CV #37(G): No Science Behind Determining A “Variant” Of Coronavirus, Just Make Assumptions

Do we have actual “experts” and “professionals” in charge? Or, are we being ruled by a group of actors being paid to read from a script? More and more, it appears to be the latter. There’s little reason or justification behind a lot of what they do, and no science.

1. Remember: Listen To The “Experts” For Advice

So-called “experts” here and here talk about need for more lockdowns. It’s interesting how many of these interviews are softballs. Instead of pushing hard for a justification, these “journalists” seem content to parrot the talking points. Is there a lockdown or martial law area of expertise in epidemiology? How is it they are all completely on the same page when it comes to imposing restrictions?

Fauci: Just assume these variants are more dangerous. Don’t worry about proof or testing, just guess and make predictions. It’s shocking that anyone still takes this quack seriously, considering how wrong he has been about everything.

When he says (at 0:36) that the Pfizer and Moderna seem to continue to be effective against the mutant strain, what is he basing this on? Was there research and testing, or is he making more assumptions? Likewise, what is the basis of his claims of vaccine efficacy being reduced?

(At 1:22) he talks about modifying and upgrading vaccines. In that case, what is the point of vaccinating everyone now if it will become obsolete at a later point?

Also, never forget: Anthony Fauci was previously on the Scientific Advisory Council in collaboration with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Health Organization.

The so-called “top doctors” in Alberta and British Columbia, Deena Hinshaw and Bonnie Henry, have a great scientific method for determining whether you have a variant. To heck with confirmation sequencing. They say you should just assume you have it.

2. Definitions Of CV Cases And Deaths

2. DEFINITION FOR DEATHS DUE TO COVID-19
A death due to COVID-19 is defined for surveillance purposes as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death.
.
A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer) and should be counted independently of preexisting conditions that are suspected of triggering a severe course of COVID-19

Never mind that the BC Centre for Disease Control admits that these tests can’t determine if it’s actually an infection. Simply finding traces of genetic material (after many amplification cycles) does not in any way mean a disease has been detected.

(a) https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Surveillance_Case_Definition-2020.2
(b) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf?ua=1
(c) http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Professionals-Site/Documents/COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf

3. Fluoride Free Peel On Virus Isolation

An honourable mention to Fluoride Free Peel, and them filing literally dozens of freedom of information requests. If the “original” virus has never been isolated, how can there be any legitimate assumption that variants have been identified?

4. Lack Of Science Behind What “Experts” Doing

(A) Bonnie Henry Admits No Science In Anything She Does
(B) ARTICLE: Lack Of Real Science In “Global Pandemic”
(1) WHO Supports Mask Use, Admits No Real Evidence
(2) WHO “Still” Recommends Masks Despite Little Evidence
(3) WHO’s Records Show PCR Testing Always Was A Fraud
(4) WHO Distorts On Cases, Deaths, Surveillance Information
(5) WHO Promotes Masks For Children As Young As 6
(6) RT-PCR Tests For A Gene, Not A Virus

If you still think this is all about a virus, and that people are acting in good faith, there is no hope. Fortunately, the readers seem far more skeptical.

2 Replies to “CV #37(G): No Science Behind Determining A “Variant” Of Coronavirus, Just Make Assumptions”

  1. Germ theory is a massive fraud that was pushed in modern medicine schools starting at the beginning of the 20th century by the eugenics. Robert Young offered 5 million years ago to anyone who can purify and isolate HIV, reward has yet to be claimed by any company or individual… Stefan Lanka offered 100k Euro to anyone who can isolate measles, two fraudsters attempted but the German courts rejected them due to insufficient data and no isolates. Germ theory was created as a money racket, sickness is caused from within, “viruses” that spread is a complete fraud and a creation of the establishment. Same as satellites, space travel, climate change and a bunch of other hoaxes, it’s all a lie.

    Measles doesn’t exist, and yet we continue with MMR vaccines, as part of the forced child vaccine programs they receive from 16-18 months old… So what’s in the vaccine, and why are we even vaccinating humans against the measles if it’s been proven that it doesn’t exist? Moreover, MMR vaccines are linked to autism. 7 biggest baby food makers in the US got caught putting lethal levels of toxic metals in their baby food products, report got published 2 months ago. People are starting to understanding that the entire “medical” and “pharma” industries are massive scams meant to kill off humanity and profit off it while doing it.

    Virologist are exactly the same as astronauts at this point, paid actors… Fauci & Co were receiving 7-8 billion in year in HIV research funds from Bush Jr. Reagan was spending couple billion a year as well. If HIV doesn’t exist, what where they doing and where was the money going? Similar to the cold war hoax, it was all a lie.

    Read into the germ theory fraud, Tom Cowan and Stefan Lanka are excellent.. Expose the fraud and rationality wins. A lot know the gig is up, many are demanding isolation of covid and nobody can produce it because they can’t. Viruses don’t exist. All those charlatans in academia doing pseudo-science, fake studies to get billions in grants is coming to an end as well. I believe the Truman show is about to collapse within two years at most.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Canuck Law

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading