NGO/CS Archives - Page 10 of 44

February 3, 2022

Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures

Health Canada has had several names since its inception in 1919. Despite how innocuous its name and mandate sounds, this organization had an initial purpose: population control. It’s been previously covered how PHAC was an artificial creation from the World Health Organization to serve a global order.

Few people know this, but the Department of Health was formed with the same goal in mind.

In January 2004, the WHO put out an edict that all Member States were to create an “outpost” for public health. Consequently, the Government of Paul Martin created PHAC, the Public Health Agency of Canada, out of nothing in that year. In late 2004 and into 2005, hearings went on for Bill C-12, the Quarantine Act. This was really just domestic implementation of the 3rd Edition of the International Health Regulations. The Provinces have their own laws which are based on this. The PHAC Act was introduced in 2006 by Stephen Harper shortly after taking power.

(a) International Health Regulations are legally binding on Member States.
(b) 2005 Quarantine Act was, in reality, written by WHO
(c) Public Health Agency Of Canada is a branch of WHO, and not Canadian

Again, this should be a review for most readers, but it’s still worth bringing up. The bigger picture is quite scary when it’s all laid out.

PHAC’s purpose is to use the pretense of public health as a means to control the local populations. Thing is: Health Canada (in its previous iterations) was formed for the same purpose.

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

1837: William White publishes book — Evils Of Quarantine Laws
1851: First International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1859: Second International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1866: Third International Sanitary Conference, Constantinople
1874: Fourth International Sanitary Conference, Vienna
1881: Fifth International Sanitary Conference, Washington
1885: Sixth International Sanitary Conference, Rome
1892: Seventh International Sanitary Conference, Venice
1983: Eighth International Sanitary Conference, Dresden
1894: Ninth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1897: Tenth International Sanitary Conference, Venice
1903: Eleventh International Sanitary Conference : Paris, 1903
1906: Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906 Publication
1907: Founding of the Office international d’Hygiene publique
1911-1912: Twelfth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1912: Canadian Public Health Association Incorporated
1919: Bill 37, Canada forms the Department of Health
1926: Thirteenth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1928: Bill 205, Canada’s DOH becomes Department of Pensions and National Health
1938: Fourteenth International Sanitary Conference, Paris
1944: Bill C-149, Canada’s DPNH becomes Department of National Health and Welfare
1946: Canada joins World Health Organization, agrees to Constitution
1951: International Sanitation Regulations take effect from WHO
1959: “Privileges And Immunities” granted to all WHO Officials
1969: International Health Regulations (1st Ed.) replace Sanitation Regulations
1984: Bill C-3, Health Canada Act passed
1993: Department of National Health and Welfare becomes Health Canada
1995: 2nd Edition of WHO International Health Regulations
2001: DARK WINTER pandemic simulation plays out
2004: WHO issues edict all Members to have “public health outpost”
2004: PHAC, Public Health Agency of Canada, created by Order In Council
2004: Bill C-12, hearings on Quarantine Act in Parliament
2005: 3rd Edition of WHO International Health Regulations
2005: ATLANTIC STORM pandemic simulation plays out
2006: PHAC Act introduced by Harper Government
2010: Rockefeller paper released, includes infamous LOCKSTEP SCENARIO
2010: Theresa Tam stars in movie about fictional outbreak
2017: SPARS Pandemic Scenario plays out
2018: CLADE X pandemic simulation plays out
2019: EVENT 201 pandemic simulation plays out

A book by William White titled “The Evils of Quarantine Laws” is still available today. In fact, it can be purchased on Amazon. In that book, White pushed his case that contagions did not actually exist, and that these quarantine laws were pushed for other purposes.

The pdf version is nearly 200 pages, but it’s well worth a read. It goes into considerable depth about how a pseudo-science is pushed on the public under the guises of protection.

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

Going back to 1851, there were over a dozen International Sanitary Conferences held in the West. Canada (then a British Colony) would have been subjected to whatever measures the U.K. wanted. The measures sounded innocuous enough, and claimed the purpose of trying to prevent international spread of disease. The archive is also available.

The stated reasons including establishing global standards of health in order to prevent the transmission and spreading of cholera, among other diseases. Sounds pretty familiar with what’s going on now, doesn’t it?

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

Even back in 1906, Canada had a Quarantine Act on the books. Although heavily promoted as a way to manage international trade and immigration, those same principles can be used to restrict people domestically.

What’s going on today globally isn’t anything new, at least conceptually. Instead, it’s the scale of which that is novel.

The Medical Officer of Health isn’t a new concept either. Ages ago, there were still “experts” who had almost dictatorial powers to implement laws and regulations. After all, if Kings didn’t know what was going on, they would have to trust the thinking to other people.

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

The Welcome Collection in the U.K. published the document for the creation of an International Office of Public Health. As a Colony at the time, Canada would presumably have been subjected to the same laws and regulations.

That said, the information is still available on the Canadian Government’s site. Over a century ago, our “leaders” signed us up to be regulated and controlled by public health experts.

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

Ongoing programs:
.
Providing an effective liaison and network both nationally and internationally in collaboration with various disciplines, agencies and organizations; Encouraging and facilitating measures for disease prevention, health promotion and protection and healthy public policy; Initiating, encouraging and participating in research directed at the fields of disease prevention, health promotion and healthy public policy; Providing an effective liaison and partnership with CPHA’s Provincial and Territorial Public Health Associations; Acting in partnership with a range of disciplines including health, environment, agriculture, transportation, other health-oriented groups and individuals in developing and expressing a public health viewpoint on personal and community health issues; Designing, developing and implementing public health policies, programs and activities; Facilitating the development of public health goals for Canada; Identifying public health issues and advocating for policy change; Identifying literacy as a major factor in achieving equitable access to health services.

The Canadian Public Health Association was created in 1910, and incorporated in 1912. It became a charity in 1975. In its most recent C.R.A. filings, approximately 60% of the CPHA’s financing came from the Government.

Although the page has since been altered, the main financial support of the CPHA comes from drug companies like Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. That shouldn’t be the least bit surprising to anyone at this point.

CPHA is involved in advocating for national and international health policies, including the restriction of people’s movements. It presumably is quite influential regarding Health Canada. At the time of writing this, there are several Provincial counterparts, all advocating for much the same thing. More on that in later pieces.

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

[Section 4a]
Cooperation with the provincial, territorial and other health authorities with a view towards to coordination of the efforts proposed or being made for preserving and improving public health

Section 4f referred to enforcement of rules made by the International Joint Committee.

Bill 37 came into effect in 1919, after the First World War. Supposedly, the driving force behind this was the Spanish influenza, and the need to protect global public health.

Interestingly, it references the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1906, Volume 2. Even back then, there were Quarantine Acts on the books in order to restrict the movement of people. Of course, these were “supposed” to only apply to sick people.

Worth noting is that the League of Nations, the predecessor to the United Nations, also placed a heavy focus on public health. Many associate it with attempts to prevent wars between countries. In reality, there was a lot more to it.

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

In 1928, there was a change in name to the Department of Pensions and National Health. This came with the introduction of Bill 205. However, the purposes regarding public health remained much the same.

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

There was another change of name in 1994, courtesy of Bill 149. This time it became the Department of National Health and Welfare. Keep in mind, this was in the latter stages of the Second World War, and the beginnings of the new world order forming. The groundwork for the United Nations and World Health Organization had already been laid out.

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

After the defeat of the Axis powers, the World was supposed to embrace freedom and human rights, but then this happened.

Article 21
The Health Assembly shall have authority to adopt regulations concerning:
(a) sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent the international spread of disease;
(b) nomenclatures with respect to diseases, causes of death and public health practices;
(c) standards with respect to diagnostic procedures for international use;
(d) standards with respect to the safety, purity and potency of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce;
(e) advertising and labelling of biological, pharmaceutical and similar products moving in international commerce.

Article 22
Regulations adopted pursuant to Article 21 shall come into force for all Members after due notice has been given of their adoption by the Health Assembly except for such Members as may notify the Director-General of rejection or reservations within the period stated in the notice.

In 1946, Canada signed a Treaty endorsing the Constitution of the World Health Organization, and agreeing to be bound by it.

Article 21(a) of the WHO’s Constitution explicitly gives it authority over Member States over issues such as quarantine, or medical martial law. WHO also (largely) gets to decide what diagnostic standards and equipment are considered suitable.

Since Canada never opted out, Article 22 means that we must live with this.

In 1951, the International Sanitation Regulations came into effect, which was really the first agreement which gave the World Health Organization power to dictate Member actions under the guise of “public health”. But at least people would be held responsible if something happened, right?

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

WHA12.41 Convention on the Privileges and immunities of the Specialized Agencies: Specification of Categories of Officials under Section 18 of Article VI of the Convention
The Twelfth World Health Assembly,
.
Considering Section 18 of Article VI of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies which requires that each specialized agency will specify the categories of officials to which the provisions of that Article and Article VIII shall apply; and Considering the practice hitherto followed by the World Health Organization under which, in implementing the terms of Section 18 of the Convention, due account has been taken of the provisions of resolution 76 (I) of the General Assembly of the United Nations,
.
1. CONFIRMS this practice; and
2. APPROVES the granting of the privileges and immunities referred to in Articles VI and VIII of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies to all officials of the World Health Organization, with the exception of those who are recruited locally and are assigned to hourly rates.
Eleventh plenary meeting, 28 May 1959 (section 3 of the fourth report of the Committee)

https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/88834
ihr.convention.on.immunities.privileges

Even back in 1959, the World Health Organization saw that its members should enjoy full legal immunity for itself, and its agents. Of course, member states seemed happy to go along with it. Looking through the records though, it seems unclear if Canada has specifically signed on.

The International Sanitation Regulations were replaced by the International Health Regulations (first edition) in 1969. Canada signed on and it became binding in 1971. The second version of WHO-IHR came out in 1995, and the third was released in 2005.

The information from this point on has been extensively covered on this site.

Most people are aware that the scope of Health Canada has grown considerably in recent decades. It has encompassed more and more things, resulting in less of a focus on public health measures. PHAC would soon pick up the slack.

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

Think the problem of drug money is limited to Health Canada, or the Public Health Agency of Canada? It’s not, and we will get more into the finances later. The list of “charities” includes groups that have the power to impose medical tyranny.

Alberta Health Services (AB)
Central Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Fraser Health Authority (BC)
Hay River Health & Social Services Authority (NT)
Interlake-Eastern Regional Health Authority (MB)
Interior Health Authority (BC)
Labrador-Grenfell Regional Integrated Health Authority (NL)
Nisga’a Valley Health Authority (BC)
Northern Regional Health Authority (MB)
Northern Regional Health Authority (BC)
Nova Scotia Health Authority (NS)
Provincial Health Services Authority (BC)
Regional Health Authority A (NB)
Regional Health Authority B (NB)
Saskatchewan Health Authority (SK)
Souris Health Auxiliary of Assinibione Regional Health Authority Inc. (MB)
Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (BC)
Vancouver Island Health Authority (BC)
Weeneebayko Area Health Authority (ON)
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (MB)

However, there are also a number of other suspicious groups that need to be looked at. Although they may not have the power to mandate martial law, they do influence policies. Now, who would donate to such groups, unless it’s done for the purposes of writing the laws? Or to ensure that solutions involve pharmaceuticals?

Alberta Public Health Association
BCCDC Foundation For Population And Public Health
Canadian Foundation For Pharmacy
Canadian Pharmaceutical Sciences Foundation
Canadian Public Health Association
Ontario Public Health Association
Pharmacists Without Borders Canada
Public Health Association of British Columbia
Seenso Institute for Public Health
Shoppers Drug Mart Life Foundation

This is just some of the groups that are registered as charities. Why be structured this way? Probably since it means that private donations are subsidized by the public via tax refunds.

A serious question: given all of the “health organizations” (and this is just a partial list), accepting private donations, does this likely impact how Health Canada does business?

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

This was addressed in March 2021. Countries across the world are world are apparently open to the idea of a legally binding globally authority to manage alleged crises. Essentially, national sovereignty would be secondary to the International Health Regulations.

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

The Department of Health (1919) was founded under the guise of managing the Spanish flu through restrictive measures. It’s original creation isn’t at all what many believe. But over time, the organization came to encompass many more functions.

The reality is that countries don’t have sovereignty over their own affairs. Using the cloak of “infection control”, people have their rights and freedoms stripped away all the time. Many so-called Health Authorities are actually structured as charities and receive private donations.

What companies would donate to health authorities which are implementing mandatory vaccination policies? Wild idea, but perhaps businesses that would profit from these dicatates are contributing.

The Public Health Agency of Canada has essentially taken over that role since it came into existence in 2004. However, Health Canada does still advocate for much the same policies. The International Health Regulations (and prior Sanitation Regulations) are legally binding on Member States.

Now, the influence and money from the pharmaceutical industry cannot be ignored. The cash is rampant, and will be the subject of a Part II, coming later.

January 30, 2022

Reminder: Immigration Is Largely A Provincial Matter

The open borders into Canada is an issue that doesn’t get addressed nearly enough. A specific detail within that subject is who’s actually responsible for it. Yes, there are plenty of NGOs and special interest groups, but that’s a discussion for another time.

Trudeau (rightly) gets a lot of flack for promoting the replacement agenda. Harper and Mulroney, although more polished, were doing much the same thing. While they definitely deserve condemnation, this doesn’t tell the complete story.

What’s very rarely mentioned is the fact that Ottawa has Treaties with all 13 Provinces and Territories over immigration rates and categories. The terms differ somewhat. However, the basic principle is that they are agreements based on estimates of how many people they wish to import.

There are also efforts underway to enact Municipal Nominee Programs to let individual cities determine how many people come into the country.

As an analogy: consider a worker who grabs takeout food for 10 of his colleagues on a lunch break. While the cashier may have dealt only with him, the overall order was placed on behalf of everyone. The food that he brings back to the office will (largely) be what his co-workers asked for.

According to Section 95 of the Constitution, the Provinces have the authority to make their own laws with respect to immigration. By contrast, it says that Ottawa may “from time to time” make their own laws. This suggests that the true power over mass entry into Canada really lies with the Provinces.

Agriculture and Immigration
Marginal note: Concurrent Powers of Legislation respecting Agriculture, etc.
.
95 In each Province the Legislature may make Laws in relation to Agriculture in the Province, and to Immigration into the Province; and it is hereby declared that the Parliament of Canada may from Time to Time make Laws in relation to Agriculture in all or any of the Provinces, and to Immigration into all or any of the Provinces; and any Law of the Legislature of a Province relative to Agriculture or to Immigration shall have effect in and for the Province as long and as far only as it is not repugnant to any Act of the Parliament of Canada.

It’s not facetious to look at the Federal immigration policy as merely a compilation of the 13 Treaties that have been signed with the Provinces and Territories. They inform Ottawa what they want, and Ottawa puts together a policy. Yes, this Ministry is managed Federally, and legal challenges go to the Federal Court, but the policy details are hammered out with the lower levels of Government.

Even if the Federal Government (in theory) were to challenge a Provincial immigration rule, the broad scope of Section 92 (Provincial jurisdiction) would make it difficult. A Judge could very well throw out any challenge as being ultra vires, or outside Ottawa’s scope.

Much of the political class, and many of the pundits don’t seem to have any understanding about how this works. That includes writers who do this professionally.

The Provinces have their own Nominee Programs, and others, such as Agricultural or Regional. They hold tremendous influence in determining the number of people who enter Canada on visas.

Keep in mind, the additional strain on social services like schools and hospitals must also be taken into account when these Treaties are made and renewed. These services are, of course, run by the Provinces.

While it would be nice to blame the Trudeau Liberals (and successive “Conservative” administrations), it’s misplaced to dump it all on them. Who’s demanding to bring in more people lately? Well, it’s Ontario, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and New Brunswick. All of those Premiers claim to be conservatives. Yes, the Feds do compile the Annual Reports to Parliament, but the contents are drafted in collaboration with the Provinces and Territories.

Have you ever heard Jason Kenney, Scott Moe, or Doug Ford asking to put the brakes on immigration?

(1) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/mandate/policies-operational-instructions-agreements/agreements/federal-provincial-territorial.html
(2) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/transparency/consultations/2020-consultations-immigration-levels-and-municipal-nominee-program/discussion-guide.html
(3) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-3.html#h-24
(4) https://spencerfernando.com/2021/01/21/why-the-conservatives-should-make-decentralization-their-core-idea/
(5) https://canucklaw.ca/immigration-annual-reports-to-parliament/

January 29, 2022

Digital ID & Authentication Council Of Canada (DIACC), Pan-Canadian Trust Framework

Remember voting for either of the Digital ID & Authentication Council Of Canada (DIACC), or the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework? Recall any public discussion or debate on these issues? If not, you probably aren’t alone.

This campaign is a private-public partnership, and done without any real consultation. Interestingly, it started in 2016, which is when GAVI, Microsoft and Rockefeller launched ID2020.

Now, what is it that DIACC is looking to do? Here’s why they are in consultations with the Canadian Government.

According to their “strategic goals” section, the plan is to:

Create, publish, and evolve the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework and identify the legislative needs to support the vision.
Accelerate interoperability by securing adoption of the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework by businesses and governments.
Design, develop, launch a certification program aligned with market needs.
Raise profile of Canada’s digital identity innovation via the DIACC as Canada’s digital identity forum.
Create Canadian expertise and intellectual property for excellence in digital identity.

It isn’t really explained how any of this would actually be accomplished, nor does it seem very reassuring that the data couldn’t be hacked, sold, or traded. Other than data-mining or research, it’s hard to see what economic benefits are expected.

And while there are vague references to economic benefits, there’s little mention of what Canadians think. That could be because there weren’t consultation.

Legislative Proposal, Bill or Resolution
–Budget 2022 as it relates to the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework and digital identification
-The government’s Digital Charter Implementation Act as it relates to prioritizing digital identification and public sector data

Policies or Programs
-Collaborate with policy makers to develop policies and programs that support the pan-canadian digital ID and authentication framework and the incorporation of digital ID and authentication considerations into government -programs and initiatives.
-Raising awareness on the need to implement a digital identity system that empowers Canadians to control their data that is held by the federal government.

The part about “raising awareness on the need to implement a digital identity system” comes across as a call to engage in propaganda efforts, to ensure Canadians don’t understand what’s really happening.

GOVERNMENT BRANCH	DATE	AMOUNT
Canada Post Corporation (CPC)	2021-08-31	$50,000
Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)	2020-08-31	$2,750
City of Toronto	2021-08-31	$10,000
Gouvernement du Quebec	2021-08-31	$50,000
Government Chief Information Officer, Province of BC	2021-08-31	$50,000
Land and Title Authority of British Columbia	2021-08-31	$10,000
Ministry of Government Services, Province of Ontario	2021-08-31	$50,000
Service New Brunswick, Province of New Brunswick	2021-08-31	$50,000
Treasury Board Of Canada Secretariat (TBS)	2020-08-31	$50,000
Treasury Board Of Canada Secretariat (TBS)	2021-08-31	$50,000

The Federal Lobbying Registry sheds some light on the grants that DIACC has been getting in the last few years. DIACC isn’t also listed on the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy page, but perhaps the rental subsidy is the $2,750 they received from the CRA.

The lobbyist pushing this, at least in Ottawa, is Jacqueline LaRocque. She has been involved in the Government from 1994 to 2004, which aligns with the years of Jean Chretien and Paul Martin. Her Linkedin profile is even more interesting, as she reveals having been a lobbyist for GlaxoSmithKine — the drug manufacturer — for 4 years after leaving government.

Keep in mind, in 1993 to 2006, Canada was run by the Liberals. They are once again. Many of the same partisan operatives from those days are still around now. Granted, there’s little difference between the parties, but that’s a discussion for another time.

What makes this even more settling is that there are a few Directors of DIACC who are currently involved in Government affairs. This includes the Canadian, Ontario, New Brunswick and B.C. Governments.

What we have here is sitting members of various Governments running a group to implement digital identification across Canada, partnered with private interests who stand to benefit from this. Again, no one ever voted for any of this, and it’s unlikely there were ever any widespread consultations.

Many directors at DIACC also have past and present connections to financial institutions. We have to ask what is the real motivation driving this digital ID push?

Perhaps the most interesting member is Neil Butters. He has worked on these kind of systems in the United States, and helped develop a smart card system for border crossings for Israel. Now, given the rampant surveillance undertaken in the U.S. and Israel, do Canadians have to worry about these digital systems being backdoored? Given the power that this kind of information has, can it really been dismissed out of hand?

Canadian Finance Minister Flaherty appointed the Task Force for the Payments System Review in 2010, made up of representatives from the public and private sectors, privacy commissioners offices, and consumer advocates. One of the key outcomes was recognition that digital ID and authentication are integral to the success of digital payments and to Canada’s digital economy.

The DIACC was created in 2012 to continue the activities of the Electronic Payments Task Force and achieve their vision for a robust, secure, scalable, and privacy-enhancing structure for transacting online.

As a self-governing and not-for-profit council, the DIACC brings together public and private sector members to collaborate and advance Canada’s digital identification and authentication ecosystem. This is accomplished by delivering a digital trust framework that will unlock digital economy opportunities for every Canadian.

DIACC establishes Expert Committees (ECs) to move high-impact projects forward. Chaired by members of the council, the committees run strategic projects and create valuable resources.

In its “principles” section, it explains that the Task Force for the Payments System Review was created in 2010 by then Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty. So this was actually started with the Conservatives were in power, and the Liberals seem to have carried on as normal. DIACC was launched in 2012 as a continuation.

Worth noting: while Jim Flaherty helped push digital identity (Federally) a decade ago, his wife, Christine Elliott, is now the Health Minister of Ontario. That Province is expected to fully adopt digital identity.

In their lobbying section, DIACC referenced the old Bill C-11, which died when the last election was called. For some extra information, Bill C-11 had concerns about facial recognition technology being used, and the safety of medical data. This isn’t addressed, at least not on their site.

For people concerned about their information, and who has access, the lack of specific detail is concerning. How will this be used, and what safeguards will be put in place? What remedies are available when the inevitable data breaches occur?

January 20, 2022October 14, 2023

Following The Money: Why Are Churches REALLY Pushing The Vaxx Agenda?

Continuing this series, we look at another potential subversion agent.

We know that Trudeau finances his political opponents, which is partly why they only provide token opposition to the things he does. Hundreds of law firms got the wage subsidy among other grants, including some “freedom lawyers”, and Bar Associations. The topic of media subsidies has been extensively documented.

How deep does this rabbit hole go? Have religious organizations also been tempted by dark money to sacrifice their believers?

Just a thought: but with this level of funding at stake, is it any wonder why so many religious groups are now shilling for the vaccines? Have they (en masse) decided that money tops what should be their primary role in society? While the existence of these payments is not necessarily proof or corruption, the size and scale are impossible to ignore.

Let’s look at some of the pathways that are open. The sheer number of religious groups getting money is mind blowing. But at the same time, it may explain an awful lot.

Either get shut down by force, or take the cash to play along….

Of course, this is all very short sighted. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of history knows that Communists (like the ones in power) ultimately want to get religion and faith out of society. These useful idiots will go once they’ve served their purpose.

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

A.C.T.S (Apostles’ Church of Today Saints)
ABIDING WORD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
ABUNDANCE BAPTIST CHURCH
ABUNDANT LIFE BAPTIST CHURCH INC
Abundant Life Church Society
ABUNDANT LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH
Abundant Life Evangelical Missionary Church
ABUNDANT LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH INC.
ADVANCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH CALGARY
ADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH
African Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada
AGAPE CHURCH BURNABY
AGAPE GOSPEL CHURCH OF TORONTO
AGAPE INTERNATIONAL PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, CALGARY
AGINCOURT BAPTIST CHURCH
Aid to the church in need (CANADA) Inc./Aide à l’Église en détresse (CANADA) Inc.
AIR RONGE PENTECOSTAL CHURCH
Ajax Church of God
ALBERNI VALLEY UNITED CHURCH
ALBERTA SYNOD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN CANADA
ALDERGROVE ALLIANCE CHURCH
ALDERVILLE UNITED CHURCH
ALDERWOOD UNITED CHURCH
ALEXIS PARK CHURCH
ALIVE CHURCH CANADA
ALL NATIONS CHURCH
ALL NATIONS FULL GOSPEL CHURCH
ANFGC
ALL PEOPLE’S CHURCH INC.
ALL PEOPLES CHURCH
ALL SAINTS ANGLICAN CHURCH
ALL SAINTS CHURCH
ALL SAINTS CHURCH – COMMUNITY CENTRE
ALL SAINTS SHERBOURNE ST.
ALL SAINTS CHURCH KINGSWAY
ALL SAINTS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH
All Saints Lutheran Anglican Church
ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH
ALL SAINTS LUTHERAN CHURCH, CALGARY, ALBERTA
ALL SAINTS OF NORTH AMERICA ORTHODOX CHURCH OF HAMILTON
ALL SERBIAN SAINTS SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
Alliance Chrétienne et missionnaire au Québec
ALLIANCE CHURCH
ALLIANCE COMMUNITY CHURCH
ALLISTON PENTECOSTAL CHURCH
ALTADORE BAPTIST CHURCH
ALTON BAPTIST CHURCH
ALTONA EVANGELICAL MENNONITE MISSION CHURCH
ALTONA UNITED CHURCH
AMAZING GRACE UNITED CHURCH
Amazing Grace Mission
AMBERLEA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
ANCHOR POINT CHURCH INC.
ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA PARISH OF ATHABASCA
ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA THE CHURCH OF ST JUDE
ANGLICAN NETWORK CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
ANNAPOLIS-GRANVILLE PASTORAL CHARGE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
ANTIOCH CHURCH
ANTIOCH CHURCH OF EDMONTON
ANTIOCHIAM MARONITE CATHOLIC CHURCH INCORPORATED
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE ANNUNCIATION
APOSTOLIC BIBLE CHURCH (UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH)
APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC ASSYRIAN CHURCH OF THE EAST
APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF PENTECOST OF CANADA INC
ASPEN RIDGE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
APPLEBY UNITED CHURCH
Archangel Raphael & St. Marina Coptic Orthodox Church
ARCHDIOCESE OF CAN ,ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA
ARDAL-GEYSIR EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
ARDEN PASTORAL CHARGE
ARDROSSAN UNITED CHURCH
ARISE CITY CHURCH
ARKELL UNITED CHURCH
ARMENIAN BROTHERHOOD BIBLE CHURCH OF TORONTO
Armenian Evangelical Church Of Montréal (The United Church Of Canada) / L’Église Arménienne Évangeline de montréal
ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH OFCAMBRIDGE
ARMENIAN HOLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH CANADIAN DIOCESE/DIOCESE CANADIEN DE LA SAINTE EGLISE APOSTOLIQUE ARMENIENNE
ARMOUR HEIGHTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
ASBURY AND WEST UNITED CHURCH
ASIAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH
Assemblea Cristiana Pentecostale Italiana
ASSOCIATED GOSPEL CHURCHES
ASSOCIATION OF FAITH CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES (CANADA)
ASSYRIAN GOSPEL CHURCH
ATHABASCA UNITED CHURCH
ATHENS FREE METHODIST CHURCH
Atlantic Community Church Inc.
ATLANTIC GARDEN CITY UNITED CHURCH
ATWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

This is just the first page on the CEWS site, or Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy. (See new link) While there are a number of irrelevant entries, there are still about 3,000 or so recipients that get flagged by searching under the term “CHURCH”. Of course, this wouldn’t include other religious affiliations who’d also be eligible.

Kudos to the National Post for covering it early on. It’s extremely rare to see something like this.

2. Grants From Federal Government

Also, a good number of these grants are pushing the “woke” racial nonsense. Great use of Canadian taxpayer dollars.

ORGANIZATION	DATE	AMOUNT
African Methodist Episcopal Church of Canada	Oct. 1, 2021	$50,347
Ailsa Craig United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$90,581
Apostolic Pentecostal Church in Pickering	Oct. 4, 2021	$70,423
Armenian Apostolic Church of British Columbia	Sep. 5, 2021	$6,622
Bayview Glen Church of the Christian and Missionary Alliance	Aug. 20, 2021	$25,106
Berean Church Of God International – Edmonton	Oct. 25, 2021	$99,814
Bethel Christian Reformed Church	Aug. 13, 2021	$65,181
Bethlehem United Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ (Winnipeg) Inc.	Oct. 1, 2021	$70,000
Bradford Baptist Church	Jul. 21, 2021	$100,000
Calgary Kidanemhret Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church	Oct. 11, 2021	$100,000
Celestial Church of Christ (Imisi Ibukun) Parish Inc.	Sep. 7, 2021	$85,000
Celestial Church Of Christ Toronto	Sep. 8, 2021	$95,000
Central United Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$55,690
Church of God Sabbath Keeping Ministries	Sep. 30, 2021	$100,000
Church of the Holy Spirit of Peace	Sep. 15, 2021	$30,833
Christ Healing Evangel Church – Faith Chapel	Oct. 4, 2021	$90,000
Cornerstone House of Refuge (OTTAWA) Apostolic Church	Sep. 24, 2021	$32,400
Consecon Pastoral Charge	Sep. 29, 2021	$87,633
Dominion Church International	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Emmanuel United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Empowerment Center Church (Edmonton)	Oct. 4, 2021	$65,000
Ephesus Seventh-Day Adventist Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$67,518
Ethiopian Evangelical Church – Ottawa	Oct. 14, 2021	$97,016
Ethiopian Othodox Tewahedo Debre Amin St Abune	Sep. 28, 2021	$100,000
Faith Lutheran Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
First Baptist Church	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
First Baptist Church Toronto	Sep. 29, 2021	$68,872
German Catholic Church St. Albertus Pfarrgemeinde	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
God’s Dwelling Place Pentecostal Church Inc.	Sep. 22, 2021	$47,671
Golden Lake United Church Camp	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Grace Apostolic Ministries Inc.	Oct. 11, 2021	$61,810
Greek Canadian Orthodox Church of Hamilton	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Hudson Pastoral Charge	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
Inspire Church	Sep. 20, 2021	$92,845
Jubilee Mennonite Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$32,827
Kenyan Global Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$35,050
Knox Presbyterian Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Knox United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$40,531
Malvern Methodist Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
MFNI Church Edmonton, AB	Sep. 24, 2021	$28,500
Michael Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church	Sep. 28, 2021	$100,000
New Life Seventh-Day Adventist Church	Sep. 29, 2021	$100,000
New Testament Church Of Christ, Redeemer Of Canada	Oct. 4, 2021	$72,243
Parish of Newboro-Westport, St. Paul’s Anglican Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$65,399
Porcupine United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Presbyterian Christian Fellowship in Canada	Oct. 1, 2021	$28,090
The Redeemed Christian Church – Cornerstone Chapel Moncton Inc.	Sep. 10, 2021	$50,001
Redeemed Christian Church, Peculiar People’s Parish	Oct. 1, 2021	$99,564
Redeemed Christian Church of God Dominion Sanctuary Inc	Aug. 30, 2021	$27,850
Redeemed Christian Church of God (King of Glory Chapel)	Sep. 1, 2021	$99,295
Redeemed Christian Church of God Regina Inc	Oct. 7, 2021	$82,675
Redeemed Christian Church of God – Solid Rock Markham Parish	Sep. 20, 2021	$98,961
Redeemed Christian Church of God Solution Sanctuary Inc.	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Redeemed Christian Church of God-Kings & Priests	Sep. 22, 2021	$54,517
Redeemed Christian Church of God-Victory House Calgary	Sep. 30, 2021	$64,600
Refuge City Pentecostal Church	Oct. 11, 2021	$98,838
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto	Sep. 3, 2021	$9,136
Samuel The Confessor Coptic Orthodox Church	Sep. 8, 2021	$100,000
Sechelt Parish of the Anglican Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$27,200
Shiloh Assembly (Apostolic) Corp.	Nov. 1, 2021	$100,000
Showers of Blessings Apostolic Church of Calgary	Oct. 15, 2021	$99,900
Simcoe Street United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$42,936
St. Aidan’s United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$32,827
St James Anglican Church Emily	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
St. John’s United Church	Sep. 15, 2021	$34,992
St Mark’s United Church, Canterbury	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
St. Paul’s United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$44,003
St. Paul’s United Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$53,661
St. Thomas Anglican Church	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Toronto Calvary Cross Church	Sep. 27, 2021	$100,000
Trinity United Church Manitoulin Pastoral Charge	Oct. 6, 2021	$100,000
The United Church of Canada	Aug. 1, 2021	$1,896,308
West Haven United Church Camp, Inc.	Sep. 22, 2021	$100,000
Wilmar Heights Baptist Church	Oct. 4, 2021	$100,000
Wilmar Heights Baptist Church	Nov. 1, 2021	$12,989

To be fair, there were a lot of these grants that came PRIOR to 2020. Still, when Ottawa is just handing over money, one has to wonder if there were any “understandings” that took place. It can’t all just be free, can it? This is just a sample of what these groups have been getting lately.

And this one is interesting: nearly $2 million to make temporary foreign workers aware of their rights, and to help out with legal clinics.

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

Some 15,000 institutions are considered to be charitable organizations, according to the Canada Revenue Agency. Any donations they receive are in fact subsidized by the public.

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

Registered charities such as churches are (for the most part), eligible for CERS, the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy. One more line of financing from Ottawa. Granted, a lot of them own their property outright, but a lot don’t. If 3000 such organizations are getting the CEWS, how many have gotten rent subsidies as well?

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

Christian Reformed churches in Canada (CRCNA Canada Corporation)

Canadian Lutheran World Relief

This can be a bit tedious, but looking through the Federal and Provincial Registries can unearth some specific details.

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

This topic has been covered before. Many places, like British Columbia, openly promote degenerate behaviour, drug use and abortion during this “pandemic”. At the same time, stable institutions like religion, and family events (like weddings and funerals) must be interfered with.

Restaurants may have been shut down in 2020, but B.C. did release a guide to “safely” go about doing sex work (prostitution).

It’s also worth pointing out that religious groups — at least those calling themselves Christians — are remarkably silent on what’s going on around them. Maybe the message is to not call out destructive activities if one’s donors happen to be funding them.

SOURCE MATERIAL
(1) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/cews/srch/pub/bscSrch
(2) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/habs/cews/srch/pub/dsplyBscSrch?request_locale=en
(3) https://nationalpost.com/news/wage-subsidy-program-to-help-fund-faith-as-congregations-face-covid-19-crunch
(4) https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/wage-rent-subsidies/covid-rent-property-support-businesses/rent-who-apply.html
(5) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/
(6) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/id/esdc-edsc,001-2021-2022-Q2-00690,current
(7) https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/srch/pub/bscSrch
(8) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=257442&regId=918027
(9) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=368706&regId=910025
(10) https://lobbyist.oico.on.ca/Pages/Public/PublicSearch/

DEGENERACY
(I) https://twitter.com/jjhorgan/status/1294762295348715520
(II) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/COVID19_SexWorkersGuidance-1.pdf
(III) https://goodtimes.gov.bc.ca/
(IV) https://archive.fo/naVsZ
(V) http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/priority-populations/people-who-use-substances
(VI) http://archive.is/AVbNY
(VII) http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/prevention-risks/covid-19-and-sex
(VIII) https://archive.fo/H7Q1V

CONTROLLING THE LEVERS OF POWER
(A) https://canucklaw.ca/trudeau-using-taxpayer-money-to-subsidize-opposition-parties-liberals-too/
(B) https://canucklaw.ca/conservatives-pretend-to-be-outraged-over-vaccine-mandates-they-in-fact-support/
(C) https://canucklaw.ca/law-firms-bar-associations-receiving-canada-emergency-wage-subsidy-cews/
(D) https://canucklaw.ca/conflicting-out-its-not-just-cews-that-the-lawyers-are-receiving/
(E) https://canucklaw.ca/media-subsidies-and-govt-financing/

December 30, 2021December 31, 2021

Compilation Video Of “Pandemic” Psychological Warfare Against Society (Extended Also Available)

A video of nearly 90 minutes has been put together for your viewing. Yes, it’s a bit glitchy in a few places, but this is the first attempt something this size. Nothing here should be all that surprising. A page will be going up soon with all of the supporting links for more information.

Given YouTube’s rather “questionable” (or non-existent) commitment to free speech, here it is posted on Odysee. Everyone who sees it is encouraged to save and/or mirror it. The censorship gods strike hard and fast.

The extended version is also posted, which contains material that was missing from the previous video. Here it is on Odysee.

Considering how easy most of this was to find, the only explanation for it not being reported in the mainstream press is that they have been bought off. This applies to “conservative” media and to the vast majority of self-described independents.

Thank you to a number of people who have helped out over the last year, and in particular, Fred and Andy. Christine and Shelly also deserve a shoutout for their work.

Happy New Year, everyone!

Take care of yourselves, and your families.

(1) https://odysee.com/@CanuckLaw:8/CV-Is-A-Real-Danger:f
(2) https://odysee.com/@CanuckLaw:8/CV-Hoax-Compilation-02:d
(3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/MmFDnULRHs1L/
(4) https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
(5) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRBSHsj0RvI-IYO0qUmMbvA
(6) https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B095Y515XK
(7) https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B09BCNP48J

December 21, 2021

Ottawa’s Bipartisan Love Of Giving Aga Khan Money

It’s all just an act.

Remember the times in recent years when Members of Parliament pretended to be outraged about Trudeau being so close to Aga Khan? Maybe they were just upset about not getting invited themselves.

One would think that there’d be more of a stink about the sheer amount of money the public was handing over without any sort of democratic mandate or referendum. This isn’t to defend Trudeau in any way, but this trip isn’t exactly the the worst of it.

Strange that the so-called “conservative” media would never write about what was really going on. Guess they need to prop up their side.

Note: there were 2 different search engines used to compile this article, which gave overlapping, albeit different results. One was from Open Search, and the other from the Federal Lobbying Registry. Both will be included to show all figures.

DATE	BODY ISSUING	AMOUNT
Oct. 29, 2014	Global Affairs Canada	$12,000,000
Mar. 18, 2015	Global Affairs Canada	$293,892
Mar. 30, 2015	Global Affairs Canada	$1,500,000
Apr. 21, 2015	Global Affairs Canada	$10,625,000
Nov. 30, 2015	Global Affairs Canada	$71,914
Dec. 22, 2015	International Development Assistance Program	$55,000,000
Feb. 22, 2016	Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada	$125,985
Mar. 31, 2016	Global Affairs Canada	$10,533,873
Mar. 31, 2016	International Development Assistance Program	$24,964,678
Mar. 31, 2016	Global Affairs Canada	$1,250,000
Mar. 31, 2016	Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada	$312,838
Oct. 27, 2016	Canadian Heritage	$12,837
Jan. 11, 2017	Global Affairs Canada	$7,000,000
Jan. 12, 2017	Global Affairs Canada	$12,000,000
Oct. 1, 2018	Global Affairs Canada	$19,380,037
Apr. 1, 2019	Canadian Heritage	$60,052
Jun. 29, 2019	Canadian Heritage	$8,790
Dec. 6, 2019	Global Affairs Canada	$59,792
Feb. 21, 2020	Global Affairs Canada	$47,000,000
Apr. 1, 2020	Canadian Heritage	$40,000
Jun. 30, 2020	Canadian Heritage	$6,590
Nov. 18, 2020	Global Affairs Canada	$2,000,000
Nov. 20, 2020	Global Affairs Canada	$27,785
Mar. 29, 2021	Employment and Social Development Canada	$100,000
Apr. 1, 2021	Canada Arts Presentation Fund	$25,000

Next, we come to the Federal Lobbying Registry. It outlines amounts handed out annually, and where they came from, but doesn’t specify the specific assignment of project involved.

YEAR	BODY ISSUING	AMOUNT
2010	Canadian International Development Agency	$19,838,431
2011	Canadian International Development Agency	$16,912,457
2011	Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada	$180,949
2012	Canadian International Development Agency	$21,997,201
2012	Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada	$1,575,197
2013	Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada	$410,481
2013	International Development Research Centre	$169,000
2014	Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada	$50,513,370
2014	International Development Research Centre	$594,190
2015	Global Affairs Canada	$46,796,700
2015	International Development Research Centre	$578,585
2016	Global Affairs Canada	$48,966,065
2016	International Development Research Centre	$396,299
2017	Global Affairs Canada	$36,737,220
2017	International Development Research Centre	$1,425,000
2018	Global Affairs Canada	$31,354,539
2018	International Development Research Centre	$560,972
2020	Global Affairs Canada	$22,735,954
2020	International Development Research Centre	$363,718

The Lobbying Registry, likely through a gap in registration records, doesn’t list anything for 2019. And information for 2021 isn’t yet available. However, it does still show $200 million since 2010. And it doesn’t stop there.

According to the Canada Revenue Agency, the grants go back to 2003, although it doesn’t specify how much. What has this group gotten in total? It’s over $200 million, but unclear how much more. Strange, it’s not like Canadians could have used that or anything.

Wild idea: but maybe politicians in Ottawa feign outrage over a $200,000 trip so that the public won’t notice that they’ve handed out some $200 million to a foreign NGO. Just putting it out there.

(1) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/
(2) https://search.open.canada.ca/en/gc/?sort=score%20desc&page=1&search_text=aga%20khan#
(3) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/advSrch
(4) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/advSrch?V_SEARCH.command=refineCategory&V_TOKEN=1234567890&V_SEARCH.scopeCategory=solr.facetName.documentType%3D
(5) https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/other-organizations-that-issue-donation-receipts-qualified-donees/other-qualified-donees-listings/list-foreign-charities-that-have-received-a-gift-majesty-right-canada.html
(6) https://twitter.com/erinotoole/status/1470506345455628290
(7) https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/justin-trudeau-vacation-to-aga-khans-island-broke-ethics-rules-1790408

FOR SOME EXTRA READING
(A) https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2020/04/23/the-united-nations-aga-khans-throne-part-i-money-laundering/
(B) https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2019/04/12/the-aga-khans-stranglehold-on-alberta/
(C) https://www.civilianintelligencenetwork.ca/2020/05/22/the-united-nations-aga-khans-throne-part-2-pluralism-and-banking/

Category: NGO/CS

Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

Like this:

Reminder: Immigration Is Largely A Provincial Matter

Like this:

Digital ID & Authentication Council Of Canada (DIACC), Pan-Canadian Trust Framework

Like this:

Following The Money: Why Are Churches REALLY Pushing The Vaxx Agenda?

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

2. Grants From Federal Government

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

Like this:

Compilation Video Of “Pandemic” Psychological Warfare Against Society (Extended Also Available)

Like this:

Ottawa’s Bipartisan Love Of Giving Aga Khan Money

Like this:

1. Timeline Of Major Events In Public Health

2. International Sanitary Conferences: 1851 to 1938

3. Revised Statutes Of Canada In 1906

4. Founding of the Office International d’Hygiene Publique In 1907

5. Canadian Public Health Association Created In 1910

6. Department Of Health Created In 1919, Bill 37

7. Department of Pensions and National Health, 1928, Bill 205

8. Department of National Health and Welfare Created In 1944, Bill 149

9. WHO Membership Means Submitting To THEIR Constitution

10. World Health Organization Gives Itself/Officials Immunity

11. Public Health Groups Are Registered “Charities” In Canada

12. Binding Global “Pandemic Management” Treaty Proposed

13. Final Thoughts On This Subject

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

1. Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) Recipients

2. Grants From Federal Government

3. Churches Getting Favourable Tax Rates From Revenue Canada

4. Charities Eligible For Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy From C.R.A.

5. Lobbying Registries Have More Information Available

6. Look At What’s Still Promoted In Society

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: