1. Other Articles On CV “Planned-emic”
The rest of the series is here. Many lies, lobbying, conflicts of interest, and various globalist agendas operating behind the scenes. The Gates Foundation finances: the World Health Organization, the Center for Disease Control, GAVI, ID2020, John Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the Pirbright Institute, the British Broadcasting Corporation, and individual pharmaceutical companies. Also: there is little to no science behind what our officials are doing; they promote degenerate behaviour; the Australian Department of Health admits the PCR tests don’t work; the US CDC admits testing is heavily flawed; and The International Health Regulations are legally binding. See here, here, and here.
2. Alternate Theory On Models
Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson has (justifiably) taken a lot of criticism for his doomsday computer modelling of how the coronavirus “planned-emic” was supposed to play out.
Considering Ferguson’s laughable failures in other predictions before, people are wondering why anyone still takes this man seriously. That is a fair question to ask.
But consider an alternate theory. Let’s suppose these doomsday scenarios were cooked up on purpose. Perhaps this modelling INTENTIONALLY led to overhyped conclusions and estimates. It wasn’t incompetence, but deliberate.
Why would someone do this? To answer this, think about where Imperial College London gets a good amount of its financing from. There are many vested interests who would stand to make a fortune if countries around the world were desperate for a vaccine. In this scenario, Ferguson’s modelling should not be taken as research, but as a calculated effort at propaganda.
Disclaimer: I don’t have any hard evidence to support such a theory. However, it is interesting that Ferguson’s work is financed by people who would greatly benefit from him reaching a doomsday conclusion. It’s reasonable to assume he would become more cautious after his repeated failure, but he hasn’t.
3. Gates Grants To Imperial College London
This chart was compiled from information posted on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation website. The following grants are just those provided to Imperial College London. Note: it seems that computer modelling is just one small part of what they do.
| DATE | AMOUNT | PURPOSE |
|---|---|---|
| June 2002 | $31,928,231 | Schistosomiasis Control |
| July 2002 | $30,000,000 | HIV Prevention |
| Jan 2003 | $200,000,000 | AIDS, Malaria, Other Diseases |
| July 2005 | $12,501,971 | Tuberculosis |
| Oct 2005 | $8,636,543 | Test CD4+, T-lymphnodes |
| Nov 2005 | $8,600,000 | AIDS Testing |
| June 2006 | $9,185,813 | Novel Recombinant Adenovirus |
| Oct 2006 | $9,826,566 | Health Package in Dev. World |
| Dec 2006 | $46,700,000 | Neglected Tropical Diseases |
| Sept 2007 | $3,565,073 | Neglected Tropical Dis. |
| Oct 2007 | $47,616 | STD, Infections |
| Oct 2008 | $100,000 | Prevent TB Replication |
| Oct 2008 | $7,344,583 | HIV/AIDS Research |
| Feb 2009 | $7,300,000 | HIV/AIDS Research |
| Feb 2009 | $871,544 | Collab W/Euro Partners |
| Sept 2009 | $16,529,688 | Feeding Prog in Africa |
| Oct 2009 | $100,000 | “Homing Factors” As Vax Adjuvants |
| Oct 2009 | $100,000 | Enzymes, Malaria Parasites |
| Nov 2009 | $1,200,000 | Nutrition Research |
| Sept 2010 | $2,692,835 | Euro Agri Development |
| Oct 2010 | $3,044,244 | HIV Computer Modelling*** |
| Oct 2010 | $1,648,585 | Neglected Tropical Disease |
| Nov 2010 | 2.7M (pounds) | Agricultural Research |
| Dec 2010 | $1,500,000 | Disease From Livestock |
| Apr 2011 | $100,000 | Polio Vaccine, India |
| Oct 2011 | $100,000 | Self-Replicating Biosensor |
| Oct 2011 | $2,724,038 | Malaria Blocker Research |
| May 2012 | $3,018,257 | Oral Polio Vaccine |
| Oct 2012 | $3,589,972 | Malaria Computer Models*** |
| Oct 2012 | $1,132,773 | HIV, Hormone Contraceptives |
| June 2013 | $5,194,767 | HIV, Intervention, Planning |
| June 2013 | $1,397,325 | Merger, Computer Modelling*** |
| oct 2013 | $1,894,953 | Advocacy, EU Donors |
| Oct 2013 | $648,060 | Product Development, Misc. |
| Nov 2013 | $772,341 | Polio Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2013 | $2,054,944 | DNA Vaccine, HIV |
| Nov 2013 | $582,541 | TB Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2013 | $2,743,052 | Health Care Consulting |
| Sept 2014 | $74,433 | Information Dissemination |
| Oct 2014 | $36,752 | Vaxx Research Meetings |
| Oct 2014 | $98,934 | Cell Phones, Meals |
| Oct 2014 | $181,868 | Cost Estimates, Vaccines |
| Apr 2015 | $100,000 | Meals Or Shoes For Vaxx |
| May 2015 | $249,549 | Optical Imaging, Gut Lesions |
| July 2015 | $1,271,423 | HIV/AIDS Testing |
| Nov 2015 | $180,000 | Child Health, Africa |
| Dec 2015 | $15,558,425 | Global Health Care |
| Apr 2016 | $100,000 | Vaxx for HIV, mucosal |
| May 2016 | $37,468,960 | Stop Malaria Transmission |
| Nov 2016 | $100,000 | Malaria Tracing Modelling*** |
| Nov 2016 | $5,625,310 | Vaxx Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2016 | $3,752,342 | Mosquito Tampering |
| Nov 2017 | $736,222 | Malaria Tracking |
| May 2018 | $1,320,030 | HIV Prevention |
| Sept 2018 | $505,207 | HIV/Reprod Modelling*** |
| Sept 2018 | $292,318 | Mosquito Sporozoites |
| Nov 2018 | $326,707 | TB Computer Modelling*** |
| May 2019 | $100,000 | Crop Viruses |
| July 2019 | $11,300 | Attend Mosquito Summit |
| Nov 2019 | $959,389 | Typhoid Surveillance |
| Mar 2020 | $79,006,570 | Malaria Control, Africa |
| May 2020 | $52,180 | Testing Gene Drives |
| May 2020 | $2,699,443 | Degradable Contraceptive Implant |
| June 2020 | $3,375,098 | Population Replacement In Genes |
As for just the funds directly provided to Imperial College London for computer modelling, these are the donations listed on the site.
| DATE | AMOUNT | PURPOSE |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2010 | $3,044,244 | HIV Computer Modelling*** |
| Oct 2012 | $3,589,972 | Malaria Computer Models*** |
| June 2013 | $1,397,325 | Merger, Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2013 | $772,341 | Polio Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2013 | $582,541 | TB Computer Modelling*** |
| Nov 2016 | $100,000 | Malaria Tracing Modelling*** |
| Nov 2016 | $5,625,310 | Vaxx Computer Modelling*** |
| Sept 2018 | $505,207 | HIV/Reprod Modelling*** |
| Nov 2018 | $326,707 | TB Computer Modelling*** |
Yes, the Gates Foundation directly finances a lot of the computer modelling that Imperial College London is involved with. Some $16 million or so directly granted for these computer models.
But do these doomsday models actually work? Are they supposed to? Perhaps not. After all, if they predicted that there weren’t deadly pandemic, then there would be no need to develop a vaccine.
4. From Gates Foundation Tax Records, ICL
BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION
EIN: 56-2618866
gates.foundation.taxes.2016
gates.foundation.taxes.2017
gates.foundation.taxes.2018
Don’t worry. It’s not like this is any major conflict of interest, or anything like that.
5. Imperial College London Admits Grants
Even a quick look of the website for Imperial College London will show many grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
6. GAVI Funded By Gates Foundation
This is probably the most well known link in the chain. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped found GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance in 1999, and has made regular contributions to it. The foundation essentially runs the show.
The Global Vaccine Alliance, as the name suggests, is an organization devoted to pushing vaccinations on the public all across the world. Bill Gates has long been a proponent of mass vaccinations.
One of (but certainly not the only) lobbyist for the vaccine agenda is a firm called Crestview Strategy. They lobbied the Federal Government on behalf of GAVI, on 20 separate occasions. See Part 4 in the series.
7. Gates/GAVI Issuing Vaccine Bonds
(Information on what the International Finance Facility for Immunization, or IFFIm, really is and does)
This was covered in Part 18 of the series. Vaccine bonds are now a real thing, and GAVI is involved in running the operation. Of course, the bonds market would completely dry up if there weren’t a pandemic to deal with. Pretty convenient.
8. Gates Influence In Pharma Industry
BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION
EIN: 56-2618866
gates.foundation.taxes.2016
gates.foundation.taxes.2017
gates.foundation.taxes.2018
BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION TRUST
EIN: 91-1663695
gates.foundation.trust.taxes.2018
| Company | Type Of Stock | Shares | Total Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly | Corp Bonds | – | $952,265 |
| Gilead Sciences | Common | 21,250 | $1,329,188 |
| Gilead Sciences | Corp Bonds | – | $3,297,777 |
| Laobaixing Pharma | Common | 831,829 | $5,719,831 |
| Merck | Common | 27,200 | $2,078,352 |
| Novartis | Common | 70,330 | $5,995,662 |
| Pfizer | Common | 39,500 | $1,724,175 |
| Roche | Common | 37,881 | $9,353,059 |
| Sichuan Kelun | Common | 2,818,448 | 8,480,098 |
| Sinopharm | Common | 394,080 | $1,655,978 |
| Tasly Pharma | Common | 8,114,941 | $22,693,515 |
| Teva Fin BV | Corp Bonds | – | $819,555 |
| Teva Fin IV | Corp Bonds | – | $9,465 |
| Teva Pharma NE | Corp Bonds | – | $1,106,435 |
While this is by no means an exhaustive list, the point is clear. See Part 21 in the series. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust (which is separate from the Foundation), owns stocks and bonds in many pharmaceutical companies that are pushing the Federal Government for money to develop a vaccine.
9. Gates Funding WHO & CDC
It’s pretty well known at this point that the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control in the U.S. both are heavily funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Consequently, they toe the line that coronavirus is a deadly pandemic, and that vaccines are necessary.
10. Immunization 2030, ID2020
This was addressed in Part 3. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is heavily involved in both ID2020 and Immunization Agenda 2030. The Foundation also supports some version of a “vaccine certification” which would be needed to go about life in the new normal.
Of course, advancing these agendas depends on there being a pandemic (or perceived pandemic). Good thing Ferguson was so completely off in his computer modelling. Make no mistake, it’s not only helpful that the death rates be inflated, but essential that they are.
11. Models Supposed To Be Wrong?
Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Charlotte Reid, a farmer’s neighbor, recalls: “I remember that appalling time. Sheep were left starving in fields near us. Then came the open air slaughter. The poor animals were panic stricken. It was one of the worst things I’ve witnessed. And all based on a model — if’s but’s and maybe’s.”
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that, by 2080, up to 150,000 people could die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay.
Could it be that Ferguson is truly incompetent, and has no clue what he is doing? Or, are his predictions exaggerated on purpose? There’s no reason to take him or his models seriously, yet governments still do.
While this all sounds like an absurd conspiracy theory, consider what else is going on. Would there be a growing vaccine bonds industry without this so-called pandemic? Would it be easy to get the public on board with implanting a vaccine certificate, or pushing Immunization 2030? How else could one get the public on board with making mask wearing seem normal?
It is possible that there is nothing malevolent here, and that Ferguson is just a serial screwup. But it’s undeniable that these screwups help advance other parts of the agenda.
Nothing is as it seems.
Question everything.