An Apology/Retraction To Constitutional Rights Centre, Mr. Galati

A few articles have been retracted that concerned Rocco Galati and the Constitutional Rights Centre, as they are inappropriate and demeaning. About the specifics that need to be corrected:

Apologies for suggesting that lawyers are scum. In reality, the profession is entirely noble and honourable, and comments to the contrary are based on ignorance and/or malice.

Apologies for any potential inference that could be drawn between a lawyer and their clientele. Lawyers who represent terrorists should not be labelled “terrorist lawyers”. Likewise, lawyers who take mafia cases should not be called “mob lawyers”, and lawyers who take criminal cases should not be called “criminal lawyers”, etc….

Apologies for using the term “agitator” to describe a person’s record. Surely, the cases they take on do not necessarily reflect any privately held beliefs and opinions. Work is work, and personal is personal.

Apologies for any suggestion that fighting for terrorists to keep their citizenship, or challenging judicial appointments somehow amounted to subversion or lawfare. There are people who believe these to be legitimate causes.

Apologies for suggesting that serious criminal charges, convictions and/or security risks should be grounds for stripping someone of their citizenship. Despite this being practice in many countries, it’s wrong, xenophobic, and racist to treat people like that. A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian.

Apologies for making any distinction between naturalized and born citizens, or implying that people simply aren’t Canadians. This was uncalled for. As the Charter and Citizenship Act view them as the same, so there is no debate on the issue.

Apologies for suggesting that citizenship was anything beyond obtaining the required paperwork, and that place of birth should be an issue at all. After all, having the status means loyalty to the adopted country.

Apologies for criticizing the current refugee pathways as abusive, and in particular, people fleeing from the United States. Surely, this is shortsighted with regards to the big picture, and everyone, no matter the situation, deserves a fair hearing.

Apologies for suggesting borders should exist at all. After all, if a person’s lineage in Canada doesn’t trace back thousands of years, they are in no position to keep anyone else out today. Such a stance is racist.

Apologies for suggesting certain ideologies are incompatible with the West. After all, diversity is our strength, and no sensible person would disagree.

Apologies for wondering and questioning why urgent cases sit dormant for months, even as vaccines arrive and are being administered. Certainly, there are valid explanations for these delays, and ulterior motives must never be assumed.

Apologies for watching a video and thinking it meant forms being sold, instead of a pleadings package. More due diligence should have been done in advance. And yes, if people wish to purchase the products, that is absolutely their right to do so.

Apologies for suggesting the Federal Government may have influenced or rigged the Bank of Canada case. The rulings they handed down may seem suspicious to the casual observer.

The articles in question have now been removed. Nothing here should be interpreted as to detract from the reputation of Galati and the Constitutional Rights Centre, in the opinions of fair minded people. They are committed to upholding the freedoms we hold dear (including, but not limited to), free speech, free association, viewpoint diversity. More than ever, controversial views must be protected from tyrants who would silence dissent and/or shut down media outlets.

9 Replies to “An Apology/Retraction To Constitutional Rights Centre, Mr. Galati”

  1. Hahah. Why redact this ? He’s a fraud. I’ll call him out all day long and take his threats to challenge me.

    1. Honestly curious about what makes you say so, care to elaborate? just a little bit? please?

  2. So, Rocco Galati, a fighter for justice and freedom, is the enemy? I would definitely be interested in knowing why.

  3. “suggesting that serious criminal charges, convictions and/or security risks should be grounds for stripping someone of their citizenship” – That is a steep downhill slope of teflon covered ice.

    Who gets to decide “security risks”?
    “Serious criminal charges”. Charges? No innocent until PROVEN guilty?
    Once convicted you determine how long to incarcerate but what country will take another country’s criminal citizens? Strip them of Canadian citizenship and then what? Send them where exactly? If they aren’t citizens of Canada why would you leave them here? I mean Clifford Olson is still a citizen.

  4. “Apologies for wondering and questioning why urgent cases sit dormant for months, even as vaccines arrive and are being administered. Certainly, there are valid explanations for these delays, and ulterior motives must never be assumed.”

    It seems that you have been proven right:
    “Nothing Burger Lawsuits”:

    I’d like to tack onto that:

    This legal proceeding is signed by Rocco Galati.

    It’s Rocco Galati’s factum, it’s 20 pages and signatures, and it seems to be properly done. This is what “he” apparently is capable of producing when he’s working in cahoots with government branches, in this case the Attorney General of Quebec.

    The reasonable question arises, given Galati’s horrific mess of law suits all over Canada for the Freedom Movement, whether the AG Quebec actually wrote it for Galati (who is really a government stooge) and Galati signed it.

    This is what makes me wonder if it’s possible that Galati badly wrote all those cases for the Freedom Movement precisely to have them thrown out (to protect the government). Or maybe he’s a hack who makes himself available to the government for its dirty work, and they write proper documents for him at that time.

    This is Galati in the Nadon scam at SCC:

    But we can’t see whether Galati’s factum was any good in the Nadon file at the SCC, because it’s not posted, you’d have to request it:

    My position is that Galati colluded with Stephen Harper by instituting the “Justice Nadon” file, precisely so Harper could get an “opinion” from the SCC helpful to the break-up of Canada, i.e., by giving the SCC the chance to make the ludicrous assertion that the Supreme Court Act had “evolved” from a mere statute of the Parliament, revisable & repealable at will under s. 101, to become instead an actual part of the Constitution subject to the amending formulae. This is the file where I see Galati as a real stooge for the federal government. Moreover, Galati was a long-time friend and lawyer to Paul Hellyer, a member of the Privy Council of Canada, who set up the commie-front Canadian Action Party in BC, apparently to derail genuine opposition to the North American Union by protesting it, and even calling for a public “vote” on it; whereas annexing Canada to the USA is unconstitutional and illegal, it should be brought to court and stopped.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Canuck Law

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading