Immigration (Canada) Archives - Page 3 of 32

June 30, 2022

Gov’t Recommends More Pathways For Hong Kong Residents To Come

The Canadian Government has posted its take on the report by the Immigration Committee in Parliament. This concerns the topic: “Safe Haven in Canada: Special Immigration and Refugee Measures are Urgently Needed for the People of Hong Kong”.

The responses are not encouraging. Overall, Ottawa seems to favour more people coming to Canada, and less accountability overall. While most of the recommendations are specific to Hong Kong, there’s little interest in legitimate security concerns related to China.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

Recommendation 1
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issue study permits to Hong Kong applicants who have been accepted in a study program at an institution with a COVID-19 readiness plan, regardless of their age.

Recommendation 2
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada undertake to extend the young professionals Working Holiday work permit for Hong Kong residents to two years and to include persons up to 35 years of age.

Recommendation 3
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada extend the criteria for eligibility for the three-year open work permit to include all persons with a minimum of 60 credits or its equivalent of post-secondary education regardless of when this education was completed.

Disagreed with, if only because there are already of pathways available. This is a response that will come up over and over again.

Recommendations 4 and 5
#4 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada adopt an inclusive approach and develop a pathway to permanent residence for former Hong Kong residents based on a broad range of work experience, and requiring minimal language and education levels.
#5 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada quickly develop and implement a pathway to permanent residence for Hong Kong residents who complete their post-secondary studies in Canada, ensuring that this pathway remains available to all Hong Kong residents studying at designated learning institutions.

Recommendations 6 and 7
#6 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada create a temporary public policy to grant refugee status to pro-democracy activists within Hong Kong and within third countries, which will enable their resettlement to Canada.
#7 That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada implement a temporary public policy to bring Hong Kong residents at risk to Canada on temporary resident visas regardless of their age.

Recommendation 8
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada partner with designated non-governmental organizations to identify Hong Kong pro-democracy activists in need of safe haven in Canada on a temporary resident visa, to certify Hong Kong refugees, and to facilitate both classes of Hong Kong residents at risk to travel from Hong Kong to third countries and to Canada, and redevelop a refugee stream similar to the former source country program.

Recommendation 9
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada acknowledge the urgency of the situation and that, given the exit ban will take effect on 1 August 2021, the Minister immediately respond with an expansion of humanitarian measures to the current immigration and refugee measures to support the people of Hong Kong.

Recommendation 10
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issue travel documents to residents of Hong Kong at risk of persecution and exempt them from non-essential pandemic travel restrictions, following all public health guidelines.

Recommendation 11
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada implement a temporary public policy to create an expedited pathway to permanent residence for Hong Kong residents in Canada or abroad before the exit ban comes into effect on 1 August 2021.

Recommendation 12
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada promote its family reunification stream to family members of Hong Kong residents looking to come to Canada and create a temporary public policy to also include extended family members of Canadian citizens and of pro-democracy activists living in Canada.

Recommendation 13
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada develop a temporary public policy to allow former Canadian citizens to return to Canada as permanent residents.

Recommendation 14
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, in partnership with Public Services and Procurement Canada, and, as needed, other departments and agencies, investigate Canada’s Visa Application Centres in China, especially in regard to personal data leaks due to employee coercion, and that it tables its findings with the Committee.

Recommendation 15
That Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada terminate its contract with VFS Global in China and bring the services back in-house at Canadian diplomatic missions in China.

The Government disagrees with recommendations #14 and #15, which is interesting. There seems to be little urgency to investigate, or replace a private agency (despite concerns) that is processing the visas for Chinese nationals.

Doesn’t seem like there is much interest in protecting Canadian borders or sovereignty.

3. Important Links

(1) https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/CIMM/report-1/
(2) https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/CIMM/report-1/response-8512-441-10
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/content/Committee/441/CIMM/GovResponse/RP11842881/441_CIMM_Rpt01_GR/DepartmentOfCitizenshipAndImmigration-e.pdf
(4) Department Of Citizenship And Immigration Hong Kong

June 13, 2022July 22, 2024

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

Below is some significant data on temporary foreign workers (TFW) from 1994 to 2013. (See archive). In fairness, the totals differ somewhat from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. Perhaps, the methods of calculation weren’t the same.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

There’s also the issue that “temporary” workers and students often don’t leave when their visas expire. Canada offers many pathways to extend their stays, and there is little in the way of enforcement.

Aside from all the official totals, there are 3 “temporary” programs that are worth mentioning. These lead to hundreds of thousands of foreigners entering Canada each year, and most with some option to extend. There are also pathways to permanent residence. These are:

Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
International Mobility Programme (IMP)
International Students

Let’s look at a decade worth of data, and see where the bulk of these people are coming from. Of course, this should be pretty obvious. This is from page 27 and 36, and focuses on the International Mobility Programme. In fairness, it’s likely that a lot of these people leave afterwards. That said, having the rates would be nice.

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

For reference: the International Mobility Visas (also known as “Working Holiday Visas”) are typically valid for 1-2 years. The charts below refer to the total at any given year.

YEAR	NEW IMP PERMITS ISSUED
1994	64,020
1995	60,358
1996	59,293
1997	61,339
1998	64,405
1999	67,584
2000	71,186
2001	72,525
2002	66,984
2003	58,619
2004	66,757
2005	72,689
2006	81,312
2007	88,217
2008	102,659
2009	106,737
2010	121,642
2011	138,533
2012	148,070
2013	161,541

This is from page 27 of this report. Overall data is from 1994 to 2013. Also, the number of permits has nearly tripled from 1994 (64,000) through to 2013 (161,000).

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	18,567	27.8	1
Australia	7,271	10.9	2
France	7,028	10.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,476	9.7	4
Japan	5,916	8.9	5
Germany	2,467	3.7	6
China	1,801	2.8	7
Ireland	1,615	2.4	8
South Korea	1,558	1.8	9
New Zealand	1,484	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	53,517	80.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	13,240	19.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	66,757	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	19,453	26.8	1
France	8,636	11.9	2
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,701	9.2	3
Japan	6,244	9.2	4
Germany	2,751	3.8	5
South Korea	1,998	2.7	6
China	1,959	2.7	7
New Zealand	1,702	2.3	8
India	1,688	2.3	9
Ireland	1,572	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	52,704	72.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	19,985	27.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	72,689	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	21,469	26.4	1
France	9,767	12.0	2
Australia	7,975	9.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,894	8.5	4
Japan	5,953	7.3	5
Germany	4,211	5.2	6
India	2,295	2.8	7
China	2,242	2.8	8
South Korea	2,009	2.5	9
Ireland	1,998	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	64,813	79.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	16,499	20.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	81,312	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	22,168	25.1	1
France	10,358	11.7	2
Australia	8,220	9.3	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,397	8.4	4
Japan	5,683	6.4	5
Germany	4,809	5.5	6
China	2,822	3.2	7
South Korea	2,363	2.7	8
Ireland	2,259	2.6	9
New Zealand	2,058	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	68,137	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	20,080	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	88,217	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	24,169	23.5	1
Australia	11,879	11.6	2
France	11,505	11.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	7,813	7.6	4
Japan	6,715	6.5	5
Germany	5,336	5.2	6
India	3,776	3.7	7
South Korea	3,318	3.2	8
China	3,098	3.0	9
New Zealand	2,436	2.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	80,045	78.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	22,614	22.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	102,659	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	23,446	22.0	1
France	14,233	13.3	2
Australia	10,053	9.4	3
United Kingdom	7,983	7.5	4
Germany	6,092	5.7	5
Japan	5,954	5.6	6
India	4,166	3.9	7
South Korea	4,041	3.8	8
China	2,920	2.7	9
Ireland	2,812	2.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,700	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	25,037	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	106,737	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,398	22.5	1
France	16,107	13.2	2
Australia	10,375	8.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	8,161	6.7	4
Germany	6,812	5.6	5
India	6,603	5.4	6
South Korea	5,508	4.5	7
Japan	5,059	4.2	8
Ireland	3,649	3.0	9
Philippines	3,440	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	93,112	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	28,530	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,642	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	27,979	20.2	1
France	17,509	12.6	2
India	9,961	7.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,386	6.8	4
Australia	9,160	6.6	5
Germany	6,854	4.9	6
Japan	6,284	4.5	7
South Korea	6,014	4.3	8
Philippines	5,514	4.0	9
Ireland	5,247	3.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	103,908	75.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	34,625	25.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	138,533	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	29,833	20.1	1
France	17,951	12.1	2
India	11,368	7.7	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	9,771	6.6	4
Australia	9,135	6.2	5
Germany	6,932	4.7	6
Japan	6,436	4.3	7
Ireland	6,231	4.2	8
South Korea	6,144	4.1	9
Philippines	5,387	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	109,188	73.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,882	26.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	148,070	100	—

INT’L MOBILITY PROGRAMME, PERMITS HOLDERS IN 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	30,399	18.8	1
France	19,971	12.4	2
India	14,251	8.8	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	10,189	6.3	4
Australia	9,840	6.1	5
Ireland	7,076	4.4	6
Japan	6,723	4.1	7
Philippines	6,703	4.1	8
Germany	6,386	4.0	9
South Korea	5,885	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	117,423	72.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	44,118	27.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,541	100	—

It should also be mentioned: it’s likely that a lot more of people from this program will actually leave afterwards, as opposed to international students, and the TFWP.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

June 12, 2022July 21, 2024

Source Countries For “Temporary” Workers: 2004-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
International Mobility Programme (IMP)
International Students

Let’s look at a decade worth of data, and see where the bulk of these people are coming from. Of course, this should be pretty obvious. This is on page 17.

Starting with the TFWP: it should be apparent from the data provided that the Philippines is consistently at the top of the TFWP.

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

Note: these figures are considerably less than the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. It’s unclear why, but perhaps this doesn’t encompass all portions. In any event, we can at least see where people are coming from.

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	13,812	37.1	1
United States	4,423	11.9	2
India	2,714	7.3	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	2,636	7.1	4
Japan	1,125	3.0	5
France	1,095	2.9	6
South Africa	918	2.5	7
Australia	847	2.3	8
China	537	1.4	9
South Korea	513	1.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	28,620	76.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	8,602	24.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	37,222	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	16,561	38.1	1
United States	4,721	10.9	2
India	3,560	8.2	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,179	7.3	4
France	1,233	2.8	5
Japan	1,042	2.4	6
South Africa	972	2.2	7
Australia	867	2.0	8
Germany	827	1.9	9
China	642	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	33,004	76.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	10,415	24.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	43,419	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	21,362	39.5	1
United States	4,924	9.1	2
India	4,249	7.9	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,568	6.6	4
France	1,509	2.8	5
Germany	1,225	2.3	6
Japan	1,055	2.0	7
South Korea	1,020	1.9	8
Australia	984	1.8	9
Thailand	847	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	40,743	75.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	13,275	24.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	54,018	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	32,451	41.4	1
India	6,250	8.0	2
United States	5,456	6.9	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,402	5.6	4
China	2,447	3.1	5
Mexico	2,337	3.0	6
France	1,928	2.5	7
Germany	1,905	2.4	8
South Korea	1,531	2.0	9
Australia	1,234	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	59,941	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	18,420	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	78,361	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	46,816	42.3	1
India	8,333	7.5	2
United States	6,305	5.7	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,812	5.3	4
Mexico	4,819	4.4	5
South Korea	2,922	2.6	6
Germany	2,743	2.5	7
China	2,727	2.7	8
France	2,309	2.1	9
Japan	1,684	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	78,165	70.7	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	32,464	29.3	—
GRAND TOTAL	110,629	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	51,019	45.3	1
India	8,287	7.4	2
United States	6,242	5.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,657	5.0	4
Mexico	4,467	4.0	5
South Korea	3,101	2.8	6
France	2,435	2.2	7
Germany	2,349	2.1	8
China	2,239	2.0	9
Japan	1,523	1.4	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,319	77.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	25,266	22.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	112,585	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	44,401	50.8	1
India	7,338	8.0	2
United States	5,044	5.5	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,165	4.5	4
Mexico	2,747	3.0	5
France	2,409	2.6	6
South Korea	2,305	2.5	7
China	1,717	1.9	8
Guatemala	1,468	1.6	9
Germany	1,378	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	72,972	79.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	19,182	20.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	92,154	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	36,984	45.3	1
India	5,728	7.0	2
United States	4,937	6.1	3
Mexico	4,019	4.9	4
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,749	4.6	5
France	2,664	3.3	6
South Korea	2,210	2.8	7
China	1,568	1.9	8
Guatemala	1,523	1.9	9
Jamaica	1,188	1.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	64,570	79.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	17,016	20.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	81,586	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	36,501	42.1	1
India	6,520	7.5	2
United States	5,741	6.6	3
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,052	4.7	4
Mexico	2,983	3.4	5
France	2,924	3.4	6
South Korea	2,517	2.9	7
Guatemala	2,036	2.3	8
China	1,632	1.9	9
Thailand	1,403	1.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	66,039	76.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	20,671	23.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	86,710	100	—

TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS ADMITTED IN 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Philippines	40,655	39.0	1
India	7,930	7.6	2
United States	5,861	5.6	3
United Kingdom	4,941	4.7	4
Mexico	4,226	4.1	5
South Korea	3,369	3.5	6
France	3,230	3.1	7
Guatemala	2,504	2.4	8
Jamaica	2,234	2.1	9
Ireland	2,078	2.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	77,028	74.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	27,132	26.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	104,160	100	—

Of course, this is just a snapshot from a decade, but it shows the patterns. It’s also worth noting that the TFWP has many pathways to extend visas, or to transition in permanent residents.

A quick look will show that Canada went from 37,000 or so visas in 2004, to issuing 104,000 in 2013. That has not gone on unnoticed.

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

This point had been made before, but is important to go over again. (See archive). In 2013/2014, the “Conservative” Government of Stephen Harper faced backlash for how many TFWs were coming into the Canada, and the effect of reducing wages.

Instead of making serious cuts — as was implied — the Government split up the program, and bumped up the number of people who could come under the International Mobility Programme. This had the effect of appearing (on paper) that significant reductions had occurred, but was really a sleight-of-hand.

The International Mobility Programme will be covered in greater detail later, but here is some background information on it.

And sure, there’s always the claim that immigration and temporary workers will grow the economy. Yes, but which economies? Perhaps many aren’t up to date on some of the statistics surrounding remittances sent abroad from Canada. Or sent globally.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

June 2, 2022February 14, 2023

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

This piece focuses on the problem that is the United States border, particularly the side with Mexico. There have been many interests vested in not securing it. Consequently, people flood in illegally, since there’s little reason not to.

Why should Canadians care about this?

The answer is simple: it’s not just an American problem. Open borders threatens the sovereignty of nations in general. Not only that, many of those illegal aliens will surely be working their way to Canada, given the generous welfare benefits available.

Unfortunately, far too few Canadians, including many “conservatives”, fail to realize that open borders changes everything. The makeup of the country impacts everything: voting patterns; finance; culture; crime; and future immigration policies. And the mantra “just come legally” misses the bigger picture.

For an earlier piece on the estimated real scale of illegals in the U.S., north of 22 million. There was also this gem in 2018, suing for the right to illegally enter the U.S.

Now, let’s get into some of the data from the USCBP, or the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. The numbers are quite shocking indeed.

A note about “fiscal year”: Fiscal Year 2022 runs October 01, 2021 – September 30, 2022. All of the years seem to be done in this format.

“Recidivism” in the context of CBP refers to the percentage of people who are detained multiple times within the same fiscal year. It’s been approximately 25% the last few years, meaning 1/4 of people caught and forced to leave are caught again. There doesn’t seem to be much of a deterrent. As for drugs being brought in:

Month	Marijuana	Cocaine	Heroin	Meth	Fentanyl	Other
October 2021	376	220	0	290	73	3
November 2021	191	73	0	581	84	3
December 2021	127	102	66	559	26	4
January 2022	360	39	0	457	65	56
February 2022	785	90	2	268	12	27
March 2022	58	50	2	224	13	4
April 2022	259	186	14	479	174	19

Data from the 2022 fiscal year (thus far). The C.B.P. also provides recent statistics on the drug busts that have occurred from people trying to bring narcotics into the country. While it’s nice to have these seizures, it’s likely just a drop in the bucket as to what really goes on.

AGENCY INVOLVED	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office of Field Operations Encounters	216,370	281,881	288,523	241,786	294,352	259,057
U.S. Border Patrol Total Encounters	310,531	404,142	859,501	405,036	1,662,167	1,219,920
Total Enforcement Actions	526,901	683,178	1,148,024	646,822	1,956,519	1,478,977

For “enforcement actions”, this refers to: individuals encountered at ports of entry who are seeking lawful admission into the United States but are determined to be inadmissible, individuals presenting themselves to seek humanitarian protection under our laws, and individuals who withdraw an application for admission and return to their countries of origin within a short timeframe. This is according to the CBP’s own definition.

In other words, it’s the number of people who show up LEGALLY to border ports of entry and then are turned away. It doesn’t cover the vast numbers who enter illegally between border ports.

CATEGORY	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Office Of Field Operations
Criminal Non-Citizens	10,596	11,623	12,705	7,009	6,567	9,101
NCIC Arrests	7,656	5,929	8,546	7,108	8,979	5,580
U.S. Border Patrol
Criminal Noncitizens Encountered	8,531	6,698	4,269	2,438	10,763	5,985
Criminal Noncitizens With Warrants	2,675	1,550	4,153	2,054	1,904	525

There have also been considerable amounts of arrests for people who either had criminal records, and/or outstanding warrants. This doesn’t include people who entered without being detected.

GANG ARRESTS	FY15	FY16	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
18th Street	84	47	61	145	168	36	28	66
MS-13	335	253	228	413	464	72	113	149
Paisas	73	119	53	62	90	93	79	80
Other	352	283	194	188	254	162	128	98
Total	844	702	536	808	976	363	348	393

There have also been gang-related arrests of people attempting to enter the United States. Of course, not all are included, just a few which represent the larger numbers of arrests.

Concerning arrests of suspected terrorists (all nationalities), CBP provides some data of people detained at both the Southern and Northern borders.

TERRORISTS AT BORDER	FY17	FY18	FY19	FY20	FY21	FY22TD
Southern Border	116	155	280	72	103	42
Northern Border	217	196	258	124	54	115
Total	333	351	538	196	157	157

How many encounters does the U.S. Government have overall? Thankfully, they do provide more data, and a lot of it is mind blowing.

Nationwide Encounters
.
Encounter data includes U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Title 8 Apprehensions, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 Inadmissibles, and Title 42 Expulsions for fiscal years (FY) 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data is available for the Northern Land Border, Southwest Land Border, and Nationwide (i.e., air, land, and sea modes of transportation) encounters.

FISCAL YEAR	2019	2020	2021	2022
October	60,781	45,139	71,929	164,849
November	62,469	42,643	72,113	174,849
December	70,694	40,565	73,994	179,254
January	58,317	36,585	78,414	154,816
February	76,545	36,687	101,099	165,900
March	103,731	34,460	173,277	221,144
April	109,415	17,106	178,795	234,088
May	114,116	23,237	180,597	–
June	104,311	33,049	189,034	–
July	81,777	40,929	213,593	–
August	62,707	50,014	209,840	–
September	57,674	192,001	227,547	–
TOTAL	962,533	458,088	1,734,686	1,141,054 (so far)

Once more, how many people are simply sneaking in undetected?

The data can further be broken down by the type of person/people coming:

Accompanied Minors (AM)
Individuals in a Family Unit (FMUA)
Single Adults
Unaccompanied Children (UC)

While there are clearly a lot of people who get stopped by the various departments, an awful lot don’t. They are let in through some pathway, or just sneak in.

It also doesn’t help that there are countless Sanctuary Cities and States, which do an end run around border security. If people know they can get social services without the risk of being deported, many more will come.

Again, this is not just an American issue. Many of the hordes flooding into the U.S. will eventually make their way North. Canadians should absolutely be worried about this.

Don’t worry, there will be much more included on this subject in the near future. This can’t be done justice by a single piece.

(1) https://www.cbp.gov/
(2) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
(3) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters
(4) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
(5) https://canucklaw.ca/true-scale-of-illegals-in-us-22-million-more-amnesty-coming/
(6) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-2-migrant-caravan-lawyers-sue-for-right-to-legally-invade-u-s/
(7) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-10b-sanctuary-cities-an-end-run-around-having-borders/

June 1, 2022June 2, 2022

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

Ever wonder how many international students are in Canada, and where they come from? Well, we have some data available, courtesy of the Federal Government. Let’s take a look at this troubling pattern.

The replacement agenda (a.k.a. the Kalergi Plan) is alive and well. And flooding the country with students from abroad is just one way to help implement it. Colleges and universities get much needed cash, and students get access to life in the West.

One thing to note: it appears that the data from these tables, page 44, refers to the TOTAL number of international students within Canada. This is not the same as the number of visas issued annually.

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,954	23.7	1
South Korea	26,700	15.8	2
United States	12,807	7.6	3
Japan	8,983	5.3	4
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,685	4.0	5
India	6,680	4.0	6
France	6,677	4.0	7
Taiwan	5,247	3.1	8
Mexico	3,384	2.0	9
Germany	2,294	1.4	10
Iran	2,110	1.4	11
Hong Kong	1,993	1.2	12
Pakistan	1,836	1.1	13
Vietnam	1,751	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,731	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	122,147	72.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,492	27.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	168,639	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	40,021	23.5	1
South Korea	27,596	16.2	2
United States	13,130	7.7	3
Japan	9,057	5.3	4
India	7,153	4.2	5
France	6,952	4.1	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,944	3.5	7
Taiwan	4,928	2.9	8
Mexico	3,601	2.1	9
Iran	2,558	1.5	10
Germany	2,462	1.4	11
Hong Kong	2,397	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,795	1.1	13
Bangladesh	1,718	1.0	14
Vietnam	1,695	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	131,007	76.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,461	23.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	170,468	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,993	23.2	1
South Korea	29,551	17.1	2
United States	12,920	7.5	3
Japan	8,310	4.8	4
France	8,125	4.7	5
India	7,464	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,404	3.1	7
Taiwan	4,853	2.8	8
Mexico	3,839	2.2	9
Hong Kong	2,663	1.5	10
Germany	2,588	1.5	11
Iran	2,342	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,839	1.1	13
Morocco	1,723	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,651	0.9	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	133,265	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,110	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	172,375	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	41,113	22.9	1
South Korea	30,676	17.1	2
United States	12,835	7.2	3
France	9,005	5.0	4
India	7,929	4.4	5
Japan	7,662	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,021	2.8	7
Taiwan	4,683	2.6	8
Mexico	3,861	2.2	9
Germany	2,947	1.6	10
Hong Kong	2,812	1.5	11
Iran	2,390	1.3	12
Brazil	1,959	1.1	13
Morocco	1,930	1.1	14
Nigeria	1,919	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	136,742	76.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	42,413	23.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	179,155	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	43,101	23.4	1
South Korea	28,976	15.7	2
United States	12,226	6.6	3
France	9,377	5.1	4
India	8,286	4.5	5
Japan	6,592	3.6	6
United Kingdom	4,627	2.5	7
Saudi Arabia	4,463	2.4	8
Taiwan	4,122	2.2	9
Mexico	3,879	2.1	10
Germany	3,141	1.7	11
Hong Kong	2,912	1.6	12
Iran	2,649	1.4	13
Brazil	2,396	1.3	14
Nigeria	2,178	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	138,925	75.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	45,254	24.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	184,179	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	50,446	24.7	1
South Korea	27,166	13.3	2
United States	12,128	5.9	3
India	11,682	5.7	4
France	10,358	5.1	5
Saudi Arabia	8,413	4.1	6
Japan	6,113	3.0	7
Mexico	4,184	2.1	8
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,151	2.0	9
Taiwan	3,816	1.9	10
Iran	3,507	1.7	11
Germany	3,102	1.5	12
Hong Kong	2,956	1.4	13
Nigeria	2,820	1.4	14
Brazil	2,415	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	153,257	75.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	50,795	24.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	204,052	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	57,339	25.4	1
South Korea	25,301	11.2	2
India	20,281	9.0	3
Saudi Arabia	12,267	5.4	4
United States	12,156	5.4	5
France	11,365	5.0	6
Japan	5,874	2.6	7
Mexico	4,384	1.9	8
Iran	3,930	1.7	9
Nigeria	3,648	1.6	10
Taiwan	3,639	1.6	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,563	1.5	12
Germany	3,142	1.4	13
Hong Kong	2,864	1.3	14
Brazil	2,722	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	172,475	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	52,920	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,395	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	68,469	27.5	1
India	27,339	11.0	2
South Korea	22,631	9.1	3
Saudi Arabia	14,180	5.7	4
France	12,715	5.1	5
United States	12,191	4.9	6
Japan	6,018	2.4	7
Mexico	4,801	1.9	8
Iran	4,755	1.9	9
Nigeria	4,432	1.8	10
Taiwan	3,370	1.4	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,360	1.4	12
Brazil	3,270	1.3	13
Pakistan	3,161	1.3	14
Vietnam	3,110	1.3	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	190,432	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	58,395	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	248,827	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	81,444	29.5	1
India	32,243	11.7	2
South Korea	20,285	7.4	3
France	14,748	5.3	4
Saudi Arabia	13,930	5.0	5
United States	12,302	4.5	6
Japan	6,486	2.4	7
Nigeria	5,481	2.0	8
Iran	5,229	1.9	9
Brazil	5,126	1.8	10
Mexio	4,977	1.8	11
Pakistan	3,588	1.3	12
Vietnam	3,523	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,358	1.2	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,352	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	208,961	75.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	66,922	24.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	275,883	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	95,731	31.4	1
India	34,887	11.4	2
South Korea	19,123	6.3	3
France	16,486	5.4	4
Saudi Arabia	13,955	4.6	5
United States	12,263	4.0	6
Brazil	7,757	2.5	7
Nigeria	6,903	2.3	8
Japan	6,604	2.2	9
Mexico	5,306	1.7	10
Iran	5,177	1.7	11
Vietnam	4,173	1.4	12
Pakistan	4,045	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,500	1.1	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,462	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	239,372	78.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	65,504	21.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	304,876	100	—

Again, this refers to the total number of students in the country, not the amount of visas issued in any given year. Needless to say, those numbers continue to climb as well. Note: page 48 of the same document gives even higher totals for the same years.

For a reference point, consider page 15 of the 2020 Canada Annual Immigration Report to Parliament. It was reported that:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

This means that the number of foreign students has nearly tripled from 2013 to 2019/2020. This is a major source of people entering the country.

Keep in mind, there are many, MANY pathways for international students to stay longer, or transition into permanent residents. The probable reason for not being open about this is to minimize the backlash from the already high immigration rates.

May 25, 2022July 21, 2024

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1980 – 2020 Statistics

Note: This is a continuation of the recent piece, which covered the years from 1989 through 1998. The data needs to be shown in order to fully demonstrate what’s really going on.

This piece does come with an obvious disclaimer: it doesn’t take the hordes of “temporary” workers and student visas in account. That will be addressed elsewhere.

The Kalergi Plan was laid out for Europe a century ago. The goal was to ultimately get rid of all the whites, with a combination of open doors immigration, depressed local birth rates, and miscegenation. That said, the plot it not limited to Europe, but to all white countries.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

Isn’t trying to replace or displace a population considered genocide by the United Nations? Well, it does fit their own definitions….

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article V
The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

It’s also worth asking if pluralism (imposed without the consent of the people) would amount to genocide under the terms as laid out by the U.N. in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide After all, if pluralism results in at least a partial replacement of a group, isn’t that bringing about its destruction?

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

Let’s have a look at some of those recent years. While 2003 to 2020 has already been covered pretty extensively on this site, the problem extends much further than that.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1980
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	25,541	17.8	1
United Kingdom	18,245	12.8	2
United States	9,926	6.9	3
India	8,483	5.9	4
Hong Kong	6,309	4.4	5
Laos	6,206	4.4	6
Philippines	6,051	4.2	7
China	4,936	3.5	8
Portugal	4,228	3.0	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	89,955	62.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	53,132	37.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	143,087	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1980
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,330	3.0
Asia	71,062	50.0
South America	5,433	3.8
Caribbean/Antilles	7,362	5.2
United States	9,926	6.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,168	28.8
Others	3,297	2.8
Total	143,087	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1981
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	21,154	16.5	1
United States	10,559	8.2	2
India	8,256	6.4	3
Vietnam	8,251	6.4	4
China	6,550	5.1	5
Hong Kong	6,451	5.0	6
Philippines	5,859	4.6	7
Poland	3,850	3.0	8
Haiti	3,667	2.8	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	74,594	58	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	54,021	42.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	128,618	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1981
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,887	3.8
Asia	48,830	38.0
South America	6,136	4.8
Caribbean/Antilles	8,633	6.7
United States	10,559	8.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,295	36.0
Others	3,278	2.5
Total	128,618	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1982
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	16,445	13.6	1
United States	9,360	7.7	2
Poland	8,278	6.8	3
India	7,776	6.4	4
Hong Kong	6,542	5.4	5
Vietnam	5,935	4.9	6
Philippines	5,062	4.2	7
Germany	4,425	3.7	8
China	3,571	2.9	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	67,414	55.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	57,753	44.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,167	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1982
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,510	3.7
Asia	41,617	34.3
South America	6,870	5.7
Caribbean/Antilles	8,674	7.2
United States	9,360	7.7
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,150	38.1
Others	3,966	3.3
Total	121,167	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1983
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	7,381	8.3	1
India	7,041	7.9	2
Hong Kong	6,710	7.5	3
Vietnam	6,451	7.2	4
United Kingdom	5,737	6.4	5
Poland	5,094	5.7	6
Philippines	4,454	5.1	7
Haiti	2,827	3.2	8
Guyana	2,605	2.9	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	48,300	54.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	40,857	45.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	89,157	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1983
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	3,659	4.1
Asia	36,906	41.4
South America	4,816	5.4
Caribbean/Antilles	7,216	8.1
United States	7,381	8.3
Europe and the United Kingdom	24,312	27.3
Others	4,867	5.4
Total	89,157	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1984
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	10,950	12.4	1
Hong Kong	7,696	8.7	2
United States	6,922	7.8	3
India	5,502	6.2	4
United Kingdom	5,104	5.8	5
Poland	4,499	5.1	6
Philippines	3,748	4.2	7
El Salvador	2,569	2.9	8
Jamaica	2,479	2.8	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	49,479	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,760	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	88,239	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1984
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	3,552	4.0
Asia	41,920	47.5
South America	4,085	4.6
Caribbean/Antilles	5,630	6.4
United States	6,922	7.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	20,901	23.7
Others	5,229	5.9
Total	88,239	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1985
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	10,404	12.3	1
Hong Kong	7,380	8.8	2
United States	6,669	7.9	3
United Kingdom	4,454	5.3	4
India	4,028	4.8	5
Poland	3,617	4.3	6
Philippines	3,076	3.6	7
Jamaica	2,922	3.5	8
El Salvador	2,881	3.4	9
Guyana	2,301	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	47,732	56.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	36,570	43.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	84,302	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1985
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	3,545	4.2
Asia and Pacific	38,597	45.8
South America	4,356	4.2
North/Central America	5,016	6.0
Caribbean/Antilles	6,132	7.2
United States	6,669	7.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	18,859	22.4
Others	1,128	1.2
Total	84,302	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1986
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	7,275	7.3	1
India	6,940	7.0	2
Vietnam	6,622	6.7	3
Hong Kong	5,893	5.9	4
Poland	5,231	5.3	5
United Kingdom	5,088	5.1	6
Jamaica	4,652	4.7	7
Philippines	4,102	4.1	8
Guyana	3,905	4.0	9
El Salvador	3,167	3.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	52,875	53.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,344	46.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	99,219	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1986
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	4,770	4.8
Asia and Pacific	41,600	41.9
South America	6,686	6.7
North/Central America	6,078	6.1
Caribbean/Antilles	8,874	9.0
United States	7,275	7.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	22,709	22.9
Others	1,227	1.2
Total	99,219	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1987
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	16,170	10.6	1
India	9,692	6.4	2
United Kingdom	8,547	5.6	3
United States	7,967	5.2	4
Philippines	7,343	4.8	5
Portugal	7,300	4.8	6
Poland	7,036	4.7	7
Guyana	6,073	4.0	8
Vietnam	5,668	3.7	9
Jamaica	5,422	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,218	53.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	70,880	46,6	—
GRAND TOTAL	152,098	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1987
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	8,501	5.6
Asia and Pacific	67,337	44.3
South America	10,801	7.1
North/Central America	6,873	4.5
Caribbean/Antilles	11,227	7.4
United States	7,967	5.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	37,563	24.7
Others	1,829	1.2
Total	152,098	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1988
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	23,281	14.4	1
India	10,409	6.4	2
Poland	9,231	5.7	3
United Kingdom	9,172	5.7	4
Philippines	8,310	5.1	5
United States	6,537	4.0	6
Portugal	6,467	4.0	7
Vietnam	6,196	3.8	8
Jamaica	3,923	2.4	9
Iran	3,669	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,195	53.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	74,734	46.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,929	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1988
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	9,380	5.8
Asia and Pacific	81,136	50.1
South America	7,255	4.5
North/Central America	5,671	3.5
Caribbean/Antilles	9,439	5.9
United States	6,537	4.0
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,689	25.1
Others	1,822	1.1
Total	161,929	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1989
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	19,908	10.4	1
Poland	15,985	8.3	2
Philippines	11,383	5.9	3
Vietnam	9,425	4.9	4
India	8,819	4.6	5
United Kingdom	8,420	4.4	6
Portugal	8,189	4.3	7
United States	6,931	3.6	8
Lebanon	6,179	3.2	9
China	4,430	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	99,679	51.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	92,322	48.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	193,001	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1989
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	12,199	6.3
Asia and Pacific	93,261	48.6
South America	8,685	4.5
United States	6,931	3.6
Europe and the United Kingdom	52,107	27.1
North/Central America	5,870	3.1
Caribbean/Antilles	10,909	5.7
Others	2,041	1.1
Total	193,001	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1990
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,261	13.7	1
Poland	16,579	7.7	2
Lebanon	12,462	5.8	3
Philippines	12,042	5.6	4
India	10,624	5.1	5
Vietnam	9,081	4.2	6
United Kingdom	8,217	3.8	7
China	7,987	3.7	8
Portugal	7,917	3.7	9
United	6,084	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	120,256	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,974	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	214,230	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1990
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,440	6.3
Asia and Pacific	111,739	52.2
South America	8,898	4.2
United States	6,084	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	51,945	24.3
North/Central America	7,781	3.6
Caribbean/Antilles	11,689	5.5
Others	2,654	1.2
Total	214,230	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1991
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,340	9.7	1
Poland	15,731	6.8	2
China	13,915	6.0	3
India	12,848	5.6	4
Philippines	12,335	5.3	5
Lebanon	11,987	5.2	6
Vietnam	8,963	3.9	7
United Kingdom	7,543	3.3	8
El Salvador	6,977	3.0	9
Sri Lanka	6,826	3.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	119,465	51.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	111,316	48.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	230,781	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1991
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,087	7.0
Asia and Pacific	119,955	52.0
South America	10,582	4.6
United States	6,597	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	48,055	20.8
North/Central America	13,404	5.8
Caribbean/Antilles	12,922	5.6
Others	3,179	1.4
Total	230,781	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1992
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	38,910	15.4	1
Philippines	13,273	5.2	2
India	12,675	5.0	3
Sri Lanka	12,635	5.0	4
Poland	11,878	4.7	5
China	10,429	4.1	6
Vietnam	7,681	3.2	7
United States	7,537	3.0	8
Taiwan	7,456	2.9	9
United Kingdom	7,138	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	129,612	51.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	123,230	48.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	252,842	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1992
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	19,633	7.7
Asia and Pacific	139,216	54.4
South America	10,389	4.1
United States	7,537	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	44,871	17.5
North/Central America	12,526	4.9
Caribbean/Antilles	14,952	5.8
Others	3,718	1.5
Total	252,842	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1993
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	36,574	14.3	1
India	20,472	8.0	2
Philippines	19,772	7.7	3
Taiwan	9,867	3.9	4
China	9,466	3.7	5
Sri Lanka	9,103	3.6	6
Vietnam	8,301	3.2	7
United States	8,014	3.1	8
United Kingdom	7,159	2.8	9
Poland	6,877	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	135,605	53.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	120,214	47.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	255,819	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1993
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,918	6.6
Asia and Pacific	147,323	57.6
South America	9,580	3.7
United States	8,014	3.1
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,602	18.2
North/Central America	7,737	3.0
Caribbean/Antilles	16,563	6.5
Others	3,082	1.2
Total	255,819	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1994
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	44,169	19.7	1
Philippines	19,097	8.5	2
India	17,225	7.7	3
China	12,486	5.6	4
Taiwan	7,411	3.3	5
Sri Lanka	6,671	3.0	6
United States	6,234	2.8	7
Vietnam	6,230	2.8	8
United Kingdom	5,971	2.8	9
Bosnia-Hercegovina	4,905	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	130,399	58.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,476	41.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	223,875	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1994
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,706	6.1
Asia and Pacific	141,587	63.2
South America	7,919	3.5
United States	6,234	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,641	17.3
North/Central America	3,503	1.6
Caribbean/Antilles	9,980	4.5
Others	2,215	1.0
Total	223,875	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1995
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	31,746	14.9	1
India	16,215	7.6	2
Philippines	15,149	7.1	3
China	13,291	6.3	4
Sri Lanka	8,926	4.2	5
Taiwan	7,691	3.6	6
Bosnia-Hercegovina	6,270	3.0	7
United Kingdom	6,161	2.9	8
United States	5,185	2.4	9
Pakistan	3,996	1.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	114,630	53.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,874	46.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	212,504	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1995
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	14,631	6.9
Asia and Pacific	129,106	60.8
South America	7,538	3.5
United States	5,185	2.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,266	19.4
North/Central America	2,842	1.3
Caribbean/Antilles	10,056	4.5
Others	1,880	0.8
Total	212,504	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1996
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,966	13.3	1
India	21,276	9.4	2
China	17,516	7.8	3
Taiwan	13,207	5.8	4
Philippines	13,132	5.8	5
Pakistan	7,753	3.4	6
Sri Lanka	6,151	2.7	7
United States	5,837	2.6	8
Iran	5,828	2.6	9
United Kingdom	5,585	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	126,251	55.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	99,522	44.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,773	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1996
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	36,503	16.15
Asia and Pacific	124,771	55.20
South and Central America	18,878	8.35
United States	5,869	2.60
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,009	17.70
Not Stated	20	0.01
Total	225,773	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1997
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,242	10.30	1
India	19,614	9.08	2
China	18,530	8.58	3
Taiwan	13,321	6.17	4
Pakistan	11,233	5.20	5
Philippines	10,873	5.03	6
Iran	7,477	3.46	7
Sri Lanka	5,069	2.35	8
United States	5,043	2.33	9
United Kingdom	4,659	2.16	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	118,061	54.65	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,983	45.35	—
GRAND TOTAL	216,044	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1997
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	37,794	17.49
Asia and Pacific	117,076	54.19
South and Central America	17,425	8.07
United States	5,043	2.33
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,673	17.90
Not Stated	33	0.02
Total	216,044	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1998
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	19,749	11.34	1
India	11.34	8.80	2
Philippines	8,172	4.69	3
Hong Kong	8,083	4.64	4
Pakistan	8,081	4.64	5
Taiwan	7,164	4.11	6
Iran	6,772	3.89	7
South Korea	4,910	2.82	8
United States	4,764	2.74	9
Russia	4,299	2.47	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,321	50.16	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	86,779	49.84	—
GRAND TOTAL	174,100	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1998
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	32,534	18.69
Asia and Pacific	84,036	48.27
South and Central America	14,003	8.04
United States	4,764	2.74
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,477	22.10
Not Stated	286	0.16
Total	174,100	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1999
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	29,095	15.33	1
India	17,415	9.17	2
Pakistan	9,285	4.89	3
Philippines	9,285	4.89	4
South Korea	7,212	3.80	5
Iran	5,903	3.11	6
United States	5,514	2.90	7
Taiwan	5,461	2.88	8
Sri Lanka	4,719	2.49	9
United Kingdom	4,476	2.36	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	98,240	51.76	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	91,576	48.24	—
GRAND TOTAL	189,816	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1999
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	33,441	17.62
Asia and Pacific	96,370	50.77
South and Central America	15,188	8.00
United States	5,514	2.90
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,912	20.50
Not Stated	391	0.21
Total	189,816	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2000
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	36,715	16.15	1
India	26,086	11.48	2
Pakistan	14,182	6.24	3
Philippines	10,086	4.44	4
South Korea	7,626	3.35	5
Sri Lanka	5,841	2.57	6
United States	5,814	2.56	7
Iran	5,608	2.47	8
Yugoslavia	4,723	2.08	9
United Kingdom	4,647	2.04	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	121,328	53.38	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	105,985	46.62	—
GRAND TOTAL	227,313	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2000
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	40,815	17.96
Asia and Pacific	120,539	53.03
South and Central America	16,944	7.45
United States	5,814	2.56
Europe and the United Kingdom	42,885	18.87
Not Stated	316	0.14
Total	227,313	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2001
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	40,315	16.09	1
India	27,848	11.12	2
Pakistan	15,341	6.12	3
Philippines	12,914	5.16	4
South Korea	9,604	3.83	5
United States	5,902	2.36	6
Iran	5,737	2.29	7
Romania	5,585	2.23	8
Sri Lanka	5,514	2.20	9
United Kingdom	5,350	2.14	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	134,110	53.54	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	116,374	46.46	—
GRAND TOTAL	250,484	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2001
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	48,078	19.20
Asia and Pacific	132,711	53.01
South and Central America	20,129	8.04
United States	5,894	2.35
Europe and the United Kingdom	43,204	17.26
Not Stated	330	0.13
Total	250,346	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2002
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	33,231	14.51	1
India	28,815	12.58	2
Pakistan	14,164	6.18	3
Philippines	11,000	4.80	4
Iran	7,742	3.38	5
South Korea	7,326	3.20	6
Romania	5,692	2.48	7
United States	5,288	2.31	8
Sri Lanka	4,961	2.17	9
United Kingdom	4,720	2.06	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	122,939	53.67	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	106,152	46.33	—
GRAND TOTAL	229,091	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2002
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	46,113	20.13
Asia and Pacific	118,899	51.90
South and Central America	19,417	8.48
United States	5,288	2.31
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,841	16.95
Not Stated	533	0.23
Total	229,091	100

https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
Source for 1995/1996:
Source for 1996-1998

(Page 18 of the 2004 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 24 of the 2005 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 18, 19 of the 2006 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 19, 20 of the 2007 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 21, 22 of the 2008 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2009 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2008
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	51,313	20.8
Asia and Pacific	117,480	47.5
South and Central America	26,493	10.7
United States	11,216	4.5
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,649	16.4
Not Stated	96	0.0
Total	247,247	100

(Page 14 of the 2010 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2009
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	56,151	22.2
Asia and Pacific	117,174	46.5
South and Central America	26,776	10.6
United States	9,723	3.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	42,311	16.8
Not Stated	37	0.0
Total	252,172	100

(Page 18 of the 2011 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2010
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	66,692	23.8
Asia and Pacific	135,008	48.1
South and Central America	28,357	10.1
United States	9,242	3.3
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,317	14.7
Not Stated	73	0.0
Total	280,689	100

(Page 15 of the 2012 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2011
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	59,323	23.8
Asia and Pacific	120,330	48.4
South and Central America	27,447	11.0
United States	8,830	3.5
Europe and the United Kingdom	32,755	13.2
Not Stated	63	0.0
Total	248,748	100

(Page 19 of the 2013 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2012
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	56,060	21.7
Asia and Pacific	129,592	50.3
South and Central America	26,864	10.4
United States	9,414	3.7
Europe and the United Kingdom	35,828	13.9
Not Stated	129	0.0
Total	257,887	100

(Page 16 of the 2014 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2015 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 10 of the 2016 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 14 of the 2017 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 28 of the 2018 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2019 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 33 of the 2020 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2021 Annual Report to Parliament)

Are things starting to make sense? Immigration policies for the last 50+ years have focused on Asians and Africans, replacing (to a large degree) the overwhelmingly European makeup that was Canada for many years.

Of course, speaking up about what’s apparent will lead to cries of racism.

One thing people really need to get clear: so-called “conservatives” have no interest whatsoever in preserving demographics or the makeup of a country. They fully support the genocide agenda, but try to pitch it from a more economic perspective.

White replacement is a very real thing. Only the most obtuse or unobservant cannot see what’s going on, especially given how blatant it is..

While Liberals are generally quite open for their disdain of Europeans, “Conservatives” behave in a stealthier and more subversive manner. They camouflage their true intentions, making them more dangerous.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Category: Immigration (Canada)

Gov’t Recommends More Pathways For Hong Kong Residents To Come

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

3. Important Links

Like this:

International Mobility Programme Data: 1994-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Source Countries For “Temporary” Workers: 2004-2013

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

U.S. Customs And Border Protection: Some Statistics On The Invasion

Like this:

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Like this:

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1980 – 2020 Statistics

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Recommendations From June 2022 Report

3. Important Links

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. International Mobility Programme: Permit Holders 1994-2013

3. Source Countries For International Mobility: 2004 To 2013

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Temporary Foreign Worker Program Source Countries: 2004-2013

3. Changes Made To Temporary Foreign Worker Program

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this: