World Economic Forum Partnering With Major Banks, Pension Funds

This may be nothing, but should we be worried that the World Economic Forum has partnered with the banking industry, asset management groups, pharmaceutical companies, and other major corporations?

1. WEF Partners: Banks, Finance, Pensions

  • African Development Bank Group
  • Algebris Investments
  • Al Nowais Investments
  • Banco Bradesco
  • Banco BTG Pactual
  • Banco Safra Brasil
  • Banco Santander
  • Bangchak
  • Bank Julius Baer
  • Bank Leumi Le-Israel
  • Bank Lombard Odier & Co.
  • Bank Mandiri (Persero)
  • Bank of America
  • BlackRock
  • Blackstone Group
  • BMO Financial Group
  • Brightstar Capital Partners
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions
  • Brookfield Asset Management
  • Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ)
  • Capricorn Investment Group
  • Cassa Depositi e Prestiti
  • Cathay Capital Private Equity
  • Cedar Holdings Group
  • China Construction Bank
  • Citibank
  • CLS Bank International
  • CPP Investments
  • Credit Suisse
  • CVC Capital Partners (Luxembourg)
  • Deloitte
  • Depository Trust & Clearing (DTCC)
  • Deutsche Bank
  • Development Bank of Japan (DBJ)
  • Development Bank of Southern Africa
  • Discovery
  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)
  • European Investment Bank
  • Fidelity International
  • Fubon Financial Holding
  • Giti Group
  • Glencore International
  • Global Asset Capital
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Grupo Mega
  • HPS Investment Partners
  • HSBC Holdings
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)
  • Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa
  • ING Group
  • Inter-American Development Bank
  • Islamic Development Bank
  • Itaú Unibanco
  • Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC)
  • John Keells Holdings
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • Kcap Holdings
  • Kirin Holdings
  • KPMG
  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Manulife
  • Mastercard
  • McKinsey & Company
  • Mizuho Financial Group
  • Morgan Stanley
  • MUFG Bank
  • Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
  • Nasdaq
  • Nedbank Group
  • NYSE
  • Olayan Financing Group
  • Old Mutual
  • OMINVEST
  • Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan
  • Pension Danmark
  • Public Institution for Social Security (PIFSS)
  • Qatar Financial Centre (QFC)
  • Qatar Investment Authority
  • Qatar National Bank
  • Rabobank
  • RBC (Royal Bank of Canada)
  • Russian Direct Investment Fund
  • S&P Global
  • S4Capita
  • Saudi Industrial Development Fund
  • Sberbank
  • Scotiabank
  • Sequoia Capital
  • Softbank Group
  • Standard Bank Group
  • Standard Chartered Bank
  • Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG)
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • TD Bank Group
  • Turkey Wealth Fund
  • Unison Capital
  • Visa
  • Vista Equity Partners
  • Vital Capital Fund
  • VTB Bank
  • Zenith Bank
  • Zurich Insurance Group

2. WEF Partners With Major Corporations

  • Alshaya Group
  • Amazon Web Services
  • CVS Health
  • Honda
  • Huawei Technologies
  • Hyundai Motor
  • Lockheed Martin
  • SNC-Lavalin Group
  • The Coca-Cola Company
  • Uber Technologies
  • Walmart
  • Western Union
  • Zoom

3. WEF Partners With Vaccine Pushers

  • AstraZeneca
  • Bayer
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Facebook
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Google
  • Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Jubilant Bhartia Group
  • LinkedIn
  • Microsoft
  • Merck
  • Moderna
  • Novartis
  • Open Society Foundations
  • Pfizer
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • These lists are not exhaustive, and the World Economic Forum does have more partners from these groups. However, it should demonstrate the “types” of organizations who ideologically support this.

    4. WEF’s Plants In Canadian Politics

    Any familiar faces?

    CV #9: A Look At Money Sunk Into Paying For Vaccines, Research

    On August 1, 2020, the Canadian Government, or rather taxpayers, handed out over $240,000 to conduct research which included the study of the issues surrounding MANDATORY vaccines. Yes, that was apparently worth paying for a study. Now, let’s see what else the public’s money has been spent on.

