Pluralism Is A Policy Of Population Replacement

Recently, “Conservative” Michelle Rempel-Garner posted on Twitter calling for (presumably) her party to adopt the policy of “pluralism”. Sounds lovely, doesn’t it. But what is pluralism really?

Merriam-Webster defines pluralism as: “a state of society in which members of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, or social groups maintain and develop their traditional culture or special interest within the confines of a common civilization”.

It has nothing to do with assimilation. Instead, it’s discouraged.

Furthermore, the definition also includes “a concept, doctrine, or policy advocating this state [of pluralism]”. Let the word games begin now….

[1] Liberals promote policies of “diversity”.
[2] Conservatives promote policies of “pluralism”.

But in the end, these are the same things. If you’re championing pluralism, you’re championing diversity. This leads to society being carved up and balkanized along various identity groups.

Since these people are all U.N. puppets, here’s something else that’s worth addressing. There are different ways to advocate for genocide.

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article V
The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

It’s also worth asking if pluralism (imposed without the consent of the people) would amount to genocide under the terms as laid out by the U.N. in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide After all, if pluralism results in at least a partial replacement of a group, isn’t that bringing about its destruction?

These policies are pushed in Western countries, and only in Western countries. This means that the consequences are deliberate.

Endorsing the globohomo agenda also seems to be part of conservatism these days, which shows just how far things have fallen.

Rempel supports pluralism, which is essentially state-imposed diversity. And how exactly does one make a country more diverse? Quite simply, you have to replace (or displace) at least a portion of the local population in order to make room for the new arrivals.

Now, are conservatives proud of this?

After all, if forced diversity is something that everyone’s on board with, doesn’t that lend credence to the notion that whites are being replaced?

Rempel did explain herself more fully:

That was not the first or the last time I have had to counter that particular racist diatribe. It is a core tenet of so-called “great replacement theory”; an anti-Semitic white-nationalist conspiracy theory involving a supposed plot to replace white people with non-whites.

The narrative it usually follows is that the immigration policy of western countries is designed to replace whites, or to “out breed them,” in order to prevent whites from getting jobs, dominating culture, or electing a “pro-white” government. It is racism built on longstanding colonial and white nationalist dogma that never truly has been erased, even after decades spent building pluralistic policy.

It is pure ignorance to believe that white replacement dogma doesn’t exist in Canada.

In a wink to this sentiment, some right leaning political candidates in recent years, both at the federal and provincial levels, have promised to “lower immigration levels” without explaining what benefit this would bring to Canada.

On May 18, 2022, Rempel wrote a piece that appeared in the National Post, denouncing “White Replacement Theory” as the paranoid rantings of racists. She condemns such conspiracies, and calls for people who endorse it to be removed from the party.

A serious question to ask: how can a Member of Parliament openly call for the creation of a “pluralistic” society, but condemn any talk of “white replacement”?

Do these people simply object to their ideals being explained as what they really are?

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

(1) https://twitter.com/MichelleRempel/status/1517246163828846597
(2) https://twitter.com/MichelleRempel/status/1527006649059254273
(3) https://nationalpost.com/opinion/michelle-rempel-garner-we-have-a-duty-to-reject-conspiracy-theories-about-white-replacement
(4) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pluralism
(5) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf

Replacement Migration In Canada: The Years 1989 To 1998

The Kalergi Plan was laid out for Europe a century ago. The goal was to ultimately get rid of all the whites, with a combination of open doors immigration, depressed local birth rates, and miscegenation. That said, the plot is not limited to Europe, but to all white countries.

Forced diversity is code for genocide.

1. Mass LEGAL Immigration In Canada

Despite what many think, LEGAL immigration into Canada is actually a much larger threat than illegal aliens, given the true scale of the replacement that is happening. What was founded as a European (British) colony is becoming unrecognizable due to forced demographic changes. There are also social, economic, environmental and voting changes to consider. See this Canadian series, and the UN programs for more detail. Politicians, the media, and so-called “experts” have no interest in coming clean on this.

CLICK HERE, for UN Genocide Prevention/Punishment Convention.
CLICK HERE, for Barcelona Declaration & Kalergi Plan.
CLICK HERE, for UN Kalergi Plan (population replacement).
CLICK HERE, for UN replacement efforts since 1974.
CLICK HERE, for tracing steps of UN replacement agenda.

Note: If there are errors in calculating the totals, please speak up. Information is of no use to the public if it isn’t accurate.

2. Genocidal Population Replacement Long Time Problem

Let’s have a look at some of those recent years. While 2003 to 2020 has already been covered pretty extensively on this site, the problem extends much further than that.

PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1989
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 19,908 10.4 1
Poland 15,985 8.3 2
Philippines 11,383 5.9 3
Vietnam 9,425 4.9 4
India 8,819 4.6 5
United Kingdom 8,420 4.4 6
Portugal 8,189 4.3 7
United States 6,931 3.6 8
Lebanon 6,179 3.2 9
China 4,430 2.3 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 99,679 51.9
TOTAL — OTHERS 92,322 48.1
GRAND TOTAL 193,001 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1989
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 12,199 6.3
Asia and Pacific 93,261 48.6
South America 8,685 4.5
United States 6,931 3.6
Europe and the United Kingdom 52,107 27.1
North/Central America 5,870 3.1
Caribbean/Antilles 10,909 5.7
Others 2,041 1.1
Total 193,001 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1990
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 29,261 13.7 1
Poland 16,579 7.7 2
Lebanon 12,462 5.8 3
Philippines 12,042 5.6 4
India 10,624 5.1 5
Vietnam 9,081 4.2 6
United Kingdom 8,217 3.8 7
China 7,987 3.7 8
Portugal 7,917 3.7 9
United 6,084 2.8 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 120,256 56.1
TOTAL — OTHERS 93,974 43.9
GRAND TOTAL 214,230 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1990
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 13,440 6.3
Asia and Pacific 111,739 52.2
South America 8,898 4.2
United States 6,084 2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom 51,945 24.3
North/Central America 7,781 3.6
Caribbean/Antilles 11,689 5.5
Others 2,654 1.2
Total 214,230 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1991
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 22,340 9.7 1
Poland 15,731 6.8 2
China 13,915 6.0 3
India 12,848 5.6 4
Philippines 12,335 5.3 5
Lebanon 11,987 5.2 6
Vietnam 8,963 3.9 7
United Kingdom 7,543 3.3 8
El Salvador 6,977 3.0 9
Sri Lanka 6,826 3.0 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 119,465 51.8
TOTAL — OTHERS 111,316 48.2
GRAND TOTAL 230,781 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1991
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 16,087 7.0
Asia and Pacific 119,955 52.0
South America 10,582 4.6
United States 6,597 2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom 48,055 20.8
North/Central America 13,404 5.8
Caribbean/Antilles 12,922 5.6
Others 3,179 1.4
Total 230,781 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1992
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 38,910 15.4 1
Philippines 13,273 5.2 2
India 12,675 5.0 3
Sri Lanka 12,635 5.0 4
Poland 11,878 4.7 5
China 10,429 4.1 6
Vietnam 7,681 3.2 7
United States 7,537 3.0 8
Taiwan 7,456 2.9 9
United Kingdom 7,138 2.8 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 129,612 51.3
TOTAL — OTHERS 123,230 48.7
GRAND TOTAL 252,842 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1992
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 19,633 7.7
Asia and Pacific 139,216 54.4
South America 10,389 4.1
United States 7,537 2.9
Europe and the United Kingdom 44,871 17.5
North/Central America 12,526 4.9
Caribbean/Antilles 14,952 5.8
Others 3,718 1.5
Total 252,842 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1993
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 36,574 14.3 1
India 20,472 8.0 2
Philippines 19,772 7.7 3
Taiwan 9,867 3.9 4
China 9,466 3.7 5
Sri Lanka 9,103 3.6 6
Vietnam 8,301 3.2 7
United States 8,014 3.1 8
United Kingdom 7,159 2.8 9
Poland 6,877 2.7 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 135,605 53.0
TOTAL — OTHERS 120,214 47.0
GRAND TOTAL 255,819 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1993
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 16,918 6.6
Asia and Pacific 147,323 57.6
South America 9,580 3.7
United States 8,014 3.1
Europe and the United Kingdom 46,602 18.2
North/Central America 7,737 3.0
Caribbean/Antilles 16,563 6.5
Others 3,082 1.2
Total 255,819 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1994
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 44,169 19.7 1
Philippines 19,097 8.5 2
India 17,225 7.7 3
China 12,486 5.6 4
Taiwan 7,411 3.3 5
Sri Lanka 6,671 3.0 6
United States 6,234 2.8 7
Vietnam 6,230 2.8 8
United Kingdom 5,971 2.8 9
Bosnia-Hercegovina 4,905 2.2 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 130,399 58.2
TOTAL — OTHERS 93,476 41.8
GRAND TOTAL 223,875 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1994
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 13,706 6.1
Asia and Pacific 141,587 63.2
South America 7,919 3.5
United States 6,234 2.8
Europe and the United Kingdom 38,641 17.3
North/Central America 3,503 1.6
Caribbean/Antilles 9,980 4.5
Others 2,215 1.0
Total 223,875 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1995
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 31,746 14.9 1
India 16,215 7.6 2
Philippines 15,149 7.1 3
China 13,291 6.3 4
Sri Lanka 8,926 4.2 5
Taiwan 7,691 3.6 6
Bosnia-Hercegovina 6,270 3.0 7
United Kingdom 6,161 2.9 8
United States 5,185 2.4 9
Pakistan 3,996 1.9 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 114,630 53.9
TOTAL — OTHERS 97,874 46.1
GRAND TOTAL 212,504 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1995
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 14,631 6.9
Asia and Pacific 129,106 60.8
South America 7,538 3.5
United States 5,185 2.4
Europe and the United Kingdom 41,266 19.4
North/Central America 2,842 1.3
Caribbean/Antilles 10,056 4.5
Others 1,880 0.8
Total 212,504 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1996
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 29,966 13.3 1
India 21,276 9.4 2
China 17,516 7.8 3
Taiwan 13,207 5.8 4
Philippines 13,132 5.8 5
Pakistan 7,753 3.4 6
Sri Lanka 6,151 2.7 7
United States 5,837 2.6 8
Iran 5,828 2.6 9
United Kingdom 5,585 2.5 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 126,251 55.9
TOTAL — OTHERS 99,522 44.1
GRAND TOTAL 225,773 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1996
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 36,503 16.15
Asia and Pacific 124,771 55.20
South and Central America 18,878 8.35
United States 5,869 2.60
Europe and the United Kingdom 40,009 17.70
Not Stated 20 0.01
Total 225,773 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1997
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
Hong Kong 22,242 10.30 1
India 19,614 9.08 2
China 18,530 8.58 3
Taiwan 13,321 6.17 4
Pakistan 11,233 5.20 5
Philippines 10,873 5.03 6
Iran 7,477 3.46 7
Sri Lanka 5,069 2.35 8
United States 5,043 2.33 9
United Kingdom 4,659 2.16 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 118,061 54.65
TOTAL — OTHERS 97,983 45.35
GRAND TOTAL 216,044 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1997
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 37,794 17.49
Asia and Pacific 117,076 54.19
South and Central America 17,425 8.07
United States 5,043 2.33
Europe and the United Kingdom 38,673 17.90
Not Stated 33 0.02
Total 216,044 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS IN YEAR 1998
SOURCE COUNTRY NUMBER PERCENTAGE RANK
China 19,749 11.34 1
India 11.34 8.80 2
Philippines 8,172 4.69 3
Hong Kong 8,083 4.64 4
Pakistan 8,081 4.64 5
Taiwan 7,164 4.11 6
Iran 6,772 3.89 7
South Korea 4,910 2.82 8
United States 4,764 2.74 9
Russia 4,299 2.47 10
TOTAL — TOP 10 87,321 50.16
TOTAL — OTHERS 86,779 49.84
GRAND TOTAL 174,100 100
PERMANENT RESIDENTS ADMITTED BY REGION IN 1998
REGION NUMBER PERCENTAGE
Africa and the Middle East 32,534 18.69
Asia and Pacific 84,036 48.27
South and Central America 14,003 8.04
United States 4,764 2.74
Europe and the United Kingdom 38,477 22.10
Not Stated 286 0.16
Total 174,100 100

Source for 1995/1996:
Source for 1996-1998

Are things starting to make sense? Immigration policies for the last 50+ years have focused on Asians and Africans, replacing (to a large degree) the overwhelmingly European makeup that was Canada for many years.

Of course, speaking up about what’s apparent will lead to cries of racism.

One thing people really need to get clear: so-called “conservatives” have no interest whatsoever in preserving demographics or the makeup of a country. They fully support the genocide agenda, but try to pitch it from a more economic perspective.

White replacement is a very real thing. Only the most obtuse or unobservant cannot see what’s going on, especially given how blatant it is..

While Liberals are generally quite open for their disdain of Europeans, “Conservatives” behave in a stealthier and more subversive manner. They camouflage their true intentions, making them more dangerous.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

3. Documents Provided By Canadian Government

(A.0) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/index.html
(A.1) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1966.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1966
(A.2) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1967.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1967
(A.3) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1968.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1968
(A.4) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1969.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1969
(A.5) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1970.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1970
(A.6) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1971.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1971
(A.7) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1972.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1972
(A.8) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1973.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1973
(A.9) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1974.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1974
(A.10) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1975.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1975
(A.11) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1976.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1976
(A.12) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1977.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1977
(A.13) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1978.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1978
(A.14) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1979.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1979
(A.15) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1980.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1980
(A.16) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1981.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1981
(A.17) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1982.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1982
(A.18) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1983.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1983
(A.19) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1984.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1984
(A.20) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1985.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1985
(A.21) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1986.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1986
(A.22) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1987.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1987
(A.23) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1988.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1988
(A.24) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1989.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1989
(A.25) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1990.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1990
(A.26) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1991.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1991
(A.27) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1992.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1992
(A.28) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1993.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1993
(A.29) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1994.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1994
(A.30) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1995.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1995
(A.31) https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/202/301/immigration_statistics-ef/mp22-1_1996.pdf
Canada Immigration Statistics 1996

(B.0) https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.505817/publication.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/statistics-open-data.html
(B.1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/cic/MP43-333-1999-eng.pdf
Canada Immigration Facts And Figures 1998
(B.2) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/MP43-333-2000E.pdf

(C.0) Parliament Report Index
http://archive.is/vwM6G
(C.1) 2004 Report to Canadian Parliament
2004.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.2) 2005 Report to Canadian Parliament
2005.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.3) 2006 Report to Canadian Parliament
2006.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.4) 2007 Report to Canadian Parliament
2007.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.5) 2008 Report to Canadian Parliament
2008.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.6) 2009 report to Canadian Parliament
2009.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.7) 2010 Report to Canadian Parliament
2010.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.8) 2011 Report to Canadian Parliament
2011.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.9) 2012 Report to Canadian Parliament
2012.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.10) 2013 Report to Canadian Parliament
2013.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.11) 2014 Report to Canadian Parliament
2014.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.12) 2015 Report to Canadian Parliament
2015.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.13) 2016 Report to Canadian Parliament
2016.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.14) 2017 Report to Canadian Parliament
2017.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.15) 2018 Report to CDN Parliament
2018.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.15.2) 2019-2021 Supplemental Report
http://archive.is/onyev
(C.16) 2019 Report to Canadian Parliament
2019.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.17) 2020 Report to Canadian Parliament
2020.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
(C.18) 2021 Report to Canadian Parliament
2021.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament

Canada Before 1970: Growing A Population Without Replacing It

In Western societies, there seems to be the mentality that populations must always grow. Furthermore, large numbers of people from very different backgrounds should be brought in to make this happen. At least, this is what public figures and media heads say, regardless of what the citizens want.

That being said, this “diversity” push is something that has only existed for the last 50 years or so. Before that, there was a focus on maintaining the demographic makeup. Let’s take a look.

A good starting place would be to see how many people are coming to Canada every year. Although this doesn’t tell the entire story, the numbers of Permanent Residents is a good place to start.

YEAR PERMANENT RESIDENTS % OF POPULATION
1852 29,307
1853 29,464
1854 37,263
1855 25,296
1856 22,544
1857 33,854
1858 12,339
1859 6,300
1860 6,276 0.2
1861 13,589 0.4
1862 18,294 0.6
1863 21,000 0.6
1864 24,779 0.7
1865 18,958 0.6
1866 11,427 0.3
1867 10,666 0.3
1868 12,765 0.4
1869 18,630 0.5
1870 24,706 0.7
1871 27,773 0.8
1872 36,578 1.0
1873 50,050 1.3
1874 39,373 1.0
1875 27,382 0.7
1876 25,633 0.6
1877 27,082 0.7
1878 29,807 0.7
1879 40,492 1.0
1880 38,505 0.9
1881 47,991 1.1
1882 112,458 2.6
1883 133,624 3.0
1884 103,824 2.3
1885 76,169 1.7
1886 69,152 1.5
1887 84,526 1.8
1888 88,766 1.9
1889 91,600 1.9
1890 75,067 1.6
1891 82,165 1.7
1892 30,996 0.6
1893 29,633 0.6
1894 20,829 0.4
1895 18,790 0.4
1896 16,835 0.3
1897 21,716 0.4
1898 31,900 0.6
1899 44,543 0.9
1900 41,681 0.8
1901 55,747 1.0
1902 89,102 1.6
1903 138,660 2.5
1904 131,252 2.3
1905 141,465 2.4
1906 211,653 5.3
1907 272,409 4.2
1908 143,326 2.2
1909 173,694 2.6
1910 286,839 4.1
1911 331,288 4.6
1912 375,756 5.1
1913 400,870 5.3
1914 150,484 1.9
1915 33,665 0.4
1916 55,914 0.7
1917 72,910 0.9
1918 41,845 0.5
1919 107,698 1.3
1920 138,824 1.6
1921 91,728 1.0
1922 64,224 0.7
1923 133,729 1.5
1924 124,164 1.4
1925 84,907 0.9
1926 135,982 1.4
1927 158,886 1.6
1928 166,783 1.7
1929 164,993 1.6
1930 104,806 1.0
1931 27,530 0.3
1932 20,591 0.2
1933 14,382 0.1
1934 12,476 0.1
1935 11,277 0.1
1936 11,643 0.1
1937 15,101 0.1
1938 17,244 0.2
1939 16,994 0.2
1940 11,324 0.1
1941 9,329 0.1
1942 7,576 0.1
1943 8,504 0.1
1944 12,801 0.1
1945 22,722 0.2
1946 71,719 0.6
1947 64,127 0.5
1948 125,414 1.0
1949 95,217 0.7
1950 73,912 0.5
1951 194,391 1.4
1952 164,498 1.1
1953 168,868 1.1
1954 154,227 1.0
1955 109,946 0.7
1956 164,857 1.0
1957 282,164 1.7
1958 124,851 0.7
1959 106,928 0.6
1960 104,111 0.6
1961 71,698 0.4
1962 74,856 0.4
1963 93,151 0.5
1964 112,606 0.6
1965 146,758 0.7
1966 194,743 1.0
1967 222,876 1.1
1968 183,974 0.9
1969 164,531 0.8
1970 147,713 0.7
1971 121,900 0.6
1972 122,006 0.6
1973 184,200 0.8
1974 218,465 1.0
1975 187,881 0.8
1976 149,429 0.6
1977 114,914 0.5
1978 86,313 0.4
1979 112,093 0.5
1980 43,137 0.6
1981 128,641 0.5
1982 121,175 0.5
1983 89,186 0.4
1984 88,272 0.3
1985 84,347 0.3
1986 99,355 0.4
1987 152,079 0.6
1988 161,588 0.6
1989 191,555 0.7
1990 86,452 0.6
1991 232,806 0.8
1992 254,790 0.9
1993 256,641 0.9
1994 224,385 0.8
1995 212,865 0.7
1996 226,071 0.8
1997 216,035 0.7
1998 174,195 0.6
1999 189,951 0.6
2000 227,456 0.7
2001 250,637 0.8
2002 229,048 0.7
2003 221,349 0.7
2004 235,823 0.7
2005 262,242 0.8
2006 251,640 0.8
2007 236,753 0.7
2008 247,247 0.7
2009 252,172 0.7
2010 280,689 0.8
2011 248,748 0.7
2012 257,887 0.7

Source for this chart is that data provided on page 3. Also, data for some earlier years is provided by Statistics Canada.

Even though large numbers of people have been coming to Canada for a long time, there was still a lot of social cohesion. This is because migrants were primarily selected from countries with a very similar makeup and composition.

Historically, the numeric predominance of those of British and French origin was unquestionable. Before the great wave of European migration to Canada between 1896 and the beginning of the First World War, Canada’s population was indeed mainly made up of those of British and French origin. For example, the 1871 Census of Canada shows that 60 percent of Canada’s 3.5 million people were of British origin, and 30 percent French origin; Europeans not of British nor French origin accounted for only 7 percent of Canada’s population in 1871 as well as in 1881 (Kalbach, 1990: 24). This demographic composition basically persisted until the turn of the century.

The wave of immigration to Canada prior to the First World War began to increase the stock of Europeans not from British or French origin. Between 1896 and 1914, over three million immigrants came to Canada. When the supply of emigrants from England and Western Europe was dwindling, Canada began accepting people from Eastern and Southern Europe, including Poles, Ukrainians, Hutterites and Doukhobors. In the period between the two world wars from 1915 to 1945, another two million immigrants came to Canada (Statistics Canada, 1983: A125-163).

The census data of Canada indicate that Canadians of European origin other than British and French increased from 8.5 percent of the total population in 1901 to 14.2 percent in 1921, and to 17.8 percent in 1941 (Kalbach, 1990: 24). In contrast, Canadians of British origin declined in relative terms from 57 percent of the total population in 1901 to 50 percent in 1941, but those of French origin remained at around 30 percent of the total population in 1901 and in 1941. In short, if the composition of Canadians of European origin other than British and French is used as an indicator of ethnic plurality, then there was an increase in diversity between 1901 and 1941. However, Canada’s population in 1941, as in 1871, was made up of people mainly of European origin, which accounted for 98 percent of the total population in 1941 and in 1871, despite the fact that the population had increased from 3.5 million people in 1871 to 11.5 million people in 1941.

The Government of Canada openly admits that traditionally, the bulk of immigration came from Europe. More specifically, it came from the West, from places like Britain and France. (See archive).

And what was the result of this? Very little in terms of enclaves or balkanization. The population grew, but without the genocidal “multicultural” push that goes around now. This type of system focused on cultural compatibility, something that would be unthinkable today.

TIME PERIOD REGION # OF MIGRANTS % OF TOTAL
1968-1972 Europe 387,670 52.6
United States 114,615 15.5
Central/South America 24,863 3.4
Carribean 53,100 7.2
Asia 112,584 15.3
Africa 22,014 3
Australia 18,656 2.5
Oceania 0 0
Not Stated 3,622 0.5
Total 737,124 100
1973-1977 Europe 324,131 37.9
United States 102,141 11.9
Central/South America 63,598 7.4
Asia 216,837 25.4
Africa 42,748 5
Australia 10,870 1.3
Oceania 7,937 0.9
Not Stated 0 0
Total 854,889 100
1978-1982 Europe 196,546 33.2
United States 49,407 8.4
Central/South America 36,262 6.1
Carribean 39,362 6.7
Asia 236,596 40
Africa 21,946 3.7
Australia 6,438 1.1
Oceania 4,502 0.8
Not Stated 232 0
Total 591,291 100
1983-1987 Europe 124.344 24.42
United States 36,214 7.1
Central/South America 56,442 11
Carribean 39,079 7.6
Asia 226,326 44.1
Africa 24,027 4.7
Australia 2,774 0.5
Oceania 3,771 0.7
Not Stated 38 0
Total 513,015 100
1988-1992 Europe 237,666 22.6
United States 33,686 3.2
Central/South America 91,061 8.7
Carribean 59,911 5.7
Asia 545,410 51.9
Africa 70,744 6.7
Australia 4,771 0.5
Oceania 8,534 0.8
Not Stated 0 0
Total 1,051,783 100
1993-1995 Europe 126,509 18.3
United States 19,433 2.8
Central/South America 39,199 5.7
Carribean 36,599 5.3
Asia 418,016 60.4
Africa 45,255 6.5
Australia 3,476 0.5
Oceania 3,791 0.5
Not Stated 0 0
Total 692,198 100

The Government’s own data tables show just how rapidly the source countries have been shifting. While immigration to Canada used to mainly be from Europe, it’s now overwhelmingly Asian. Looking at the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament in recent years, this trend has only gotten worse.

Now, were the voters ever asked if they wanted to become minorities?

Article I
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article IV
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

A Government doesn’t have to round up and execute its citizens in order to commit genocide. Another way is to flood the country with large numbers of very different people, with the purpose and intent of diluting and erasing the host population. Instead of having a national identity, society becomes “multicultural”.

One caveat of course: the people coming in are encouraged to maintain their own identities, customs, traditions, and language. The populations being replaced are expected to endlessly accommodate that.

If a larger population is needed, it’s entirely possible to grow it organically. However, modern efforts across the West can best be explained as attempting to erase groups entirely.

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all major issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist or bigoted to discuss these hard truths.

(1) https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/cic/Ci1-8-2012-eng.pdf
(2) https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-310-x/2011003/fig/fig3_1-2-eng.cfm
(3) https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rp02_8-dr02_8/t2.html
(4) https://archive.ph/QkUeu
(5) https://justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rp02_8-dr02_8/p2.html
(6) https://archive.ph/PzcO3
(7) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml
(8) https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
(9) UN Convention On Punishing And Preventing Genocide

M-44: Parliament Votes To Accelerate TFW/Student-To-PR Pipeline

Motion M-44 has recently passed. The House of Commons voted to demand that the Trudeau Government come up with new ways to accelerate the transition of “temporary” foreign workers and international students into Permanent Residents.

The legislation was advanced by Liberal Randeep Sarai. This isn’t at all surprising, considering the largest group coming to Canada in recent years has been Indians.

The final vote was 324-0. This means each Member of Parliament who voted did so in favour of this Motion, regardless of partisan affiliation. Every single “Conservative” voted in favour of speeding up demographic replacement by supporting this.

Even worse: they condemn the truthful description of what’s happening as racist conspiracy theories.

It’s interesting that there’s no hurry by Federal politicians to get rid of masks or vaccine passports. However, all of Parliament agreed that there should be a plan within the next 4 months to expand and speed up pathways to creating more Permanent Residents.

MOTION TEXT
That, in the opinion of the House, the government should develop and publicly release within 120 days following the adoption of this motion a comprehensive plan to expand the economic immigration stream to allow workers of all skill levels to meet the full range of labour needs and pathways to permanent residency for temporary foreign workers, including international students, with significant Canadian work experience in sectors with persistent labour shortages, and such plan should incorporate the following elements:
.
(a) amending eligibility criteria under economic immigration programs to give more weight to significant in-Canada work experience and expand the eligible occupational categories and work experience at various skills levels;
.
(b) examining evidence and data gathered from recent programs such as Temporary Resident to Permanent Resident Pathway, Atlantic Immigration Program (AIP), Rural and Northern Immigration Program (RNIP), and Agri-Food Pilot, and Provincial Nominee Process (PNP);
.
(c) incorporating data on labour market and skills shortages to align policy on immigrant-selection with persistent labour gaps;
.
(d) assessing ways to increase geographic distribution of immigration and encourage immigrant retention in smaller communities, as well as increase Francophone immigration outside Quebec;
.
(e) identifying mechanisms for ensuring flexibility in immigration-selection tools to react quicker to changes in labour market needs and regional economic priorities; and
.
(f) specifically considering occupations and essential sectors that are underrepresented in current economic immigration programs, such as health services, caregivers, agriculture, manufacturing, service industry, trades, and transportation.

What specific sectors will be targeted? Included are: health services, caregivers, agriculture, manufacturing, service industry, trades, and transportation. Of course, it’s much easier to support a family if they are living in a country with a much lower cost of living.

Sure, one could argue that it’s just to demand a plan. However, Trudeau is extremely accommodating when it comes to finding new ways to bring people into Canada.

Another development saw the Government extend the work visas for graduates get extended by 18 months. Now, students who complete a diploma or degree are typically eligible for a 3 year open work visa (via the Post Graduate Work Program). For those involved, it effectively makes those permits 4 1/2 years. It’s unclear if this is just a one-off.

In 2020, the Government quietly made changes to allow people on student visas to work an unlimited amount of hours — while still in school. This policy existed to ensure that students were in fact focused on studying, and not just using it as a backdoor work permit. See page 12 of 2021 Report. Guess we’ll see if it ever goes back.

It seems unlikely that the average Canadian has any idea just how many students and “temporary” workers come to Canada. This should demonstrate the trend, at least for recent years.

Year Stu TFWP IMP Total
2003 61,293 82,151 143,444

2004 56,536 90,668 147,204

2005 57,476 99,146 156,622

2006 61,703 112,658 174,361

2007 64,636 165,198 229,834

2008 79,509 192,519 272,028

2009 85,140 178,478 263,618

2010 96,157 182,276 278,433

2011 98,383 190,842 289,225

2012 104,810 213,573 318,383

2013 111,865 221,310 333,175

2014 127,698 95,086 197,924 420,078

2015 219,143 73,016 175,967 468,126

2016 265,111 78,402 207,829 551,342

2017 317,328 78,788 224,033 620,149

2018 356,876 84,229 255,034 696,139

2019 402,427 98,310 306,797 807,534

2020 256,740 84,609 242,130 583,452

Stu = Student Visa
TFWP = Temporary Foreign Worker Program
IMP = International Mobility Program

Data for this table was compiled from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament, from 2004 through 2021. These cover the years 2003 to 2020. Keep in mind, this is just what’s on the books.

How many of them actually stay? It’s hard to say. Either the Government doesn’t keep data on this this, or they do, but just don’t make it easily available.

About the change from 2013 to 2014: the Harper Government got a lot of flack for flooding Canada with TFWs. The solution they came up with was not to reduce the number of them. Instead, they broke up the program into different areas to better conceal what was happening. This has been addressed elsewhere on this site.

Simply beyond pumping up the people who are getting PR status, the Canadian Parliament has also been holding hearings since February on the topic of boosting the number of international students coming in the first place.

More people coming + more staying = faster rate of change

The lie has been heavily promoted that it’s only 300,000 or 400,000 people coming to Canada per year. It’s not. Whether it’s ignorance or malice, very few report the truth, including those in alternative media. Here’s a recent review of the numbers in Canada. It’s shocking, or at least it should be.

While politicians here facilitate open borders, it’s worth mentioning that over 4.2 million babies have been aborted since 1970. Then of course, they’re feminism and the globohomo agenda doing a number on birth rates. The solution then becomes to bring more people over, to compensate for a declining population.

Are things starting to make sense now?

A little self promotion: Borderless Canada is still available online. Learn about what’s been going on in this country. Virtually all issues can be directly tied to immigration and border security, and it’s not racist to discuss hard truths.

(1) https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/89339/motions/11528727
(2) https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/randeep-sarai(89339)
(3) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/votes/44/1/85
(4) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/CIMM/StudyActivity?studyActivityId=11473703
(5) https://kitchener.citynews.ca/national-news/federal-government-will-let-international-graduates-stay-in-canada-another-18-months-5291183
(6) https://www.cp24.com/news/tory-leadership-candidate-pierre-poilievre-denounces-white-replacement-theory-1.5906421

2004.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2005.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2006.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2007.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2008.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2009.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2010.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2011.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2012.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2013.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2014.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2015.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2016.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2017.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2018.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2019.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2020.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2021.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament

Demographic Makeup Of People Entering Canada Illegally 2017-2021

Now for something that isn’t covered much by mainstream (or alternative) media. Who exactly is coming into Canada illegally, in between official border ports of entry? What are the numbers? Fortunately, the Immigration and Refugee Board has at least some information to share.

RANK COUNTRY INTAKE ACC REJ ABAN WD&O RESOLVED PENDING
n/a Total 60,544 25,802 18,010 1,059 3,404 49,000 11,544
1 Nigeria 16,374 4,739 7,279 189 1,785 13,992 2,382
2 Haiti 9,350 2,210 4,595 323 517 7,645 1,705
3 Colombia 3,565 1,629 486 57 117 2,289 1,276
4 Pakistan 2,406 1,184 670 21 115 1,990 416
5 DR Congo 2,165 479 416 36 145 1,076 1,089
6 Turkey 2,011 1,812 43 <20 <20 1,901 110
7 Sudan 1,694 1,372 123 25 77 1,597 97
8 Angola 1,486 420 381 <20 <20 865 621
9 Eritrea 1,224 1,004 <20 <20 105 1,178 46
19 U.S.A. 1,203 24 754 57 160 995 208
n/a All Others 19,066 10,929 3,205 308 305 15,472 3,594

ACC = Accepted
REJ = Rejected
ABAN = Abandoned
WD&O = Withdrawn And Other

**The IRB lists some totals as <20, and they claim that this is done for privacy reasons. The logic seems to be that if there were only a few who crossed, it would be easier to identify them.

The above totals are from February 2017 to December​​ 2021. The IRB claims that it didn’t have access to such information prior to this.

Isn’t this lovely, that the bulk of the people ILLEGALLY entering Canada are from the 3rd World? But let’s be fair, we don’t have nearly enough rocket scientists and brain surgeons here already. Keep in mind, these people have entered the United States — at some point — and decided to continue onwards. They’ve already passed on at least one safe country, one that gets hundreds of thousands of applications per year.

And again, this could be stopped very quickly. However, politicians (of all stripes) actively work against the interests of their own citizens.

(1) https://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/statistics/Pages/irregular-border-crossers-countries.aspx
(2) https://archive.ph/x4T1i
(3) Wayback Machine

Illegal Aliens Coming Into Canada: 2022, And Earlier

Things are picking up again, particularly in Quebec.

YEAR: 2022
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 2,367 0 16 0 2,383
February 2,154 1 9 0 2,164
March 2,492 2 8 0 2,502
TOTALS 7,013 3 33 0 7,049

It appears that illegals coming into Canada is back in full swing, not that it ever stopped. Over 7,000 people were intercepted by the RCMP in the first 3 months of 2022. Of course, this is just what’s on the books, and just what’s publicly available.

The police didn’t seem to have any issues with shutting down businesses, stopping peaceful protests, enforcing mask orders, and the like. However, enforcing borders is something they lack the willpower to do. But they do make good bellhops.

Of course, this problem has been going on for a very long time. Here are some earlier years, to show the trends. There was a significant drop (although not a complete stop) during this “pandemic” psy-op. Perhaps Government at least needs to put on appearances.

Let’s not pretend that this is an unsolvable problem. Governments could put a stop to mass illegal entries very quickly, if that was their goal. But they don’t, regardless of what party is in power.

PROVINCE/TERRITORY 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Newfoundland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Prince Edward Island 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nova Scotia 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Brunswick 10 5 5 ? ? 25
Quebec 1,335 1,295 785 875 1,035 2,595
Ontario 2,660 2,340 1,995 2,630 2,790 3,7935
Manitoba 20 15 25 10 225 505
Saskatchewan ? ? ? ? ? 30
Alberta 35 40 35 65 70 120
British Columbia 125 85 110 130 170 220
Yukon 0 0 0 0 0 5
Northwest Territories 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nunavut 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 4,185 3,770 2,955 3,715 4,290 7,365

Illegals were still coming into Canada via land border crossings during the Harper years. However, it’s only considered an issue when Trudeau is in power.

YEAR: 2017
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 245 19 46 5 315
February 452 142 84 0 678
March 654 170 71 2 897
April 672 146 32 9 859
May 576 106 60 0 742
June 781 63 39 1 884
July 2,996 87 51 0 3,314
August 5,530 80 102 0 5,712
September 1,720 78 79 4 1,881
October 1,755 67 68 8 1,890
November 1,539 38 46 0 1,623
December 1,916 22 40 0 1,978
TOTAL 18,836 1,018 718 22 20,593
YEAR: 2018
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 1,458 18 41 0 1,517
February 1,486 31 48 0 1,565
March 1,884 53 33 0 1,970
April 2,479 50 31 0 2,560
May 1,775 36 53 0 1,869
June 1,179 31 53 0 1,263
July 1,552 51 31 0 1,634
August 1,666 39 39 3 1,747
September 1,485 44 68 4 1,601
October 1,334 23 37 0 1,394
November 978 23 18 0 1,019
December 1,242 11 27 0 1,280
TOTAL 18,518 410 479 7 19,419
YEAR: 2019
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 871 1 16 1 888
February 800 1 6 2 808
March 967 13 22 0 1,002
April 1,206 15 25 0 1,246
May 1,149 27 20 0 1,196
June 1,536 26 5 0 1,567
July 1,835 23 15 1 1,874
August 1,712 26 22 2 1,762
September 1,706 19 17 0 1,737
October 1,595 18 8 1 1,622
November 1,118 9 21 0 1,148
December 1,646 2 5 2 1,653
TOTAL 16,136 180 182 9 16,503
YEAR: 2020
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 1,086 7 7 0 1,100
February 976 2 2 0 980
March 930 7 18 0 955
April 1 0 5 0 6
May 17 0 4 0 21
June 28 1 3 1 33
July 29 2 17 0 48
August 15 3 0 0 18
September 30 4 7 0 41
October 27 0 4 0 31
November 24 0 8 0 32
December 26 2 8 0 36
TOTAL 3,189 28 84 1 3,302
YEAR: 2021
MONTH QUEBEC MANITOBA B.C. OTHERS TOTAL
January 28 1 10 0 39
February 39 0 1 0 40
March 29 5 2 0 36
April 29 2 2 0 33
May 12 3 13 0 28
June 11 0 6 0 17
July 28 5 6 0 39
August 63 2 11 0 76
September 150 0 19 0 169
October 96 0 17 0 113
November 832 1 12 0 845
December 2,778 0 33 0 2,811
TOTAL 4,095 19 132 0 4,246

One can only imagine how bad the rest of 2022 will end up being with this issue. Of course, the vast scale of LEGAL immigration is a much, MUCH bigger problem than the illegal entries. That said, it’s not an issue that can be ignored.

There are of course some other points to bring up to give additional context to the subject of illegal border crossings.

Something not really reported on in 2019 was the fact that the Canadian Government scrapped the DCO, or Designated Country of Origin policy. This stopped people from 42 countries (mainly in Europe) from being able to abuse the refugee system with bogus claims.

The Parties agree to review this Agreement and its implementation. The first review shall take place not later than 12 months from the date of entry into force and shall be jointly conducted by representatives of each Party. The Parties shall invite the UNHCR to participate in this review. The Parties shall cooperate with UNHCR in the monitoring of this Agreement and seek input from non-governmental organizations.

As for the Safe 3rd Country Agreement, people are still allowed to enter, and it’s still being gamed by human smugglers and traffickers.

Section 8 of the text makes it clear that the UNHCR, or United Nations High Commission on Refugees, is a Party to this Treaty. Interestingly, this detail is never reported by the mainstream press.

In addition to the people who ILLEGALLY enter Canada, our “authorities” LEGALLY let in thousands of people each year who had initially been denied for a variety of reasons. IRPA, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, has at least 2 provisions to allow inadmissible people in anyway. These are sections 24(1) and 25.1(2).

Even if previously deemed inadmissible to Canada to be given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. Here are the totals from the Annual Reports to Parliament on Immigration. Note: the first one listed only started in 2010.

Those allowed in under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA

YEAR TRP Issued Cumulative
2010 17 17
2011 53 70
2012 53 123
2013 280 403
2014 385 788
2015 1,063 1,851
2016 596 2,447
2017 555 3002
2018 669 3,671
2019 527 4,198
2020 115 4,313

From 2010 to 2020, a total of 4,313 people who were otherwise inadmissible to Canada were allowed in anyway under Rule 25.1(2) of IRPA. This is the category that Global News previously reported on. As for the other one, under Rule 24(1) of IRPA, Global News leaves that out:

Year Permits Cumulative
2002 12,630 12,630
2003 12,069 24,699
2004 13,598 38,297
2005 13,970 52,267
2006 13,412 65,679
2007 13,244 78,923
2008 12,821 91,744
2009 15,640 107,384
2010 12,452 119,836
2011 11,526 131,362
2012 13,564 144,926
2013 13,115 158,041
2014 10,624 168,665
2015 10,333 178,998
2016 10,568 189,566
2017 9,221 198,787
2018 7,132 205,919
2019 6,080 211,999
2020 2,044 214,043

From 2002 to 2020 (inclusive), a total of 214,043 people previously deemed inadmissible to Canada were given Temporary Resident Permits anyway. This has almost certainly been going on for a lot longer, but is as far back as the reports go. Now let’s consider the reasons these people are initially refused entry.

SEC = Security (espionage, subversion, terrorism)
HRV = Human or International Rights Violations
CRIM = Criminal
S.CRIM = Serious Criminal
NC = Non Compliance
MR = Misrepresentation

YEAR Total SEC HRV Crim S.Crim NC MR
2002 12,630 ? ? ? ? ? ?
2003 12,069 17 25 5,530 869 4,855 39
2004 13,598 12 12 7,096 953 4,981 20
2005 13,970 27 15 7,917 981 4,635 21
2006 13,412 29 20 7,421 982 4,387 18
2007 13,244 25 8 7,539 977 4,109 14
2008 12,821 73 18 7,108 898 4,170 17
2009 15,640 32 23 6,619 880 7,512 10
2010 12,452 86 24 6,451 907 4,423 36
2011 11,526 37 14 6,227 899 3,932 11
2012 13,564 20 15 7,014 888 5,206 18
2013 13,115 17 10 6,816 843 5,135 8
2014 10,624 12 2 5,807 716 3,895 14
2015 10,333 3 3 5,305 578 4,315 28
2016 10,568 8 4 4,509 534 2,788 20
2017 9,221 10 5 5,035 591 3,412 121
2018 7,132 5 3 4,132 559 2,299 131
2019 6,080 2 0 3,202 546 2,139 175
2020 2,044 2 1 666 131 1,000 37

In 2020, only 2,044 people barred were allowed in under Rule 24(1) of IRPA, which is the lowest it’s been since this legislation was enacted. Nonetheless, ZERO of these people should be coming in.

Interestingly, even though the Government has wide discretion to let people into the country under 24(1) and 25.1(2) of IRPA, it chose not to use its discretion to prohibit anyone from entering.

The data for these tables was compiled from the Annual Immigration Reports to Parliament. They are included at the bottom as source material.

Even if people are excluded from Canada — for a variety of valid reasons — often they will still be given temporary entrance into Canada. Will they ever leave? Who knows?

Not only are people let in who shouldn’t be, but sanctuary cities like Toronto and Montreal provide social services (at taxpayer expense) to people here illegally. Do right wingers oppose this? Nope, many of them have facilitated this problem.

Of course, none of this addresses the elephant in the room: the genocidal levels of replacement migration that come in through various legal channels on visas.

It’s strange that so many who identify as conservatives or nationalists are silent on what’s going on. Worse, these gatekeepers condemn and mock people who speak up on these important issues. To all those constitutionalists out there: how will you maintain your systems of law when you are eventually outvoted by people who want very different things?

(1) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/roxham-road-reopen-1.6257868
(2) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/processed-claims.html
(3) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2017.html
(4) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2018.html
(5) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2019.html
(6) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2020.html
(7) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2021.html
(8) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/asylum-claims/asylum-claims-2022.html
(9) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2019/05/canada-ends-the-designated-country-of-origin-practice.html
(10) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/mandate/policies-operational-instructions-agreements/agreements/safe-third-country-agreement/final-text.html
(11) https://canucklaw.ca/tsce-10c-bit-of-history-doug-rob-ford-voted-in-2013-for-sanctuary-toronto-amnesty-for-illegals/

ANNUAL IMMIGRATION REPORTS TO PARLIAMENT
2004.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2005.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2006.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2007.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2008.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2009.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2010.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2011.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2012.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2013.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2014.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2015.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2016.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2017.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2018.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2019.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2020.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament
2021.annual.immigration.report.to.parliament

%d bloggers like this: