior Advisor for the Liberal Party of Canada, to a lobbyist for Counsel Public Affairs. That certainly didn’t take long.

Brad Lavigne actually used to run the Federal NDP back in the days of Jack Layton. Now, he shills for the very same corporations he once pretended he opposed.

This sort of thing is hardly an isolated incident. Some more of the corruption that lobbying is:

But don’t worry. If all else fails, simply vote for the PPC. Surely, Maxime Bernier will stand up to the pharmaceutical industry, and do what he can to protect Canadians.

On second thought, maybe those high profile lawsuits will work instead. After all, a defense is expected to be filed any day now.

Why should people care about this? Because if democracy is going to work, then there has to be real options. Simply putting new labels on the same things doesn’t count.

(1) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/advSrch
(2) https://counselpa.com/
(3) https://www.linkedin.com/in/bridgethowe/
(4) https://archive.is/S6B9i
(5) https://www.linkedin.com/in/brad-lavigne-a0927a39/
(6) https://archive.is/rTfrK
(7) https://www.linkedin.com/in/sheamusmurphy/
(8) https://archive.is/zghs1
(9) https://www.linkedin.com/in/benparso/

Posted on

Repost: Asking 10 Tough Questions And Exposing Vaccine Genocide

This is a repost from Exposing Vaccine Genocide, by Dr. Leonard Horowitz. Here are 10 hard questions that need to be asked and answered, in order to get a more complete picture of what’s going on. Go check out the site itself.

https://exposingvaccinegenocide.org/10-tough-questions-we-asked/

(1) Why is vaccination risk data always neglected or concealed by officials?

(2) With no tracking (and no published long-term studies) of vaccination risks; including injuries, illnesses and deaths, how can we be sure vaccines are not killing and maiming more people than we may be helping or saving with “immunizations”?

(3) Why are exploding cancer rates never linked to the common vaccine contaminants such as the Epstein Barr Virus (“EBV”) known to prompt cancers?

(4) Why does Bill Gates lecture on vaccines reducing the world’s population by 15% if they are so “safe and effective” and are meant to “save lives”?

(5) With nearly 40 million people having died from HIV/AIDS since 1978, why haven’t officials refuted the many experts who evidence that AIDS sourced from hepatitis B vaccines containing SIVcpz (chimpanzee AIDS virus)?*

(6) Why, after the Merck Drug Co.’s all time leading vaccine developer, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, stated during an interview in 1982 on PBS that he unwittingly brought the AIDS virus into North America while unknowingly developing AIDS-laced vaccines for Merck, has science and the media neglected this frightening admission?

(7) How much money does the drug industry and “modern medicine” make from vaccine side effects?

(8) How much money in “perks” and “bribes,” in total, is paid to lawmakers and medical doctors by Big Pharma to promote vaccinations?

(9) Why, if scholars are required to reveal their conflicting financial interests before being permitted to publicly speak promoting their products at medical conferences or scientific symposiums is the mainstream media not required to similarly inform viewers and readers how much money they received from drug and vaccine advertisers?

(10) Why have federal prosecutors neglected unfair and deceptive trade practices in healthcare evidenced by the widespread monopolization of health science and medicine, including heavy suppression and disparagement of natural health products and providers, such as chiropractors, acupuncturists and homeopathic physicians?

Footnotes:

  • Pursuant to exposing vaccine genocide, these hepatitis B vaccines were injected into gay men in NYC, Willowbrook State School mentally retarded children on Staten Island in New York, and Black sex workers in central Africa from 1972 thru 1974–that is, 2-4 years before the first AIDS cases were discovered in these precise places and exact groups.

Most sensible people would agree that these are important questions. So why aren’t they being openly addressed?

Posted on

Canadian Pharmaceutical Sciences Foundation A Registered Charity Funded By Drug Companies

The Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences (CSPS) is an NGO devoted to advancing drug research in Canada. It also states it wants to be “involved with the [political] decision making process. The Canadian Pharmaceutical Sciences Foundation (CPFS) appears to be the fundraising arm of the CSPS. The Foundation is a registered charity with the Canada Revenue Agency.

The CPFS was received its status as a charity in 2018. From that point on, any donations made would be eligible for taxpayer funded rebates of around 50%.

As pointed out in the previous article, there is a reason public health groups are often set up as charities. It makes private interest groups more likely to donate, since the taxpayers end up subsidizing a good chunk of these contributions.

According to its website, the The specific goals of the CSPS are:

  • To advocate excellence in pharmaceutical research
  • To promote allocation of funds for pharmaceutical research
  • To be involved in decision and policy making processes at the government level

On the surface, this doesn’t seem so bad. But this is where things get sticky: the big donors to the CSPS are pharmaceutical companies. In other words, the organization calling for (a) better pharma research; (b) more funding for research; and (c) being involved with the policy decisions gets money from drug makers.

Doesn’t this come across as a bit of a conflict of interest?

LATINUM SPONSORS

  • Roche
  • University of Alberta

GOLD SPONSORS

  • Abbvie
  • AstraZeneca
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Gilead
  • Janssen
  • Innovative Medicines Canada
  • Merck
  • Pendant Biosciences

SILVER SPONSORS

  • Waters

BRONZE SPONSORS

  • Advanced Polymer Materials
  • Aphria
  • Avicanna
  • Bayer
  • CDRD
  • CJPP
  • Dalhousie U
  • Dynacare
  • IMV
  • IPAC
  • Pfizer
  • Precision Rx-Dx
  • London HSC
  • Children’s Hospital
  • Northernchem
  • Panag
  • SickKids
  • Schulich Medicine & Dentistry, Western U
  • University of Toronto Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy
  • U of Toronto Physiology & Pharmacology

A/V SPONSOR

  • PSAV

Taking a look at their 2018 conference newsletter, it’s revealed that major drug companies (including household names) are top sponsors. Pharma research is being promoted and funded … by the very companies who stand to profit from the sales of those products. Remember, CSPS wants to be involved in the decision making process.

As for their 2017 conference sponsors, well, you probably get the idea by now. It’s funded by interested parties.

The CSPS offers an undergraduate award to all pharmacy schools in Canada. There is also a GSK early career award. The University of Alberta also offers a “poster award” for the most innovative poster presentation, based on scientific discovery.

Do as you will, but understand where pharma research money is really coming from. A lot of it is from drug companies, getting tax breaks on the backs of the public.

(1) https://www.cspscanada.org/
(2) https://www.cspscanada.org/canadian-pharmaceutical-sciences-foundation-2/
(3) https://www.cspscanada.org/about-csps/mission-vision/
(4) https://www.cspscanada.org/symposium-events/awards/research-program-awards/
(5) https://www.cspscanada.org/symposium-events/awards/csps-awards/early-career-award/
(6) https://www.cspscanada.org/symposium-events/awards/poster-awards/
(7) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/srch/pub/chrt
(8) https://www.cspscanada.org/?s=sponsors
(9) CSPS Conference Sponsors 2012
(10) CSPS Conference Sponsors 2014
(11) CSPS Conference Sponsors 2015
(12) CSPS Conference Sponsors 2016
(13) CSPS Conference Sponsors 2017
(14) CSPS Newsletter 2016 Fall Edition
(15) CSPS Newsletter 2017 Fall Edition
(16) CSPS Newsletter 2018 Fall Edition