    1. Grants To Develop CV Vaccines In Canada

    NAME DATE AMOUNT
    Alberta Research Chemicals Inc. Jul. 1, 2020 $36,000
    Archambault, Denis Jun. 1, 2020 $622,782
    Barr, Stephen D Apr. 1, 2020 $998,840
    Bell, John C Jun. 1, 2020 $1,936,150
    Biodextris Inc. Sep. 24, 2020 $1,307,678
    BioVectra Inc. Sep. 4, 2020 $5,412,045
    Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Aug. 4, 2020 $40,000,000
    Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc. May 1, 2020 $100,000
    Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sep. 1, 2020 $5,000,000
    Falzarano, Darryl Feb. 1, 2020 $999,793
    Falzarano, Darryl Jun. 1, 2020 $1,459,325
    Grant, Michael D Sep. 1, 2020 $497,175
    Halperin, Scott A Aug. 1, 2020 $240,731
    Halperin, Scott A Sep. 1, 2020 $3,516,000
    Houghton, Michael Apr. 1, 2020 $600,000
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Apr. 1, 2020 $378,239
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Apr. 1, 2020 $636,596
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Sep. 17, 2020 $1,000,000
    Kobinger, Gary P Feb. 1, 2020 $999,356
    Leclerc, Denis Feb. 1, 2020 $717,645
    Les biotechnologies Ulysse inc Jun. 22, 2020 $30,000
    Lewis, John D Jun. 1, 2020 $4,175,000
    Liu, Jun Jun. 1, 2020 $416,483
    McGill University (Academia) Nov. 6, 2020 $160,198
    Medicago inc. Oct. 18, 2020 $173,000,000
    Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada Sep. 8, 2020 $500,000
    PharmAchieve Corporation. Ltd. Apr. 1, 2020 $49,920
    Pharma Glycovax Inc Aug. 31, 2020 $3,978,832
    Precision NanoSystems Inc. Oct. 9, 2020 $18,203,000
    Providence Therapeutics Holdings Sep. 1, 2020 $4,700,000
    Resilience Biotechnologies Inc. Nov. 1, 2020 $2,103,150
    Richardson, Christopher D Jun. 1, 2020 $138,097
    Symvivo Corporation Sep. 4, 2020 $2,821,081
    Watts, Tania H Jun. 1, 2020 $1,329,250
    University of Saskatchewan Jul. 7, 2020 $23,000,000
    Xing, Zhou Jun. 1, 2020 $1,920,985
    Yao, Xiao-Jian Apr. 1, 2020 $326,578

    This came from a quick search of Federal donations, “Vaccine + Covid”. A lot of money was spent already, for many different parties.

    2. Other Grants Funding Vaccines/Research

    NAME DATE AMOUNT
    Adventist Development and Relief Agency Mar. 30, 2020 $3,500,000
    Brockman, Mark A Dec. 1, 2011 $1,419,901
    CARE Canada May 29, 2019 $2,000,000
    Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance Mar. 28, 2014 $20,000,000
    Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance Sep. 17, 2015 $500,000,000
    IDRC Feb. 17, 2015 $3,000,000
    Immuno Vaccine Technologies Sep. 15, 2011 $2,944,000
    Immuno Vaccine Technologies Oct. 6, 2008 $3,000,000
    Int’l Development Research Centre Sep. 29, 2015 $9,000,000
    International Rescue Committee Jun. 12, 2019 $2,600,000
    Kobinger, Gary P Apr. 1, 2017 $3,997,503
    Loeb, Mark B Oct. 1, 2012 $2,864,660
    Loeb, Mark B Jul. 1, 2016 $8,310,463
    Medicago inc. May 13, 2015 $8,000,000
    Medicago Inc. Jan. 1, 2019 $2,515,000
    Novartis Animal Health Canada Inc. Nov. 1, 2006 $1,836,921
    Novartis Animal Health Canada Inc. Nov. 7, 2008 $1,747,458
    Ogilvie, Gina S Apr. 1, 2019 $10,090,731
    Ostrowski, Mario A Dec. 1, 2011 $1,415,432
    UNICEF Sep. 4, 2020 $2,500,000
    University of Saskatchewan Feb. 16, 2018 $3,609,771
    University of Saskatchewan Mar. 23, 2018 $15,609,771
    University of Saskatchewan (VIDO) Oct. 2, 2007 $49,000,000
    WHO – World Health Organization Mar. 31, 2015 $20,000,000
    WHO – World Health Organization Nov. 13, 2019 $2,000,000
    Xing, Zhou Jul. 1, 2017 $2,462,740

    This is by no means all of them, but are some of the bigger grants flagged by searching “vaccines” on the Government of Canada website.

    3. NSERC/CIHR/SSHRC Research Grants

    NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, has also handed out hundreds of grants over the last year regarding “Covid research”. It’s available for all to see.

    CIHR, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, has also listed the grants they they will be handing out. As of August 8, 2020, it was listed at $111 million.

    SSHRC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, also has a website detailing information about its grants and spending.

    4. Who Needs Science-Based Policy Anyway?

    This is BC Provincial Health Officer, Bonnie Henry. Despite repeated admissions like this, the local media fawns over her, refusing to ask difficult questions. This is the unelected dictator of the Province, that all parties agreed to abdicate their responsibilities to. And this is what BC promotes as “safety“.

    New $2.25M For “Vaccine Confidence” Programs, $240K To Study Mandatory Vaccines

    The Canadian Government is offering organizations up to $50,000 each to promote “vaccine confidence”, and to convince people that they should be taking it. It’s being organized jointly by the NSERC, the SSHRC, and the CIHR.

    To be clear, this isn’t 1 grant of $2.25 million. It is 45 grants of $50,000 each, or potentially more than 45, if amounts less than this are awarded.

    1. Grants To Promote “Vaccine Confidence”

    The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) are pleased to launch a special $2.25 million funding opportunity to support activities that promote vaccine confidence in Canada. The agencies expect these activities will improve public understanding of vaccines and help Canadians to make evidence-based decisions, especially among populations that are hesitant about vaccines.

    The new funding is targeted at Canadian non-profit organizations, non-federal museums and science centres, and academic institutions with a strong track record of science and/or health promotion. Researchers from all fields with an expertise in combating vaccine-related misinformation may apply either individually through their institutions or in collaboration with science, social sciences, humanities, and/or health promotion organizations.

    NSERC will host information webinars to discuss the funding opportunity’s goals and selection criteria, how to prepare an application, and to answer questions. Interested applicants can attend the French session on March 8, 2021 at 1:30 PM Eastern and/or the English session on March 9, 2021 at 12:30 PM Eastern.

    This is serious. SSHRC/NSERC/CIHR are working together to launch a program that will award up to $50,000 each for an institution to promote “vaccine confidence”, in order to convince Canadians that these vaccines are safe. Presumably the CV shots are the primary target.

    Note: none of these grants are aimed at ENSURING vaccines are safe, such as with additional testing. Instead, the goal is to CONVINCE people that they already are.

    2. Marketing/Advertising, Not Science At Play

    Examples of eligible activities include:
    .
    -providing scientifically sound information about vaccines via social media, hotlines, webinars, forums or websites in a way that addresses beliefs and fears
    developing, translating and disseminating easy-to-understand and engaging materials on vaccine acceptance and adoption of public health measures in a culturally appropriate way
    -delivering workshops to train community leaders on promoting vaccine confidence and sharing best practices for evidence-based decision making
    -mobilizing social sciences and humanities knowledge to address cultural and societal determinants of vaccine hesitancy in order to better ensure vaccine confidence
    -sharing historical perspectives on pandemics and vaccine development to build trust and confidence in the community
    -providing techniques for identifying reliable sources of information versus misinformation pertaining to vaccines

    These activities have nothing to do with science. Instead, they are about using the perceived legitimacy of scientific institutions in order to promote the Government narratives. In short, these institutions would become propaganda outlets, much like the media in Canada.

    3. Study Into MANDATORY Vaccines In Canada

    Remember how, just 6 months ago, people who spoke of mandatory vaccinations were called “conspiracy theorists”? Turns out, that at least $240,000 of public money has been spend looking into exactly that issue. And there are probably more of these grants.

    The Government is enlisting institutions which appear to be neutral in order to prop up its agenda. Seriously, how much is integrity worth these days? It’s bad enough that almost the entire Canadian media is in on it, but scientific institutions at least claim to be neutral truth seekers.

    4. Important Links

    https://twitter.com/CIHR_IRSC
    https://twitter.com/NSERC_CRSNG
    https://twitter.com/SSHRC_CRSH

    NSERC Grant Postings, For “Vaccine Confidence”
    https://archive.is/QRJAW

    Event Information Describing The Grant Program
    https://archive.is/8QaUT

    $240,000 Spent To Study MANDATORY Vaccines
    https://archive.is/5xA4e

    Other “Pandemic” Grants

    RE: CANUCK LAW ON “VACCINE HESITANCY”
    (A) Canada’s National Vaccination Strategy
    (B) The Vaccine Confidence Project
    (C) More Research Into Overcoming “Vaccine Hesitancy”
    (D) Psychological Manipulation Over “Vaccine Hesitancy”
    (E) World Economic Forum Promoting More Vaccinations

    RE: CANUCK LAW ON MEDIA SUBSIDIES, DONATIONS
    (a) Subsidization Programs Available For Media Outlets (QCJO)
    (b) Political Operatives Behind Many “Fact-Checking” Groups
    (c) DisinfoWatch, MacDonald-Laurier, Journalists For Human Rights
    (d) Taxpayer Subsidies To Combat CV “Misinformation”
    (e) Postmedia Periodicals Getting Covid Subsidies
    (f) Aberdeen Publishing (BC, AB) Getting Grants To Operate
    (g) Other Periodicals Receiving Subsidies
    (h) Still More Media Subsidies Taxpayers Are Supporting
    (i) Media Outlets, Banks, Credit Unions, All Getting CEWS

    CV #30(E): Crestview Strategy, Danielle Peters, Lobbyists Behind $173 Million Grant To Medicago

    Medicago received a grant of $173,000,000 to develop a CV-19 vaccine. Beyond that, a portion of the grant is to build a manufacturing facility, which presumably should be operational by 2040.

    1. Other Articles On CV “Planned-emic”

    The rest of the series is here. Many lies, lobbying, conflicts of interest, and various globalist agendas operating behind the scenes, obscuring the vile agenda called the GREAT RESET. The Gates Foundation finances: the WHO, the US CDC, GAVI, ID2020, John Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the Pirbright Institute, the BBC, and individual pharmaceutical companies. The International Health Regulations are legally binding. The Postmedia empire and the “independent” media are paid off, as are the fact-checkers. The virus was never isolated, PCR tests are a fraud, as are forced masks, social bubbles, and 2m distancing.

    2. Danielle Peters, Major Pharma Lobbyist

    • February 4, 2019
    • February 4, 2019
    • February 5, 2019
    • November 27, 2019
    • January 22, 2020
    • March 3, 2020
    • March 5, 2020
    • May 25, 2020
    • June 8, 2020
    • June 8, 2020
    • June 29 2020
    • July 13, 2020
    • July 15, 2020
    • July 29, 2020
    • July 30, 2020
    • August 6, 2020
    • August 7, 2020
    • August 26, 2020
    • August 27, 2020
    • September 1, 2020
    • September 10, 2020
    • September 16, 2020
    • September 29, 2020
    • October 10, 2020
    • October 10 2020
    • January 13, 2021
    • January 28, 2021

    The above list only includes searches for Medicago, which Danielle Peters is featured prominently. She has been registered as a Medicago lobbyist since 2013. Those dates are when she met on behalf of Medicago to lobby for vaccines. If you only search her name, Peters is involved in other pharma lobbying, such as with Merck, Kalgene Pharmaceuticals, Therapure Biopharma, and the Alliance for Safe Online Pharmacies

    3. Danielle Peters, Magnet Strategy Group

    Dani Peters is President of Magnet Strategy Group, a consulting firm that manages public affairs strategies in Canada and the United States.

    Prior to founding Magnet Strategy Group, Dani held senior roles in public affairs firms in the U.S. and Canada, concentrating on fields that include innovation, health and life sciences. Over the past decade, Dani has worked with groups in the health sector to develop and manage government, public policy, funding, advocacy and stakeholder strategies.

    Dani is co-founder of the Cross-Border Health Foundation, an organization that fosters dialogue between Canada and the United States around common health priorities. In addition to operating Magnet Strategy Group, Dani serves on the Industry Advisory Board for Bloom Burton & Co., a healthcare investment advisory firm in Toronto. She is also a Health Leader-in-Residence for the World Health Innovation Network (WIN), within the University of Windsor’s Odette School of Business.

    What else is there to say? She is clearly a very connected person. Considering that Medicago landed a $173 million contract, due largely to her lobbying, Peters was financially a great investment. This deal wasn’t just to fund vaccine research, it was to build a facility as well.

    4. Peters Lobbied While With Rothwell

    It worth pointing out that Peters also lobbied on behalf of Medicago when she was employed by the firm, Rothwell Group. Seems that not much has changed.

    5. Peters Part Of Adjuvant Partners As Well

    Look familiar? It should. This profile is almost identical to the Magnet profile, down to using the same photograph. Among other things, Adjuvant lists “gene therapy” as one area it’s involved with. This appears to be another lobbying firm, as they don’t do medical research themselves.

    6. Peters’ LinkedIn Page

    The profile of one of the main players behind the $173 million spending. However, she has not acted alone in this.

    7. Blake Oliver Jumps Ship To Government

    On February 26, 2020, Blake Oliver lobbied the Federal Government on behalf of Medicago, while still employed at Crestview Strategy. Days later, he was working for the Government, in the Ministry of Transportation. He also helped volunteer for the Liberals in the 2019 election.

    8. Patricia Sibal, Liberal Party Volunteer

    Also connected to this is Patricia Sabil. She has lobbied for Medicago, while working for Crestview Strategy. She is also a volunteer with the Liberals in Ontario and Quebec.

    9. Susie Heath, Liberal With Wynne/McGuinty

    Susie Heath spent years with the Liberal Government of Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne. She has also lobbied on behalf of Medicago, while with Crestview Strategy

    10. Jennifer Babcock, Ex-Crestview Lobbyist

    Babcock spent several years in Parliament, working for various politicians. She also lobbied on behalf of both Medicago and GAVI. Honourable mentions go out to Lucas Malinowski, and Joanna Carey, who appear to have since left Crestview.

    Jason Clark is still with Crestview, and has acted for Medicago and GAVI. He volunteered in the 2015 election for Liberals in the Ottawa region. Crestview itself was co-founded by Rob Silver, husband of Katie Telford, Trudeau’s Chief-of-Staff.

    Currently, Ashton Arsenault is registered as a lobbyist for both Medicago and GAVI. For some variety, he is a strategist with the Conservative Party of Canada.

    For some background information into Crestview and other lobbying, please check here, here, here and here.

    This is what they mean when they say “we’re all in it together”.

    11. Conflicts Of Interest Ignored In Media

    Given the heavy subsidization of the media in Canada, it’s no surprise that none of this is being reported. When outlets are dependent on the Government to prop them up, they are unlikely to do real research. But about that $173 million grant, people should know who is really pulling the strings.

    Various Bonds, Enterprises, The World Bank Group Is Running

    The World Bank tries to portray itself as an organization devoted to the welfare of humankind globally. However, the organization is involved in many bond schemes that most people are completely unaware of. It’s quite the lucrative side operation.

    • IBRD, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    • IDA, The International Development Association
    • IFC, The International Finance Corporation
    • MIGA, The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
    • ICSID, The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute

    Partnering With Governments
    Together, IBRD and IDA form the World Bank, which provides financing, policy advice, and technical assistance to governments of developing countries. IDA focuses on the world’s poorest countries, while IBRD assists middle-income and creditworthy poorer countries.
    .
    Partnering With The Private Sector
    IFC, MIGA, and ICSID focus on strengthening the private sector in developing countries. Through these institutions, the World Bank Group provides financing, technical assistance, political risk insurance, and settlement of disputes to private enterprises, including financial institutions.
    .
    One World Bank Group
    While our five institutions have their own country membership, governing boards, and articles of agreement, we work as one to serve our partner countries. Today’s development challenges can only be met if the private sector is part of the solution. But the public sector sets the groundwork to enable private investment and allow it to thrive. The complementary roles of our institutions give the World Bank Group a unique ability to connect global financial resources, knowledge, and innovative solutions to the needs of developing countries.

    Most people don’t know this, but the World Bank is actually the partnership of 5 organizations. Strangely, an outside search of them reveals nothing about them, other than being part of the World Bank Group. A deep dive is needed into the inner workings of the World Bank, and is coming in a future article.

    1. Types Of Bonds World Bank Involved With

    Here are some of the programs the World Bank has been mixed up in. It’s quite the varied and lucrative enterprise. People can become very wealthy with these schemes, although, it’s dependent on others playing along.

    • Blockchain Bonds
    • Blue (Water) Bonds
    • Green Bonds
    • Pandemic Bonds
    • Social Bonds
    • Vaccine Bonds

    2. World Bank & Blockchain Bonds

    WASHINGTON/SYDNEY, August 23/24, 2018 – The World Bank launched bond-i (blockchain operated new debt instrument), the world’s first bond to be created, allocated, transferred and managed through its life cycle using distributed ledger technology. The two-year bond raised $110 million, marking the first time that investors have supported the World Bank’s development activities in a transaction that is fully managed using the blockchain technology.

    The World Bank mandated Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) as arranger for the bond on August 10. The announcement was followed by a two-week consultation period with the market, with key investors indicating strong support for the issuance.

    Investors in the bond include CBA, First State Super, NSW Treasury Corporation, Northern Trust, QBE, SAFA, and Treasury Corporation of Victoria. CBA and the World Bank will continue to welcome investor interest in the bond throughout its life cycle, and inquiries from other market participants in relation to the platform.

    The bond is part of a broader strategic focus of the World Bank to harness the potential of disruptive technologies for development. In June 2017, the World Bank launched a Blockchain Innovation Lab to understand the impact of blockchain and other disruptive technologies in areas such as land administration, supply chain management, health, education, cross-border payments, and carbon market trading.

    The World Bank Group started “blockchain bonds” in 2018. Rather than the more traditional methods, this would, as the name implies, use Blockchain technology as an alternative. The next round of bonds came in 2019.

    3. World Bank & Blue (Water) Bonds

    The Republic of Seychelles start the first sovereign “blue bond” in 2018. The Rockefeller Foundation, Standard Chartered Bank and Bank of New York Mellon helped with payments. The bonds themselves were placed with the private investors: Nuveen, Prudential and Calvert Impact Capital.

    4. World Bank & Green/Climate Bonds

    Climate Bonds, or “Green Bonds“, is yet another growing industry that the Rockefellers and other environmental groups are trying to pump up. This is an industry that is potentially worth $100 trillion or more. However, the money likely won’t be going where people think it will.

    5. World Bank, PEFF & Pandemic Bonds

    Washington, DC, June 28, 2017 – The World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development) today launched specialized bonds aimed at providing financial support to the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF), a facility created by the World Bank to channel surge funding to developing countries facing the risk of a pandemic.

    This marks the first time that World Bank bonds are being used to finance efforts against infectious diseases, and the first time that pandemic risk in low-income countries is being transferred to the financial markets.

    The PEF will provide more than $500 million to cover developing countries against the risk of pandemic outbreaks over the next five years, through a combination of bonds and derivatives priced today, a cash window, and future commitments from donor countries for additional coverage.

    The transaction, that enables PEF to potentially save millions of lives, was oversubscribed by 200% reflecting an overwhelmingly positive reception from investors and a high level of confidence in the new World Bank sponsored instrument. With such strong demand, the World Bank was able to price the transaction well below the original guidance from the market. The total amount of risk transferred to the market through the bonds and derivatives is $425 million.

    In June 2017, the World Bank started up “Pandemic Bonds“, which would be a sort of insurance policy against infectious diseases. Of course, one has to wonder how far ahead they saw in starting this.

    The PEFF, or Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility, will determine if there is a pandemic, according to certain criteria. But early in 2020, the World Bank was accused of “waiting for people to die”, by refusing to pay out this money.

    6. World Bank & Social Impact Bonds

    In February 2019 “Social Impact Bonds” were started up. They are marketed as a sort of social investment driver, to improve the quality of live for people in the 3rd World, particularly women. They are also supposed to help with the financing of the UNSDA, or United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda.

    7. World Bank, IFFM & Vaccine Bonds

    This was addressed in the Planned-emic series. Instead of giving money directly to GAVI, there is a convoluted scheme that involves making pledges to IFFIm, the International Finance Facility for Immunizations. Those pledges are then used to generate bonds which are sold to the World Bank. The World Bank then re-sells those bonds on the open market. The money from sales goes to GAVI, who uses it to finance their vaccine agenda.

    Note: IFFIm is actually financed by GAVI (who is financed by Gates), so there isn’t really any independence here.

    Of course, these means that donor pledges end up costing much more than originally told, or it means only a portion of that money is put to use.

    8. Some Thoughts On These Bonds

    In early 2020, the President of Belarus claimed that the IMF (International Monetary Fund), and World Bank, offered him a bribe of almost $1 billion if he would impose pandemic measures on his country. He refused. While that seemed like an absurd conspiracy theory at the time, more and more questions need to be answered.

    What are the IMF and World Bank up to, and are these bonds connected to their push for drastic (and forced) social changes?

    While all of these projects have nice enough sounding names, a question keeps coming up: why is it necessary to use these bonds at all? Instead of selling, and reselling bonds, shouldn’t the money go directly to the people who will be impacted? After all, the average person doesn’t benefit from increased bond values, only the bond holders do.

    It’s interesting that the Rockefeller Foundation is so supportive of all of this. After all, they drafted the Lockstep Narrative in 2010. They lay out in broad strokes how to force social change under the false pretense of a global health crisis.

    Of course, companies that don’t play along with the agenda, such as “non-green” industries, will soon be forced out of business. The threats have been openly made for a long time now.

    (1) 5 Organizations Make Up The World Bank
    (2) World Bank Launches “Blockchain Bond” In 2018
    (3) Second Round Of Blockchain Bonds In 2019
    (4) Video Explaining Blockchain Implementation In New Bonds
    (5) Seychelles Launches Blue Bonds In 2018
    (6) Blue Bonds Partially Financed By Rockefeller Foundation
    (7) Video Explaining Blue (Water) Bonds Concept
    (8) Rockefeller Foundation Financing Green Bonds
    (9) Founders And Partners Of Climate Bonds
    (10) “Pandemic Bonds” Started in 2017 By World Bank Group
    (11) Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility
    (12) World Bank Won’t Pay Out Pandemic Bonds
    (13) Video Explaining Pandemic Bonds Concept
    (14) World Bank Launching Social Impact Bonds
    (15) Lukashenko Claims IMF & World Bank Offered Bribe

    Conservatives Whine About Sexual Assault During Quarantine, Not The Forced Quarantines Themselves

    This is a new level of moral relativity. Apparently, authorities detaining people for 14 days under the false pretense of public safety is okay. The forcible confinement is not the issue. Nor is the nasal rape that comes in the form of PCR tests. However, the entire experience is suddenly a human rights violation if a sexual assault is committed during that time.

    1. Rempel Supports House Arrest In Principle

    https://twitter.com/GregMcLeanYYC/status/1358115105683066881

    This is from February 6, 2021. At the 28 second mark, Michelle Rempel-Garner explicitly states that everyone (presuming her party included), supports the idea of forcing people into their homes for 14 days at a time.

    In her usual “Canada last” ways, she does ask for exemptions for Temporary Foreign Workers from quarantine, at a time when unemployment in Canada is still extremely high.

    To reiterate, the “Official Opposition” doesn’t have a problem with imprisoning people. Their complaints are limited to some of the details of implementing such policies.

    2. Fake Outrage Over Assault In Quarantine

    https://twitter.com/MichelleRempel/status/1365032919866118147

    On February 25, Rempel pretended to be outraged that people coming into Canada were being forced into quarantine against their will, and not knowing where they are going. Keep in mind, on February 6, she was okay with this, according to her own statement.

    Does any of this mean that Conservatives now have a problem with this sort of confinement? Keep in mind, it would be illegal in any other circumstances. No. Instead, all that is asked is for a review, and to do a better job of vetting the guards holding them prisoner.

    “The Liberal government must take action now. We call for the Liberals to suspend the hotel quarantine requirement until they have put measures in place to ensure the safety of Canadians and institute a system for verifying at-home quarantine that doesn’t involve security agents who have not been properly vetted. During this necessary pause, the federal government should continue with on-arrival testing and the 14-day at-home quarantine for all international travelers to protect the public health of Canadians.”

    Even in her statement, there is no principled objection to the quarantine camps themselves (or internment camps). There is no objection to forcing people into house arrest. In fact, they seem content to re-establish these detention centers once better screening methods are in place.

    The National Post mentioned that there was a call to suspend the program, which is not the same thing as cancelling it altogether.

    3. Vaccine Agenda: They’re All In It Together

    (See 1:30 mark in this, or original video). Trudeau claims that “normalcy will not return without a vaccine that is widely available, and that could be a very long way off”.

    https://twitter.com/erinotoole/status/1356966419934683138

    This is Erin O’Toole, the leader of the so-called “Conservative” Party of Canada, which claims to be the main opposition to Trudeau. Problem is: they don’t actually oppose anything ideologically. They whine about vaccines and tests not arriving fast enough, but don’t object on moral or ethical grounds.

    There’s no way to describe this other than as a dog and pony show. These “leaders” are just going through the motions.