This is going to be quite different from the usual article. This is simply an ideological standing: Nationalism v.s. Conservatism and Libertarianism.
- This is an opinion. Don’t be triggered.
- Feedback or rebuttal always welcome.
- Most of the following is backed up in other articles.
REJECTION OF CONSERVATISM
As is now a common rebuttal point, so called “Conservatives” don’t actually conserve anything. This is true throughout the Western world. Most “Conservative” parties are really just corporatists, trying to serve a business class.
- Culture isn’t conserved. Multiculturalism is forced upon us.
- Language isn’t conserved, and learning it becomes less of a priority
- Heritage isn’t conserved. Our history can be rewritten.
- Founding of nation isn’t conserved. Everyone is replaceable.
- Respect for life isn’t conserved.
- Any meaning of family isn’t conserved
- Any religion which helped found society isn’t conserved.
- With the above points, the “majority” culture, language or heritage dwindles, however, “minority” ones are encouraged to thrive.
- The environment isn’t conserved (the lefties are right on this one).
- Education standards aren’t conserved. School is big business.
- Pensions and social benefits aren’t conserved.
- Health Care isn’t conserved.
- National borders aren’t conserved.
- National sovereignty isn’t conserved.
- Military strength isn’t conserved, nor veterans cared for.
- Actual free markets aren’t conserved. Cronyism is rampant.
- “Small Government” ideals aren’t conserved.
- Employment prospects aren’t conserved, if they can be outsourced.
- True free speech isn’t conserved
And while “Conservatives” like to crow about how responsible they are with the public purse, successive governments have heaped debts onto the populations. But they don’t like that detail pointed out.
Consider too: so called neo-cons who have little to no hesitation about starting foreign wars abroad either for resources or power.
Most topics on the list have been addressed elsewhere on the site. There is much more to a nation than GDP, unemployment and stock prices.
REJECTION OF LIBERTARIANISM
Most of the above points can also be directed towards Libertarians. They have no interest in conserving anything either.
To be fair, Libertarians do have a genuine interest in smaller government overall. They push for less regulation and government involvement in people’s lives. Valid points.
An interesting note: while pushing for “individual” rights and freedoms, Libertarians (many anyway), take no issue with mass migration from cultures which push for “collective” powers. It never seems to dawn on them that these freedoms can be eventually voted away by the people they welcome.
It also never occurs to Libertarians (or Conservatives) that in pushing for multiculturalism, they are forging alliances with groups which will wield power by numbers. Individual preference doesn’t matter when an entire group votes another way.
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS SHOULD BE PROTECTED
Looking out for group identity doesn’t mean we should have to — EVER — give up our individual freedoms, such as these:
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of association
- Freedom of the press
- Freedom of peaceful assembly
- Freedom of religion (except violent movements “cloaked” as religion)
- Private property rights
- Presumption of innocence in criminal proceedings
Most (if not all) nationalists also support these rights.
LOOK TO GENERATIONS AHEAD
This should be commonsense, but is worth repeating: we should be looking ahead generations to what kind of society we will leave our descendants. It is not worth sacrificing it for our short term gain.
Policies should be aimed at protecting the items cited above. After all, our ancestors left them to us.
As such, nationalism is the way forward.
OUR PEOPLE COME FIRST.