This article will focus on data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or USCBP. It sheds light on just how bad things are with their borders, particularly the side with Mexico. There have been many interests vested in not securing it. Consequently, people flood in illegally, since there’s little reason not to at least try.
Why should Canadians care about this?
The answer is simple: it’s not just an American problem. Open borders threatens nations in general. Not only that, many of those illegal aliens will surely be working their way to Canada, given the generous welfare benefits available.
There’s also some historical data, going back 100 years on total apprehensions.
The following data is by no means all of the information that CBP releases, including on weapons and drugs. It’s just a portion of it. But it should be alarming to anyone who takes border security seriously.
Total Customs And Border Patrol Enforcement Actions
YEAR | TOTALS | OFFICE OF FIELD OPS | US BORDER PATROL |
---|---|---|---|
FY 2017 | 526,901 | 216,370 | 310,531 |
FY 2018 | 683,178 | 281,881 | 404,142 |
FY 2019 | 1,148,024 | 288,523 | 859,501 |
FY 2020 | 646,822 | 241,786 | 405,036 |
FY 2021 | 1,956,519 | 294,352 | 1,662,167 |
FY 2022 | 2,766,582 | 551,930 | 2,214,652 |
FY 2023 | 3,201,144 | 1,137,452 | 2,063,692 |
FY 2024* | 1,981,177 | 809,460 | 1,171,717 |
* Beginning in March FY20, OFO Encounters statistics include both Title 8 Inadmissibles and Title 42 Expulsions. To learn more, visit Title-8-and-Title-42-Statistics. Inadmissibles refers to individuals encountered at ports of entry who are seeking lawful admission into the United States but are determined to be inadmissible, individuals presenting themselves to seek humanitarian protection under our laws, and individuals who withdraw an application for admission and return to their countries of origin within a short timeframe.
** Beginning in March FY20, USBP Encounters statistics include both Title 8 Apprehensions and Title 42 Expulsions. To learn more, visit Title-8-and-Title-42-Statistics. Apprehensions refers to the physical control or temporary detainment of a person who is not lawfully in the U.S. which may or may not result in an arrest.
Inadmissible Foreign Criminals And Outstanding Warrants
YEAR | OFO C.N.E | NCIC** | USBP C.N.E | USBP Warrants | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2017 | 10,596 | 7,656 | 8,531 | 2,675 | |||||||||
FY 2018 | 11,623 | 5,929 | 6,698 | 1,550 | |||||||||
FY 2019 | 12,705 | 8,546 | 4,269 | 4,153 | |||||||||
FY 2020 | 7,009 | 7,108 | 2,438 | 2,054 | |||||||||
FY 2021 | 6,567 | 8,979 | 10,763 | 1,904 | |||||||||
FY 2022 | 16,993 | 10,389 | 15,267 | 949 | |||||||||
FY 2023 | 20,166 | 11,509 | 15,267 | 988 | |||||||||
FY 2024*** | 11,626 | 6,946 | 10,337 | 587 |
YEAR | OC | NO | DE | JA | FE | MA | AP | MY | JN | JL | AU | SE | TOT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 98K | 67K | 69K | 60K | 90K | 88K | 64K | 89K | 93K | 77K | 75 | 45 | 913K |
2022 | 83K | 58K | 45K | 50K | 60K | 44K | 53K | 47K | 61K | 54K | 60K | 41K | 656K |
2023 | 37K | 39K | 40K | 49K | 70K | 56K | 36K | 41K | 44K | 50K | 49K | 39K | 549K |
2024* | 37K | 48K | 34K | 37K | 67K | 51K | 46K | – | – | – | – | – | 321K |
* FY 2024, or Fiscal Year 2024, ends on September 30th, 2024
Data represents pounds that were seized, rounded for space considerations. For example, 58K means 58,000 pounds of narcotics.
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/drug-seizure-statistics
Types Of Drugs Seized 2021-2024
YEAR | MJ | ME | CO | FE | HE | KH | KE | EC | LSD | OTH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 319K | 192K | 98K | 11K | 5K | 203K | 22K | 1K | 38 | 73K |
2022 | 155K | 175K | 70K | 15K | 2K | 175K | 14K | 1K | 36 | 49K |
2023 | 150K | 140K | 81K | 27K | 2K | 70K | 8K | 649 | 11 | 71K |
2024* | 110K | 105K | 41K | 11K | 513 | 5K | 9K | 321 | 6 | 39K |
MJ = Marijuana
ME = Methamphetamine
CO = Cocaine
FE = Fentanyl
HE = Heroin
KH = Khat (Catha Edulis)
EC = Ecstasy
LSD = LSD
OTH = Other Drugs
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/drug-seizure-statistics
* FY 2024, or Fiscal Year 2024, ends on September 30th, 2024
Weapons And Firearms Seized
YEAR | AM | CA | MA | OG | RE | SC | SI | BA | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2021 | 345,757 | – | 419 | 230,761 | 181 | – | 18,036 | – | 595,154 |
FY 2022 | 1,029,554 | – | 516 | 115,902 | 253 | – | 1,272 | – | 1,147,497 |
FY 2023 | 501,368 | 847 | 7,532 | 34,181 | 324 | 357 | 2,457 | 544 | 547,610 |
FY 2024* | 243,783 | 178 | 6,475 | 47,719 | 175 | 238 | 1,907 | 3,282 | 303,756 |
AM = Ammunition
CA = Case
MA = Magazine
OG = Other Gun Parts
RE = Receiver
SC = Scope
SI = Silencer/Muffler
BA = Vest/Body Armour
* FY 2024, or Fiscal Year 2024, ends on September 30th, 2024
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/weapons-and-ammunition-seizures
Terrorist Screening Encounters
YEAR | SOUTHERN BORDER | NORTHERN BORDER | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
FY 2017 | 116 | 217 | 333 |
FY 2018 | 155 | 196 | 351 |
FY 2019 | 280 | 258 | 538 |
FY 2020 | 72 | 124 | 196 |
FY 2021 | 103 | 54 | 157 |
FY 2022 | 67 | 313 | 380 |
FY 2023 | 80 | 484 | 564 |
FY 2024* | 24 | 172 | 196 |
YEAR | SOUTHERN BORDER | NORTHERN BORDER | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
FY 2017 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
FY 2018 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
FY 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
FY 2020 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
FY 2021 | 15 | 1 | 16 |
FY 2022 | 98 | 0 | 98 |
FY 2023 | 169 | 3 | 172 |
FY 2024* | 80 | 1 | 81 |
* FY 2024, or Fiscal Year 2024, ends on September 30th, 2024
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
Arrests Of Non-Citizen Gang Members
YEAR | 18TH ST. | MS-13 | PAISAS | OTHER | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2015 | 84 | 335 | 73 | 352 | 844 |
FY 2016 | 47 | 253 | 119 | 283 | 702 |
FY 2017 | 61 | 228 | 53 | 194 | 536 |
FY 2018 | 145 | 413 | 62 | 188 | 808 |
FY 2019 | 168 | 464 | 90 | 254 | 976 |
FY 2020 | 36 | 72 | 93 | 162 | 363 |
FY 2021 | 28 | 113 | 79 | 128 | 348 |
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics-fy2023
Note: More recent data breaks down data among many other gangs. However, most have had just a few members detained at the border.
Arrests of Non-Citizens with Criminal Convictions
FISCAL YEAR | TOTAL ARRESTS |
---|---|
FY 2017 | 8,531 |
FY 2018 | 6,698 |
FY 2019 | 4,269 |
FY 2020 | 2,438 |
FY 2021 | 10,763 |
FY 2022 | 12,028 |
FY 2023 | 15,267 |
FY 2024* | 10,337 |
* FY 2024 ends on September 30th, 2024
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics/criminal-noncitizen-statistics
Records checks of available law enforcement databases following the apprehension of an individual may reveal a history of criminal conviction(s). That conviction information is recorded in a U.S. Customs and Border Protection database, from which the data below is derived.
Total Criminal Convictions by Type Of Non-Citizens
YEAR | ABSV | ROB | DUI | HOM | DRUG | IRE | WEAP | SEX | OTH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2017 | 692 | 595 | 1,596 | 3 | 1,249 | 4,502 | 173 | 137 | 1,851 |
FY 2018 | 524 | 347 | 1,113 | 3 | 871 | 3,920 | 106 | 80 | 1,364 |
FY 2019 | 299 | 184 | 614 | 2 | 449 | 2,663 | 66 | 58 | 814 |
FY 2020 | 208 | 143 | 364 | 3 | 386 | 1,261 | 49 | 156 | 580 |
FY 2021 | 1,178 | 825 | 1,629 | 60 | 2,138 | 6,160 | 336 | 488 | 2,691 |
Fy 2022 | 1,142 | 896 | 1,614 | 62 | 2,239 | 6,797 | 309 | 365 | 2,891 |
FY 2023 | 1,254 | 864 | 2,493 | 29 | 2,055 | 8,790 | 307 | 284 | 3,286 |
FY 2024* | 662 | 412 | 1,778 | 20 | 942 | 6,368 | 142 | 133 | 1,933 |
* Fiscal Year 2024 runs October 1, 2023- September 30, 2024.
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics/criminal-noncitizen-statistics
The FY total displays the total CES apprehensions but does not equal the sum of data by category because the same apprehension can have multiple NCIC Charges that are included in multiple categories.
“Other” includes any conviction not included in the categories above.
ABSV = Assault, Battery, Domestic Violence
ROB = Burglary, Robbery, Larceny, Theft, Fraud
DUI = Driving Under The Influence
HOM = Homicide: Murder, Manslaughter, etc….
DRUG = Illegal Drug Possession, Trafficking
IRE = Illegal Re-Entry
WEAP = Illegal Weapons Possession, Transport, Trafficking
SEX = Sexual Offences
OTH = Categories Not Listed Above
Historical Data On Apprehensions: 1925 – 2020
YEAR | TOTAL | YEAR | TOTAL | YEAR | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1925 | 22,199 | 1926 | 12,735 | 1927 | 16,393 |
1928 | 23,566 | 1929 | 32,711 | 1930 | 20,880 |
1931 | 22,276 | 1932 | 22,735 | 1933 | 20,949 |
1934 | 10,319 | 1935 | 11,016 | 1936 | 11,728 |
1937 | 13,054 | 1938 | 12,851 | 1939 | 12,037 |
1940 | 10,492 | 1941 | 11,294 | 1942 | 11,784 |
1943 | 11,175 | 1944 | 31,175 | 1945 | 69,164 |
1946 | 99,591 | 1947 | 193,657 | 1948 | 192,779 |
1949 | 288,253 | 1950 | 468,339 | 1951 | 509,040 |
1952 | 528,815 | 1953 | 835,311 | 1954 | 1,028,246 |
1955 | 225,186 | 1956 | 68,420 | 1957 | 46,225 |
1958 | 40,504 | 1959 | 32,996 | 1960 | 28,966 |
1961 | 29,384 | 1962 | 29,897 | 1963 | 38,861 |
1964 | 42,879 | 1965 | 52,422 | 1966 | 79,610 |
1967 | 94,778 | 1968 | 123,519 | 1969 | 172,391 |
1970 | 231,116 | 1971 | 302,517 | 1972 | 396,495 |
1973 | 498,123 | 1974 | 634,777 | 1975 | 596,796 |
1976 | 696,039 | 1977 | 812,541 | 1978 | 862,837 |
1979 | 888,729 | 1980 | 759,420 | 1981 | 825,290 |
1982 | 819,919 | 1983 | 1,105,670 | 1984 | 1,138,566 |
1985 | 1,262,435 | 1986 | 1,692,544 | 1987 | 1,158,030 |
1988 | 969,214 | 1989 | 891,147 | 1990 | 1,103,354 |
1991 | 1,132,033 | 1992 | 1,199,560 | 1993 | 1,263,490 |
1994 | 1,031,668 | 1995 | 1,324,202 | 1996 | 1,549,876 |
1997 | 1,412,953 | 1998 | 1,555,776 | 1999 | 1,579,010 |
2000 | 1,676,438 | 2001 | 1,266,214 | 2002 | 955,310 |
2003 | 931,557 | 2004 | 1,160,395 | 2005 | 1,189,075 |
2006 | 1,089,092 | 2007 | 876,704 | 2008 | 723,825 |
2009 | 556,041 | 2010 | 463,382 | 2011 | 340,252 |
2012 | 364,768 | 2013 | 420,789 | 2014 | 486,651 |
2015 | 337,117 | 2016 | 415,816 | 2017 | 310,531 |
2018 | 414,142 | 2019 | 859,501 | 2020 | 405,036 |
* FY 2020 ended on September 30th, 2020
Source: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/media-resources/stats (pdf file) (archive)
Again, this is nowhere near all the information that the CBP puts out. It’s just a snapshot of the people, drugs, weapons and more that have been stopped. It’s alarming to think how many people, drugs and weapons aren’t being caught.
(1) https://www.cbp.gov/
(2) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
(3) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/drug-seizure-statistics
(4) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/weapons-and-ammunition-seizures
(5) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters
(6) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics/criminal-noncitizen-statistics
(7) https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/media-resources/stats
(8) U.S. Border Patrol Total Apprehensions (FY 1925 – FY 2020) (508)
Review Of 2023 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
The 2023 Annual Immigration Report to Parliament came out a while back. And if people were hoping that the rates would be cut, there’s nothing here to indicate that.
One milestone: Canada has finally brought in over a million temporary workers and students. This isn’t just the number of people who’ve gotten permanent residence or citizenship. This is in addition to that. But if there’s a silver lining, it’s that more of the public is starting to catch on.
Voting “conservative” in the upcoming election doesn’t appear to be a solution to this. The plan can best be summed up as: More! Faster! Legally!
1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada
Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.
CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.
Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.
Immigration is essential for Canada, providing economic, social, and cultural benefits. Canada’s aging population means that the worker-to-retiree ratio is shifting, with an expected ratio of 2 to 1 by 2035, compared to the 7 to 1 ratio in 1975. Immigration accounts for almost 100% of labour force growth, and with continued immigration, it is projected to account for 100% of population growth by 2032. Though the labour market remains tight, it is easing and economic immigration will continue to be a Government of Canada priority to help address the persistent labour shortages resulting from the aging population and lower fertility rates, including in critical sectors such as healthcare where immigrants account for 1 out of every 4 workers.
On page 5 of the report, it’s stated that nearly all of the growth is coming from immigration. Within the next several years, 100% of the growth is expected to come from people brought in. To summarize, this is a replacement plan.
2. Annual Immigration Reports To Parliament
2004 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2005 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2006 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2007 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2008 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2009 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2010 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2011 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2012 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2013 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2014 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2015 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2016 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2017 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2018 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2019 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2020 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2021 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2022 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
2023 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
The information in this article, and similar ones, comes directly from information provided by the Government of Canada in their annual reports. These numbers, while likely not truly accurate, are at least a good starting point.
3. Immigration Largely Controlled By Provinces
Concurrent Powers of Legislation respecting Agriculture, etc.
.
95 In each Province the Legislature may make Laws in relation to Agriculture in the Province, and to Immigration into the Province; and it is hereby declared that the Parliament of Canada may from Time to Time make Laws in relation to Agriculture in all or any of the Provinces, and to Immigration into all or any of the Provinces; and any Law of the Legislature of a Province relative to Agriculture or to Immigration shall have effect in and for the Province as long and as far only as it is not repugnant to any Act of the Parliament of Canada.
Contrary to popular belief, immigration is largely set by the Provinces. This is laid out in Section 95 of the Constitution. While Ottawa may impose laws from time to time, the understanding seems to be that the Premiers will be mostly the decision makers. While it’s understandable to get angry at Trudeau, he’s far from the only deserving target.
Additionally, there are talks underway to launch a Municipal Nominee Program, which will allow cities to directly bring people in, and to sponsor their bids to become permanent residents. It’s unclear at this point how large it will ultimately be.
4. Key Highlights From The Year 2022
As stated before, it’s not entirely clear how many people are staying after some kind of temporary visa, v.s. how many leave. We also don’t have hard data on the “inadmissibles” who don’t leave, and on the visitors who overstay. Consequently, take this as a rough estimate:
437,539 new permanent residents
-124,970 temps transitioning to PR
= 312,569 new permanent residents brought into Canada
Temporaries Brought Into Canada
550,187 (Student Visas Issued)
+135,818 (Temporary Foreign Worker Program)
+470,033 (International Mobility Program)
= 1,156,038 (in the temporary classes)
13,899 “inadmissibles” allowed under Rule 24(1) of IRPA
119 “inadmissibles” allowed under Rule 25.2(1) of IRPA
2,866,545 eTAs (electronic travel authorizations)
+1,923,148 TRV (temporary resident visas)
4,789,693 combined eTAs and TRV
364,166 permanent residents became citizens in 2022. That’s interesting, considering it’s far lower than the number of people who got their PR. Perhaps the population of Canada is much larger than we think, with a huge number who remain as PR, and don’t officially become citizens.
How many people remained in Canada? Who knows?
Other immigration (PR pathway) plans to take note of:
- 2 pathways for Hong Kong residents (June 1, 2021 to August 31, 2026)
- PR for TRP holders and their families recently (May 6, 2021 to November 5, 2021)
- Families of air crashes PS 752 and EA302 can get PR
- 500 people (+families) amnesty for illegals to work in construction
- “Refugees” willing to work in health care settings can get PR
The Government brags about expediting work permits for “essential workers”, even as Canada experienced record high unemployment. They even created a program for “refugees” to get accelerated permanent residence if they work in health care settings. This comes at a time when Canadian workers are being let go for refusing the experimental shots.
Foreign students (under a rule change) became exempt from the 20 hour/week work limit that their visas typically imposed. Supposedly, this was to enable them to provide essential services. Again, this seems screwed up given how many Canadians were forced out of work.
Foreign students also received emergency benefits designed for Canadians, although the full extent of this is not yet published.
In January 2020, the G.T.A./IIRC started their program to give out permanent residencies to 500 people — and their families — who had overstayed their initial visas. This could be interpreted as an amnesty-for-illegals program, and we’ll have to see how much it expands.
IIRC also extended the Interim Federal Health Program, or IFHP, which is a plan that also covers so-called asylum claimants. This applies also to people who’ve illegally entered from the United States. Some 14% of claimants in 2020 had entered the country illegally, primarily via Roxham Road.
There’s also an initiative underway to bring in large numbers of people from Hong Kong, who claim to be fleeing persecution. Interesting, as Canada doesn’t seem to be run much better these days.
The Rainbow Refugee Assistance Program is supposed to grow. This is to resettle people alleging they are persecuted because of their questionable behaviours.
Canada also will allow people (women primarily) fleeing domestic violence to get a temporary permit, with a the possibility of becoming a permanent resident. There isn’t any information given about whether the abuser will be deported.
New initiatives have been announced to fast-track Afghans, Ukranians and Iranians into Canada. Expect details (and numbers) in the next annual report.
There is, of course, the usual GBA+ nonsense in the document.
Those are just a few points worth mentioning in the report.
5. Continued Population Replacement
(Page 18 of the 2004 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 24 of the 2005 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 18, 19 of the 2006 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 19, 20 of the 2007 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 21, 22 of the 2008 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 16 of the 2009 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 14 of the 2010 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 18 of the 2011 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 15 of the 2012 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 19 of the 2013 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 16 of the 2014 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 16 of the 2015 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 10 of the 2016 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 14 of the 2017 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 28 of the 2018 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 36 of the 2019 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 33 of the 2020 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 36 of the 2021 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 50 of the 2022 Annual Report to Parliament)
(Page 59 of the 2023 Annual Report to Parliament)
Ever get the sense that people are European descent are being replaced? It’s no coincidence. The plan for decades has been to bring in large numbers of people from the 3rd World (mostly Asia and Africa), to remake society.
The top 3 are: (a) India; (b) China; and (c) Afghanistan. No surprise that the enclaves in Canada are growing. More data from the recent census will be released later this year, and the results shouldn’t be a shock to anyone. India itself comprises nearly 1/3 of the total.
And keep in mind, these are just official statistics for Permanent Residents. This is by no means everyone who is coming into the country.
6. Temporary Visitors To Canada
TRV = Temporary Resident Visa
eTA = Electronic Travel Authorization
YEAR | TRV Issued | eTA Issued | Totals |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1,347,898 | 2,605,077 | 3,952,975 |
2017 | 1,617,222 | 4,109,918 | 5,570,197 |
2018 | 1,898,324 | 4,125,909 | 6,024,233 |
2019 | 1,696,871 | 4,077,471 | 5,774,342 |
2020 | 257,330 | 648,789 | 906,119 |
2021 | 654,027 | 813,306 | 1,467,333 |
2022 | 1,923,148 | 2,866,545 | 4,789,693 |
2,866,545 eTAs (electronic Travel Authorizations)
1,923,148 TRV (Temporary Resident Visa)
Travelers entering Canada tripled in 2022, as compared to 2021. It’s nearing the levels it was back in 2019. Of course, we cannot be sure how many of these people actually left.
7. More “Inadmissibles” Let Into Canada
Broadly speaking, there are two provisions within IRPA, the Immigrant and Refugee Protection Act, that allow people who were previously deemed inadmissible to Canada to be given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. Here are the totals from the Annual Reports to Parliament on Immigration. Note: the first one listed only started in 2010.
Those allowed in under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA
YEAR | TRP Issued | Cumulative |
---|---|---|
2010 | 17 | 17 |
2011 | 53 | 70 |
2012 | 53 | 123 |
2013 | 280 | 403 |
2014 | 385 | 788 |
2015 | 1,063 | 1,851 |
2016 | 596 | 2,447 |
2017 | 555 | 3002 |
2018 | 669 | 3,671 |
2019 | 527 | 4,198 |
2020 | 115 | 4,313 |
2021 | 95 | 4,408 |
2022 | 119 | 4,527 |
From 2010 to 2022, a total of 4,527 people who were otherwise inadmissible to Canada were allowed in anyway under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA. This is the category that Global News previously reported on. As for the other one, under Rule 24(1) of IRPA, Global News leaves that out:
Year | Permits | Cumulative |
---|---|---|
2002 | 12,630 | 12,630 |
2003 | 12,069 | 24,699 |
2004 | 13,598 | 38,297 |
2005 | 13,970 | 52,267 |
2006 | 13,412 | 65,679 |
2007 | 13,244 | 78,923 |
2008 | 12,821 | 91,744 |
2009 | 15,640 | 107,384 |
2010 | 12,452 | 119,836 |
2011 | 11,526 | 131,362 |
2012 | 13,564 | 144,926 |
2013 | 13,115 | 158,041 |
2014 | 10,624 | 168,665 |
2015 | 10,333 | 178,998 |
2016 | 10,568 | 189,566 |
2017 | 9,221 | 198,787 |
2018 | 7,132 | 205,919 |
2019 | 6,080 | 211,999 |
2020 | 2,044 | 214,043 |
2021 | 6,687 | 220,730 |
2022 | 13,899 | 234,629 |
From 2002 to 2022 (inclusive), a total of 234,629 people previously deemed inadmissible to Canada were given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. This has almost certainly been going on for a lot longer, but is as far back as the reports go. Now let’s consider the reasons these people are initially refused entry.
SEC = Security (espionage, subversion, terrorism)
HRV = Human or International Rights Violations
CRIM = Criminal
S.CRIM = Serious Criminal
NC = Non Compliance
MR = Misrepresentation
YEAR | Total | SEC | HRV | Crim | S.Crim | NC | MR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | 12,630 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
2003 | 12,069 | 17 | 25 | 5,530 | 869 | 4,855 | 39 |
2004 | 13,598 | 12 | 12 | 7,096 | 953 | 4,981 | 20 |
2005 | 13,970 | 27 | 15 | 7,917 | 981 | 4,635 | 21 |
2006 | 13,412 | 29 | 20 | 7,421 | 982 | 4,387 | 18 |
2007 | 13,244 | 25 | 8 | 7,539 | 977 | 4,109 | 14 |
2008 | 12,821 | 73 | 18 | 7,108 | 898 | 4,170 | 17 |
2009 | 15,640 | 32 | 23 | 6,619 | 880 | 7,512 | 10 |
2010 | 12,452 | 86 | 24 | 6,451 | 907 | 4,423 | 36 |
2011 | 11,526 | 37 | 14 | 6,227 | 899 | 3,932 | 11 |
2012 | 13,564 | 20 | 15 | 7,014 | 888 | 5,206 | 18 |
2013 | 13,115 | 17 | 10 | 6,816 | 843 | 5,135 | 8 |
2014 | 10,624 | 12 | 2 | 5,807 | 716 | 3,895 | 14 |
2015 | 10,333 | 3 | 3 | 5,305 | 578 | 4,315 | 28 |
2016 | 10,568 | 8 | 4 | 4,509 | 534 | 2,788 | 20 |
2017 | 9,221 | 10 | 5 | 5,035 | 591 | 3,412 | 121 |
2018 | 7,132 | 5 | 3 | 4,132 | 559 | 2,299 | 131 |
2019 | 6,080 | 2 | 0 | 3,202 | 546 | 2,139 | 175 |
2020 | 2,044 | 2 | 1 | 666 | 131 | 1,000 | 37 |
2021 | 6,687 | 1 | 2 | 602 | 134 | 1,552 | 48 |
2022 | 13,899 | 2 | 6 | 1,377 | 464 | 2,458 | 62 |
In 2022, some 13,899 people barred were allowed in under Rule 24(1) of IRPA. This is from page 58 of the report. That is double what it was in 2021. Most were classified as “other”, which doesn’t really help. Nevertheless, none of these people should be coming in.
Use of the negative discretion authority
In 2022 the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship did not use the negative discretion authority under subsection 22.1(1) of IRPA. This authority allows the Minister to make a declaration that, on the basis of public policy considerations, a foreign national may not become a temporary resident for a period of up to three years.
The Minister could have exercised discretion to refuse people entry under sections 24(1) and 25.1(2) of IRPA, but did not during the 2022 calendar year.
Even if people are excluded from Canada — for a variety of valid reasons — often they will still be given temporary entrance into Canada. Will they ever leave? Who knows?
8. Students & Temporary Workers
After a steep decline in 2020, the number of student visas being issued has shot back up in 2021. It was over 550,000 for 2022, something that politicians have finally started to at least pay lip service to.
As for the “temporary” workers, the image here seems to imply that these are the total numbers of people with permits. However, it elsewhere states that these are the number issued in 2021. Of course, the International Mobility Visas (a.k.a. “working holiday”) are only 1-2 years in length.
Year | Stu | TFWP | IMP | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 61,293 | 82,151 | – | 143,444 | |
2004 | 56,536 | 90,668 | – | 147,204 | |
2005 | 57,476 | 99,146 | – | 156,622 | |
2006 | 61,703 | 112,658 | – | 174,361 | |
2007 | 64,636 | 165,198 | – | 229,834 | |
2008 | 79,509 | 192,519 | – | 272,028 | |
2009 | 85,140 | 178,478 | – | 263,618 | |
2010 | 96,157 | 182,276 | – | 278,433 | |
2011 | 98,383 | 190,842 | – | 289,225 | |
2012 | 104,810 | 213,573 | – | 318,383 | |
2013 | 111,865 | 221,310 | – | 333,175 | |
2014 | 127,698 | 95,086 | 197,924 | 420,078 | |
2015 | 219,143 | 73,016 | 175,967 | 468,126 | |
2016 | 265,111 | 78,402 | 207,829 | 551,342 | |
2017 | 317,328 | 78,788 | 224,033 | 620,149 | |
2018 | 356,876 | 84,229 | 255,034 | 696,139 | |
2019 | 402,427 | 98,310 | 306,797 | 807,534 | |
2020 | 256,740 | 84,609 | 242,130 | 583,452 | |
2021 | 445,776 | 103,552 | 313,294 | 862,622 | |
2022 | 550,187 | 135,818 | 470,033 | 1,156,038 |
Stu = Student Visa
TFWP = Temporary Foreign Worker Program
IMP = International Mobility Program
“Permit holders refers to a count of permit holders by the year their permits became effective. This is the date the permit was signed by an authorized signing agent/officer of IRCC.”
Let’s do some quick math here:
550,187 (students) + 135,818 (IMP) + 470,033 (TFWP) = 1,156,038
More than 1.1 million people entered with a temporary work or student visa. Less than 20 years ago, it would have been about 10% of that.
About the apparent “split” of the TFWP into 2 programs: this had been addressed before. However, it’s worth a reminder. (See archive). In 2013/2014, the “Conservative” Government of Stephen Harper faced backlash for how many TFWs were coming into the Canada, and the effect of reducing wages. In 2014, following public backlash at the TFWP being abused, subsequent reports splits it off with the IMP, to help camouflage what was going on.
There are, of course, a number of pathways to remain in Canada longer and/or transition in permanent residence. Let’s not pretend that they’re all leaving afterwards. In fact, recent changes have allowed students to remain in their home countries while collecting time towards a PR designation here.
Other changes included:
- lifting the 20-hour per week restriction on the number of hours international students may work off-campus from November 15, 2022 until December 31, 2023;
- extending distance learning facilitation measures that were put in place during the pandemic, with a reduced scope, to allow international students to study online from abroad without it negatively impacting their
eligibility for a post-graduation work permit or its duration until August 31, 2023; and - introducing new measures allowing eligible foreign nationals whose post-graduation work permit expired between September 20, 2021 and December 31, 2022 to work in Canada for an additional 18 months by either extending their work permit or applying for a new one
In 2022, IRCC also announced a new temporary public policy that provided an opportunity for foreign nationals with post-graduation work permits expiring between September 20, 2021 and December 31, 2022 to apply for an additional 18-month open work permit.
It would be nice to have more of a breakdown on the number of people who use more than 1 type of visa, but it doesn’t seem to be included here.
9. Refugee And Asylum Programs In Canada
IRCC launched a Temporary Public Policy in November 2022 to exempt refugee claimants in Canada from certain requirements for work permit issuance, which allows asylum claimants to obtain open work permits.
91,710 asylum claims were filed in 2022 under CUAET, the Canada-Ukraine Authorization for Emergency Travel. This is in addition to 13,700 who were already in the country.
169 TRPs to victims of human trafficking and their dependents.
10. “Anti-Racism” Initiatives To Be Advanced In Canada
The agenda endorsed by the Federal Government is to be implemented into immigration policy as well. It’s quite openly anti-white, and gaslights objections as racism and oppressions.
- That racism against Indigenous Peoples, Black people and racialized groups has persisted over time; it exists to support, reinforce and build upon supremacy of one group over many. In our society, this is the elevation of (the) white people (or settler groups) above everyone else in many areas of Canadian life. The inertia continues to be upheld by access, privilege and indifference.
- That colonialism, through our immigration system, has had an impact on Indigenous Peoples.
- That global events, such as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Asian communities, fuel the rise of hate crimes in Canada. This has a profound effect on the safety and mental health of our racialized clients and employees.
- That the experiences of many Indigenous Peoples, Black people and racialized groups intersect with sexism, ethnocentrism, classism, homophobia, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and other forms of discrimination, such as those experienced by persons with visible and non-visible disabilities. These intersections exacerbate an already difficult and in some cases precarious existence.
- That, despite efforts and some progress made, IRCC has not yet achieved a fully diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace. Black employees remain in entry-level positions, and Indigenous employees, as well as employees from racialized groups, are not sufficiently represented at the executive level.
- That many of our staff, as expressed in town halls, focus groups, trust circles and surveys, experience racism in the workplace, feel it impacts their career advancement and lack trust in senior management to address this.
- That our fight against racism happens in solidarity with our fight against all forms of inequity.
- That our renewed focus on Anti-Racism today builds on the tireless efforts of many unsung heroes who have long contributed to the fight against racism and all forms of inequity.
- That racism spans beyond hate; it includes unconscious and unintended actions.
Interestingly, the idea of colonialism via immigration is mentioned. Of course, it’s primarily non-whites who are coming these days, which should throw the narrative for a loop.
When they speak of making workplaces more diverse and equitable, they really mean that the goal is to make them less white.
Pretty strange that people continue to come to Canada in record numbers, if this place really is the racist hellhole that’s being displayed.
And if this report is any indication, expect Ukrainians to also be pouring in for the foreseeable future.
11. Illegals Entering Via U.S./Canada Border
Although the report focused primarily on LEGAL immigration into Canada, the illegal brand is still worth talking about, since so few actually do. The United Nations gives detailed instructions and guidance on how to go about circumventing the border. The result, quite predictably, is that people keep trying to cross over.
YEAR: 2019 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONTH | QUEBEC | MANITOBA | British Columbia | OTHERS | TOTAL |
January | 871 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 888 |
February | 800 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 808 |
March | 967 | 13 | 22 | 0 | 1,002 |
April | 1,206 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 1,246 |
May | 1,149 | 27 | 20 | 0 | 1,196 |
June | 1,536 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 1,567 |
July | 1,835 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 1,874 |
August | 1,712 | 26 | 22 | 2 | 1,762 |
September | 1,706 | 19 | 17 | 0 | 1,737 |
October | 1,595 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 1,622 |
November | 1,118 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 1,148 |
December | 1,646 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1,653 |
TOTAL | 16,136 | 180 | 182 | 9 | 16,503 |
YEAR: 2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONTH | QUEBEC | MANITOBA | British Columbia | OTHERS | TOTAL |
January | 1,086 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1,100 |
February | 976 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 980 |
March | 930 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 955 |
April | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
May | 17 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 21 |
June | 28 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 33 |
July | 29 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 48 |
August | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
September | 30 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 41 |
October | 27 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 31 |
November | 24 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 32 |
December | 26 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 36 |
TOTAL | 3,189 | 28 | 84 | 1 | 3,302 |
YEAR: 2021 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONTH | QUEBEC | MANITOBA | British Columbia | OTHERS | TOTAL |
January | 28 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 39 |
February | 39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 40 |
March | 29 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 36 |
April | 29 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 33 |
May | 12 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 28 |
June | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 17 |
July | 28 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 39 |
August | 63 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 76 |
September | 150 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 169 |
October | 96 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 113 |
November | 832 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 845 |
December | 2,778 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 2,811 |
TOTAL | 4,095 | 19 | 132 | 0 | 4,246 |
YEAR: 2022 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONTH | QUEBEC | MANITOBA | B.C. | OTHERS | TOTAL |
January | 2,367 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2,383 |
February | 2,154 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2,164 |
March | 2,492 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2,502 |
April | 2,791 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 2,805 |
May | 3,449 | 3 | 40 | 1 | 3,493 |
June | 3,066 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 3,086 |
July | 3,645 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 3,677 |
August | 3,234 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 3,249 |
September | 3,650 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3,660 |
October | 3,901 | 16 | 34 | 0 | 3,951 |
November | 3,731 | 23 | 34 | 0 | 3,788 |
December | 4,689 | 3 | 52 | 1 | 4,745 |
TOTALS | 39,171 | 72 | 289 | 7 | 39,540 |
YEAR: 2023 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MONTH | QUEBEC | MANITOBA | B.C. | OTHERS | TOTAL |
January | 4,875 | 19 | 100 | 0 | 4,994 |
February | 4,517 | 5 | 59 | 0 | 4,581 |
March | 4,087 | 15 | 71 | 0 | 4,173 |
April | 69 | 9 | 26 | 0 | 104 |
May | 46 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 79 |
June | 30 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 60 |
July | 42 | 8 | 33 | 0 | 83 |
August | 53 | 3 | 40 | 1 | 97 |
September | 59 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 88 |
October | 36 | 7 | 29 | 3 | 75 |
November | 58 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 95 |
December | 90 | 5 | 131 | 0 | 226 |
TOTAL | 13,962 | 77 | 616 | 8 | 14,663 |
Although not listed in the Annual Immigration Report to Parliament, this is worth a mention. Illegal crossings from the U.S. did drop quite drastically in the Spring of 2020. It picked up in 2021, and much more so in 2022.
Keep in mind, the text of the Safe Third Country Agreement requires both Canada and the U.S. to consult with the UNHCR on refugees, and to get input from NGOs. We haven’t had meaningful borders in a long time. Yes, the Agreement was renegotiated in early 2023 to include the entire border, but people are still coming in.
As a reminder: the Trudeau Government scrapped the DCO, or Designated Country of Origin, back in 2019. This would allow for claims from “safe” countries to be denied much more quickly. However, with things the way they are, it seems nowhere is really safe. While the issue was very mainstream from 2017 to 2019, it seems to have disappeared.
In June 2020, a new policy kicked in to finally track who is leaving the country. Even more strange that a Trudeau would bring it in when he did. Probably to make it harder for people fleeing during lockdowns.
Overall, the replacement agenda slowed down in 2020, but it rebounded significantly in 2021 and 2022. Will this trend continue? Or will the public’s fatigue finally make a difference.
Senate Recommends Adding “Temporary” Workers To Reflect True Immigration Numbers
Not too long ago, Canadians were fed the line that only 300,000 to 400,000 people were coming to Canada each year. The more “moderate” plan from the Conservatives supposedly was only 250,000 annually.
Is the Overton Window finally shifting? 5 years ago, this website reported that the true scale of people immigrating to Canada was vastly under reported. See here, here, here, here and here. In reality, the number is more like 1 million per year, and has been for a long time. The Annual Reports to Parliament from 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 are available. 2023 will be covered shortly. In order to have a meaningful discussion on policy, accurate information has to be included.
Specifically, public discourse about “immigration levels” had focused primarily on the number of new permanent residents. This is misleading because it glosses over so-called temporary categories, including:
- Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP)
- International Mobility Program (IMP)
- International Students
Each of these programs has options to transition to permanent resident, or at least to extend the stay via other means.
Finally, in the Spring of 2023, Statistics Canada finally began disclosing more realistic figures. The organization admitted that 2022 saw approximately 1 million people enter the country.
Now, the Senate has recommended changes in how the TFWP is reported. Does this mean that the TFWP will be scrapped, or greatly scaled down? Nope. What it does it include the numbers in the totals that are disclosed to the public.
The Temporary Foreign Worker Program was created in 1973 as a measure of last resort to bring foreign workers to Canada on a temporary basis to fill jobs for which qualified Canadians were not available. It is now clear that this program is essential and entrenched; it is therefore time to recognize this reality and adapt Canada’s migrant labour infrastructure accordingly.
In other words, it’s not going away.
However, to be more transparent with the totals, it’s not just the TFWP that needs to be addressed. There’s also the International Mobility Program, which is similar, but effectively an open work permit. Then there are the hundreds of thousands of student visas handed out every year.
RECOMMENDATION 3
The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology recognizes that neither migrant work programs nor workers are truly temporary, and therefore, recommends that the Government of Canada:
.
–implement the March 2024 commitment to include temporary residents in the annual Immigration Levels Plans;
-provide more transparent pre- and on-arrival information about transitioning from temporary work permits to permanent residence;
-review the language and education eligibility criteria required to apply for permanent residence;
–expand the Provincial Nominee Program to allow more temporary and migrant workers to obtain permanent residence;
-make migrant workers eligible for integration services under the existing Settlement Program and increase funding to support the additional demand, including to community organizations already doing this work;
–develop Settlement Program services specific to temporary residents’ needs including targeted language and education resources to support greater integration and reduce barriers to obtaining permanent residence; and
–increase funding to the Migrant Workers Support Program and existing grassroots organizations to support dedicated services across the country to help migrant workers navigate Canadian bureaucracy before, during and after their stay, including accessing health care, social supports like Employment Insurance, and immigration needs.
While the bit about transparency is nice, the Senate also recommends increasing the number of temporary workers that obtain PR status. They also suggest increasing taxpayer funding across the board.
As for their recent report, (archived here), the Senate does show how many people are actually coming via “temporary” categories. Here are the official statistics, compiled from the last 20 years. Sources are the reports linked below.
Year | Stu | TFWP | IMP | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 61,293 | 82,151 | – | 143,444 | |
2004 | 56,536 | 90,668 | – | 147,204 | |
2005 | 57,476 | 99,146 | – | 156,622 | |
2006 | 61,703 | 112,658 | – | 174,361 | |
2007 | 64,636 | 165,198 | – | 229,834 | |
2008 | 79,509 | 192,519 | – | 272,028 | |
2009 | 85,140 | 178,478 | – | 263,618 | |
2010 | 96,157 | 182,276 | – | 278,433 | |
2011 | 98,383 | 190,842 | – | 289,225 | |
2012 | 104,810 | 213,573 | – | 318,383 | |
2013 | 111,865 | 221,310 | – | 333,175 | |
2014 | 127,698 | 95,086 | 197,924 | 420,078 | |
2015 | 219,143 | 73,016 | 175,967 | 468,126 | |
2016 | 265,111 | 78,402 | 207,829 | 551,342 | |
2017 | 317,328 | 78,788 | 224,033 | 620,149 | |
2018 | 356,876 | 84,229 | 255,034 | 696,139 | |
2019 | 402,427 | 98,310 | 306,797 | 807,534 | |
2020 | 256,740 | 84,609 | 242,130 | 583,452 | |
2021 | 445,776 | 103,552 | 313,294 | 862,622 | |
2022 | 550,187 | 135,818 | 470,033 | 1,156,038 |
From the way the reports are worded, it appears that these are new visas being issued. In fairness, some are people who had one category expire, and are applying for another.
However, the reports are confusing as to how many people are counted across multiple programs. A cynic may wonder if it’s done deliberately.
This point had been made before, but is important to go over again. (See archive). In 2013/2014, the “Conservative” Government of Stephen Harper faced backlash for how many TFWs were coming into the Canada, and the effect of reducing wages. In 2014, following public backlash at the TFWP being abused, subsequent reports splits it off with the IMP, to help camouflage what was going on.
The Issue of Employer-Specific Work Permits
An overwhelming majority of migrant workers, migrant worker advocates, academics and economists told the committee that employer-specific work permits are the single most egregious condition of vulnerability. While employer-specific work permits are most often associated with the TFWP, Judy Fudge notes that “approximately one-third” of IMP participants also hold them.
Catherine Bryan summarized that the closed work permit is a primary concern for migrant workers because it imposes barriers on their ability to “contest any difficulties that they are encountering and it makes it almost impossible for them to leave.” Elizabeth Kwan added that these permits make “migrant workers vulnerable to abuse and exploitation and provide employers with a stable low-wage and compliant migrant workforce.”
Page 34 of the Senate report recommends scrapping the requirement that foreign workers stay with a single employer.
On some level, it’s nice to see an initiative from the Senate to reflect the true scale of people coming to Canada. However, they seem content with increasing the numbers overall. Not exactly a win.
There’s also the problem that Ottawa doesn’t know how many people remain in the Canada after their visas expire. It was just 2016 when it was announced that a proper entry/exit system would be implemented. Before this, there wasn’t really any passport tracking of who had left.
This Senate report will be followed up.
(1) https://sencanada.ca/en/committees/SOCI/44-1
(2) https://sencanada.ca/en/info-page/parl-44-1/soci-temporary-and-migrant-labour/
(3) https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/441/SOCI/reports/2024-05-17_SOCI_Migrant_Report_e.pdf
(4) Canada Senate SOCI Report 2024
(5) https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canada-to-begin-collecting-exit-passport-data-1.2947418
ANNUAL IMMIGRATON REPORTS TO PARLIAMENT:
(1) 2004 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(2) 2005 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(3) 2006 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(4) 2007 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(5) 2008 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(6) 2009 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(7) 2010 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(8) 2011 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(9) 2012 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(10) 2013 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(11) 2014 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(12) 2015 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(13) 2016 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(14) 2017 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(15) 2018 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(16) 2019 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(17) 2020 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(18) 2021 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(19) 2022 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
(20) 2023 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament
Private Members Bill C-388: Fast Tracking Energy, Gas And Weapons To Ukraine
Garnett Genuis, Conservative Member of Parliament for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB, has introduced Bill C-388. The short title is: Boosting Canadian Energy and Mining Projects and Ukraine’s Munitions Supply Act. As implied, the goal is to ship weapons and energy to Ukraine. It’s been promoted on Twitter.
However, the Bill is so lacking in details and specifics that it’s unsettling where this will end up. It comes across as a way to endlessly throw money away on a foreign conflict. Not once does Genuis mention any safeguards that would be put in place.
Genuis also wants Canada’s “outdated” or unneeded equipment to be sent off as well. Apparently, the Canadian Forces won’t use them, but they’ll help fight off Russian aggression. It’s never explained or implied how this will happen. To summarize:
- Canada has made promises to send weapons to Ukraine and not fulfilled them
- Canada has weapons that are “surplus, and no longer useful” here
- Canada should be sending equipment to Ukraine that it no longer uses
- Canada should be buying new equipment here, or making more weapons
- Canada should fast track gas and energy and mining projects to Ukraine
- Energy and mining growth will help Canadian economy
Dealing with energy and mining first:
Plan to Fast Track Energy and Mining Projects
Preparation of plan
2 (1) Within 60 days after the day on which this Act comes into force, the Minister of Natural Resources must, in collaboration with representatives of the provincial governments responsible for natural resources, prepare a detailed plan to fast track energy and mining projects, including those related to liquefied natural gas and civilian nuclear energy, that includes measures to displace energy exports from hostile countries and support energy cooperation with allies and partners.
Genuis’ legislation would compel Ottawa to come up with a plan to fast track various energy exports to Ukraine. But this is still very broad, and doesn’t give any numbers or targets.
There’s also nothing in the Bill that would require that energy sales take place at fair market rates. Yes, he pitches the “benefits” to the Canadian economy, but how much could a country at war for 2 years afford? The Bill doesn’t specify any of this. Would these be (forgivable) loans? To what degree would the public be forced to subsidize this?
Bearing in mind that Genuis has openly supported and endorsed the Paris Accord, he wants to ramp up production in Canada anyway. This isn’t so that Canadians can have cheap fuel and energy prices, but so that Ukraine can. Interestingly, he doesn’t seem concerned about potential Carbon taxes when it applies to energy shipments abroad. This was from 2017, but a revealing clip, assuming he still holds the same views.
Would the details be worked out behind the scenes by anonymous bureaucrats?
Now, getting to the munitions part:
Genuis is extremely vague on which “munitions” would be sent to Ukraine. He implies that it’s older equipment that the Canadian Forces wouldn’t need. In that case, why would Ukraine need it? Are these guns? Body armour? Explosives? Vehicles? Surveillance equipment?
Genuis doesn’t specify if he expects the “unneeded” weapons to be sold to Ukraine at fair market rates (or close to it). If the Trudeau Government is so wasteful and incompetent, isn’t he concerned they’ll simply be given away, or sold for next to nothing? Is he worried that the munitions will end up in the hands of a hostile power?
And if these are things the Canadian Forces are unlikely to ever use, are they obsolete to the point that they’re useless in war? This isn’t clarified.
Changes To Other Acts As Well
Purposes
10 (1) The Corporation is established for the purposes of
(a) supporting and developing, directly or indirectly, domestic business, at the request of the Minister and the Minister of Finance for a period specified by those Ministers;
.
(b) supporting and developing, directly or indirectly, Canada’s export trade and Canadian capacity to engage in that trade and to respond to international business opportunities; and
.
(c) providing, directly or indirectly, development financing and other forms of development support in a manner that is consistent with Canada’s international development priorities
Section 10(c) of the Export Development Act will be altered to make include this subsequently: “the Corporation shall give preference to the development of munitions manufacturing capacity in Ukraine.”
Genuis’ Bill, if implemented, would give priority to shipping weapons to Ukraine over other foreign “development”.
The Defence Production Act would have Section 16 amended to include this:
16.1 For as long as any territory of Ukraine is occupied by armed forces of the Russian Federation, the Minister of National Defence must periodically review Canada’s inventory of defence supplies, and the Minister must offer to donate to Ukraine any defence supplies that, in the opinion of the Minister of National Defence, are surplus or no longer useful to Canada.
The Business Development Bank of Canada Act would be amended to give Ukraine priority to develop munitions. In other words, preference with tax dollars will be given to a foreign country.
The Export and Import Permits Act would be amended to treat weapons exports to Ukraine the same as exports to the United States.
As with most Canadian legislation, there are built-in regulations which give almost unfettered power to bureaucrats. This would alter several Acts, but do nothing to ensure accountability. The whole thing comes across as a means to endlessly take from taxpayers, under the guise of preventing Russian aggression.
For all that Genuis — and Conservatives in general — rail against Trudeau waste and corruption, there’s nothing in Bill C-388 that would prevent more of the same. Are we to be skeptical domestically, but not internationally?
(1) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bills
(2) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-388
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/garnett-genuis(89226)
(4) https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-388/first-reading
(5) https://twitter.com/GarnettGenuis/
(6) https://twitter.com/GarnettGenuis/status/1786470255960744343
(7) https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/E-20/page-1.html#h-211513
(8) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/d-1/
(9) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/b-9.9/index.html
(10) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-19/
Private Member Bills In Current Session:
(1) Bill C-206: Decriminalizing Self Maiming To Avoid Military Service
(2) Bill C-207: Creating The “Right” To Affordable Housing
(3) Bill C-219: Creating Environmental Bill Of Rights
(4) Bill C-226: Creating A Strategy For Environmental Racism/Justice
(5) Bill C-229: Banning Symbols Of Hate, Without Defining Them
(6) Bill C-235: Building Of A Green Economy In The Prairies
(7) Bill C-245: Entrenching Climate Change Into Canada Infrastructure Bank
(8) Bill C-250: Imposing Prison Time For Holocaust Denial
(9) Bill C-261: Red Flag Laws For “Hate Speech”
(10) Bill C-293: Domestic Implementation Of Int’l Pandemic Treaty
(11) Bill C-312: Development Of National Renewable Energy Strategy
(12) Bill C-315: Amending CPPIB Act Over “Human, Labour, Environmental Rights”
(13) Bill C-367: Removing Religious Exemptions Protecting Against Antisemitism
(14) Bill C-373: Removing Religious Exemptions Protecting Against Antisemitism 2.0
(15) Bill S-215: Protecting Financial Stability Of Post-Secondary Institutions
(16) Bill S-243: Climate Related Finance Act, Banking Acts
(17) Bill S-248: Removing Final Consent For Euthanasia
(18) Bill S-257: Protecting Political Belief Or Activity As Human Rights
(19) Bill S-275: Adding “Sustainable And Equitable Prosperity” To Bank Of Canada Act
Action4Canada: 4 Years Later, No Legitimate Notice Of Civil Claim Filed
Yes, the Action4Canada case has been covered here before, but consider this:
It’s been nearly four (4) years since the group began fundraising, under the pretense that they were going to file a Court challenge in British Columbia. They started in the Summer of 2020, and it’s now the end of March 2024. Almost 4 years later, there’s still no valid case on file.
Despite repeatedly assuring the public that time was of the essence, every attempt has been made to ensure that it will never go forward. Probably the worst example was filing a Notice of Appeal back in September 2022, even though the Judge had granted permission to amend and refile.
It’s undeniable at this point, if it wasn’t obvious long ago. The Action4Canada case was never intended to go to Trial. It was a “placeholder” case, to give the illusion that something was being done. This was all while diverting money and energy away from other causes.
And it’s not as if the case was taken on a pro-bono (or “free”) basis. Donors have paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars for what they thought was a sincere anti-lockdown challenge. They’ve received nothing of value for their money. In the Spring of 2021 alone there was a $200,000 payment for legal services.
True, these people could be delusional, but it could just as easily be an act. It’s hard to imagine anyone this out of touch with reality being given control over an organization’s finances.
Yes, one could argue that there technically was a Claim filed a few years ago. But no sensible person who understands civil procedure takes this seriously. For a quick rundown:
(1) August, 2021: After nearly a year of stalling, Action4Canada files their Notice of Civil Claim, a.k.a. Statement of Claim. It’s 391 pages long, rambling, incoherent, and fails to follow the basics of Civil Procedure. This critique of it aged very well.
(2) August, 2022: The B.C. Supreme Court ruled that it was “bad beyond argument”, and drafted so poorly that it was impossible to respond to. Although leave (permission) was granted to amend, the Claim was never accepted as valid.
(3) February, 2023: The Law Society of B.C. put it in their training manual for new lawyers. This case is now a teaching exercise of “wholly inadequate pleadings”, and how to avoid them. See page 15. That’s right, the LSBC is using it to train new lawyers on how not to draft lawsuits.
(4) February 2024: The Law Society of B.C. puts out its newest version of their training manual for new lawyers, and the Action4Canada case is still in there. Even a year later, they still view it as teaching material. It wasn’t just a one-off.
(5) February, 2024: The B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the original Claim wasn’t drafted in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. It was too long, confusing, and difficult to follow. They didn’t address the litany of other errors contained within. The lawyer also apparently didn’t understand that you can appeal the Order, but not the Reasons.
This so-called challenge has been smacked down by the:
(a) British Columbia Supreme Court
(b) British Columbia Court of Appeal
(c) Law Society of British Columbia
And it wasn’t over some minor or technical defect or deficiency. This suit has become the laughing stock of the legal profession because it has been so absurdly handled.
More than a month after the BCCA ruling, there’s still no amended NOCC filed. There obviously is no urgency whatsoever to get anything done.
Let’s not forget that both Vaccine Choice cases, from 2019 and 2020, have been allowed to sit idly for years. No rush here either to advance those.
Fundraising started 4 years ago, and still no legitimate Claim from Action4Canada.
If there really was all this expert evidence and testimony ready to go, why mess around with incoherent and unintelligible pleadings? Why unnecessarily complicate things if all of these witnesses were set? It makes no sense whatsoever. Why delay things for years like this?
Even if a well written Notice of Claim were filed tomorrow (unlikely as that is), the Statute of Limitations would be a serious issue. Any new claims would be barred if they happened over 2 years earlier. And since most of the current NOCC is irrelevant or outside the jurisdiction of a Civil Court, there isn’t much left to go on.
What was the plan, to let Bonnie Henry just die of old age?
All that they’ve done is deliberately waste time and money. As of late, they smear their critics as “paid agitators”. Strange how it’s apparently not defamation when they suggest others are controlled opposition.
Remember to donate!
LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA:
(1) BCLS Civil Instruction Manual 2023
(2) BCLS Civil Instruction Manual 2024
(3) https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/becoming-a-lawyer-in-bc/admission-program/professional-legal-training-course/
(4) https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/becoming-a-lawyer-in-bc/admission-program/professional-legal-training-course/faq-pltc/
ACTION4CANADA APPEAL DOCUMENTS:
(1) A4C Notice Of Appeal September 28 2022
(2) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Appearance – VIHA
(3) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Appearance – BC Defendants
(4) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Appearance – Attorney General of Canada
(5) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Appearance – Peter Kwok, Translink
(6) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Appearance – BC Ferries, Brittney Sylvester
(7) A4C Appeal – Appeal Book – Appellant
(8) A4C Appeal – Appeal Book – Respondent VIH And PHC
(9) A4C Appeal – Appeal Record – Stand Alone Respondents VIHA
(10) A4C Appeal – Appeal Record – Stand Alone
(11) A4C Appeal – Factum – Appellant
(12) A4C Appeal – Factum – Respondent Attorney General Of Canada
(13) A4C Appeal – Factum – Respondent BC Ferries and Brittney Sylvester
(14) A4C Appeal – Factum – Respondent HMK -Provincial Defendants
(15) A4C Appeal – Factum – Respondent Peter Kwok and Translink
(16) A4C Appeal – Factum – Respondent VIHA and Providence Health
(17) A4C Appeal – Consent Order – Factum, Time Limits
(18) A4C Appeal – Change In Representation – BC Defendants
(19) A4C Appeal – Notice Of Hearing February 2024
(20) CanLII Decision In Action4Canada Appeal
ACTION4CANADA BCSC DOCUMENTS:
(1) A4C BCSC – Notice Of Civil Claim
(2) A4C BCSC – Response to Civil Claim (Health Authority Defendants)
(3) A4C BCSC – Response to Civil Claim (Provincial Defendants)
(4) A4C BCSC – Affidavit No 1 of Rebecca Hill
(5) A4C BCSC – Notice of Application (AG and RCMP applies to strike)
(6) A4C BCSC – Notice of Application (Provincial Defendants applies to strike)
(7) A4C BCSC – Notice of Application (Translink applies to strike)
(8) A4C BCSC – Application Response (Health Authority Defendants consent to strike)
(9) A4C BCSC – Application Response (BC Ferries consents to strike)
(10) A4C BCSC – Application Response (AG and RCMP consent to Prov. strike application)
(11) A4C BCSC – Application Response (Translink consents to HA Defendants strike application)
(12) A4C BCSC – Application Response (Translink consents to Prov. strike application)
(13) A4C BCSC – Affidavit No 2 of Rebecca Hill
(14) A4C BCSC – Application Record (to strike)
(15) A4C BCSC – Application Response (all plaintiffs)
(16) A4C BCSC – Amended Application Response (all plaintiffs)
(17) A4C BCSC – Transcript Application To Strike
(18) A4C BCSC – Reasons For Striking NOCC In Its Entirety
(19) A4C BCSC – Order striking pleadings
(20) A4C BCSC – Order striking pleading in its entirety with costs payable forthwith
(21) A4C BCSC – Appointment to assess bill of costs for Kwok and Translink
(22) A4C BCSC – Notice of Discontinuance (Kimberly Woolman & Estate of Jaqueline Woolman)
(23) A4C BCSC – Notice of Discontinuance (Amy Muranetz)
(24) A4C BCSC – Notice of Discontinuance (Federico Fuoco & Fire Productions Ltd.)
OTHER:
(1) https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2022/2022bcsc1507/2022bcsc1507.html
(2) https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/Website/media/Shared/docs/becoming/material/civil.pdf
(3) https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/168_2009_01#rule3-1
(4) https://justice.gov.bc.ca/cso/index.do
(5) https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/120_2022a#division_d0e3656
(6) https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2022/2022bcca450/2022bcca450.html#par10
ACTION4CANADA FINANCIAL DOCS:
(A) A4C Docs Profits And Losses 2021-2022
(B) A4C Docs Balance Sheet 2021-2022
(C) A4C-Docs-General-Ledger-2021-2022
Bill C-63 (Online Harms Act): Who’s Really Pushing This Agenda?
Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, has been introduced in Parliament by Arif Virani, the Justice Minister. First Reading happened on February 26th, 2024. There’s a lot of it to go through
To begin with, there are actually some worthwhile provisions in the Bill, such as the mandatory reporting of child pornography. No sensible reason would reject that. And there are instances where being able to quickly remove certain content would be in the best interests of society.
Ottawa gives its own summary of the Bill.
However, Bill C-63 seems to blend together straightforward and legitimate issues with ones that are much more vague and impractical. Consequently, it’s harder to simply accept or reject.
There’s also the question of who has been influencing the drafting of this content. That will be addressed a bit later.
The Bill would create a Digital Safety Office of Canada, and an Ombudsman to oversee it. In essence, it would add a new layer of bureaucracy to specifically monitor “digital safety”.
Content that foments hatred is “defined” in this Bill, but is still vague. Additionally, it seeks to be able to attribute specific motivations to expression. What may be valid discourse to some will be considered hate speech to others.
There is a disclaimer that this wouldn’t apply to content solely because it expresses “disdain or dislike or it discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends”. Sounds great, but that also is subjective as well, depending on the views of whoever is interpreting it.
Harmful content in fact lists 7 different categories, and all of them at least somewhat open to interpretation. What can easily happen is that these new laws will be selectively applied, depending on the politics of the people involved.
The Bill would create a new section of the Criminal Code. This is one which a person could lay an information on another, and with the Attorney General’s consent, it could be brought before a Judge. If ordered by that Judge a person may be forced to enter into a recognizance, if a Judge is convinced that hate crime may be committed.
Fear of hate propaganda offence or hate crime
.
810.012 (1) A person may, with the Attorney General’s consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit
(a) an offence under section 318 or any of subsections 319(1) to (2.1); or
(b) an offence under section 320.1001.
A person could be forced into this recognizance for up to 2 years, or would face 12 months in prison if they refuse. This is similar to being out on bail or on a peace bond, but with no actual crime committed.
Terms of the “recognizance” could include:
(a) Wearing an electronic monitoring device
(b) Return to and remain at their place of residence at specified times, a.k.a. a curfew
(c) Abstaining from drugs and alcohol
(d) Submitting to drug and alcohol testing
(e) No contact orders
(f) Weapons prohibitions
The topper on this one is that a Judge isn’t required to give reasons for this, but is supposed to say why written reasons aren’t included. Again, this is for when some is suspected that they may commit a crime. No actual charges are necessary.
Other changes to the Criminal Code involve Section 318 and 319, which raise the potential imprisonment for incitement to hatred from 2 years to 5 years.
Advocating genocide will also expose a person to a potential life sentence.
The Canadian Human Rights Act would also be amended to include “communication of hate speech”, which is defined as: to communicate or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the Internet or any other means of telecommunication in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
But it also is poorly defined, which will likely lead to it being applied in an uneven manner, depending on the politics of those involved.
Section 140 of the Online Harms Act is the “Regulations” part. This is where unnamed and unelected bureaucrats are able to change or interpret provisions of the legislation without any real oversight. Nearly all Acts have such a backdoor, which allows changes to be done behind the scenes.
There is more to Bill C-63, but those are some of the major points.
Now, where did this come from?
Lobbying is a reality in politics. Special interests groups lobby money to get certain agendas pushed, and to get money for their causes. This is hardly news. Searching the Federal Lobbyist Registry, the following names come up:
- Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA)
- National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM)
- Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund (LEAF)
- YWCA Canada
- Friends of Canadian Broadcasting
Are there others involved in this? Probably, but these are the names that come up, which appear to be relevant to regulating speech and expression.
The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, CIJA, has been prolific in lobbying Ottawa for changes to the Human Rights Act, and to the Criminal Code. This group has pushed for stricter definitions around so-called hate crimes and antisemitism. Their recent efforts include making Holocaust denial punishable by prison time, and removing religious protections. See here and here.
The National Council of Canadian Muslims, NCCM, specifically lists Section 13 of the Canadian Rights Act. They want laws against Islamophobia, and condemn “white supremacy”. Other efforts include anti-racism initiatives, such as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.
Women’s Legal Education & Action Fund, LEAF, had pressured Ottawa to take action against online harassment and gendered violence. The recent lobbying specifically relates to new technologies used to do this.
YWCA Canada supports regulations against online hate, which is taken from a feminist and “gendered violence” perspective.
Friends of Canadian Broadcasting is a bit of an outlier. It wants more financial support for smaller, independent media, while opposing the funding of the CBC. It also pushes for regulations around online hate. Presumably, this would lead to many (much smaller) anti-racist outlets.
And to search online hate more generally, click on this link.
While it’s always important to read upcoming legislation, this piece often gets left out. The groups pushing for changes need to be considered as well. This is especially true if our interests don’t align.
(1) https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/online-harms.html
(2) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-63
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/arif-virani(88910)
(4) https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading
(5) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/advSrch?searchCommand=navigate&time=1709098767406
(6) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/cmmLgPblcVw?comlogId=584229
(7) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=111®Id=937469
(8) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/cmmLgPblcVw?comlogId=594289
(9) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=358918®Id=946132
(10) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=362688®Id=941750
(11) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=377298®Id=947241
(12) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=375749®Id=944913
Private Member Bills In Current Session:
(A) Bill C-206: Decriminalizing Self Maiming To Avoid Military Service
(B) Bill C-207: Creating The “Right” To Affordable Housing
(C) Bill C-219: Creating Environmental Bill Of Rights
(D) Bill C-226: Creating A Strategy For Environmental Racism/Justice
(E) Bill C-229: Banning Symbols Of Hate, Without Defining Them
(F) Bill C-235: Building Of A Green Economy In The Prairies
(G) Bill C-245: Entrenching Climate Change Into Canada Infrastructure Bank
(H) Bill C-250: Imposing Prison Time For Holocaust Denial
(I) Bill C-261: Red Flag Laws For “Hate Speech”
(J) Bill C-293: Domestic Implementation Of Int’l Pandemic Treaty
(K) Bill C-312: Development Of National Renewable Energy Strategy
(L) Bill C-315: Amending CPPIB Act Over “Human, Labour, Environmental Rights”
(M) Bill C-367: Removing Religious Exemptions Protecting Against Antisemitism
(N) Bill S-215: Protecting Financial Stability Of Post-Secondary Institutions
(O) Bill S-243: Climate Related Finance Act, Banking Acts
(P) Bill S-248: Removing Final Consent For Euthanasia
(Q) Bill S-257: Protecting Political Belief Or Activity As Human Rights