CV #66(D): Call-In Centers Are Wrongly Telling People “Vaccines” Were Approved

Mass vaccination centers have opened across Canada. The goal is to inject largely untested substances into people, under the pretense of a public health emergency. Now, these aren’t really “vaccines”, but are gene-replacement therapy, and 99% of people don’t need them, but that’s another story. This is to get into the misrepresentation that is going on with the call in centers set up.

1. “Vaccines” Not Health Canada Approved

Before going any further, it is time to distinguish between 2 completely different ways medical devices and substances can be advanced.

  • INTERIM AUTHORIZATION — deemed to be “worth the risk” under the circumstances, doesn’t have to be fully tested. Allowed under Section 30.1 of the Canada Food & Drug Act. Also known as emergency authorization.
  • APPROVED — Health Canada has fully reviewed all the testing, and steps have been done, with the final determination that it can be used for the general population.

To be approved means that this thing has been rigorously tested, and has passed all safety measures, and that it has rigorously been examined. This is not what happened here.

Instead, these “vaccines” were given interim authorization, because the Government has decided that it’s worth releasing it to the general public, and finishing the testing later. This is allowed under Section 30.1 of the Canada Food & Drug Act, and an Interim Order was signed by Patty Hajdu.

https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-pm-en.pdf
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/janssen-covid-19-vaccine-pm-en.pdf
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/covid-19-vaccine-moderna-pm-en.pdf
https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-pm1-en.pdf

Think this is an exaggeration? Take a look at the paperwork available from Health Canada. Not once do they refer to them as approved. Instead, they are “authorized under an Interim Order”. These are not the same thing, and cannot be used interchangeably.

2. Recordings From Booking Centers

Fraser Health Booking

Interior Health Booking

Island Health Booking

Northern Health Booking

Vancouver Health Booking

Saskatchewan Booking

Manitoba Booking

Ontario Booking

In each inquiry made, the person on the other end conflated “approved” with an “interim or temporary authorization”. Now, it possible — even likely — that they don’t know the difference and are not attempting to deceive. But the result is the same. Average citizens call in, and won’t know the difference.

Pardon the less than stellar quality. Speaker phones aren’t the best for this sort of thing.

The 5 recordings here are from each of the 5 health zones in BC. But surely, this is going on elsewhere as well. People don’t ask the necessary questions.

3. Calls To Various Government Lines

Health Canada

Public Health Agency of Canada (Their # anyway)

811 Phone Support In BC

Manitoba Health Services

The people booking not seem to know. Not only that, various Government bodies apparently don’t have a clue either. Not very reassuring.

4. Trudeau’s Two-Faced Claims

Here, we get the standard answer of “Health Canada tests and insures the safety of all vaccines that are APPROVED”. While this sounds fine on the surface, these were never approved, they were given interim authorization. The Government hopes you won’t know the difference.

NSERC/CIHR/SSHRC Offering Money To Those Willing To Target Minorities For Vaccination

On Tuesday, March 9, 2021, these 4 bodies held a joint conference to discuss funding opportunities for targeting minority groups in Canada for vaccination. This isn’t limited to these CV “vaccines”, but is aimed at vaccination in general. In case anyone wonders that the videos are taken out of context, the entire videos and power-points (both English and French), are included in the following links.

Encouraging vaccine confidence in Canada.ppt_
Renforcer la confiance a l’egard des vaccins au Canada

CIHR/NSERC/SSHRC Vaccine Confidence Full Conference (English)
CIHR/NSERC/SSHRC Vaccine Confidence Full Conference (French)

NSERC Page Announcing Grant Program

This is a continuation from this previous article. The Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and Social Studies and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), are launching this joint program. $2.25 million is to be spent. Grants are to be up to $50,000 each. In theory, 45 organizations could receive this money.

To be clear, this isn’t about financing research into the causes and details of “vaccine hesitancy”. Instead, this is about employing institutions (who present as scientific) to push the narrative that vaccination is a good thing. This is paying organizations to promote the push the narrative. In short, this is glorified advertising. It is made clear throughout that this is not about employing research.

If you want this money, you need to figure out how to target a minority community in Canada, getting them more accepting of mass vaccination. Having a science background is not important, provided you are good at selling things. Is your integrity worth just $50,000?

You may be forgiven for thinking that CIHR, NSERC, and SSHRC were about providing grants for scientific research. That is supposed to be their agenda. But not today.

RE: CANUCK LAW ON “VACCINE HESITANCY”
(A) Canada’s National Vaccination Strategy
(B) The Vaccine Confidence Project
(C) More Research Into Overcoming “Vaccine Hesitancy”
(D) Psychological Manipulation Over “Vaccine Hesitancy”
(E) World Economic Forum Promoting More Vaccinations
(F) CIHR/NSERC/SSHRC On Grants To Raise Vaccine Uptake

RE: CANUCK LAW ON MEDIA SUBSIDIES, DONATIONS
(a) Subsidization Programs Available For Media Outlets (QCJO)
(b) Political Operatives Behind Many “Fact-Checking” Groups
(c) DisinfoWatch, MacDonald-Laurier, Journalists For Human Rights
(d) Taxpayer Subsidies To Combat CV “Misinformation”
(e) Postmedia Periodicals Getting Covid Subsidies
(f) Aberdeen Publishing (BC, AB) Getting Grants To Operate
(g) Other Periodicals Receiving Subsidies
(h) Still More Media Subsidies Taxpayers Are Supporting
(i) Media Outlets, Banks, Credit Unions, All Getting CEWS

Other articles are available above. They concern both the corruption of the media in Canada, and the “vaccine hesitancy” research that has been underway for a long time. Take the deep dive.

While so much of the Canadian media is compromised, this site never will be. Truth matters much more than money.

World Economic Forum Partnering With Major Banks, Pension Funds

This may be nothing, but should we be worried that the World Economic Forum has partnered with the banking industry, asset management groups, pharmaceutical companies, and other major corporations?

1. WEF Partners: Banks, Finance, Pensions

  • African Development Bank Group
  • Algebris Investments
  • Al Nowais Investments
  • Banco Bradesco
  • Banco BTG Pactual
  • Banco Safra Brasil
  • Banco Santander
  • Bangchak
  • Bank Julius Baer
  • Bank Leumi Le-Israel
  • Bank Lombard Odier & Co.
  • Bank Mandiri (Persero)
  • Bank of America
  • BlackRock
  • Blackstone Group
  • BMO Financial Group
  • Brightstar Capital Partners
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions
  • Brookfield Asset Management
  • Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ)
  • Capricorn Investment Group
  • Cassa Depositi e Prestiti
  • Cathay Capital Private Equity
  • Cedar Holdings Group
  • China Construction Bank
  • Citibank
  • CLS Bank International
  • CPP Investments
  • Credit Suisse
  • CVC Capital Partners (Luxembourg)
  • Deloitte
  • Depository Trust & Clearing (DTCC)
  • Deutsche Bank
  • Development Bank of Japan (DBJ)
  • Development Bank of Southern Africa
  • Discovery
  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)
  • European Investment Bank
  • Fidelity International
  • Fubon Financial Holding
  • Giti Group
  • Glencore International
  • Global Asset Capital
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Grupo Mega
  • HPS Investment Partners
  • HSBC Holdings
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)
  • Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa
  • ING Group
  • Inter-American Development Bank
  • Islamic Development Bank
  • Itaú Unibanco
  • Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC)
  • John Keells Holdings
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • Kcap Holdings
  • Kirin Holdings
  • KPMG
  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Manulife
  • Mastercard
  • McKinsey & Company
  • Mizuho Financial Group
  • Morgan Stanley
  • MUFG Bank
  • Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
  • Nasdaq
  • Nedbank Group
  • NYSE
  • Olayan Financing Group
  • Old Mutual
  • OMINVEST
  • Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan
  • Pension Danmark
  • Public Institution for Social Security (PIFSS)
  • Qatar Financial Centre (QFC)
  • Qatar Investment Authority
  • Qatar National Bank
  • Rabobank
  • RBC (Royal Bank of Canada)
  • Russian Direct Investment Fund
  • S&P Global
  • S4Capita
  • Saudi Industrial Development Fund
  • Sberbank
  • Scotiabank
  • Sequoia Capital
  • Softbank Group
  • Standard Bank Group
  • Standard Chartered Bank
  • Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFG)
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • TD Bank Group
  • Turkey Wealth Fund
  • Unison Capital
  • Visa
  • Vista Equity Partners
  • Vital Capital Fund
  • VTB Bank
  • Zenith Bank
  • Zurich Insurance Group

2. WEF Partners With Major Corporations

  • Alshaya Group
  • Amazon Web Services
  • CVS Health
  • Honda
  • Huawei Technologies
  • Hyundai Motor
  • Lockheed Martin
  • SNC-Lavalin Group
  • The Coca-Cola Company
  • Uber Technologies
  • Walmart
  • Western Union
  • Zoom

3. WEF Partners With Vaccine Pushers

  • AstraZeneca
  • Bayer
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Facebook
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Google
  • Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Jubilant Bhartia Group
  • LinkedIn
  • Microsoft
  • Merck
  • Moderna
  • Novartis
  • Open Society Foundations
  • Pfizer
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • These lists are not exhaustive, and the World Economic Forum does have more partners from these groups. However, it should demonstrate the “types” of organizations who ideologically support this.

    4. WEF’s Plants In Canadian Politics

    Any familiar faces?

    CV #9: A Look At Money Sunk Into Paying For Vaccines, Research

    On August 1, 2020, the Canadian Government, or rather taxpayers, handed out over $240,000 to conduct research which included the study of the issues surrounding MANDATORY vaccines. Yes, that was apparently worth paying for a study. Now, let’s see what else the public’s money has been spent on.

    1. Grants To Develop CV Vaccines In Canada

    NAME DATE AMOUNT
    Alberta Research Chemicals Inc. Jul. 1, 2020 $36,000
    Archambault, Denis Jun. 1, 2020 $622,782
    Barr, Stephen D Apr. 1, 2020 $998,840
    Bell, John C Jun. 1, 2020 $1,936,150
    Biodextris Inc. Sep. 24, 2020 $1,307,678
    BioVectra Inc. Sep. 4, 2020 $5,412,045
    Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Aug. 4, 2020 $40,000,000
    Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc. May 1, 2020 $100,000
    Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sep. 1, 2020 $5,000,000
    Falzarano, Darryl Feb. 1, 2020 $999,793
    Falzarano, Darryl Jun. 1, 2020 $1,459,325
    Grant, Michael D Sep. 1, 2020 $497,175
    Halperin, Scott A Aug. 1, 2020 $240,731
    Halperin, Scott A Sep. 1, 2020 $3,516,000
    Houghton, Michael Apr. 1, 2020 $600,000
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Apr. 1, 2020 $378,239
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Apr. 1, 2020 $636,596
    Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. Sep. 17, 2020 $1,000,000
    Kobinger, Gary P Feb. 1, 2020 $999,356
    Leclerc, Denis Feb. 1, 2020 $717,645
    Les biotechnologies Ulysse inc Jun. 22, 2020 $30,000
    Lewis, John D Jun. 1, 2020 $4,175,000
    Liu, Jun Jun. 1, 2020 $416,483
    McGill University (Academia) Nov. 6, 2020 $160,198
    Medicago inc. Oct. 18, 2020 $173,000,000
    Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada Sep. 8, 2020 $500,000
    PharmAchieve Corporation. Ltd. Apr. 1, 2020 $49,920
    Pharma Glycovax Inc Aug. 31, 2020 $3,978,832
    Precision NanoSystems Inc. Oct. 9, 2020 $18,203,000
    Providence Therapeutics Holdings Sep. 1, 2020 $4,700,000
    Resilience Biotechnologies Inc. Nov. 1, 2020 $2,103,150
    Richardson, Christopher D Jun. 1, 2020 $138,097
    Symvivo Corporation Sep. 4, 2020 $2,821,081
    Watts, Tania H Jun. 1, 2020 $1,329,250
    University of Saskatchewan Jul. 7, 2020 $23,000,000
    Xing, Zhou Jun. 1, 2020 $1,920,985
    Yao, Xiao-Jian Apr. 1, 2020 $326,578

    This came from a quick search of Federal donations, “Vaccine + Covid”. A lot of money was spent already, for many different parties.

    2. Other Grants Funding Vaccines/Research

    NAME DATE AMOUNT
    Adventist Development and Relief Agency Mar. 30, 2020 $3,500,000
    Brockman, Mark A Dec. 1, 2011 $1,419,901
    CARE Canada May 29, 2019 $2,000,000
    Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance Mar. 28, 2014 $20,000,000
    Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance Sep. 17, 2015 $500,000,000
    IDRC Feb. 17, 2015 $3,000,000
    Immuno Vaccine Technologies Sep. 15, 2011 $2,944,000
    Immuno Vaccine Technologies Oct. 6, 2008 $3,000,000
    Int’l Development Research Centre Sep. 29, 2015 $9,000,000
    International Rescue Committee Jun. 12, 2019 $2,600,000
    Kobinger, Gary P Apr. 1, 2017 $3,997,503
    Loeb, Mark B Oct. 1, 2012 $2,864,660
    Loeb, Mark B Jul. 1, 2016 $8,310,463
    Medicago inc. May 13, 2015 $8,000,000
    Medicago Inc. Jan. 1, 2019 $2,515,000
    Novartis Animal Health Canada Inc. Nov. 1, 2006 $1,836,921
    Novartis Animal Health Canada Inc. Nov. 7, 2008 $1,747,458
    Ogilvie, Gina S Apr. 1, 2019 $10,090,731
    Ostrowski, Mario A Dec. 1, 2011 $1,415,432
    UNICEF Sep. 4, 2020 $2,500,000
    University of Saskatchewan Feb. 16, 2018 $3,609,771
    University of Saskatchewan Mar. 23, 2018 $15,609,771
    University of Saskatchewan (VIDO) Oct. 2, 2007 $49,000,000
    WHO – World Health Organization Mar. 31, 2015 $20,000,000
    WHO – World Health Organization Nov. 13, 2019 $2,000,000
    Xing, Zhou Jul. 1, 2017 $2,462,740

    This is by no means all of them, but are some of the bigger grants flagged by searching “vaccines” on the Government of Canada website.

    3. NSERC/CIHR/SSHRC Research Grants

    NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, has also handed out hundreds of grants over the last year regarding “Covid research”. It’s available for all to see.

    CIHR, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, has also listed the grants they they will be handing out. As of August 8, 2020, it was listed at $111 million.

    SSHRC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, also has a website detailing information about its grants and spending.

    4. Who Needs Science-Based Policy Anyway?

    This is BC Provincial Health Officer, Bonnie Henry. Despite repeated admissions like this, the local media fawns over her, refusing to ask difficult questions. This is the unelected dictator of the Province, that all parties agreed to abdicate their responsibilities to. And this is what BC promotes as “safety“.

    New $2.25M For “Vaccine Confidence” Programs, $240K To Study Mandatory Vaccines

    The Canadian Government is offering organizations up to $50,000 each to promote “vaccine confidence”, and to convince people that they should be taking it. It’s being organized jointly by the NSERC, the SSHRC, and the CIHR.

    To be clear, this isn’t 1 grant of $2.25 million. It is 45 grants of $50,000 each, or potentially more than 45, if amounts less than this are awarded.

    1. Grants To Promote “Vaccine Confidence”

    The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) are pleased to launch a special $2.25 million funding opportunity to support activities that promote vaccine confidence in Canada. The agencies expect these activities will improve public understanding of vaccines and help Canadians to make evidence-based decisions, especially among populations that are hesitant about vaccines.

    The new funding is targeted at Canadian non-profit organizations, non-federal museums and science centres, and academic institutions with a strong track record of science and/or health promotion. Researchers from all fields with an expertise in combating vaccine-related misinformation may apply either individually through their institutions or in collaboration with science, social sciences, humanities, and/or health promotion organizations.

    NSERC will host information webinars to discuss the funding opportunity’s goals and selection criteria, how to prepare an application, and to answer questions. Interested applicants can attend the French session on March 8, 2021 at 1:30 PM Eastern and/or the English session on March 9, 2021 at 12:30 PM Eastern.

    This is serious. SSHRC/NSERC/CIHR are working together to launch a program that will award up to $50,000 each for an institution to promote “vaccine confidence”, in order to convince Canadians that these vaccines are safe. Presumably the CV shots are the primary target.

    Note: none of these grants are aimed at ENSURING vaccines are safe, such as with additional testing. Instead, the goal is to CONVINCE people that they already are.

    2. Marketing/Advertising, Not Science At Play

    Examples of eligible activities include:
    .
    -providing scientifically sound information about vaccines via social media, hotlines, webinars, forums or websites in a way that addresses beliefs and fears
    developing, translating and disseminating easy-to-understand and engaging materials on vaccine acceptance and adoption of public health measures in a culturally appropriate way
    -delivering workshops to train community leaders on promoting vaccine confidence and sharing best practices for evidence-based decision making
    -mobilizing social sciences and humanities knowledge to address cultural and societal determinants of vaccine hesitancy in order to better ensure vaccine confidence
    -sharing historical perspectives on pandemics and vaccine development to build trust and confidence in the community
    -providing techniques for identifying reliable sources of information versus misinformation pertaining to vaccines

    These activities have nothing to do with science. Instead, they are about using the perceived legitimacy of scientific institutions in order to promote the Government narratives. In short, these institutions would become propaganda outlets, much like the media in Canada.

    3. Study Into MANDATORY Vaccines In Canada

    Remember how, just 6 months ago, people who spoke of mandatory vaccinations were called “conspiracy theorists”? Turns out, that at least $240,000 of public money has been spend looking into exactly that issue. And there are probably more of these grants.

    The Government is enlisting institutions which appear to be neutral in order to prop up its agenda. Seriously, how much is integrity worth these days? It’s bad enough that almost the entire Canadian media is in on it, but scientific institutions at least claim to be neutral truth seekers.

    4. Important Links

    https://twitter.com/CIHR_IRSC
    https://twitter.com/NSERC_CRSNG
    https://twitter.com/SSHRC_CRSH

    NSERC Grant Postings, For “Vaccine Confidence”
    https://archive.is/QRJAW

    Event Information Describing The Grant Program
    https://archive.is/8QaUT

    $240,000 Spent To Study MANDATORY Vaccines
    https://archive.is/5xA4e

    Other “Pandemic” Grants

    RE: CANUCK LAW ON “VACCINE HESITANCY”
    (A) Canada’s National Vaccination Strategy
    (B) The Vaccine Confidence Project
    (C) More Research Into Overcoming “Vaccine Hesitancy”
    (D) Psychological Manipulation Over “Vaccine Hesitancy”
    (E) World Economic Forum Promoting More Vaccinations

    RE: CANUCK LAW ON MEDIA SUBSIDIES, DONATIONS
    (a) Subsidization Programs Available For Media Outlets (QCJO)
    (b) Political Operatives Behind Many “Fact-Checking” Groups
    (c) DisinfoWatch, MacDonald-Laurier, Journalists For Human Rights
    (d) Taxpayer Subsidies To Combat CV “Misinformation”
    (e) Postmedia Periodicals Getting Covid Subsidies
    (f) Aberdeen Publishing (BC, AB) Getting Grants To Operate
    (g) Other Periodicals Receiving Subsidies
    (h) Still More Media Subsidies Taxpayers Are Supporting
    (i) Media Outlets, Banks, Credit Unions, All Getting CEWS

    CV #30(E): Crestview Strategy, Danielle Peters, Lobbyists Behind $173 Million Grant To Medicago

    Medicago received a grant of $173,000,000 to develop a CV-19 vaccine. Beyond that, a portion of the grant is to build a manufacturing facility, which presumably should be operational by 2040.

    1. Other Articles On CV “Planned-emic”

    The rest of the series is here. Many lies, lobbying, conflicts of interest, and various globalist agendas operating behind the scenes, obscuring the vile agenda called the GREAT RESET. The Gates Foundation finances: the WHO, the US CDC, GAVI, ID2020, John Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the Pirbright Institute, the BBC, and individual pharmaceutical companies. The International Health Regulations are legally binding. The Postmedia empire and the “independent” media are paid off, as are the fact-checkers. The virus was never isolated, PCR tests are a fraud, as are forced masks, social bubbles, and 2m distancing.

    2. Danielle Peters, Major Pharma Lobbyist

    • February 4, 2019
    • February 4, 2019
    • February 5, 2019
    • November 27, 2019
    • January 22, 2020
    • March 3, 2020
    • March 5, 2020
    • May 25, 2020
    • June 8, 2020
    • June 8, 2020
    • June 29 2020
    • July 13, 2020
    • July 15, 2020
    • July 29, 2020
    • July 30, 2020
    • August 6, 2020
    • August 7, 2020
    • August 26, 2020
    • August 27, 2020
    • September 1, 2020
    • September 10, 2020
    • September 16, 2020
    • September 29, 2020
    • October 10, 2020
    • October 10 2020
    • January 13, 2021
    • January 28, 2021

    The above list only includes searches for Medicago, which Danielle Peters is featured prominently. She has been registered as a Medicago lobbyist since 2013. Those dates are when she met on behalf of Medicago to lobby for vaccines. If you only search her name, Peters is involved in other pharma lobbying, such as with Merck, Kalgene Pharmaceuticals, Therapure Biopharma, and the Alliance for Safe Online Pharmacies

    3. Danielle Peters, Magnet Strategy Group

    Dani Peters is President of Magnet Strategy Group, a consulting firm that manages public affairs strategies in Canada and the United States.

    Prior to founding Magnet Strategy Group, Dani held senior roles in public affairs firms in the U.S. and Canada, concentrating on fields that include innovation, health and life sciences. Over the past decade, Dani has worked with groups in the health sector to develop and manage government, public policy, funding, advocacy and stakeholder strategies.

    Dani is co-founder of the Cross-Border Health Foundation, an organization that fosters dialogue between Canada and the United States around common health priorities. In addition to operating Magnet Strategy Group, Dani serves on the Industry Advisory Board for Bloom Burton & Co., a healthcare investment advisory firm in Toronto. She is also a Health Leader-in-Residence for the World Health Innovation Network (WIN), within the University of Windsor’s Odette School of Business.

    What else is there to say? She is clearly a very connected person. Considering that Medicago landed a $173 million contract, due largely to her lobbying, Peters was financially a great investment. This deal wasn’t just to fund vaccine research, it was to build a facility as well.

    4. Peters Lobbied While With Rothwell

    It worth pointing out that Peters also lobbied on behalf of Medicago when she was employed by the firm, Rothwell Group. Seems that not much has changed.

    5. Peters Part Of Adjuvant Partners As Well

    Look familiar? It should. This profile is almost identical to the Magnet profile, down to using the same photograph. Among other things, Adjuvant lists “gene therapy” as one area it’s involved with. This appears to be another lobbying firm, as they don’t do medical research themselves.

    6. Peters’ LinkedIn Page

    The profile of one of the main players behind the $173 million spending. However, she has not acted alone in this.

    7. Blake Oliver Jumps Ship To Government

    On February 26, 2020, Blake Oliver lobbied the Federal Government on behalf of Medicago, while still employed at Crestview Strategy. Days later, he was working for the Government, in the Ministry of Transportation. He also helped volunteer for the Liberals in the 2019 election.

    8. Patricia Sibal, Liberal Party Volunteer

    Also connected to this is Patricia Sabil. She has lobbied for Medicago, while working for Crestview Strategy. She is also a volunteer with the Liberals in Ontario and Quebec.

    9. Susie Heath, Liberal With Wynne/McGuinty

    Susie Heath spent years with the Liberal Government of Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne. She has also lobbied on behalf of Medicago, while with Crestview Strategy

    10. Jennifer Babcock, Ex-Crestview Lobbyist

    Babcock spent several years in Parliament, working for various politicians. She also lobbied on behalf of both Medicago and GAVI. Honourable mentions go out to Lucas Malinowski, and Joanna Carey, who appear to have since left Crestview.

    Jason Clark is still with Crestview, and has acted for Medicago and GAVI. He volunteered in the 2015 election for Liberals in the Ottawa region. Crestview itself was co-founded by Rob Silver, husband of Katie Telford, Trudeau’s Chief-of-Staff.

    Currently, Ashton Arsenault is registered as a lobbyist for both Medicago and GAVI. For some variety, he is a strategist with the Conservative Party of Canada.

    For some background information into Crestview and other lobbying, please check here, here, here and here.

    This is what they mean when they say “we’re all in it together”.

    11. Conflicts Of Interest Ignored In Media

    Given the heavy subsidization of the media in Canada, it’s no surprise that none of this is being reported. When outlets are dependent on the Government to prop them up, they are unlikely to do real research. But about that $173 million grant, people should know who is really pulling the strings.