Dysgenics – Page 10

February 3, 2022

Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures

Health Canada has had several names since its inception in 1919. Despite how innocuous its name and mandate sounds, this organization had an initial purpose: population control. It’s been previously covered how PHAC was an artificial creation from the World Health Organization to serve a global order.

Few people know this, but the Department of Health was formed with the same goal in mind.

In January 2004, the WHO put out an edict that all Member States were to create an “outpost” for public health. Consequently, the Government of Paul Martin created PHAC, the Public Health Agency of Canada, out of nothing in that year. In late 2004 and into 2005, hearings went on for Bill C-12, the Quarantine Act. This was really just domestic implementation of the 3rd Edition of the International Health Regulations. The Provinces have their own laws which are based on this. The PHAC Act was introduced in 2006 by Stephen Harper shortly after taking power.

(a) International Health Regulations are legally binding on Member States.
(b) 2005 Quarantine Act was, in reality, written by WHO
(c) Public Health Agency Of Canada is a branch of WHO, and not Canadian

Again, this should be a review for most readers, but it’s still worth bringing up. The bigger picture is quite scary when it’s all laid out.

PHAC’s purpose is to use the pretense of public health as a means to control the local populations. Thing is: Health Canada (in its previous iterations) was formed for the same purpose.

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

1837: William White publishes book — Evils Of Quarantine Laws
1851: First International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1859: Second International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1866: Third International Sanitary Conference, Constantinople
1874: Fourth International Sanitary Conference, Vienna
1881: Fifth International Sanitary Conference, Washington
1885: Sixth International Sanitary Conference, Rome
1892: Seventh International Sanitary Conference, Venice
1983: Eighth International Sanitary Conference, Dresden
1894: Ninth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1897: Tenth International Sanitary Conference, Venice
1903: Eleventh International Sanitary Conference : Paris, 1903
1906: Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906 Publication
1907: Founding of the Office international d’Hygiene publique
1911-1912: Twelfth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1912: Canadian Public Health Association Incorporated
1919: Bill 37, Canada forms the Department of Health
1926: Thirteenth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1928: Bill 205, Canada’s DOH becomes Department of Pensions and National Health
1938: Fourteenth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1944: Bill C-149, Canada’s DPNH becomes Department of National Health and Welfare
1946: Canada joins World Health Organization, agrees to Constitution
1951: International Sanitation Regulations take effect from WHO
1959: “Privileges And Immunities” granted to all WHO Officials
1969: International Health Regulations (1st Ed.) replace Sanitation Regulations
1984: Bill C-3, Health Canada Act passed
1993: Department of National Health and Welfare becomes Health Canada
1995: 2nd Edition of WHO International Health Regulations
2001: DARK WINTER pandemic simulation plays out
2004: WHO issues edict all Members to have “public health outpost”
2004: PHAC, Public Health Agency of Canada, created by Order In Council
2004: Bill C-12, hearings on Quarantine Act in Parliament
2005: 3rd Edition of WHO International Health Regulations
2005: ATLANTIC STORM pandemic simulation plays out
2006: PHAC Act introduced by Harper Government
2010: Rockefeller paper released, includes infamous LOCKSTEP SCENARIO
2010: Theresa Tam stars in movie about fictional outbreak
2017: SPARS Pandemic Scenario plays out
2018: CLADE X pandemic simulation plays out
2019: EVENT 201 pandemic simulation plays out

A book by William White titled “The Evils of Quarantine Laws” is still available today. In fact, it can be purchased on Amazon. In that book, White pushed his case that contagions did not actually exist, and that these quarantine laws were pushed for other purposes.

The pdf version is nearly 200 pages, but it’s well worth a read. It goes into considerable depth about how a pseudo-science is pushed on the public under the guises of protection.

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

Going back to 1851, there were over a dozen International Sanitary Conferences held in the West. Canada (then a British Colony) would have been subjected to whatever measures the U.K. wanted. The measures sounded innocuous enough, and claimed the purpose of trying to prevent international spread of disease. The archive is also available.

The stated reasons including establishing global standards of health in order to prevent the transmission and spreading of cholera, among other diseases. Sounds pretty familiar with what’s going on now, doesn’t it?

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

Even back in 1906, Canada had a Quarantine Act on the books. Although heavily promoted as a way to manage international trade and immigration, those same principles can be used to restrict people domestically.

What’s going on today globally isn’t anything new, at least conceptually. Instead, it’s the scale of which that is novel.

The Medical Officer of Health isn’t a new concept either. Ages ago, there were still “experts” who had almost dictatorial powers to implement laws and regulations. After all, if Kings didn’t know what was going on, they would have to trust the thinking to other people.

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

The Welcome Collection in the U.K. published the document for the creation of an International Office of Public Health. As a Colony at the time, Canada would presumably have been subjected to the same laws and regulations.

That said, the information is still available on the Canadian Government’s site. Over a century ago, our “leaders” signed us up to be regulated and controlled by public health experts.

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

Ongoing programs:
.
Providing an effective liaison and network both nationally and internationally in collaboration with various disciplines, agencies and organizations; Encouraging and facilitating measures for disease prevention, health promotion and protection and healthy public policy; Initiating, encouraging and participating in research directed at the fields of disease prevention, health promotion and healthy public policy; Providing an effective liaison and partnership with CPHA’s Provincial and Territorial Public Health Associations; Acting in partnership with a range of disciplines including health, environment, agriculture, transportation, other health-oriented groups and individuals in developing and expressing a public health viewpoint on personal and community health issues; Designing, developing and implementing public health policies, programs and activities; Facilitating the development of public health goals for Canada; Identifying public health issues and advocating for policy change; Identifying literacy as a major factor in achieving equitable access to health services.

The Canadian Public Health Association was created in 1910, and incorporated in 1912. It became a charity in 1975. In its most recent C.R.A. filings, approximately 60% of the CPHA’s financing came from the Government.

Although the page has since been altered, the main financial support of the CPHA comes from drug companies like Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. That shouldn’t be the least bit surprising to anyone at this point.

CPHA is involved in advocating for national and international health policies, including the restriction of people’s movements. It presumably is quite influential regarding Health Canada. At the time of writing this, there are several Provincial counterparts, all advocating for much the same thing. More on that in later pieces.

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

[Section 4a]
Cooperation with the provincial, territorial and other health authorities with a view towards to coordination of the efforts proposed or being made for preserving and improving public health

Section 4f referred to enforcement of rules made by the International Joint Committee.

Bill 37 came into effect in 1919, after the First World War. Supposedly, the driving force behind this was the Spanish influenza, and the need to protect global public health.

Interestingly, it references the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1906, Volume 2. Even back then, there were Quarantine Acts on the books in order to restrict the movement of people. Of course, these were “supposed” to only apply to sick people.

Worth noting is that the League of Nations, the predecessor to the United Nations, also placed a heavy focus on public health. Many associate it with attempts to prevent wars between countries. In reality, there was a lot more to it.

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

In 1928, there was a change in name to the Department of Pensions and National Health. This came with the introduction of Bill 205. However, the purposes regarding public health remained much the same.

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

There was another change of name in 1994, courtesy of Bill 149. This time it became the Department of National Health and Welfare. Keep in mind, this was in the latter stages of the Second World War, and the beginnings of the new world order forming. The groundwork for the United Nations and World Health Organization had already been laid out.

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

After the defeat of the Axis powers, the World was supposed to embrace freedom and human rights, but then this happened.

Article 21
The Health Assembly shall have authority to adopt regulations concerning:
(a) sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent the international spread of disease;
(b) nomenclatures with respect to diseases, causes of death and public health practices;
(c) standards with respect to diagnostic procedures for international use;
(d) standards with respect to the safety, purity and potency of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce;
(e) advertising and labelling of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce.

Article 22
Regulations adopted pursuant to Article 21 shall come into force for all Members after due notice has been given of their adoption by the Health Assembly except for such Members as may notify the Director-General of rejection or reservations within the period stated in the notice.

In 1946, Canada signed a Treaty endorsing the Constitution of the World Health Organization, and agreeing to be bound by it.

Article 21(a) of the WHO’s Constitution explicitly gives it authority over Member States over issues such as quarantine, or medical martial law. WHO also (largely) gets to decide what diagnostic standards and equipment are considered suitable.

Since Canada never opted out, Article 22 means that we must live with this.

In 1951, the International Sanitation Regulations came into effect, which was really the first agreement which gave the World Health Organization power to dictate Member actions under the guise of “public health”. But at least people would be held responsible if something happened, right?

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

WHA12.41 Convention on the Privileges and immunities of the Specialized Agencies: Specification of Categories of Officials under Section 18 of Article VI of the Convention
The Twelfth World Health Assembly,
.
Considering Section 18 of Article VI of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies which requires that each specialized agency will specify the categories of officials to which the provisions of that Article and Article VIII shall apply; and Considering the practice hitherto followed by the World Health Organization under which, in implementing the terms of Section 18 of the Convention, due account has been taken of the provisions of resolution 76 (I) of the General Assembly of the United Nations,
.
1. CONFIRMS this practice; and
2. APPROVES the granting of the privileges and immunities referred to in Articles VI and VIII of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies to all officials of the World Health Organization, with the exception of those who are recruited locally and are assigned to hourly rates.
Eleventh plenary meeting, 28 May 1959 (section 3 of the fourth report of the Committee)

https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/88834
ihr.convention.on.immunities.privileges

Even back in 1959, the World Health Organization saw that its members should enjoy full legal immunity for itself, and its agents. Of course, member states seemed happy to go along with it. Looking through the records though, it seems unclear if Canada has specifically signed on.

The International Sanitation Regulations were replaced by the International Health Regulations (first edition) in 1969. Canada signed on and it became binding in 1971. The second version of WHO-IHR came out in 1995, and the third was released in 2005.

The information from this point on has been extensively covered on this site.

Most people are aware that the scope of Health Canada has grown considerably in recent decades. It has encompassed more and more things, resulting in less of a focus on public health measures. PHAC would soon pick up the slack.

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

Think the problem of drug money is limited to Health Canada, or the Public Health Agency of Canada? It’s not, and we will get more into the finances later. The list of “charities” includes groups that have the power to impose medical tyranny.

Alberta Health Services (AB)
Central Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Fraser Health Authority (BC)
Hay River Health & Social Services Authority (NT)
Interlake-Eastern Regional Health Authority (MB)
Interior Health Authority (BC)
Labrador-Grenfell Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Nisga’a Valley Health Authority (BC)
Northern Regional Health Authority (MB)
Northern Regional Health Authority (BC)
Nova Scotia Health Authority (NS)
Provincial Health Services Authority (BC)
Regional Health Authority A (NB)
Regional Health Authority B (NB)
Saskatchewan Health Authority (SK)
Souris Health Auxiliary of Assinibione Regional Health Authority Inc. (MB)
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (BC)
Vancouver Island Health Authority (BC)
Weeneebayko Area Health Authority (ON)
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (MB)

However, there are also a number of other suspicious groups that need to be looked at. Although they may not have the power to mandate martial law, they do influence policies. Now, who would donate to such groups, unless it’s done for the purposes of writing the laws? Or to ensure that solutions involve pharmaceuticals?

Alberta Public Health Association
BCCDC Foundation For Population And Public Health
Canadian Foundation For Pharmacy
Canadian Pharmaceutical Sciences Foundation
Canadian Public Health Association
Ontario Public Health Association
Pharmacists Without Borders Canada
Public Health Association of British Columbia
Seenso Institute for Public Health
Shoppers Drug Mart Life Foundation

This is just some of the groups that are registered as charities. Why be structured this way? Probably since it means that private donations are subsidized by the public via tax refunds.

A serious question: given all of the “health organizations” (and this is just a partial list), accepting private donations, does this likely impact how Health Canada does business?

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

This was addressed in March 2021. Countries across the world are world are apparently open to the idea of a legally binding globally authority to manage alleged crises. Essentially, national sovereignty would be secondary to the International Health Regulations.

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

The Department of Health (1919) was founded under the guise of managing the Spanish flu through restrictive measures. It’s original creation isn’t at all what many believe. But over time, the organization came to encompass many more functions.

The reality is that countries don’t have sovereignty over their own affairs. Using the cloak of “infection control”, people have their rights and freedoms stripped away all the time. Many so-called Health Authorities are actually structured as charities and receive private donations.

What companies would donate to health authorities which are implementing mandatory vaccination policies? Wild idea, but perhaps businesses that would profit from these dicatates are contributing.

The Public Health Agency of Canada has essentially taken over that role since it came into existence in 2004. However, Health Canada does still advocate for much the same policies. The International Health Regulations (and prior Sanitation Regulations) are legally binding on Member States.

Now, the influence and money from the pharmaceutical industry cannot be ignored. The cash is rampant, and will be the subject of a Part II, coming later.

January 30, 2022

Reminder: Immigration Is Largely A Provincial Matter

The open borders into Canada is an issue that doesn’t get addressed nearly enough. A specific detail within that subject is who’s actually responsible for it. Yes, there are plenty of NGOs and special interest groups, but that’s a discussion for another time.

Trudeau (rightly) gets a lot of flack for promoting the replacement agenda. Harper and Mulroney, although more polished, were doing much the same thing. While they definitely deserve condemnation, this doesn’t tell the complete story.

What’s very rarely mentioned is the fact that Ottawa has Treaties with all 13 Provinces and Territories over immigration rates and categories. The terms differ somewhat. However, the basic principle is that they are agreements based on estimates of how many people they wish to import.

There are also efforts underway to enact Municipal Nominee Programs to let individual cities determine how many people come into the country.

As an analogy: consider a worker who grabs takeout food for 10 of his colleagues on a lunch break. While the cashier may have dealt only with him, the overall order was placed on behalf of everyone. The food that he brings back to the office will (largely) be what his co-workers asked for.

According to Section 95 of the Constitution, the Provinces have the authority to make their own laws with respect to immigration. By contrast, it says that Ottawa may “from time to time” make their own laws. This suggests that the true power over mass entry into Canada really lies with the Provinces.

Agriculture and Immigration
Marginal note: Concurrent Powers of Legislation respecting Agriculture, etc.
.
95 In each Province the Legislature may make Laws in relation to Agriculture in the Province, and to Immigration into the Province; and it is hereby declared that the Parliament of Canada may from Time to Time make Laws in relation to Agriculture in all or any of the Provinces, and to Immigration into all or any of the Provinces; and any Law of the Legislature of a Province relative to Agriculture or to Immigration shall have effect in and for the Province as long and as far only as it is not repugnant to any Act of the Parliament of Canada.

It’s not facetious to look at the Federal immigration policy as merely a compilation of the 13 Treaties that have been signed with the Provinces and Territories. They inform Ottawa what they want, and Ottawa puts together a policy. Yes, this Ministry is managed Federally, and legal challenges go to the Federal Court, but the policy details are hammered out with the lower levels of Government.

Even if the Federal Government (in theory) were to challenge a Provincial immigration rule, the broad scope of Section 92 (Provincial jurisdiction) would make it difficult. A Judge could very well throw out any challenge as being ultra vires, or outside Ottawa’s scope.

Much of the political class, and many of the pundits don’t seem to have any understanding about how this works. That includes writers who do this professionally.

The Provinces have their own Nominee Programs, and others, such as Agricultural or Regional. They hold tremendous influence in determining the number of people who enter Canada on visas.

Keep in mind, the additional strain on social services like schools and hospitals must also be taken into account when these Treaties are made and renewed. These services are, of course, run by the Provinces.

While it would be nice to blame the Trudeau Liberals (and successive “Conservative” administrations), it’s misplaced to dump it all on them. Who’s demanding to bring in more people lately? Well, it’s Ontario, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and New Brunswick. All of those Premiers claim to be conservatives. Yes, the Feds do compile the Annual Reports to Parliament, but the contents are drafted in collaboration with the Provinces and Territories.

Have you ever heard Jason Kenney, Scott Moe, or Doug Ford asking to put the brakes on immigration?

(1) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/mandate/policies-operational-instructions-agreements/agreements/federal-provincial-territorial.html
(2) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/transparency/consultations/2020-consultations-immigration-levels-and-municipal-nominee-program/discussion-guide.html
(3) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-3.html#h-24
(4) https://spencerfernando.com/2021/01/21/why-the-conservatives-should-make-decentralization-their-core-idea/
(5) https://canucklaw.ca/immigration-annual-reports-to-parliament/

January 20, 2022October 14, 2023

Following The Money: Why Are Churches REALLY Pushing The Vaxx Agenda?

Continuing this series, we look at another potential subversion agent.

We know that Trudeau finances his political opponents, which is partly why they only provide token opposition to the things he does. Hundreds of law firms got the wage subsidy among other grants, including some “freedom lawyers”, and Bar Associations. The topic of media subsidies has been extensively documented.

How deep does this rabbit hole go? Have religious organizations also been tempted by dark money to sacrifice their believers?

Just a thought: but with this level of funding at stake, is it any wonder why so many religious groups are now shilling for the vaccines? Have they (en masse) decided that money tops what should be their primary role in society? While the existence of these payments is not necessarily proof or corruption, the size and scale are impossible to ignore.

Let’s look at some of the pathways that are open. The sheer number of religious groups getting money is mind blowing. But at the same time, it may explain an awful lot.

Either get shut down by force, or take the cash to play along….

Of course, this is all very short sighted. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of history knows that Communists (like the ones in power) ultimately want to get religion and faith out of society. These useful idiots will go once they’ve served their purpose.

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

A.C.T.S (Apostles’ Church of Today Saints)
ABIDING WORD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
ABUNDANCE BAPTIST CHURCH
ABUNDANT LIFE BAPTIST CHURCH INC
Abundant Life Church Society
ABUNDANT LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH
Abundant Life Evangelical Missionary Church
ABUNDANT LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH INC.
ADVANCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH CALGARY
ADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH
African Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada
AGAPE CHURCH BURNABY
AGAPE GOSPEL CHURCH OF TORONTO
AGAPE INTERNATIONAL PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, CALGARY
AGINCOURT BAPTIST CHURCH
Aid to the church in need (CANADA) Inc./Aide à l’Église en détresse (CANADA) Inc.
AIR RONGE PENTECOSTAL CHURCH
Ajax Church of God
ALBERNI VALLEY UNITED CHURCH
ALBERTA SYNOD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADA
ALDERGROVE ALLIANCE CHURCH
ALDERVILLE UNITED CHURCH
ALDERWOOD UNITED CHURCH
ALEXIS PARK CHURCH
ALIVE CHURCH CANADA
ALL NATIONS CHURCH
ALL NATIONS FULL GOSPEL CHURCH
ANFGC
ALL PEOPLE’S CHURCH INC.
ALL PEOPLES CHURCH
ALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCH
ALL SAINTS CHURCH
ALL SAINTS CHURCH – COMMUNITY CENTRE
ALL SAINTS SHERBOURNE ST.
ALL SAINTS CHURCH KINGSWAY
ALL SAINTS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH
All Saints Lutheran Anglican Church
ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH
ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH, CALGARY, ALBERTA
ALL SAINTS OF NORTH AMERICA ORTHODOX CHURCH OF HAMILTON
ALL SERBIAN SAINTS SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
Alliance Chrétienne et missionnaire au Québec
ALLIANCE CHURCH
ALLIANCE COMMUNITY CHURCH
ALLISTON PENTECOSTAL CHURCH
ALTADORE BAPTIST CHURCH
ALTON BAPTIST CHURCH
ALTONA EVANGELICAL MENNONITE MISSION CHURCH
ALTONA UNITED CHURCH
AMAZING GRACE UNITED CHURCH
Amazing Grace Mission
AMBERLEA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
ANCHOR POINT CHURCH INC.
ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA PARISH OF ATHABASCA
ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA THE CHURCH OF ST JUDE
ANGLICAN NETWORK CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
ANNAPOLIS-GRANVILLE PASTORAL CHARGE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
ANTIOCH CHURCH
ANTIOCH CHURCH OF EDMONTON
ANTIOCHIAM MARONITE CATHOLIC CHURCH INCORPORATED
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE ANNUNCIATION
APOSTOLIC BIBLE CHURCH (UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH)
APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC ASSYRIAN CHURCH OF THE EAST
APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF PENTECOST OF CANADA INC
ASPEN RIDGE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
APPLEBY UNITED CHURCH
Archangel Raphael & St. Marina Coptic Orthodox Church
ARCHDIOCESE OF CAN ,ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA
ARDAL-GEYSIR EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
ARDEN PASTORAL CHARGE
ARDROSSAN UNITED CHURCH
ARISE CITY CHURCH
ARKELL UNITED CHURCH
ARMENIAN BROTHERHOOD BIBLE CHURCH OF TORONTO
Armenian Evangelical Church Of Montréal (The United Church Of Canada) / L’Église Arménienne Évangeline de montréal
ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH OFCAMBRIDGE
ARMENIAN HOLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH CANADIAN DIOCESE/DIOCESE CANADIEN DE LA SAINTE EGLISE APOSTOLIQUE ARMENIENNE
ARMOUR HEIGHTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
ASBURY AND WEST UNITED CHURCH
ASIAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH
Assemblea Cristiana Pentecostale Italiana
ASSOCIATED GOSPEL CHURCHES
ASSOCIATION OF FAITH CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES (CANADA)
ASSYRIAN GOSPEL CHURCH
ATHABASCA UNITED CHURCH
ATHENS FREE METHODIST CHURCH
Atlantic Community Church Inc.
ATLANTIC GARDEN CITY UNITED CHURCH
ATWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

This is just the first page on the CEWS site, or Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy. (See new link) While there are a number of irrelevant entries, there are still about 3,000 or so recipients that get flagged by searching under the term “CHURCH”. Of course, this wouldn’t include other religious affiliations who’d also be eligible.

Kudos to the National Post for covering it early on. It’s extremely rare to see something like this.

2. Grants From Federal Government

Also, a good number of these grants are pushing the “woke” racial nonsense. Great use of Canadian taxpayer dollars.

ORGANIZATION	DATE	AMOUNT
African Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada	Oct. 1, 2021	$50,347
Ailsa Craig United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$90,581
Apostolic Pentecostal Church in Pickering	Oct. 4, 2021	$70,423
Armenian Apostolic Church of British Columbia	Sep. 5, 2021	$6,622
Bayview Glen Church of the Christian and Missionary Alliance	Aug. 20, 2021	$25,106
Berean Church Of God International – Edmonton	Oct. 25, 2021	$99,814
Bethel Christian Reformed Church	Aug. 13, 2021	$65,181
Bethlehem United Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ (Winnipeg) Inc.	Oct. 1, 2021	$70,000
Bradford Baptist Church	Jul. 21, 2021	$100,000
Calgary Kidanemhret Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church	Oct. 11, 2021	$100,000
Celestial Church of Christ (Imisi Ibukun) Parish Inc.	Sep. 7, 2021	$85,000
Celestial Church Of Christ Toronto	Sep. 8, 2021	$95,000
Central United Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$55,690
Church of God Sabbath Keeping Ministries	Sep. 30, 2021	$100,000
Church of the Holy Spirit of Peace	Sep. 15, 2021	$30,833
Christ Healing Evangel Church – Faith Chapel	Oct. 4, 2021	$90,000
Cornerstone House of Refuge (OTTAWA) Apostolic Church	Sep. 24, 2021	$32,400
Consecon Pastoral Charge	Sep. 29, 2021	$87,633
Dominion Church International	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Emmanuel United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Empowerment Center Church (Edmonton)	Oct. 4, 2021	$65,000
Ephesus Seventh-Day Adventist Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$67,518
Ethiopian Evangelical Church – Ottawa	Oct. 14, 2021	$97,016
Ethiopian Othodox Tewahedo Debre Amin St Abune	Sep. 28, 2021	$100,000
Faith Lutheran Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
First Baptist Church	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
First Baptist Church Toronto	Sep. 29, 2021	$68,872
German Catholic Church St. Albertus Pfarrgemeinde	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
God’s Dwelling Place Pentecostal Church Inc.	Sep. 22, 2021	$47,671
Golden Lake United Church Camp	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Grace Apostolic Ministries Inc.	Oct. 11, 2021	$61,810
Greek Canadian Orthodox Church of Hamilton	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Hudson Pastoral Charge	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
Inspire Church	Sep. 20, 2021	$92,845
Jubilee Mennonite Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$32,827
Kenyan Global Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$35,050
Knox Presbyterian Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Knox United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$40,531
Malvern Methodist Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
MFNI Church Edmonton, AB	Sep. 24, 2021	$28,500
Michael Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church	Sep. 28, 2021	$100,000
New Life Seventh-Day Adventist Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
New Testament Church Of Christ, Redeemer Of Canada	Oct. 4, 2021	$72,243
Parish of Newboro-Westport, St. Paul’s Anglican Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$65,399
Porcupine United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Presbyterian Christian Fellowship in Canada	Oct. 1, 2021	$28,090
The Redeemed Christian Church – Cornerstone Chapel Moncton Inc.	Sep. 10, 2021	$50,001
Redeemed Christian Church, Peculiar People’s Parish	Oct. 1, 2021	$99,564
Redeemed Christian Church of God Dominion Sanctuary Inc	Aug. 30, 2021	$27,850
Redeemed Christian Church of God (King of Glory Chapel)	Sep. 1, 2021	$99,295
Redeemed Christian Church of God Regina Inc	Oct. 7, 2021	$82,675
Redeemed Christian Church of God – Solid Rock Markham Parish	Sep. 20, 2021	$98,961
Redeemed Christian Church of God Solution Sanctuary Inc.	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Redeemed Christian Church of God-Kings & Priests	Sep. 22, 2021	$54,517
Redeemed Christian Church of God-Victory House Calgary	Sep. 30, 2021	$64,600
Refuge City Pentecostal Church	Oct. 11, 2021	$98,838
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto	Sep. 3, 2021	$9,136
Samuel The Confessor Coptic Orthodox Church	Sep. 8, 2021	$100,000
Sechelt Parish of the Anglican Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$27,200
Shiloh Assembly (Apostolic) Corp.	Nov. 1, 2021	$100,000
Showers of Blessings Apostolic Church of Calgary	Oct. 15, 2021	$99,900
Simcoe Street United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$42,936
St. Aidan’s United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$32,827
St James Anglican Church Emily	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
St. John’s United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$34,992
St Mark’s United Church, Canterbury	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
St. Paul’s United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$44,003
St. Paul’s United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$53,661
St. Thomas Anglican Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Toronto Calvary Cross Church	Sep. 27, 2021	$100,000
Trinity United Church Manitoulin Pastoral Charge	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
The United Church of Canada	Aug. 1, 2021	$1,896,308
West Haven United Church Camp, Inc.	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Wilmar Heights Baptist Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Wilmar Heights Baptist Church	Nov. 1, 2021	$12,989

To be fair, there were a lot of these grants that came PRIOR to 2020. Still, when Ottawa is just handing over money, one has to wonder if there were any “understandings” that took place. It can’t all just be free, can it? This is just a sample of what these groups have been getting lately.

And this one is interesting: nearly $2 million to make temporary foreign workers aware of their rights, and to help out with legal clinics.

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

Some 15,000 institutions are considered to be charitable organizations, according to the Canada Revenue Agency. Any donations they receive are in fact subsidized by the public.

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

Registered charities such as churches are (for the most part), eligible for CERS, the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy. One more line of financing from Ottawa. Granted, a lot of them own their property outright, but a lot don’t. If 3000 such organizations are getting the CEWS, how many have gotten rent subsidies as well?

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

Christian Reformed churches in Canada (CRCNA Canada Corporation)

Canadian Lutheran World Relief

This can be a bit tedious, but looking through the Federal and Provincial Registries can unearth some specific details.

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

This topic has been covered before. Many places, like British Columbia, openly promote degenerate behaviour, drug use and abortion during this “pandemic”. At the same time, stable institutions like religion, and family events (like weddings and funerals) must be interfered with.

Restaurants may have been shut down in 2020, but B.C. did release a guide to “safely” go about doing sex work (prostitution).

It’s also worth pointing out that religious groups — at least those calling themselves Christians — are remarkably silent on what’s going on around them. Maybe the message is to not call out destructive activities if one’s donors happen to be funding them.

SOURCE MATERIAL
(1) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/cews/srch/pub/bscSrch
(2) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/habs/cews/srch/pub/dsplyBscSrch?request_locale=en
(3) https://nationalpost.com/news/wage-subsidy-program-to-help-fund-faith-as-congregations-face-covid-19-crunch
(4) https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/wage-rent-subsidies/covid-rent-property-support-businesses/rent-who-apply.html
(5) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/
(6) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/id/esdc-edsc,001-2021-2022-Q2-00690,current
(7) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/srch/pub/bscSrch
(8) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=257442&regId=918027
(9) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=368706&regId=910025
(10) https://lobbyist.oico.on.ca/Pages/Public/PublicSearch/

DEGENERACY
(I) https://twitter.com/jjhorgan/status/1294762295348715520
(II) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/COVID19_SexWorkersGuidance-1.pdf
(III) https://goodtimes.gov.bc.ca/
(IV) https://archive.fo/naVsZ
(V) http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/priority-populations/people-who-use-substances
(VI) http://archive.is/AVbNY
(VII) http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/prevention-risks/covid-19-and-sex
(VIII) https://archive.fo/H7Q1V

CONTROLLING THE LEVERS OF POWER
(A) https://canucklaw.ca/trudeau-using-taxpayer-money-to-subsidize-opposition-parties-liberals-too/
(B) https://canucklaw.ca/conservatives-pretend-to-be-outraged-over-vaccine-mandates-they-in-fact-support/
(C) https://canucklaw.ca/law-firms-bar-associations-receiving-canada-emergency-wage-subsidy-cews/
(D) https://canucklaw.ca/conflicting-out-its-not-just-cews-that-the-lawyers-are-receiving/
(E) https://canucklaw.ca/media-subsidies-and-govt-financing/

December 18, 2021

Ontario Divisional Court Rules Requirement For Teachers To Be Proficient In Math Is Unconstitutional

There is a group that’s asking for handouts in order to water down the standards required to teach in Ontario. Unfortunately, it seems that they’ve had success.

The Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council is an NGO that claims to advocate on behalf of (potential) teachers looking to get certified in Ontario. The group states that it was created largely in response to the new requirement that new teachers have a certain level of proficiency prior to getting to teach students. The online begging started quickly.

Is this really in the best interests of students? Is eliminating a pretty reasonable requirement in the name of “diversity and equity” the way to go about this? It’s pretty alarming that (apparently) large numbers of people can obtain and undergraduate degree, and a bachelor of education, and have a limited grasp of mathematics.

This also highlights a serious flaw with the legal system in Canada. NGOs can commence lawsuits claiming they have a “public interest standing”, and try to get the laws changed to suit their political ideologies. Providing the papers are worded properly, this is routinely down. Courts often grant such standing.

The Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council was founded in early October [2019] largely in response to the Math Proficiency test which was made a mandatory requirement for the qualification of new teachers. According to the OCT, “On August 20, 2019 two regulations were filed: Regulation 271/19, Proficiency in Mathematics, under the Ontario College of Teachers Act, and Regulation 272/19, Objects of the Office under the Education Quality and Accountability Office Act, 1996. As a result certification requirements were updated to ensure that Ontario teachers are prepared for the modern demands of a changing society and increasingly dynamic learning environment.”

We believe that this test is not equitable, fair, justified or backed by data. The EQAO office has been rushed into creating a massive test in just months. In the past, EQAO has taken 3 years to roll out new tests. There is no definitive evidence which suggests that new teachers will become more effective math instructors as a result of this test, nor that students will perform better in math as a result of this. The last government-implemented test for teachers cost taxpayers $22 million and the results were mostly abandoned. This new legislation is costing tens-of-millions of dollars for a test which decides the futures of thousands of Ontarians. This new legislation comes to teacher candidates who have spent tens of thousands of dollars on their education and carefully planned the steps they would need to take to reach their goals. These thousands of jobs deeply affect the economy and future of our great province. Read our Email Templates on the Newsletter page to see our questions and arguments regarding this test. Help us, the people, even if our government will not.

It’s interesting that this group claims there’s no evidence that such requirements help. From the looks of their members, most probably couldn’t pass an introductory statistics course.

In February 2020, there was a podcast for “Education Is A Right“. Apparently, the right to a QUALITY education isn’t that important. If this really was about the students, there would be efforts to attract, retain, and upgrade the best teachers available. Instead, this group takes the opposite approach.

This isn’t something that anyone should be proud of. The Ontario Divisional Court essentially says that pandering to the anti-white diversity crowd is more important than providing quality education. Quite simply, whites passing at too high a rate implies systemic racism.

Parents would be up in arms if they were made aware of this. That said, it seems doubtful that there has been any publicity within those circles. At least the College of Teachers had enough sense to reject this idiocy.

One would think that this group would want to do what they can to ensure people of all groups are able to pass basic proficiency testing in math. However, that’s not the way they go. Turning to the ruling:

Significant Disparities in Success Rates
[32] The EQAO collected demographic information about Field Test takers through the voluntary demographic questionnaire which revealed significant disparities in success rates based on test-takers’ race, language and disabilities.

[33] In particular, the Field Test demographic data showed that non-White candidates writing in French were only successful 55 percent of the time, whereas White candidates writing in French were successful 84 percent of the time. Candidates who identified as belonging to non-White ethno-racial groups (such as African, Indigenous, Latino and Middle Eastern) failed at a significantly higher rate than White candidates. Candidates who indicated they had a cognitive disability failed the Field Test at over twice the rate of candidates without a disability.

Apparently there are differences in the average cognitive abilities between groups. The solution is obviously to reduce (or eliminate) standards, to ensure there is no difference.

Also, let’s not mince words. This isn’t just an effort to dumb down the teaching profession. This is an attempt to reduce the number of whites, and replace them with non-whites.

What Is the Appropriate Remedy?
[161] A declaration will issue that the Mathematics Proficiency Test and the legislative provisions that create it infringe s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the infringement cannot be justified under s. 1. Specifically, the Proficiency in Mathematics regulation (O. Reg 271/19), as amended, and s. 18(1)(c) of the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c.12 are of no force or effect.

[162] A declaration will issue that the Ontario College of Teachers shall grant certification to teacher candidates who have not passed the Mathematics Proficiency Test (or shall grant full certification in the case of teacher candidates whose certification is conditional on passing the Mathematics Proficiency Test) but have otherwise met all other certification requirements.

Conclusion
[167] The application for judicial review is granted. The following relief is ordered:
(a) The Mathematics Proficiency Test violates s. 15(1) of the Charter, is not justified under s. 1, and is unconstitutional;
.
(b) O. Reg. 271/19, Proficiency in Mathematics, as amended, under the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c.12 is unconstitutional and of no force and effect;
.
(c) Paragraph s. 18(1)(c) of the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c.12 is unconstitutional and of no force or effect;
.
(d) The Ontario College of Teachers shall grant certification to teacher candidates who have not passed the Mathematics Proficiency Test (or shall grant full certification in the case of teacher candidates whose certification is conditional on passing the Mathematics Proficiency Test) but who have otherwise met all other certification requirements; and
.
(e) The Respondent shall pay the Applicants $90,000 in costs of the application.

Basically, the Ontario Divisional Court ruled that it was discriminatory in order to force all teachers to have a certain mathematical background.

And on top of it, a $90,000 costs award was also handed down. Now, will the donors get a refund for their contributions, or will the group owners just pocket it?

Bella Lewkowicz is a French teacher with Ottawa-Carleton District School Board. The group itself boasts some pretty impressive educational credentials. It’s baffling then why they would work like this to dumb down the teaching profession. Is it guilt? Self-hatred? Or is this some more destructive impulse?

(1) https://www.otcc.ca/
(2) https://www.otcc.ca/get-involved
(3) Home _ Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council
(4) https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/news/ontario-court-declares-that-the-ontario-math-proficiency-test-is-unconstitutional/
(5) https://twitter.com/OTCC19
(6) https://www.gofundme.com/f/otcc-legal-fund?utm_campaign=p_cp_url&utm_medium=os&utm_source=customer
(7) https://twitter.com/otffeo/status/1471940285210968070
(8) https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/2021-12-16-OTCC-v-Ontario-FINAL-signed-by-all.pdf
(9) Court Ruling Divisional Court 2021.12.16 OTCC v Ontario FINAL signed by all
(10) http://edisaright.ca/episode-31-student-teachers-challenge-new-math-test-in-ontario
(11) https://www.linkedin.com/in/bella-lewkowicz-5232951/

November 22, 2021November 23, 2021

Society Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists Funded By Pfizer, Recommends Vaccines & Boosters

Many would think that the Society Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists of Canada is an independent organization, and that it has the best interests of women and families at heart. That may not be the case, as shown by some of their recommendations.

It’s fitting that on their home page, they have a computer simulation of the coronavirus. Quite appropriate, since it’s never been isolated, or even shown to exist. Now, what does this group have to say about vaccinating pregnant women?

In Canada, NACI has preferentially advised that “a complete vaccine series with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine should be offered to individuals in the authorized age group who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Informed consent should include discussion about emerging evidence on the safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in these populations. (Strong NACI Recommendation). Contraindications to vaccination are few and a complete description is available within the National Advisory Committee on Immunization guidance document.

Given that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe COVID-related morbidity and mortality, they represent a population that should be prioritized for vaccination in situations where vaccine supply is limited. Specifically, the WHO has recommended that pregnant women be prioritized in stage II, representing a situation where the supply is only sufficient to immunize 11-20% of a population. Importantly, the WHO recommendation is upheld in all epidemiologic situations including community transmission, sporadic cases as well as no cases.

Individuals who are discovered to be pregnant during their vaccine series or shortly afterward should not be counselled to terminate pregnancy based on having received the vaccine. If conception is presumed to predate the first dose, it is recommended to follow the same procedures for active surveillance (as available) as would be activated if the pregnancy was known at the time of vaccination. A registry to track pregnancy outcomes for individuals receiving any vaccine doses during pregnancy is being planned for Canada. Pregnant individuals can get more information here: http://med-fom-ridprogram.sites.olt.ubc.ca/vaccine-surveillance/.

Pregnant women mount immune responses comparable to the non-pregnant population and vaccine efficacy of the COVID vaccines among cohorts of pregnant women are comparable to non-pregnant women. There is no data to suggest that pregnant women who meet criteria for a booster dose should be treated differently than the non-pregnant population. While timing and criteria for booster doses may vary by jurisdiction, pregnant women should receive a booster dose when recommended.

A registry to track the effects of vaccines on pregnant women is being planned? That’s certainly good to know. These recommendations to take experimental concoctions are pretty shocking, or at least they should be.

Now, why is this group so pro-vaccine, even when the long term effects are unknown? One strong possibility is that they are funded by Pfizer, Merck and Bayer. Shocker, that the major donors to this organization would profit considerably from more people getting the shot. It seems that SOGC is quite appreciative of their partners.

SOGC also provides a set of talking points for health care workers to give to uncertain patients. It’s no surprise that a group funded by drug companies recommends to these “professionals” that everything is safe and effective.

Back in April 2020, SOGC repeated from WHO that abortion is a human right, and that it must not be denied. Pretty screwy to be starting a global pandemic, and the first thought is to wipe out the next generation. The World Health Organization seems to have a sick fascination with what they consider to be human rights.

In principle, there is nothing wrong with continuing education, especially in professions like health care. After all, information does change. That being said, it’s disturbing when the CME — or continuing medical education — is funded by drug companies, at least in Ontario.

As Searchlight Pharma, which is a sponsor of the CME program, they are a company with holdings in many related products for women. Duchesnay also sells many of the same things. It’s fair to assume that this “continuing education” will be little more than a trade show, where doctors get told about what products to push.

As for MD Financial Management, that arose after the CMA’s — Canadian Medical Association’s — push to get doctors saving and investing. It’s no surprise that the pharma industry is a good one to invest in.

To anyone thinking that you are getting (at least somewhat) independent and impartial advice, keep this in mind. The pharmaceutical industry has vested interests in making sure you’re talking to experts with an agenda.

Finally, it’s worth a mention that this group is getting the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, run by the Canada Revenue Agency. This means that taxpayers are forced to help subsidize a group that’s pushing vaccines on pregnant women. Of course, this is in addition to the funding it gets from drug companies.

Certainly makes one proud to pay taxes, knowing that these are the places that they end up going to. In essence, we are topping up a drug marketing company that wants to kill our children. Anyone who still has faith in politicians or government at this point is completely delusional.

(1) https://www.sogc.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Latest%20News/SOGC_Statement_COVID-19_Vaccination_in_Pregnancy.pdf
(2) SOGC_Statement_COVID-19_Vaccination_in_Pregnancy
(3) https://www.sogc.org/en/-COVID-19/COVID-19/COVID-19-Champions/en/content/COVID-19/covid-champions.aspx?hkey=1d24c3f0-be85-48f3-bc0a-a006c53b98a2
(4) https://archive.md/lGQpy
(5) Society Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists COVID-19 Champions
(6) https://www.sogc.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Covid%20Information/EN_HCP-FAQ_SOGC_FINAL.pdf
(7) SOGC Talking Points For Health Care Workers
(8) https://www.sogc.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Induced%20Abortion%20-%20Pandemic%20Guidance%20.pdf
(9) Induced Abortion – Pandemic Guidance WHO
(10) https://www.who.int/health-topics/abortion
(11) https://sogc.org/cme-on
(12) SOGCA Continuing Medical Education Funded By Pharma
(13) http://searchlightpharma.com/portfolio/
(14) Portfolio – Searchlight Pharma
(15) https://www.duchesnay.com/en/
(16) https://mdm.ca/md-difference/your-md-advisor
(17) https://mdm.ca/md-difference/about-md
(18) https://twitter.com/SOGCorg/status/1461438570393219074
(19) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/cews/srch/pub/bscSrch

AND FOR SOME EXTRA READING:
(A) Canadian Pharmaceutical Sciences Foundation Funded By Big Pharma
(B) Canadian Pharmacists Association: Subsidies While They Lobby Against You
(C) CDN Immunization Research Network Funded By Pfizer, GSK, Sanofi
(D) B.C. Pharmacy Association Funded By Drug Companies
(E) U.S. Council On Patient Safety: Women’s Health
(F) Emergent BioSolutions Lobbying All Federal Parties
(G) British Fertility Society Funded By Pharmaceutical Companies
(H) American College Health Foundation Is Funded By Big Pharma-and-insurance/
(I) Myocarditis Foundation Gets Donations From Big Pharma

November 19, 2021November 19, 2021

Some Of The Larger “Anti-Racism” Grants The Feds Pump Out At Taxpayer Expense

Racism divides communities, breeds fear and fuels animosity. Addressing racism and discrimination is a longstanding commitment of Canadians who see our country’s diversity as a source of strength. Canada is strong, not in spite of our differences, but because of them. Unfortunately, Canada is not immune to racism and discrimination — challenges remain when it comes to fully embracing diversity, openness and cooperation.

It is vital that Canada stands up to discrimination perpetrated against any individual or group of people on the basis of their religion and/or ethnicity and this is why the Government of Canada has committed to engage the public on a new federal anti-racism strategy. We are exploring racism as it relates to employment and income supports, social participation (for example, access to arts, sport and leisure) and justice.

Building a Foundation for Change: Canada’s Anti-Racism Strategy 2019–2022 is a $45 million investment that will take immediate steps in combatting racism and discrimination based on what was heard during the engagement process and supported by research. The Strategy will complement existing government efforts and programs aimed at eliminating inequities by focusing on three guiding principles: Demonstrating Federal Leadership, Empowering Communities, and Building Awareness & Changing Attitudes.

The premise of this would be laughable, if it weren’t meant to be taken seriously. Canada is strong, not in spite of our difference, but because of them? How is having nothing in common with your neighbours a source of strength? What exactly binds communities together if not their commonalities?

If diversity really is our strength, then why does this continuous racism exist? Doesn’t everyone celebrate that being divided makes us united?

More than just words, the Federal Government (or rather, taxpayers), have been spending huge sums of money for this delusion for years. Below is just a sample of the money spend on this.

Note: some of the grants predate that program, but are worth sharing anyway. If nothing else, this stupidity needs to be exposed.

ORGANIZATION	DATE	AMOUNT
519 Church Street Community Centre	Nov. 9, 2020	$300,000
Aboriginal Legal Services Inc.	Apr. 1, 2020	$290,000
Aboriginal Peoples Alliance Of Northern Ontario	Sep. 1, 2021	$512,600
ACCT Foundation	Apr. 15, 2020	$309,000
Action Dignity Society	Sep. 1, 2021	$245,675
Action For Healthy Communities Society Of Alberta	Sep. 1, 2021	$233,430
Actions Interculturelles De Developpement Et D’Education	Sep. 1, 2020	$200,000
Algoma University	Sep. 1, 2021	$262,500
Association Of Ontario Midwives	Sep. 1, 2021	$224,936
Bilal Community And Family Centre	Apr. 1, 2020	$212,000
Black Legal Action Centre	Feb. 1, 2020	$336,577
Black Students’ Mental Health Project	Sep. 1, 2021	$226,798
Bureau De La Communaute Haitienne De Montreal	Sep. 1, 2021	$400,000
Canadian Anti-Hate Network	Jun. 1, 2020	$268,400
Canadian Council Of Muslim Women	Oct. 1, 2020	$316,700
Canadian Freestyle Ski Association	Apr. 1, 2021	$1,010,295
Canadian Sport Institute Ontario	Apr. 1, 2021	$1,247,877
Canadian Sport Institute Pacific Society	Apr. 1, 2021	$1,721,743
Catholic Centre For Immigrants (Ottawa)	Apr. 1, 2020	$380,578
CEE Centre For Young Black Professionals	May 1, 2020	$279,500
Centre D’Amitie Autochtone De Val D’Or Inc.	Oct. 1, 2021	$416,400
Centre Des Femmes Afghanes	Sep. 1, 2021	$203,702
Centre for Race and Culture	Apr. 1, 2010	$497,663
Centre Multiculturel de Ressources de LaSalle	Oct. 18, 2021	$425,000
Children’s Peace Theatre	Sep. 1, 2021	$250,000
Chinese Canadian National Council	Sep. 1, 2021	$240,000
Coaching Association Of Canada	Apr. 1, 2021	$308,000
Coalition Of Muslim Women of KW	Jul. 1, 2020	$285,000
Council For The Advancement Of African Canadians In Alberta	Sep. 1, 2021	$221,500
Corporation Wapikoni Mobile	Sep. 1, 2021	$587,313
Culturelink Settlement And Community Services	Oct. 1, 2021	$227,636
Durhamn Regional Unemployed Help	Sep. 1, 2021	$225,801
Edmonton Centre For Race And Culture	Sep. 1, 2021	$222,020
Equipe R.D.P.	Sep. 1, 2021	$340,000
Equitas – Centre International d’Education Aux Driots Humains	Sep. 1, 2020	$490,000
Family Services of Peel	Feb. 15, 2021	$324,200
Federation Des Chambres De Commerce Du Quebec	Sep. 1, 2020	$200,000
Federation of Black Canadians	Sep. 1, 2020	$263,300
Femmes Michif Otipemisiwak	Oct. 1, 2021	$659,201
First Light St. John’s Friendship Centre Inc.	Jun. 1, 2021	$362,900
First Light St. John’s Friendship Centre Inc.	Sep. 1, 2021	$253,940
Georgian bay Native Friendship Centre Inc.	Sep. 21, 2021	$416,000
Grand Council Treaty #3	Sep. 1, 2021	$346,700
Institut National Du Sport Du Quebec	Apr. 1, 2021	$1,522,301
Institut De Recherce Et D’Eucation Sur Les Relations Racials	Aug. 3, 2020	$225,000
Integration Jeunesse Du Quebec	Sep. 1, 2020	$281,742
Jane/Finch Community And Family Centre	Aug. 1, 2021	$216,879
Jewish Family Services of Ottawa	Aug. 10, 2009	$632,273
Jewish Family Services of Ottawa	Dec. 23, 2009	$693,415
Jewish Family Services of Ottawa-Carleton	May 13, 2010	$1,263,495
John Howard Society of Ontario	Oct. 1, 2021	$433,225
Justice For Girls Outreach Program	Aug. 4, 2020	$206,970
Legal Aid Ontario	Sep. 1, 2020	$285,000
Lift Community Services Of Qathet	Sep. 1, 2020	$222,000
Maison D’Haiti	Sep. 1, 2021	$279,810
Makeway Charitable Society	Sep. 1, 2021	$228,833
Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak Inc.	Aug. 1, 2021	$500,000
Matawa First Nations Management	Sep. 7, 2021	$355,208
Metro Toronto Chinese & East Asian Legal Clinic	Apr. 1, 2020	$301,904
Metro Toronto Chinese & East Asian Legal Clinic	Sep. 1, 2021	$286,910
Midaynta Community Services	Oct. 1, 2021	$275,000
MOSAIC – Multilingual Orientation Service Association For Immigrant Communities	Sep. 1, 2021	$213,250
Muslim Association Of Canada	Sep. 1, 2021	$349,210
National Anti-Racism Council of Canada	Mar. 28, 2008	$211,205
National Anti-Racism Council of Canada	Aug. 28, 2008	$430,213
Nigerian Canadians For Cultural, Educational And Economic Progress	Oct. 1, 2021	$219,420
Nishnawbe-Aski Legal Services Corp.	Apr. 1, 2020	$376,788
Northern Alberta Alliance on Race Relations	Sep. 1, 2009	$497,161
Northern Nishnwabe Education Council	Sep. 1, 2021	$250,000
North Shore Multicultural Society	Aug. 1, 2021	$247,653
Northwestern Ontario Women’s Centre	May 3, 2019	$250,000
Nova Scotia Department Of Justice	Oct. 1, 2020	$200,000
Nunatsiavut Government	Sep. 1, 2021	$352,660
Ontario Federation Of Indigenous Friendship Centres	Apr. 1, 2020	$284,050
Parry Sound Friendship Centre	Sep. 1, 2021	$225,000
Q’Wemtsin Health Society	Jul. 1, 2021	$333,865
Reach Edmonton Council	Oct. 1, 2020	$255,000
Regent Park Community Health Centre	Sep. 1, 2021	$275,823
Regional Connections Inc.	Sep. 1, 2021	$254,704
Return The Love Community Support	Sep. 1, 2021	$200,000
Riel Institute For Education And Learning	Aug. 30, 2021	$236,095
Riverdale Immigrant Women’s Centre	Sep. 8, 2021	$288,387
Ryerson University	Sep. 1, 2020	$250,000
Sentencing And Parole Project	Nov. 1, 2021	$300,000
Service D’Orientation Et D’Integration Des Immigrants Au Travail De Quebec	Sep. 1, 2020	$280,000
Social Planning Council Of Winnipeg	Apr. 1, 2020	$266,100
Sommet Socio-Economique Pour Le Developpement Des Jeunes Des Communautres Noires	Mar. 1, 2020	$251,090
Table De Concertation Des Organismes Au Service Des Personnes Refugiees Et Immigrantes Inc.	Sep. 1, 2021	$375,000
Taibu Community Health Centre	Apr. 1, 2020	$460,238
Town Of Strathmore	Apr. 1, 2020	$260,000
Tsuut’ina Nation Police Service	May 1, 2020	$215,000
Umoja Community Mosaic	Sep. 1, 2021	$288,800
United Jewish Appeal Of Greater Toronto	Sep. 1, 2021	$340,000
Urban Alliance On Race Relations	Jul. 21, 2021	$235,800
Urban Rez Solutions Social Enterprise	Aug. 1, 2019	$430,000
Vieux Theatre De St.-Fabien (LE)	Apr. 1, 2021	$1,900,140
Women’s Health In Women’s Hands	Sep. 1, 2020	$340,000
YMCA Of Windsor-Essex County	Jan. 29, 2008	$203,002
ZMQ Global	Sep. 1, 2021	$287,840

It must be stated that the connection between many of these grants and “fighting racism” is far from clear. For a lot of these, it looks like just a way to funnel money in a manner that couldn’t otherwise be done. Do we really have to pay for people to go skiing, just to prove we’re not racists? The actual search results in 600 hits, so it’s not practical to cover them all. These are just the bigger ones listed.

An interesting observation: considering all that white privilege that exists in the West, it seems that whites are about the only group that hasn’t qualified for it’s own specific funding.

15(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Of course, equality under Section 15 of the Charter doesn’t seem to mean much. The second part of it specifically allows discrimination as long as it’s done to help “disadvantaged groups”. Thank you very much, Pierre Trudeau.

Ever wonder why some problems continue to get worse? Trudeau Jr. has substantially increased the funding of his predecessor, Stephen Harper.

(1) https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/campaigns/anti-racism-engagement.html
(2) https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/funding/anti-racism-action-program/application-guidelines.html
(3) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/?sort=agreement_value_fs%20desc&page=2&search_text=anti-racism
(4) https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/pch/documents/services/download-order-charter-bill/canadian-charter-rights-freedoms-eng.pdf

Category: Dysgenics

Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

Like this:

Reminder: Immigration Is Largely A Provincial Matter

Like this:

Following The Money: Why Are Churches REALLY Pushing The Vaxx Agenda?

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

2. Grants From Federal Government

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

Like this:

Ontario Divisional Court Rules Requirement For Teachers To Be Proficient In Math Is Unconstitutional

Like this:

Society Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists Funded By Pfizer, Recommends Vaccines & Boosters

Like this:

Some Of The Larger “Anti-Racism” Grants The Feds Pump Out At Taxpayer Expense

Like this:

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

2. Grants From Federal Government

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: