(The globalist UN, showing its true colours once again)
(In 2007, the Canadian House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee voted to endorse the idea of the UN Parliament. Stephen Harper was Prime Minister. Self-identified “populist” Maxime Bernier was the Foreign Affairs Minister.)
Items in the above list are addressed HERE
Please sign this: PETITION E-1906 CLICK HERE
All personal court appearances are under “BLOG”
1. Important Links
To all the conspiracy theorists who believe that the UN is proposing setting up a one world government, your fears just became validation.
The UN formally proposes to do exactly that.
2. Quotes From Site
Okay, let’s break this down a bit:
So what? This seems to deliberately conflate cooperation with sovereignty. Nations can and do discuss and cooperate on issues all the time. This is a solution to an artificial problem.
Searching in vain for any clause that says ordinary people can play a role in decision making? Is this a good thing? Shouldn’t people have some ability to influence decision making?
How so? Do we not want people who are directly chosen by the host nation to be taking part in such discussions?
Logistical question: how do you decide if a leader is ”popularly elected”? Military dictators frequently hold sham elections and win close to 100% of the vote.
Further, what if the values of a block of nations (such as the 50+ members of Islamic nations) democratically overrule nations which believe in human rights?
If they are not being directly elected by their people, then who is electing them? Should the UN get to decide who ”represents” the Nation of Canada, the US, Australia, or Japan?
Ah, non-binding and consultative bodies which eventually become legally binding? Kind of like the UN Global Migration Compact.
How exactly would there be ”oversight” when this would effectively take away actual representative government from host nations?
How would this possibly be democratic? It takes control even further from the public. If you think your MP or MPP or MLA or Senators don’t represent you now, how would you gain more representation from being even further removed.
3. UN Claims To Have Conducted Research
CLICK HERE, for survey results
Survey on a UN Parliamentary Assembly
survey graphic -donought -readyOn behalf of the British Broadcasting Corporation BBC, in 2004/05 the research institute GlobeScan conducted representative surveys in 18 countries representing 61% of the world population.
In one of the questions concerning reforms of the United Nations, participants were asked about their opinion on “creating a new UN Parliament, made up of representatives directly elected by citizens, having powers equal to the current UN General Assembly that is controlled by national governments.”
On average, 63% supported the reform proposal, while only 20% rejected it. For the first time, this survey provides empirical evidence that the world’s citizens overwhelmingly support the establishment of a directly elected world parliament.
In every surveyed nation the supporters of a UN Parliament significantly outnumbered the opponents. Overall, support to opposition margins show overwhelming majorities in all nations favoring the creation of a UN Parliament.
Let’s see: Only 18 countries were surveyed
UN claims these 18 countries represent 61% of the population.
UN Claims that 63% of populations surveyed support global government
8/ Great Britain (UK)
16/ South Korea
Assuming the numbers are true, that means that all but 18 countries were left out of the survey
It means that 39% of national populations were not consulted at all
It means that 37% (of consulted nations) oppose the measure.
A better level might be to use (0.63)*(0.61) = .03843 = 38%
Assuming this research is even accurate, that would mean that only 38% would support such a measure. Of course, the site doesn’t list any of the SAMPLE SIZES, which would help give a more accurate picture.
Were 100 people interviewed in each country? 1,000? 10,000? Can we see the questions that were asked?
Of course, none of this addresses the central question: why is it that there has been no public consultation on us signing away our sovereignty? Shouldn’t we have the final say?
Wait, globalists don’t care what people think. Now it makes sense.
4. Globalist Politicians In Canada
Justin Trudeau, and Elizabeth May are on here. Jagmeet Singh probably would be, if he actually was an M.P.
Members of Parliament from Canada
Senator, economist and politician from Quebec, Canada
Member of Parliament for Saskatoon West, Canada
Member of Parliament, Canada
Member of Parliament, Canada
Member of Parliament for Toronto-Danforth, Canada
MP, elected 2008; Lawyer, trade union representative, Canada
Canadian Senator, Canada
MP; first Canadian in outer space; President, Canadian Space Agency (2001-2006), Canada
MP for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, Canada
Member of Parliament, Nickel Belt, Canada
Member of Parliament since 2006 Privy Councillor Royal Canadian Air Force Veteran, Canada
Member of the Canadian Senate, representing British Columbia, Canada
Janis G. Johnson
Dr. Hélène Laverdière
Foreign Affairs Critic for the New Democratic Party of Canada and MP for Laurier – Ste-Marie, Canada
MP; Leader, Green Party of Canada, Canada
Dr. John McCallum
The Honourable John McKay P.C., M.P.
Canadian Member of Parliament for the Riding of Scarborough-Guildwood., Canada
Wilfred P. Moore
Thanh Hai Ngo
Member of Parliament , Canada
MP; Canadian Member of Parliament for the Riding of York West, Canada
Dr. Kennedy Stewart
Member of Parliament, Canada
5. Duplicity Of “Populist” Maxime Bernier
This wasn’t in the original version, but worth pointing out to the readers.
Maxime Bernier, a self-identified “populist” left the Conservative Party of Canada in August 2018 and started the People’s Party of Canada. Despite its Communist sounding name, it is marketed as a nationalist/populist party.
The problem is that Bernier was Foreign Affairs Minister in 2007, when this issue was being discussed. Very unethical to remain silent for 12 years, and now claim to oppose it.
While this petition seems to be a welcome change, it cannot be taken at face value. Bernier introduces a petition to prevent Canada from joining any such organization, despite his Committee earlier endorsing it.