Anti-White Archives - Page 2 of 6

January 11, 2023June 10, 2024

Declaration on the North American Partnership for Equity and Racial Justice

It’s the most harmless sounding names that are most chilling.

The Government of Canada has announced a new agreement with the United States and Mexico: The Declaration on the North American Partnership for Equity and Racial Justice. Mélanie Joly, Foreign Affairs Minister, also tweeted about it.

While this sounds fine enough, the vague wording of much of the text is cause for concern.

Considering the lengths that these countries have gone in establishing equal rights, it seems unproductive to keep pushing the narrative that there’s all these hate groups and institutions. It comes across as having the effect of making peaceful co-existence impossible, and maybe that’s the point.

It’s unclear what exactly “racial justice” would involve. If it were simply equal rights, then it would be very different to oppose. But would it be reparations? This idea has been floated in recent years. Perhaps it involves affirmative action or quotas in various institutions.

To address the obvious: this document doesn’t advocate for “equality”. That would be equal rights and opportunities between people. That would be fine. Instead, it calls for “equity”, which is equality of outcome, and sounds pretty much like Communism.

There’s a bit of a bait-and-switch here as the document calls on partners to: “root out the barriers to equal opportunity”. However, they are pushing equity (equality of outcome), while attempting to persuade others that it’s about equal opportunity.

Declaration between the Government of the United Mexican States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of the United States of America.

Across our three nations, generations of leaders have fought to build democracies where people from richly diverse histories and cultures share the equal promise of freedom and inclusion. Our diversity is North America’s greatest strength, as it boosts innovation, leads to economic growth, enriches our democracies, and advances our security.

Yet in spite of our progress, many across North America continue to face intersecting forms of systemic racism, discrimination and hate because of who they are, whom they love, the language they speak, their nation of origin, the color of their skin, and their religion or beliefs. Discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, disability, religion, belief, language, and socio-economic status persist throughout our region and in each of our countries. Tribal Nations and Indigenous peoples, who have lived in North America since time immemorial, continue to face unacceptable disparities and barriers, as do other communities with lived experience of discrimination and racism. Systemic racism, expressions of white supremacy and discrimination in all forms diminish our economic growth, limit our prosperity, undermine national and regional security, and threaten the durability of our democracies. To unleash North America’s full and vast potential, we must comprehensively address these barriers and challenges.

Building on efforts in our respective countries to advance equity and racial justice, at the 2021 North American Leaders’ Summit President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. declared their commitment to building just, inclusive, and equitable democracies that combat systemic racism and discrimination in all forms. Following that declaration, we committed to working together to create a North America in which every individual has an equal opportunity to achieve their full potential and equal participation in social, cultural, economic, and political life.

We now establish this North American Partnership as a reflection of our common commitments to advancing equity and racial justice within our countries, and our intent to work collaboratively to address systemic forms of discrimination and honor the diverse tapestry of histories, customs, cultures, languages, identities, ethnicities, abilities, and beliefs that make North America strong.

In recognition of our close ties and shared vision, the Participants in this Partnership will:

(1) Work within our own countries to affirmatively advance equity and racial justice, and to comprehensively root out the barriers to equal opportunity that marginalized communities continue to face.

(2) Establish a Trilateral Racial Equity and Inclusion Expert Network to facilitate the exchange of information to share best practices and innovative strategies developed across our three countries for advancing equity and racial justice in our public policies and societies, and to help identify further action areas for the Partnership. In establishing this expert exchange, we will seek opportunities to engage communities with lived experience of racism and discrimination on driving solutions to protect the rights of members of marginalized communities; advance health equity and economic inclusion; address racial and other disparities in the justice system, access to the ballot, and educational opportunities; and reflect the diversity of our nations in our federal public services workforce.

(3) Collaborate together to advance equity and racial justice through our participation in regional and multilateral organizations, such as the United Nations and other fora. This includes advancing the rights and aspirations enshrined in multilateral commitments, such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the International Decade for People of African Descent, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and other joint undertakings.

Discrimination against people “for who they love”, is presumably referring to adults of the same sex. However, it wouldn’t take much to expand that to include pedophilia, as the language is very vague. As for gender identity, many would agree that this has been forced on the public far too much already.

“Reflect[ing] the diversity of our nations in our federal public services workforce” is code for hiring quotas. Most people can agree that a merit-based civil service is the best way to have it. Social engineering shouldn’t push that principle aside

As for “address racial and other disparities in the justice system”, does this mean something like Gladue Rights across the continent? This would be race-based discounts in criminal court, due to overrepresentation of certain groups.

This agreement also endorses the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda (Agenda 2030), and connects equity and racial justice to that.

The claim that certain groups “face unacceptable disparities and barriers” is telling, even if hard to understand. Disparities simply refers to differences in overall outcomes. This can be for many reasons, and is not necessarily discrimination. But it goes on imply that these differences are the direct result of some barriers that are put in place. This follows the assumption that groups of people would essentially be the same if others wouldn’t oppress them in some way.

An obvious example is the long debunked wage gap. Just because men and woman — on average — make different personal and lifestyle choices, doesn’t mean discrimination took place.

While the text sounds well meaning enough, domestic implementation of such ideals would invite even more Government overreach and interference.

And a logistical question: what would happen to people who decide that they want nothing to do with such a system? What punishments would they face?

(1) https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/campaigns/federal-anti-racism-secretariat/declaration-partnership-equality-racial-justice.html
(2) https://twitter.com/melaniejoly/status/1612801847076749314
(3) https://www.state.gov/declaration-on-the-north-american-partnership-for-equity-and-racial-justice/
(4) https://www.state.gov/declaration-on-the-north-american-partnership-for-equity-and-racial-justice-2/

December 1, 2022May 22, 2024

Review Of 2022 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament

With the end of this so-called “pandemic” in Canada, expect the agenda to move ahead. There were increases in every category in 2021 (compared to 2020). Expect this to get worse.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Annual Immigration Reports To Parliament

The information in this article, and similar ones, comes directly from information provided by the Government of Canada in their annual reports. These numbers, while likely not truly accurate, are at least a good starting point.

3. Immigration Largely Controlled By Provinces

Concurrent Powers of Legislation respecting Agriculture, etc.
.
95 In each Province the Legislature may make Laws in relation to Agriculture in the Province, and to Immigration into the Province; and it is hereby declared that the Parliament of Canada may from Time to Time make Laws in relation to Agriculture in all or any of the Provinces, and to Immigration into all or any of the Provinces; and any Law of the Legislature of a Province relative to Agriculture or to Immigration shall have effect in and for the Province as long and as far only as it is not repugnant to any Act of the Parliament of Canada.

Contrary to popular belief, immigration is largely set by the Provinces. This is laid out in Section 95 of the Constitution. While Ottawa may impose laws from time to time, the understanding seems to be that the Premiers will be mostly the decision makers. While it’s understandable to get angry at Trudeau, he’s far from the only deserving target.

Additionally, there are talks underway to launch a Municipal Nominee Program, which will allow cities to directly bring people in, and to sponsor their bids to become permanent residents. It’s unclear at this point how large it will ultimately be.

4. Key Highlights From The Year 2021

AS stated before, it’s not entirely clear how many people are staying after some kind of temporary visa, v.s. how many leave. We also don’t have hard data on the “inadmissibles” who don’t leave, and on the visitors who overstay. Consequently, take this as a rough estimate:

405,999 new permanent residents
-191,338 temps transitioning to PR
= 214,661 new permanent residents brought into Canada

Temporaries Brought Into Canada
445,776 (Student Visas Issued)
+103,552 (Temporary Foreign Worker Program)
+313,294 (International Mobility Program)
= 862,622 (in the temporary classes)

6,687 “inadmissibles” allowed under Rule 24(1) of IRPA
95 “inadmissibles” allowed under Rule 25.2(1) of IRPA

813,306 eTAs (electronic travel authorizations)
+654,027 TRV (temporary resident visas)
1,467,333 combined eTAs and TRV

221,919 permanent residents became citizens in 2021. That’s interesting, considering it’s far lower than the number of people who got their PR. Perhaps the population of Canada is much larger than we think, with a huge number who remain as PR, and don’t officially become citizens.

How many people remained in Canada? Who knows?

Other immigration (PR pathway) plans to take note of:

2 pathways for Hong Kong residents (June 1, 2021 to August 31, 2026)
PR for TRP holders and their families (May 6, 2021 to November 5, 2021)
Families of air crashes PS 752 and EA302 can get PR
500 people (+families) amnesty for illegals to work in construction
“Refugees” willing to work in health care settings can get PR

The Government brags about expediting work permits for “essential workers”, even as Canada experienced record high unemployment. They even created a program for “refugees” to get accelerated permanent residence if they work in health care settings. This comes at a time when Canadian workers are being let go for refusing the experimental shots.

Foreign students (under a rule change) became exempt from the 20 hour/week work limit that their visas typically imposed. Supposedly, this was to enable them to provide essential services. Again, this seems screwed up given how many Canadians were forced out of work.

Foreign students also received emergency benefits designed for Canadians, although the full extent of this is not yet published.

In January 2020, the G.T.A./IIRC started their program to give out permanent residencies to 500 people — and their families — who had overstayed their initial visas. This could be interpreted as an amnesty-for-illegals program, and we’ll have to see how much it expands.

IIRC also extended the Interim Federal Health Program, or IFHP, which is a plan that also covers so-called asylum claimants. This applies also to people who’ve illegally entered from the United States. Some 14% of claimants in 2020 had entered the country illegally, primarily via Roxham Road.

There’s also an initiative underway to bring in large numbers of people from Hong Kong, who claim to be fleeing persecution. Interesting, as Canada doesn’t seem to be run much better these days.

The Rainbow Refugee Assistance Program is supposed to grow. This is to resettle people alleging they are persecuted because of their questionable behaviours.

Canada also will allow people (women primarily) fleeing domestic violence to get a temporary permit, with a the possibility of becoming a permanent resident. There isn’t any information given about whether the abuser will be deported.

New initiatives have been announced to fast-track Afghans, Ukranians and Iranians into Canada. Expect details (and numbers) in the next annual report.

There is, of course, the usual GBA+ nonsense in the document.

5. Continued Population Replacement

(Page 18 of the 2004 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 24 of the 2005 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 18, 19 of the 2006 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 19, 20 of the 2007 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 21, 22 of the 2008 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2009 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 14 of the 2010 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 18 of the 2011 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 15 of the 2012 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 19 of the 2013 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2014 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2015 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 10 of the 2016 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 14 of the 2017 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 28 of the 2018 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2019 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 33 of the 2020 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2021 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 50 of the 2022 Annual Report to Parliament)

Ever get the sense that people are European descent are being replaced? It’s no coincidence. The plan for decades has been to bring in large numbers of people from the 3rd World (mostly Asia and Africa), to remake society.

As usual, the top 3 are: (a) India; (b) China; and (c) The Philippines. No surprise that the enclaves in Canada are growing. More data from the recent census will be released later this year, and the results shouldn’t be a shock to anyone. India itself comprises nearly 1/3 of the total.

And keep in mind, these are just official statistics for Permanent Residents. This is by no means everyone who is coming into the country.

6. Temporary Visitors To Canada

TRV = Temporary Resident Visa
eTA = Electronic Travel Authorization

YEAR	TRV Issued	eTA Issued	Totals
2016	1,347,898	2,605,077	3,952,975
2017	1,617,222	4,109,918	5,570,197
2018	1,898,324	4,125,909	6,024,233
2019	1,696,871	4,077,471	5,774,342
2020	257,330	648,789	906,119
2021	654,027	813,306	1,467,333

813,306 eTAs (electronic Travel Authorizations)
654,027 TRV (Temporary Resident Visa)

Travelers entering Canada increased by 62%, compared to 2020, according to the Government’s data. Expect the numbers in 2022 to come pretty close to 2018/2019 levels.

7. More “Inadmissibles” Let Into Canada

Broadly speaking, there are two provisions within IRPA, the Immigrant and Refugee Protection Act, that allow people who were previously deemed inadmissible to Canada to be given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. Here are the totals from the Annual Reports to Parliament on Immigration. Note: the first one listed only started in 2010.

Those allowed in under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA

YEAR	TRP Issued	Cumulative
2010	17	17
2011	53	70
2012	53	123
2013	280	403
2014	385	788
2015	1,063	1,851
2016	596	2,447
2017	555	3002
2018	669	3,671
2019	527	4,198
2020	115	4,313
2021	95	4,408

From 2010 to 2021, a total of 4,408 people who were otherwise inadmissible to Canada were allowed in anyway under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA. This is the category that Global News previously reported on. As for the other one, under Rule 24(1) of IRPA, Global News leaves that out:

Year	Permits	Cumulative
2002	12,630	12,630
2003	12,069	24,699
2004	13,598	38,297
2005	13,970	52,267
2006	13,412	65,679
2007	13,244	78,923
2008	12,821	91,744
2009	15,640	107,384
2010	12,452	119,836
2011	11,526	131,362
2012	13,564	144,926
2013	13,115	158,041
2014	10,624	168,665
2015	10,333	178,998
2016	10,568	189,566
2017	9,221	198,787
2018	7,132	205,919
2019	6,080	211,999
2020	2,044	214,043
2021	6,687	220,730

From 2002 to 2021 (inclusive), a total of 220,730 people previously deemed inadmissible to Canada were given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. This has almost certainly been going on for a lot longer, but is as far back as the reports go. Now let’s consider the reasons these people are initially refused entry.

SEC = Security (espionage, subversion, terrorism)
HRV = Human or International Rights Violations
CRIM = Criminal
S.CRIM = Serious Criminal
NC = Non Compliance
MR = Misrepresentation

YEAR	Total	SEC	HRV	Crim	S.Crim	NC	MR
2002	12,630	?	?	?	?	?	?
2003	12,069	17	25	5,530	869	4,855	39
2004	13,598	12	12	7,096	953	4,981	20
2005	13,970	27	15	7,917	981	4,635	21
2006	13,412	29	20	7,421	982	4,387	18
2007	13,244	25	8	7,539	977	4,109	14
2008	12,821	73	18	7,108	898	4,170	17
2009	15,640	32	23	6,619	880	7,512	10
2010	12,452	86	24	6,451	907	4,423	36
2011	11,526	37	14	6,227	899	3,932	11
2012	13,564	20	15	7,014	888	5,206	18
2013	13,115	17	10	6,816	843	5,135	8
2014	10,624	12	2	5,807	716	3,895	14
2015	10,333	3	3	5,305	578	4,315	28
2016	10,568	8	4	4,509	534	2,788	20
2017	9,221	10	5	5,035	591	3,412	121
2018	7,132	5	3	4,132	559	2,299	131
2019	6,080	2	0	3,202	546	2,139	175
2020	2,044	2	1	666	131	1,000	37
2021	6,687	1	2	602	134	1,552	48

In 2021, some 6,687 people barred were allowed in under Rule 24(1) of IRPA. That is triple what it was in 2020. Nevertheless, none of these people should be coming in.

Interestingly, even though the Government has wide discretion to let people into the country under 24(1) and 25.1(2) of IRPA, it chose not to use its discretion to prohibit anyone from entering.

Even if people are excluded from Canada — for a variety of valid reasons — often they will still be given temporary entrance into Canada. Will they ever leave? Who knows?

8. Students & Temporary Workers

After a steep decline in 2020, the number of student visas being issued has shot back up in 2021. Expect this to get worse in the coming years.

As for the “temporary” workers, the image here seems to imply that these are the total numbers of people with permits. However, it elsewhere states that these are the number issued in 2021. Of course, the International Mobility Visas (a.k.a. “working holiday”) are only 1-2 years in length.

Year	Stu	TFWP	IMP	Total
2003	61,293	82,151	–	143,444
2004	56,536	90,668	–	147,204
2005	57,476	99,146	–	156,622
2006	61,703	112,658	–	174,361
2007	64,636	165,198	–	229,834
2008	79,509	192,519	–	272,028
2009	85,140	178,478	–	263,618
2010	96,157	182,276	–	278,433
2011	98,383	190,842	–	289,225
2012	104,810	213,573	–	318,383
2013	111,865	221,310	–	333,175
2014	127,698	95,086	197,924	420,078
2015	219,143	73,016	175,967	468,126
2016	265,111	78,402	207,829	551,342
2017	317,328	78,788	224,033	620,149
2018	356,876	84,229	255,034	696,139
2019	402,427	98,310	306,797	807,534
2020	256,740	84,609	242,130	583,452
2021	445,776	103,552	313,294	862,622

Stu = Student Visa
TFWP = Temporary Foreign Worker Program
IMP = International Mobility Program

Even during a “global pandemic” there were still 862,452 international student and temporary worker visas issued. This does represent an increase of about 48% from the 583,452 that came in 2020. Still, this is a staggering large number. As long as they were willing to take the shots, it seems anyone is welcome.

There are, of course, a number of pathways to remain in Canada longer and/or transition in permanent residence. Let’s not pretend that they’re all leaving afterwards. In fact, recent changes have allowed students to remain in their home countries while collecting time towards a PR designation here.

It would be nice to have more of a breakdown on the number of people who use more than 1 type of visa, but it doesn’t seem to be included here.

9. Refugee And Asylum Programs In Canada

The report claims to have resettled some 20,428 refugees in 2021. There isn’t a full breakdown. As far as the top 5 source countries, they are listed as:

(a) Afghanistan (6,105)
(b) Syria (4,195)
(c) Eritrea (3,674)
(d) Iraq (1,520)
(e) Democratic Republic of Somalia (1,297)

Expect far more Afghans, Ukranians and Iranians in the next few years.

10. “Anti-Racism” Initiatives To Be Advanced In Canada

The agenda endorsed by the Federal Government is to be implemented into immigration policy as well. It’s quite openly anti-white, and gaslights objections as racism and oppressions.

That racism against Indigenous Peoples, Black people and racialized groups has persisted over time; it exists to support, reinforce and build upon supremacy of one group over many. In our society, this is the elevation of (the) white people (or settler groups) above everyone else in many areas of Canadian life. The inertia continues to be upheld by access, privilege and indifference.
That colonialism, through our immigration system, has had an impact on Indigenous Peoples.
That global events, such as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Asian communities, fuel the rise of hate crimes in Canada. This has a profound effect on the safety and mental health of our racialized clients and employees.
That the experiences of many Indigenous Peoples, Black people and racialized groups intersect with sexism, ethnocentrism, classism, homophobia, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and other forms of discrimination, such as those experienced by persons with visible and non-visible disabilities. These intersections exacerbate an already difficult and in some cases precarious existence.
That, despite efforts and some progress made, IRCC has not yet achieved a fully diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace. Black employees remain in entry-level positions, and Indigenous employees, as well as employees from racialized groups, are not sufficiently represented at the executive level.
That many of our staff, as expressed in town halls, focus groups, trust circles and surveys, experience racism in the workplace, feel it impacts their career advancement and lack trust in senior management to address this.
That our fight against racism happens in solidarity with our fight against all forms of inequity.
That our renewed focus on Anti-Racism today builds on the tireless efforts of many unsung heroes who have long contributed to the fight against racism and all forms of inequity.
That racism spans beyond hate; it includes unconscious and unintended actions.

Interestingly, the idea of colonialism via immigration is mentioned. Of course, it’s primarily non-whites who are coming these days, which should throw the narrative for a loop.

When they speak of making workplaces more diverse and equitable, they really mean that the goal is to make them less white.

Pretty strange that people continue to come to Canada in record numbers, if this place really is the racist hellhole that’s being displayed.

11. Illegals Entering Via U.S./Canada Border

Although the report focused primarily on LEGAL immigration into Canada, the illegal brand is still worth talking about, since so few actually do. The United Nations gives detailed instructions and guidance on how to go about circumventing the border. The result, quite predictably, is that people keep trying to cross over.

YEAR: 2019
MONTH	QUEBEC	MANITOBA	British Columbia	OTHERS	TOTAL
January	871	1	16	1	888
February	800	1	6	2	808
March	967	13	22	0	1,002
April	1,206	15	25	0	1,246
May	1,149	27	20	0	1,196
June	1,536	26	5	0	1,567
July	1,835	23	15	1	1,874
August	1,712	26	22	2	1,762
September	1,706	19	17	0	1,737
October	1,595	18	8	1	1,622
November	1,118	9	21	0	1,148
December	1,646	2	5	2	1,653
TOTAL	16,136	180	182	9	16,503

YEAR: 2020
MONTH	QUEBEC	MANITOBA	British Columbia	OTHERS	TOTAL
January	1,086	7	7	0	1,100
February	976	2	2	0	980
March	930	7	18	0	955
April	1	0	5	0	6
May	17	0	4	0	21
June	28	1	3	1	33
July	29	2	17	0	48
August	15	3	0	0	18
September	30	4	7	0	41
October	27	0	4	0	31
November	24	0	8	0	32
December	26	2	8	0	36
TOTAL	3,189	28	84	1	3,302

YEAR: 2021
MONTH	QUEBEC	MANITOBA	British Columbia	OTHERS	TOTAL
January	28	1	10	0	39
February	39	0	1	0	40
March	29	5	2	0	36
April	29	2	2	0	33
May	12	3	13	0	28
June	11	0	6	0	17
July	28	5	6	0	39
August	63	2	11	0	76
September	150	0	19	0	169
October	96	0	17	0	113
November	832	1	12	0	845
December	2,778	0	33	0	2,811
TOTAL	4,095	19	132	0	4,246

Although not listed in the Annual Immigration Report to Parliament, this is worth a mention. Illegal crossings from the U.S. did drop quite drastically in the Spring of 2020. Of course, the Government had to play along and make this “pandemic” seem real. In recent months, however, it seems the numbers are creeping back up again.

Keep in mind, the text of the Safe Third Country Agreement requires both Canada and the U.S. to consult with the UNHCR on refugees, and to get input from NGOs. We haven’t had meaningful borders in a long time.

As a reminder: the Trudeau Government scrapped the DCO, or Designated Country of Origin, back in 2019. This would allow for claims from “safe” countries to be denied much more quickly. However, with things the way they are, it seems nowhere is really safe. While the issue was very mainstream from 2017 to 2019, it seems to have disappeared.

In June 2020, a new policy kicked in to finally track who is leaving the country. Even more strange that a Trudeau would bring it in when he did. Probably to make it harder for people fleeing his regime.

Overall, the replacement agenda slowed down in 2020, but it rebounded significantly in 2021. Expect it to resume in full swing for 2022 and beyond.

June 1, 2022June 2, 2022

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

Ever wonder how many international students are in Canada, and where they come from? Well, we have some data available, courtesy of the Federal Government. Let’s take a look at this troubling pattern.

The replacement agenda (a.k.a. the Kalergi Plan) is alive and well. And flooding the country with students from abroad is just one way to help implement it. Colleges and universities get much needed cash, and students get access to life in the West.

One thing to note: it appears that the data from these tables, page 44, refers to the TOTAL number of international students within Canada. This is not the same as the number of visas issued annually.

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2004
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,954	23.7	1
South Korea	26,700	15.8	2
United States	12,807	7.6	3
Japan	8,983	5.3	4
United Kingdom, Colonies	6,685	4.0	5
India	6,680	4.0	6
France	6,677	4.0	7
Taiwan	5,247	3.1	8
Mexico	3,384	2.0	9
Germany	2,294	1.4	10
Iran	2,110	1.4	11
Hong Kong	1,993	1.2	12
Pakistan	1,836	1.1	13
Vietnam	1,751	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,731	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	122,147	72.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,492	27.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	168,639	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2005
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	40,021	23.5	1
South Korea	27,596	16.2	2
United States	13,130	7.7	3
Japan	9,057	5.3	4
India	7,153	4.2	5
France	6,952	4.1	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,944	3.5	7
Taiwan	4,928	2.9	8
Mexico	3,601	2.1	9
Iran	2,558	1.5	10
Germany	2,462	1.4	11
Hong Kong	2,397	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,795	1.1	13
Bangladesh	1,718	1.0	14
Vietnam	1,695	1.0	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	131,007	76.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,461	23.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	170,468	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2006
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	39,993	23.2	1
South Korea	29,551	17.1	2
United States	12,920	7.5	3
Japan	8,310	4.8	4
France	8,125	4.7	5
India	7,464	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,404	3.1	7
Taiwan	4,853	2.8	8
Mexico	3,839	2.2	9
Hong Kong	2,663	1.5	10
Germany	2,588	1.5	11
Iran	2,342	1.4	12
Pakistan	1,839	1.1	13
Morocco	1,723	1.0	14
Bangladesh	1,651	0.9	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	133,265	77.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	39,110	22.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	172,375	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2007
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	41,113	22.9	1
South Korea	30,676	17.1	2
United States	12,835	7.2	3
France	9,005	5.0	4
India	7,929	4.4	5
Japan	7,662	4.3	6
United Kingdom, Colonies	5,021	2.8	7
Taiwan	4,683	2.6	8
Mexico	3,861	2.2	9
Germany	2,947	1.6	10
Hong Kong	2,812	1.5	11
Iran	2,390	1.3	12
Brazil	1,959	1.1	13
Morocco	1,930	1.1	14
Nigeria	1,919	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	136,742	76.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	42,413	23.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	179,155	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2008
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	43,101	23.4	1
South Korea	28,976	15.7	2
United States	12,226	6.6	3
France	9,377	5.1	4
India	8,286	4.5	5
Japan	6,592	3.6	6
United Kingdom	4,627	2.5	7
Saudi Arabia	4,463	2.4	8
Taiwan	4,122	2.2	9
Mexico	3,879	2.1	10
Germany	3,141	1.7	11
Hong Kong	2,912	1.6	12
Iran	2,649	1.4	13
Brazil	2,396	1.3	14
Nigeria	2,178	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	138,925	75.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	45,254	24.6	—
GRAND TOTAL	184,179	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2009
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	50,446	24.7	1
South Korea	27,166	13.3	2
United States	12,128	5.9	3
India	11,682	5.7	4
France	10,358	5.1	5
Saudi Arabia	8,413	4.1	6
Japan	6,113	3.0	7
Mexico	4,184	2.1	8
United Kingdom, Colonies	4,151	2.0	9
Taiwan	3,816	1.9	10
Iran	3,507	1.7	11
Germany	3,102	1.5	12
Hong Kong	2,956	1.4	13
Nigeria	2,820	1.4	14
Brazil	2,415	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	153,257	75.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	50,795	24.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	204,052	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2010
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	57,339	25.4	1
South Korea	25,301	11.2	2
India	20,281	9.0	3
Saudi Arabia	12,267	5.4	4
United States	12,156	5.4	5
France	11,365	5.0	6
Japan	5,874	2.6	7
Mexico	4,384	1.9	8
Iran	3,930	1.7	9
Nigeria	3,648	1.6	10
Taiwan	3,639	1.6	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,563	1.5	12
Germany	3,142	1.4	13
Hong Kong	2,864	1.3	14
Brazil	2,722	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	172,475	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	52,920	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,395	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2011
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	68,469	27.5	1
India	27,339	11.0	2
South Korea	22,631	9.1	3
Saudi Arabia	14,180	5.7	4
France	12,715	5.1	5
United States	12,191	4.9	6
Japan	6,018	2.4	7
Mexico	4,801	1.9	8
Iran	4,755	1.9	9
Nigeria	4,432	1.8	10
Taiwan	3,370	1.4	11
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,360	1.4	12
Brazil	3,270	1.3	13
Pakistan	3,161	1.3	14
Vietnam	3,110	1.3	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	190,432	76.5	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	58,395	23.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	248,827	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2012
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	81,444	29.5	1
India	32,243	11.7	2
South Korea	20,285	7.4	3
France	14,748	5.3	4
Saudi Arabia	13,930	5.0	5
United States	12,302	4.5	6
Japan	6,486	2.4	7
Nigeria	5,481	2.0	8
Iran	5,229	1.9	9
Brazil	5,126	1.8	10
Mexio	4,977	1.8	11
Pakistan	3,588	1.3	12
Vietnam	3,523	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,358	1.2	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,352	1.2	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	208,961	75.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	66,922	24.5	—
GRAND TOTAL	275,883	100	—

INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN CANADA: 2013
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	95,731	31.4	1
India	34,887	11.4	2
South Korea	19,123	6.3	3
France	16,486	5.4	4
Saudi Arabia	13,955	4.6	5
United States	12,263	4.0	6
Brazil	7,757	2.5	7
Nigeria	6,903	2.3	8
Japan	6,604	2.2	9
Mexico	5,306	1.7	10
Iran	5,177	1.7	11
Vietnam	4,173	1.4	12
Pakistan	4,045	1.3	13
Taiwan	3,500	1.1	14
United Kingdom, Colonies	3,462	1.1	15
TOTAL — TOP 15	239,372	78.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	65,504	21.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	304,876	100	—

Again, this refers to the total number of students in the country, not the amount of visas issued in any given year. Needless to say, those numbers continue to climb as well. Note: page 48 of the same document gives even higher totals for the same years.

For a reference point, consider page 15 of the 2020 Canada Annual Immigration Report to Parliament. It was reported that:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

This means that the number of foreign students has nearly tripled from 2013 to 2019/2020. This is a major source of people entering the country.

Keep in mind, there are many, MANY pathways for international students to stay longer, or transition into permanent residents. The probable reason for not being open about this is to minimize the backlash from the already high immigration rates.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

May 25, 2022July 21, 2024

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1980 – 2020 Statistics

Note: This is a continuation of the recent piece, which covered the years from 1989 through 1998. The data needs to be shown in order to fully demonstrate what’s really going on.

This piece does come with an obvious disclaimer: it doesn’t take the hordes of “temporary” workers and student visas in account. That will be addressed elsewhere.

The Kalergi Plan was laid out for Europe a century ago. The goal was to ultimately get rid of all the whites, with a combination of open doors immigration, depressed local birth rates, and miscegenation. That said, the plot it not limited to Europe, but to all white countries.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

Isn’t trying to replace or displace a population considered genocide by the United Nations? Well, it does fit their own definitions….

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article V
The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

It’s also worth asking if pluralism (imposed without the consent of the people) would amount to genocide under the terms as laid out by the U.N. in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide After all, if pluralism results in at least a partial replacement of a group, isn’t that bringing about its destruction?

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

Let’s have a look at some of those recent years. While 2003 to 2020 has already been covered pretty extensively on this site, the problem extends much further than that.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1980
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	25,541	17.8	1
United Kingdom	18,245	12.8	2
United States	9,926	6.9	3
India	8,483	5.9	4
Hong Kong	6,309	4.4	5
Laos	6,206	4.4	6
Philippines	6,051	4.2	7
China	4,936	3.5	8
Portugal	4,228	3.0	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	89,955	62.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	53,132	37.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	143,087	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1980
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,330	3.0
Asia	71,062	50.0
South America	5,433	3.8
Caribbean/Antilles	7,362	5.2
United States	9,926	6.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,168	28.8
Others	3,297	2.8
Total	143,087	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1981
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	21,154	16.5	1
United States	10,559	8.2	2
India	8,256	6.4	3
Vietnam	8,251	6.4	4
China	6,550	5.1	5
Hong Kong	6,451	5.0	6
Philippines	5,859	4.6	7
Poland	3,850	3.0	8
Haiti	3,667	2.8	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	74,594	58	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	54,021	42.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	128,618	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1981
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,887	3.8
Asia	48,830	38.0
South America	6,136	4.8
Caribbean/Antilles	8,633	6.7
United States	10,559	8.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,295	36.0
Others	3,278	2.5
Total	128,618	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1982
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United Kingdom	16,445	13.6	1
United States	9,360	7.7	2
Poland	8,278	6.8	3
India	7,776	6.4	4
Hong Kong	6,542	5.4	5
Vietnam	5,935	4.9	6
Philippines	5,062	4.2	7
Germany	4,425	3.7	8
China	3,571	2.9	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	67,414	55.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	57,753	44.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	121,167	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1982
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	4,510	3.7
Asia	41,617	34.3
South America	6,870	5.7
Caribbean/Antilles	8,674	7.2
United States	9,360	7.7
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,150	38.1
Others	3,966	3.3
Total	121,167	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1983
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	7,381	8.3	1
India	7,041	7.9	2
Hong Kong	6,710	7.5	3
Vietnam	6,451	7.2	4
United Kingdom	5,737	6.4	5
Poland	5,094	5.7	6
Philippines	4,454	5.1	7
Haiti	2,827	3.2	8
Guyana	2,605	2.9	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	48,300	54.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	40,857	45.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	89,157	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1983
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa	3,659	4.1
Asia	36,906	41.4
South America	4,816	5.4
Caribbean/Antilles	7,216	8.1
United States	7,381	8.3
Europe and the United Kingdom	24,312	27.3
Others	4,867	5.4
Total	89,157	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1984
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	10,950	12.4	1
Hong Kong	7,696	8.7	2
United States	6,922	7.8	3
India	5,502	6.2	4
United Kingdom	5,104	5.8	5
Poland	4,499	5.1	6
Philippines	3,748	4.2	7
El Salvador	2,569	2.9	8
Jamaica	2,479	2.8	9
TOTAL — TOP 9	49,479	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	38,760	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	88,239	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1984
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	3,552	4.0
Asia	41,920	47.5
South America	4,085	4.6
Caribbean/Antilles	5,630	6.4
United States	6,922	7.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	20,901	23.7
Others	5,229	5.9
Total	88,239	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1985
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Vietnam	10,404	12.3	1
Hong Kong	7,380	8.8	2
United States	6,669	7.9	3
United Kingdom	4,454	5.3	4
India	4,028	4.8	5
Poland	3,617	4.3	6
Philippines	3,076	3.6	7
Jamaica	2,922	3.5	8
El Salvador	2,881	3.4	9
Guyana	2,301	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	47,732	56.6	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	36,570	43.4	—
GRAND TOTAL	84,302	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1985
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	3,545	4.2
Asia and Pacific	38,597	45.8
South America	4,356	4.2
North/Central America	5,016	6.0
Caribbean/Antilles	6,132	7.2
United States	6,669	7.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	18,859	22.4
Others	1,128	1.2
Total	84,302	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1986
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
United States	7,275	7.3	1
India	6,940	7.0	2
Vietnam	6,622	6.7	3
Hong Kong	5,893	5.9	4
Poland	5,231	5.3	5
United Kingdom	5,088	5.1	6
Jamaica	4,652	4.7	7
Philippines	4,102	4.1	8
Guyana	3,905	4.0	9
El Salvador	3,167	3.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	52,875	53.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	46,344	46.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	99,219	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1986
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	4,770	4.8
Asia and Pacific	41,600	41.9
South America	6,686	6.7
North/Central America	6,078	6.1
Caribbean/Antilles	8,874	9.0
United States	7,275	7.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	22,709	22.9
Others	1,227	1.2
Total	99,219	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1987
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	16,170	10.6	1
India	9,692	6.4	2
United Kingdom	8,547	5.6	3
United States	7,967	5.2	4
Philippines	7,343	4.8	5
Portugal	7,300	4.8	6
Poland	7,036	4.7	7
Guyana	6,073	4.0	8
Vietnam	5,668	3.7	9
Jamaica	5,422	3.6	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	81,218	53.4	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	70,880	46,6	—
GRAND TOTAL	152,098	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1987
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	8,501	5.6
Asia and Pacific	67,337	44.3
South America	10,801	7.1
North/Central America	6,873	4.5
Caribbean/Antilles	11,227	7.4
United States	7,967	5.2
Europe and the United Kingdom	37,563	24.7
Others	1,829	1.2
Total	152,098	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1988
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	23,281	14.4	1
India	10,409	6.4	2
Poland	9,231	5.7	3
United Kingdom	9,172	5.7	4
Philippines	8,310	5.1	5
United States	6,537	4.0	6
Portugal	6,467	4.0	7
Vietnam	6,196	3.8	8
Jamaica	3,923	2.4	9
Iran	3,669	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,195	53.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	74,734	46.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	161,929	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1988
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	9,380	5.8
Asia and Pacific	81,136	50.1
South America	7,255	4.5
North/Central America	5,671	3.5
Caribbean/Antilles	9,439	5.9
United States	6,537	4.0
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,689	25.1
Others	1,822	1.1
Total	161,929	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1989
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	19,908	10.4	1
Poland	15,985	8.3	2
Philippines	11,383	5.9	3
Vietnam	9,425	4.9	4
India	8,819	4.6	5
United Kingdom	8,420	4.4	6
Portugal	8,189	4.3	7
United States	6,931	3.6	8
Lebanon	6,179	3.2	9
China	4,430	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	99,679	51.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	92,322	48.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	193,001	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1989
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	12,199	6.3
Asia and Pacific	93,261	48.6
South America	8,685	4.5
United States	6,931	3.6
Europe and the United Kingdom	52,107	27.1
North/Central America	5,870	3.1
Caribbean/Antilles	10,909	5.7
Others	2,041	1.1
Total	193,001	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1990
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,261	13.7	1
Poland	16,579	7.7	2
Lebanon	12,462	5.8	3
Philippines	12,042	5.6	4
India	10,624	5.1	5
Vietnam	9,081	4.2	6
United Kingdom	8,217	3.8	7
China	7,987	3.7	8
Portugal	7,917	3.7	9
United	6,084	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	120,256	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,974	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	214,230	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1990
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,440	6.3
Asia and Pacific	111,739	52.2
South America	8,898	4.2
United States	6,084	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	51,945	24.3
North/Central America	7,781	3.6
Caribbean/Antilles	11,689	5.5
Others	2,654	1.2
Total	214,230	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1991
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,340	9.7	1
Poland	15,731	6.8	2
China	13,915	6.0	3
India	12,848	5.6	4
Philippines	12,335	5.3	5
Lebanon	11,987	5.2	6
Vietnam	8,963	3.9	7
United Kingdom	7,543	3.3	8
El Salvador	6,977	3.0	9
Sri Lanka	6,826	3.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	119,465	51.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	111,316	48.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	230,781	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1991
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,087	7.0
Asia and Pacific	119,955	52.0
South America	10,582	4.6
United States	6,597	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	48,055	20.8
North/Central America	13,404	5.8
Caribbean/Antilles	12,922	5.6
Others	3,179	1.4
Total	230,781	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1992
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	38,910	15.4	1
Philippines	13,273	5.2	2
India	12,675	5.0	3
Sri Lanka	12,635	5.0	4
Poland	11,878	4.7	5
China	10,429	4.1	6
Vietnam	7,681	3.2	7
United States	7,537	3.0	8
Taiwan	7,456	2.9	9
United Kingdom	7,138	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	129,612	51.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	123,230	48.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	252,842	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1992
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	19,633	7.7
Asia and Pacific	139,216	54.4
South America	10,389	4.1
United States	7,537	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	44,871	17.5
North/Central America	12,526	4.9
Caribbean/Antilles	14,952	5.8
Others	3,718	1.5
Total	252,842	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1993
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	36,574	14.3	1
India	20,472	8.0	2
Philippines	19,772	7.7	3
Taiwan	9,867	3.9	4
China	9,466	3.7	5
Sri Lanka	9,103	3.6	6
Vietnam	8,301	3.2	7
United States	8,014	3.1	8
United Kingdom	7,159	2.8	9
Poland	6,877	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	135,605	53.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	120,214	47.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	255,819	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1993
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,918	6.6
Asia and Pacific	147,323	57.6
South America	9,580	3.7
United States	8,014	3.1
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,602	18.2
North/Central America	7,737	3.0
Caribbean/Antilles	16,563	6.5
Others	3,082	1.2
Total	255,819	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1994
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	44,169	19.7	1
Philippines	19,097	8.5	2
India	17,225	7.7	3
China	12,486	5.6	4
Taiwan	7,411	3.3	5
Sri Lanka	6,671	3.0	6
United States	6,234	2.8	7
Vietnam	6,230	2.8	8
United Kingdom	5,971	2.8	9
Bosnia-Hercegovina	4,905	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	130,399	58.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,476	41.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	223,875	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1994
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,706	6.1
Asia and Pacific	141,587	63.2
South America	7,919	3.5
United States	6,234	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,641	17.3
North/Central America	3,503	1.6
Caribbean/Antilles	9,980	4.5
Others	2,215	1.0
Total	223,875	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1995
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	31,746	14.9	1
India	16,215	7.6	2
Philippines	15,149	7.1	3
China	13,291	6.3	4
Sri Lanka	8,926	4.2	5
Taiwan	7,691	3.6	6
Bosnia-Hercegovina	6,270	3.0	7
United Kingdom	6,161	2.9	8
United States	5,185	2.4	9
Pakistan	3,996	1.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	114,630	53.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,874	46.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	212,504	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1995
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	14,631	6.9
Asia and Pacific	129,106	60.8
South America	7,538	3.5
United States	5,185	2.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,266	19.4
North/Central America	2,842	1.3
Caribbean/Antilles	10,056	4.5
Others	1,880	0.8
Total	212,504	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1996
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,966	13.3	1
India	21,276	9.4	2
China	17,516	7.8	3
Taiwan	13,207	5.8	4
Philippines	13,132	5.8	5
Pakistan	7,753	3.4	6
Sri Lanka	6,151	2.7	7
United States	5,837	2.6	8
Iran	5,828	2.6	9
United Kingdom	5,585	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	126,251	55.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	99,522	44.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,773	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1996
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	36,503	16.15
Asia and Pacific	124,771	55.20
South and Central America	18,878	8.35
United States	5,869	2.60
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,009	17.70
Not Stated	20	0.01
Total	225,773	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1997
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,242	10.30	1
India	19,614	9.08	2
China	18,530	8.58	3
Taiwan	13,321	6.17	4
Pakistan	11,233	5.20	5
Philippines	10,873	5.03	6
Iran	7,477	3.46	7
Sri Lanka	5,069	2.35	8
United States	5,043	2.33	9
United Kingdom	4,659	2.16	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	118,061	54.65	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,983	45.35	—
GRAND TOTAL	216,044	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1997
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	37,794	17.49
Asia and Pacific	117,076	54.19
South and Central America	17,425	8.07
United States	5,043	2.33
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,673	17.90
Not Stated	33	0.02
Total	216,044	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1998
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	19,749	11.34	1
India	11.34	8.80	2
Philippines	8,172	4.69	3
Hong Kong	8,083	4.64	4
Pakistan	8,081	4.64	5
Taiwan	7,164	4.11	6
Iran	6,772	3.89	7
South Korea	4,910	2.82	8
United States	4,764	2.74	9
Russia	4,299	2.47	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,321	50.16	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	86,779	49.84	—
GRAND TOTAL	174,100	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1998
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	32,534	18.69
Asia and Pacific	84,036	48.27
South and Central America	14,003	8.04
United States	4,764	2.74
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,477	22.10
Not Stated	286	0.16
Total	174,100	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1999
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	29,095	15.33	1
India	17,415	9.17	2
Pakistan	9,285	4.89	3
Philippines	9,285	4.89	4
South Korea	7,212	3.80	5
Iran	5,903	3.11	6
United States	5,514	2.90	7
Taiwan	5,461	2.88	8
Sri Lanka	4,719	2.49	9
United Kingdom	4,476	2.36	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	98,240	51.76	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	91,576	48.24	—
GRAND TOTAL	189,816	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1999
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	33,441	17.62
Asia and Pacific	96,370	50.77
South and Central America	15,188	8.00
United States	5,514	2.90
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,912	20.50
Not Stated	391	0.21
Total	189,816	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2000
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	36,715	16.15	1
India	26,086	11.48	2
Pakistan	14,182	6.24	3
Philippines	10,086	4.44	4
South Korea	7,626	3.35	5
Sri Lanka	5,841	2.57	6
United States	5,814	2.56	7
Iran	5,608	2.47	8
Yugoslavia	4,723	2.08	9
United Kingdom	4,647	2.04	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	121,328	53.38	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	105,985	46.62	—
GRAND TOTAL	227,313	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2000
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	40,815	17.96
Asia and Pacific	120,539	53.03
South and Central America	16,944	7.45
United States	5,814	2.56
Europe and the United Kingdom	42,885	18.87
Not Stated	316	0.14
Total	227,313	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2001
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	40,315	16.09	1
India	27,848	11.12	2
Pakistan	15,341	6.12	3
Philippines	12,914	5.16	4
South Korea	9,604	3.83	5
United States	5,902	2.36	6
Iran	5,737	2.29	7
Romania	5,585	2.23	8
Sri Lanka	5,514	2.20	9
United Kingdom	5,350	2.14	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	134,110	53.54	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	116,374	46.46	—
GRAND TOTAL	250,484	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2001
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	48,078	19.20
Asia and Pacific	132,711	53.01
South and Central America	20,129	8.04
United States	5,894	2.35
Europe and the United Kingdom	43,204	17.26
Not Stated	330	0.13
Total	250,346	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 2002
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	33,231	14.51	1
India	28,815	12.58	2
Pakistan	14,164	6.18	3
Philippines	11,000	4.80	4
Iran	7,742	3.38	5
South Korea	7,326	3.20	6
Romania	5,692	2.48	7
United States	5,288	2.31	8
Sri Lanka	4,961	2.17	9
United Kingdom	4,720	2.06	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	122,939	53.67	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	106,152	46.33	—
GRAND TOTAL	229,091	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2002
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	46,113	20.13
Asia and Pacific	118,899	51.90
South and Central America	19,417	8.48
United States	5,288	2.31
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,841	16.95
Not Stated	533	0.23
Total	229,091	100

https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
Source for 1995/1996:
Source for 1996-1998

(Page 18 of the 2004 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 24 of the 2005 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 18, 19 of the 2006 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 19, 20 of the 2007 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 21, 22 of the 2008 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2009 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2008
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	51,313	20.8
Asia and Pacific	117,480	47.5
South and Central America	26,493	10.7
United States	11,216	4.5
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,649	16.4
Not Stated	96	0.0
Total	247,247	100

(Page 14 of the 2010 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2009
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	56,151	22.2
Asia and Pacific	117,174	46.5
South and Central America	26,776	10.6
United States	9,723	3.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	42,311	16.8
Not Stated	37	0.0
Total	252,172	100

(Page 18 of the 2011 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2010
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	66,692	23.8
Asia and Pacific	135,008	48.1
South and Central America	28,357	10.1
United States	9,242	3.3
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,317	14.7
Not Stated	73	0.0
Total	280,689	100

(Page 15 of the 2012 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2011
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	59,323	23.8
Asia and Pacific	120,330	48.4
South and Central America	27,447	11.0
United States	8,830	3.5
Europe and the United Kingdom	32,755	13.2
Not Stated	63	0.0
Total	248,748	100

(Page 19 of the 2013 Annual Report to Parliament)

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 2012
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	56,060	21.7
Asia and Pacific	129,592	50.3
South and Central America	26,864	10.4
United States	9,414	3.7
Europe and the United Kingdom	35,828	13.9
Not Stated	129	0.0
Total	257,887	100

(Page 16 of the 2014 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 16 of the 2015 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 10 of the 2016 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 14 of the 2017 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 28 of the 2018 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2019 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 33 of the 2020 Annual Report to Parliament)

(Page 36 of the 2021 Annual Report to Parliament)

Are things starting to make sense? Immigration policies for the last 50+ years have focused on Asians and Africans, replacing (to a large degree) the overwhelmingly European makeup that was Canada for many years.

Of course, speaking up about what’s apparent will lead to cries of racism.

One thing people really need to get clear: so-called “conservatives” have no interest whatsoever in preserving demographics or the makeup of a country. They fully support the genocide agenda, but try to pitch it from a more economic perspective.

White replacement is a very real thing. Only the most obtuse or unobservant cannot see what’s going on, especially given how blatant it is..

While Liberals are generally quite open for their disdain of Europeans, “Conservatives” behave in a stealthier and more subversive manner. They camouflage their true intentions, making them more dangerous.

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

May 24, 2022May 31, 2022

Pluralism Is A Policy Of Population Replacement

Recently, “Conservative” Michelle Rempel-Garner posted on Twitter calling for (presumably) her party to adopt the policy of “pluralism”. Sounds lovely, doesn’t it. But what is pluralism really?

Merriam-Webster defines pluralism as: “a state of society in which members of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, or social groups maintain and develop their traditional culture or special interest within the confines of a common civilization”.

It has nothing to do with assimilation. Instead, it’s discouraged.

Furthermore, the definition also includes “a concept, doctrine, or policy advocating this state [of pluralism]”. Let the word games begin now….

[1] Liberals promote policies of “diversity”.
[2] Conservatives promote policies of “pluralism”.

But in the end, these are the same things. If you’re championing pluralism, you’re championing diversity. This leads to society being carved up and balkanized along various identity groups.

Since these people are all U.N. puppets, here’s something else that’s worth addressing. There are different ways to advocate for genocide.

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

These policies are pushed in Western countries, and only in Western countries. This means that the consequences are deliberate.

Endorsing the globohomo agenda also seems to be part of conservatism these days, which shows just how far things have fallen.

Rempel supports pluralism, which is essentially state-imposed diversity. And how exactly does one make a country more diverse? Quite simply, you have to replace (or displace) at least a portion of the local population in order to make room for the new arrivals.

Now, are conservatives proud of this?

After all, if forced diversity is something that everyone’s on board with, doesn’t that lend credence to the notion that whites are being replaced?

Rempel did explain herself more fully:

That was not the first or the last time I have had to counter that particular racist diatribe. It is a core tenet of so-called “great replacement theory”; an anti-Semitic white-nationalist conspiracy theory involving a supposed plot to replace white people with non-whites.

The narrative it usually follows is that the immigration policy of western countries is designed to replace whites, or to “out breed them,” in order to prevent whites from getting jobs, dominating culture, or electing a “pro-white” government. It is racism built on longstanding colonial and white nationalist dogma that never truly has been erased, even after decades spent building pluralistic policy.

It is pure ignorance to believe that white replacement dogma doesn’t exist in Canada.

In a wink to this sentiment, some right leaning political candidates in recent years, both at the federal and provincial levels, have promised to “lower immigration levels” without explaining what benefit this would bring to Canada.

On May 18, 2022, Rempel wrote a piece that appeared in the National Post, denouncing “White Replacement Theory” as the paranoid rantings of racists. She condemns such conspiracies, and calls for people who endorse it to be removed from the party.

A serious question to ask: how can a Member of Parliament openly call for the creation of a “pluralistic” society, but condemn any talk of “white replacement”?

Do these people simply object to their ideals being explained as what they really are?

(1) https://twitter.com/MichelleRempel/status/1517246163828846597
(2) https://twitter.com/MichelleRempel/status/1527006649059254273
(3) https://nationalpost.com/opinion/michelle-rempel-garner-we-have-a-duty-to-reject-conspiracy-theories-about-white-replacement
(4) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pluralism
(5) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf

May 23, 2022July 21, 2024

Replacement Migration In Canada: The Years 1989 To 1998

The Kalergi Plan was laid out for Europe a century ago. The goal was to ultimately get rid of all the whites, with a combination of open doors immigration, depressed local birth rates, and miscegenation. That said, the plot is not limited to Europe, but to all white countries.

Forced diversity is code for genocide.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

Let’s have a look at some of those recent years. While 2003 to 2020 has already been covered pretty extensively on this site, the problem extends much further than that.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1989
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	19,908	10.4	1
Poland	15,985	8.3	2
Philippines	11,383	5.9	3
Vietnam	9,425	4.9	4
India	8,819	4.6	5
United Kingdom	8,420	4.4	6
Portugal	8,189	4.3	7
United States	6,931	3.6	8
Lebanon	6,179	3.2	9
China	4,430	2.3	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	99,679	51.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	92,322	48.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	193,001	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1989
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	12,199	6.3
Asia and Pacific	93,261	48.6
South America	8,685	4.5
United States	6,931	3.6
Europe and the United Kingdom	52,107	27.1
North/Central America	5,870	3.1
Caribbean/Antilles	10,909	5.7
Others	2,041	1.1
Total	193,001	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1990
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,261	13.7	1
Poland	16,579	7.7	2
Lebanon	12,462	5.8	3
Philippines	12,042	5.6	4
India	10,624	5.1	5
Vietnam	9,081	4.2	6
United Kingdom	8,217	3.8	7
China	7,987	3.7	8
Portugal	7,917	3.7	9
United	6,084	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	120,256	56.1	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,974	43.9	—
GRAND TOTAL	214,230	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1990
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,440	6.3
Asia and Pacific	111,739	52.2
South America	8,898	4.2
United States	6,084	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	51,945	24.3
North/Central America	7,781	3.6
Caribbean/Antilles	11,689	5.5
Others	2,654	1.2
Total	214,230	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1991
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,340	9.7	1
Poland	15,731	6.8	2
China	13,915	6.0	3
India	12,848	5.6	4
Philippines	12,335	5.3	5
Lebanon	11,987	5.2	6
Vietnam	8,963	3.9	7
United Kingdom	7,543	3.3	8
El Salvador	6,977	3.0	9
Sri Lanka	6,826	3.0	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	119,465	51.8	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	111,316	48.2	—
GRAND TOTAL	230,781	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1991
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,087	7.0
Asia and Pacific	119,955	52.0
South America	10,582	4.6
United States	6,597	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	48,055	20.8
North/Central America	13,404	5.8
Caribbean/Antilles	12,922	5.6
Others	3,179	1.4
Total	230,781	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1992
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	38,910	15.4	1
Philippines	13,273	5.2	2
India	12,675	5.0	3
Sri Lanka	12,635	5.0	4
Poland	11,878	4.7	5
China	10,429	4.1	6
Vietnam	7,681	3.2	7
United States	7,537	3.0	8
Taiwan	7,456	2.9	9
United Kingdom	7,138	2.8	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	129,612	51.3	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	123,230	48.7	—
GRAND TOTAL	252,842	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1992
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	19,633	7.7
Asia and Pacific	139,216	54.4
South America	10,389	4.1
United States	7,537	2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom	44,871	17.5
North/Central America	12,526	4.9
Caribbean/Antilles	14,952	5.8
Others	3,718	1.5
Total	252,842	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1993
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	36,574	14.3	1
India	20,472	8.0	2
Philippines	19,772	7.7	3
Taiwan	9,867	3.9	4
China	9,466	3.7	5
Sri Lanka	9,103	3.6	6
Vietnam	8,301	3.2	7
United States	8,014	3.1	8
United Kingdom	7,159	2.8	9
Poland	6,877	2.7	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	135,605	53.0	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	120,214	47.0	—
GRAND TOTAL	255,819	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1993
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	16,918	6.6
Asia and Pacific	147,323	57.6
South America	9,580	3.7
United States	8,014	3.1
Europe and the United Kingdom	46,602	18.2
North/Central America	7,737	3.0
Caribbean/Antilles	16,563	6.5
Others	3,082	1.2
Total	255,819	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1994
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	44,169	19.7	1
Philippines	19,097	8.5	2
India	17,225	7.7	3
China	12,486	5.6	4
Taiwan	7,411	3.3	5
Sri Lanka	6,671	3.0	6
United States	6,234	2.8	7
Vietnam	6,230	2.8	8
United Kingdom	5,971	2.8	9
Bosnia-Hercegovina	4,905	2.2	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	130,399	58.2	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	93,476	41.8	—
GRAND TOTAL	223,875	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1994
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	13,706	6.1
Asia and Pacific	141,587	63.2
South America	7,919	3.5
United States	6,234	2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,641	17.3
North/Central America	3,503	1.6
Caribbean/Antilles	9,980	4.5
Others	2,215	1.0
Total	223,875	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1995
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	31,746	14.9	1
India	16,215	7.6	2
Philippines	15,149	7.1	3
China	13,291	6.3	4
Sri Lanka	8,926	4.2	5
Taiwan	7,691	3.6	6
Bosnia-Hercegovina	6,270	3.0	7
United Kingdom	6,161	2.9	8
United States	5,185	2.4	9
Pakistan	3,996	1.9	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	114,630	53.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,874	46.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	212,504	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1995
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	14,631	6.9
Asia and Pacific	129,106	60.8
South America	7,538	3.5
United States	5,185	2.4
Europe and the United Kingdom	41,266	19.4
North/Central America	2,842	1.3
Caribbean/Antilles	10,056	4.5
Others	1,880	0.8
Total	212,504	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1996
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	29,966	13.3	1
India	21,276	9.4	2
China	17,516	7.8	3
Taiwan	13,207	5.8	4
Philippines	13,132	5.8	5
Pakistan	7,753	3.4	6
Sri Lanka	6,151	2.7	7
United States	5,837	2.6	8
Iran	5,828	2.6	9
United Kingdom	5,585	2.5	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	126,251	55.9	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	99,522	44.1	—
GRAND TOTAL	225,773	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1996
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	36,503	16.15
Asia and Pacific	124,771	55.20
South and Central America	18,878	8.35
United States	5,869	2.60
Europe and the United Kingdom	40,009	17.70
Not Stated	20	0.01
Total	225,773	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1997
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
Hong Kong	22,242	10.30	1
India	19,614	9.08	2
China	18,530	8.58	3
Taiwan	13,321	6.17	4
Pakistan	11,233	5.20	5
Philippines	10,873	5.03	6
Iran	7,477	3.46	7
Sri Lanka	5,069	2.35	8
United States	5,043	2.33	9
United Kingdom	4,659	2.16	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	118,061	54.65	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	97,983	45.35	—
GRAND TOTAL	216,044	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1997
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	37,794	17.49
Asia and Pacific	117,076	54.19
South and Central America	17,425	8.07
United States	5,043	2.33
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,673	17.90
Not Stated	33	0.02
Total	216,044	100

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1998
SOURCE COUNTRY	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE	RANK
China	19,749	11.34	1
India	11.34	8.80	2
Philippines	8,172	4.69	3
Hong Kong	8,083	4.64	4
Pakistan	8,081	4.64	5
Taiwan	7,164	4.11	6
Iran	6,772	3.89	7
South Korea	4,910	2.82	8
United States	4,764	2.74	9
Russia	4,299	2.47	10
TOTAL — TOP 10	87,321	50.16	—
TOTAL — OTHERS	86,779	49.84	—
GRAND TOTAL	174,100	100	—

PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1998
REGION	NUMBER	PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East	32,534	18.69
Asia and Pacific	84,036	48.27
South and Central America	14,003	8.04
United States	4,764	2.74
Europe and the United Kingdom	38,477	22.10
Not Stated	286	0.16
Total	174,100	100

Source for 1995/1996:
Source for 1996-1998

Of course, speaking up about what’s apparent will lead to cries of racism.

White replacement is a very real thing. Only the most obtuse or unobservant cannot see what’s going on, especially given how blatant it is..

Category: Anti-White

Declaration on the North American Partnership for Equity and Racial Justice

Like this:

Review Of 2022 Annual Immigration Report To Parliament

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Annual Immigration Reports To Parliament

3. Immigration Largely Controlled By Provinces

4. Key Highlights From The Year 2021

5. Continued Population Replacement

6. Temporary Visitors To Canada

7. More “Inadmissibles” Let Into Canada

8. Students & Temporary Workers

9. Refugee And Asylum Programs In Canada

10. “Anti-Racism” Initiatives To Be Advanced In Canada

11. Illegals Entering Via U.S./Canada Border

Like this:

Source Countries For International Students: 2004-2013

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Like this:

Replacement Migration In Canada: 1980 – 2020 Statistics

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Pluralism Is A Policy Of Population Replacement

Like this:

Replacement Migration In Canada: The Years 1989 To 1998

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Annual Immigration Reports To Parliament

3. Immigration Largely Controlled By Provinces

4. Key Highlights From The Year 2021

5. Continued Population Replacement

6. Temporary Visitors To Canada

7. More “Inadmissibles” Let Into Canada

8. Students & Temporary Workers

9. Refugee And Asylum Programs In Canada

10. “Anti-Racism” Initiatives To Be Advanced In Canada

11. Illegals Entering Via U.S./Canada Border

Share this:

Like this:

“In 2019, 827,586 international students held valid study permits in Canada. Of these, 402,427 new study permits were issued (a 15% increase from 2018).”

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Replacement Migration Fits U.N. Definition Of Genocide

3. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

4. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

Share this:

Like this: